Journal of the Korea Society of Computer and Information (한국컴퓨터정보학회논문지)

Korean Society of Computer Information (한국컴퓨터정보학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Survey on the Perception for Legal Education Efficiency of Engineering Department

공학 계열의 법학 교육 효율화를 위한 인식 조사

  • Received : 2014.07.30
  • Accepted : 2014.08.10
  • Published : 2014.08.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study conducted a survey on the perception for legal education efficiency of engineering department. This study is to search for more efficient legal education method to engineering department's students, reflecting the reality that our universities have appointed the subjects - related with engineering accreditation such as engineering law - as compulsory subjects. The method of this study is that with questionnaire extracted the advanced researches, it selected the 180 undergraduates of engineering college in C university as original samples, chose 161 data as final efficient samples except for 19 untrustworthy respondent, analyzed and drew the result. The specific results are as follows. In case of legal education in engineering department, it was found that women rather than men, the students first taking the subject more than those retaking the subject, the students who have taken the basic law subjects such as law and society, an introduction to law, and the students who hope to get a job in their major field showed the higher class concentration degree and satisfaction degree.

이 연구에서는 공학 계열의 법학 교육 효율화를 위한 인식조사를 시도하였다. 이는 최근 들어 우리 대학들에서, 특히 공학인증과 관련하여 공업법규 등의 교과목을 필수 이수 과목으로 지정, 이수케 하고 있는 현실을 반영하여, 공학계열 학생들에게 보다 효율적인 법학 교육의 방법을 탐색하기 위함이다. 연구 방법은 선행 연구들에서 추출하여 조작한 설문을 중심으로, C대학교 공과대학의 재학생 180명을 최초 표본으로 선정하여, 이 과정에서 불성실하게 응답한 19명의 자료를 제외한 161명의 자료를 최종 유효 표본으로 선정, 분석하여 연구 결과를 도출하였다. 구체적인 연구 결과는 다음과 같다. 공학계열의 법학 교육의 경우 여성 보다는 남성이, 재수강 학생 보다는 처음 수강한 학생이, 법과사회 및 법학개론 등의 기초 법학 과목을 수강했던 경험이 있는 학생이, 전공 분야로의 취업을 희망하는 학생들의 각각 수업 집중도 및 만족도가 높은 것으로 조사되었다.

Keywords

References

  1. http://www.abeek.or.kr/htmls_kr/contents.jsp?menu_l=1& menu_m=8.; 2014.6.1.Searching.
  2. http://www.abeek.or.kr/htmls_kr/contents.jsp?menu_l=2& menu_m=16.; 2014.6.1.Searching.
  3. http://terms.naver.com/entry.nhn?docId=2083634&cid=44 412&categoryId=44412.; 2014.6.19. Searching.
  4. Choi, Jong-Go,"Compression to Current Law", SNU Press, 1990, pp.3-4.
  5. Choi, Jong-Go,"Law and Life", 4th ed., Parkyoungsa, 2004.
  6. Lee, Sung-Ho,"Teaching Methodology", Hakjisa, 2000, p.63.
  7. Park, Min, Pedagogical Methods in Legal Education, The Journal of Law of Education, Vol. 18, No. 2, Jun, 2006., p.76.
  8. Supra Note 7, pp.76-77.
  9. Lawrence M. Friedman,"A History of American Law, 2d ed.", Touchstone, 1985, p.615.
  10. Juan Cicero,"Piercing the Socratic Veil: Adding an Active Alternative in Legal Education", 15 Wm. Mitchell L. Rev. 1989, pp.1011-1013
  11. Myron Moskovitz, Beyond The Case Method: It's Time To Teach With Problems, 42 J. Legal Education 1992, p.242.
  12. Supra Note 11, pp.242-243
  13. Edwin W. Patterson,"The Case Method in American Legal Education: Its Origins and Objectives", 4 J. Legal Educ. 1951, pp.1-23
  14. Howard S. Barrows & Robyn M. Tamblyn, "Problem-Based Learning: An Approach to Medical Education", New York, 1980, p.5.
  15. Supra Note 11, pp.247-248.
  16. W. Pallie & D.H. Carr, The McMaster Medical Education Philosophy in Theory, Practice and Historical Perspective, 9 Med. Teacher, 1987, p.59.
  17. Luann Wilkerson & Grahame Feletti, Problem -Based Learning: One Approach to Increasing Student Participation, 37 New Directions for Teaching & Learning, 1989, pp.51-55.
  18. Supra Note 7, pp.85-86.
  19. Supra Note 7, pp.87.
  20. Gregory L. Ogden, The Problem Method in Legal Education, 34 J. Legal Educ. 1984, pp.654, 664.
  21. Howard L. Oleck, Adversary Method of Law Teaching, 27 J. Legal Educ. 1975, p86.
  22. W. H. Bryson, The Problem Method Adapted to Case Books, 26 J. Legal Educ. 1974, pp.594-598.
  23. Stephen N. Subrin, Teaching Civil Procedure While You Watch it Disintegrate, 59 Brook. L. Rev. 1993, pp.1155-1176.
  24. Lloyd C. Anderson and Charles E. Kirkwood, Teaching Civil Procedure with the Aid of Local Tory Litigation, 37 J. Legal Educ. 1987, p.215.
  25. Margaret M. Hanzen & Thomas L. Hanzen, Simulation of Legal Analysis and Instruction on the Computer, 59 Ind. L. J. 1984, pp.195-203.
  26. http://tsp7.snu.ac.kr/prof/eng_edu/eng_edu2.html.; 2014. 6.19.Searching.
  27. Buch, N., & Wolff, T., Classroom Teaching Through Inquiry. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 126, 2000, pp.105-122. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(2000)126:3(105)
  28. Kwon, Kab- Yeon., Comparative Study on Curriculum of Accreditation Criteria of Engineering Education - Focused on Curriculum of Electronic Engineering, Master degree Dissertation, Graduate School of Education, Chungnam National University, 2009, pp.4-6.
  29. Supra Note 26.
  30. Supra Note 28, p.6.