Introduction
Since Raman spectroscopy was first successfully applied to cell bioanalysis in the 1990s, surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) has become a powerful analytical tool for the ultrasensitive and highly-resoved identification of biomolecules due to the enormous amplification (106-1012) of Raman scattering at so-called “hot spots”.1,2 The fabrication of SERS-active substrates is currently focused on Raman dye-encoded nanoparticles because of their applications to biolabeling, cell imaging, and even cell targeting.3-5 For a facile biomedical application, SERS nanoprobe must have biocompatible and tailorable surface morphology. Recently, increasing attention has been directed for wrapping a SERS nanoprobe with a coating layer which can protect from oxidative environment.6,7 Furthermore, it would be very beneficial if the coating layer could provide conjugation with functional groups of various bioagents.
Gold nanoparticles with edged shapes (e.g., cube, triangle, star, multipod, flower-like, etc.) are attractive because of the localization of intense electromagnetic fields around the sharp and/or interstitial sites.8,9 Flower-like Au nanoparticles, i.e., Au nanoflowers (AuNFs), have recently been reported as a highly effective SERS substrate.10-12 Wang et al. prepared regular array of gold nanoflowers using electrochemical deposition on ITO conductive substrate and applied them as SERS substrates to probe rhodamine 6G.13 Pradeep et al. also prepared Au/Ag mesoflowers as a SERS substrate which were able to detect probe molecules sensitively.14 However, it is rarely found that AuNFs encoded with strong Raman dyes have been applied as a SERS nanoprobe.3
In this work, we prepared flower-like Au nanoparticles using ascorbic acid agents in the presence of chitosan, and the synthesized AuNFs were adsorbed by Raman-active 2-chlorothiophenol (CTP) molecules. Importantly, CTP-encoded AuNFs were subsequently coated by a thin silica layer via a sol-gel reaction, in order to provide protection and conjugation with functional groups. The as-prepared samples were characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), dynamic light scattering (DLS), UV-vis spectroscopy, and micro-Raman spectroscopy.
Experimental
Chemical Materials. The following reagents were purchased from Aldrich Chemical Co.: gold chloride hydrate (HAuCl4), L-ascorbic acid (99.0%), tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS, 99.999%), ammonia hydroxide (NH4OH, 28 wt %), ethanol (C2H5OH, 99.5%), and chitosan (50 kDa) with a deacetylation degree above 85%. Acetic acid (99.0%) was purchased from Duksan Pure Chemical, Ltd. and deionized water (HPLC grade) was purchased from J.T. Baker.
Au Nanoflowers (AuNFs). Chitosan was dissolved in 10 mL of 1.0% v/v acetic acid solution by sonication until transparent solution was obtained. 700 μL of 1.0 wt % HAuCl4 was added to 3 mL of the chitosan solution under continuous stirring for 30 min. Subsequently, 600 μL of ascorbic acid (0.1 g ascorbic acid in 10 mL HPLC water) was quickly added to the mixed solution with continuous stirring for 30 min. The amine groups of chitosan induced the electrostatic interaction with negatively charged Au NPs and the scrolling capacity of vicinal chitosan chains triggered the agglomerization of primary Au NPs, consequently leading to the formation of flower-like Au NPs.10 The resulting AuNFs were purified by centrifuging them three times and re-suspending them in 3 mL of HPLC water to remove the residual components.
Silica-coated AuNFs. For the SERS measurements, an aliquot of 2-chlorothiophenol (CTP, 10−3 M) was added into the AuNFs solution (4 mL) and gently stirred for 4 h to obtain the equilibrium state of CTP-adsorbed AuNFs (CTP-AuNFs). Subsequently, CTP-AuNFs were coated with silica layer according to the modified Stőber method.15 15 mL of isopropanol was mixed with 2 mL of AuNFs solution, and then 150 μL of ammonium solution (28 wt %) was injected into the mixed solution under constant stirring for 10 min. The sol-gel reaction proceeded for 6 h by the injection of TEOS solution, which was prepared by mixing 15 μL of TEOS (99%) with 10 mL of HPLC water for 10 s. The final products were centrifuged for 20 min at 7000 rpm and the purified products were re-suspended in 3 mL of HPLC water for a further analysis.
Instrumental Analysis. The IR spectra were recorded with a resolution of 2 cm−1 using a Fourier transform infrared spectrometer (FTIR, VERTEX 70, Bruker). The distribution of particle size was measured at room temperature using an intensity-based dynamic light scattering (DLS) method. The surface morphology of the particles was analyzed by SEM (Hitachi S-4700) operating at 15 kV and TEM (Hitachi H7600) operating at the acceleration voltage of 200 kV. UV-vis absorption spectra (Model: HP 8453) was measured in the wavelength region of 200-1000 nm. The Raman spectrograph (ANDOR Monora500i) employed a 1200 g/mm grating under a laser excitation at 632.8 nm for 5 s.
Results and Discussion
Scheme 1 shows the fabrication process for silica-coated Au nanoflowers encoded with Raman dyes (AuNF-CTP@ silica). First, flower-like Au nanoparticles (AuNFs) were prepared by adding ascorbic acid into a gold acid solution in the presence of chitosan biopolymers. The scrolling capacity of the chitosan chains induced the agglomeration of the primary Au nanoparticles, thus forming flower-like AuNFs. The chitosan-entangled AuNFs were adsorbed by Raman dyes and the AuNF-Raman dye complex was finally coated with thin silica layer by the sol-gel reaction with Si precursor of TEOS.
Scheme 1.Schematic diagram of synthesizing silica-coated AuNFs encoded with Raman dyes.
The AuNFs were prepared by mixing a gold acid solution with ascorbic acid in the presence of chitosan biopolymers with different concentrations. According to Figures 1(a-d), the size of the AuNFs decreased with increasing chitosan concentration from 0.01 wt % to 0.4 wt %. At a low chitosan concentration (0.01 wt %), the primary Au NPs were not fully entangled with chitosan chains and the agglomeration of primary Au NPs became more dominant, consequently forming large AuNFs.10 At the intermediate chitosan concentrations (0.1-0.2 wt %), the obtained particles exhibited the flower-like Au NPs (AuNFs) and the sizes of which were decreased as compared to AuNFs preapred at low chitosan concetration (0.01 wt %). At a high chitosan concentration (0.4 wt %), the primary Au NPs were immediately entangled by the chitosan chains, consequently forming the small AuNFs.
Figure 1.SEM images of AuNFs prepared by adding 600 μL of ascorbic acid and 150 μL of NH4OH in the presence of chitosan biopolymers: (a) 0.01, (b) 0.1, (c) 0.2, and (d) 0.4 wt % of chitosan.
The corresponding UV-vis spectra of the AuNFs (0.4 wt % of chitosan) exhibited a broad absorption band centered at 658 nm, whereas Au nanoparticles prepared only by ascorbic acid exhibited the characteristic absorption peak at 536 nm (see Figure S1 in supplemental materials). The significant red-shift of the localized surface plasmon resonances was attributed to the flower-like aggregation of the primary Au NPs.3,16 The AuNFs prepared with a chitosan concentration of 0.2 wt % were subsequently coated by a thin silica layer through a sol-gel reaction between the AuNFs and TEOS. According to DLS analysis, the size of the silica-coated AuNFs increased 1.5-2 times as compared to pristine AuNFs (data not shown) even though the SEM images shown in Figure S2 (in supporting information) did not show a noticeable size difference between silica-coated AuNFs.
Figure 2 shows the UV-vis spectra of pristine AuNFs (0.2 wt % of chitosan) and silica-coated AuNFs prepared at different amounts of NH4OH. The silica-coated AuNFs exhibited a red-shift of the maximal absorbance peak from 741 nm to ~773-787 nm. The red-shift of the absorbance peak indicates the change of the surrounding refractive index from water (1.33) to a silica layer (1.57).17 The increase of NH4OH decreased the intensity of the UV-vis absorption peak, probably due to the aggregation of the silica-coated AuNFs.
Figure 2.UV-vis spectra of silica-coated AuNFs prepared by adding 150 μL of TEOS and different amounts of NH4OH: (a) 0 μL, (b) 150 μL, (c) 300 μL, (d) 500 μL.
Figure 3 shows the change of zeta potentials of AuNFs according to the surface modifications such as Raman dye-encoding and the silica coating. The chitosan-entangled AuNFs exhibited a positive zeta potential, as expected from the positive amine groups of chitosan chains.18 The Raman dye-encoded AuNFs exhibited a almost zerol value of zeta potential, −0.45 mV, probably due to the screening effects of the adsorbed CTP on the AuNFs. However, the zeta potential of the silica-coated AuNFs exhibited a distinctly negative zeta potential, −20.85 mV, indicating the presence of silica layer on the AuNFs.19 As a reference, Au NPs prepared by ascorbic acid without chitosan exhibited a negative zeta potential, −5.72 mV, due to the negative surface charges of the primary Au NPs.
Figure 3.Zeta potentials of AuNFs, AuNF-CTPs, and AuNF-CTPs@ SiO2.
Figures 4(a-c) show TEM images of the pristine AuNFs and the silica-coated AuNFs. Figure 4(a) shows the size uniformity of as-prepared samples. The morphology of the flower-like Au NPs was clearly observed from the magnified TEM image shown in Figure 4(b). The magnified TEM image exhibits multipod and spike-shaped tips ranging in size from 10 nm to 20 nm. The anisotropic AuNFs formed by the aggregated primary Au NPs provided a surface morphology consisting of junctions, edges, and corners, which could act as “hot-spots” in SERS measurements.5,14 According to Figure 4(c), the silica-coated AuNFs exhibited a distinct contrast between the thin silica overlayer and the AuNF core. The selected area electron diffraction (SAED) pattern indicated the polycrystalline structure of the AuNFs, as shown in Figure 4(d).9
Figure 4.TEM images of (a) pristine AuNFs, (b) magnified image of (a), (c) silica-coated AuNFs (AuNF-CTPs@SiO2), and (d) SAED patterns of AuNFs.
Figure 5 shows the Raman spectra of the pristine AuNFs, the AuNF-CTPs, and the AuNF-CTPs@silica. No clear Raman signals were observed from the chitosan molecules entangled with AuNFs. On the other hand, AuNF-CTPs and AuNF-CTPs@silica exhibited distinct Raman signals of adsorbed CTP molecules owing to the highly anisotropic nanostructures of the AuNFs, which can create many hot spots for a localized near-field enhancement effect.3,5 The largest Stokes-shifted vibration was observed at 1570 cm−1, which was attributed to the ν (C-C) vibration. The Raman peaks observed at 1020 cm−1 and 690 cm−1 were attributed to ring def in-plane and out-of-plane, respectively. The Raman peaks observed at 460 cm−1 for both samples were attributed to the γ (C-S) vibration of thiophenol molecules.20 The Raman signals of AuNF-CTPs@silica were fairly reduced as compared to those of AuNF-CTPs. The low intensity of SERS may come from the aggregation of AuNF-CTPs@silica and/or interference of the silica shell over encoded Raman dyes.21
Figure 5.Raman signals of AuNFs, 2-chlorothiolphenol (CTP, 10−3 M) adsorbed on AuNFs (AuNF-CTPs), and silica-coated AuNFs (AuNF-CTPs@SiO2).
Conclusion
In this work, we prepared chitosan-entangled flower-like Au nanoparticles (gold nanoflowers, AuNFs) using ascorbic reducing agents. The AuNFs exhibited strong plasmon absorption in the NIR (Near infrared) region caused by the aggregation of primary Au NPs. The chitosan-entangled AuNFs were adsorbed by Raman-active CTP molecules, and the resulting CTP-encoded AuNFs (AuNF-CTPs) were coated with a thin silica layer via a sol-gel reaction with Si alkoxides. The AuNF-CTPs and silica-coated AuNFs (AuNF-CTPs@silica) exhibited highly enhnaced Raman signals of adsorbed CTP molecules. Thus, silica-coated AuNFs with Raman dye encoding can be employed as a SERS nanoprobe with versitile conjugation
References
- Xie, W.; Su, L.; Shen, A.; Materny, A.; Hu, J. J. Raman Spec. 2011, 42, 1248. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrs.2857
- Chen, C.; He. X.; Gao, L.; Ma, N. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2013, 5, 1149. https://doi.org/10.1021/am302933x
- Xie, J. P.; Zhang, Q. B.; Lee, J. Y. ACS Nano 2008, 2, 2473. https://doi.org/10.1021/nn800442q
- Li, J.; Wu, J.; Zhang, X.; Liu, Y.; Zhou, D.; Sun, H.; Zhang, H.; Yang, B. J. Phys.Chem. C 2011, 115, 3630.
- Jiang, Y.; Wu, X.; Li, Q.; Li, J.; Xu, D. Nanotechnology 2011, 22, 385601. https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-4484/22/38/385601
- Tan, X. B.; Wang, Z. Y.; Yang, J. Nanotechnology 2009, 20, 445102. https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-4484/20/44/445102
- Woo, M.; Lee, S.; Kim, G.; Baek, J.; Noh, M. S.; Kim, J. E.; Park, S. J.; Minai-Tehrani, A.; Park, S.; Seo, Y. T.; Kim, Y.; Lee, Y.; Jeong, D. H.; Cho, M. Anal. Chem. 2009, 81, 1008. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac802037x
- Kumar, B.; Raj, C. R. Chem. Mater. 2008, 20, 3546. https://doi.org/10.1021/cm7019608
- Ren, Y.; Xu, C.; Wu, M.; Niu, M.; Fang, Y. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects 2011, 380, 222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2011.02.029
- Nhung, T. T.; Lee, S. J. Cryst. Growth 2013, 373, 132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2012.09.042
- Mohanty, A.; Garg, N.; Jin, R. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 4962. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201000902
- Wang, Z. D.; Zhang, J. Q.; Ekaman, J. M.; Kenis, P. J. A.; Lu, Y. Nano Lett. 2010, 10, 1886. https://doi.org/10.1021/nl100675p
- Wang, J.; Duan, G.; Li, Y.; Liu, G.; Dai, Z.; Zhang, H.; Cai, W. Langmuir 2013, 29, 3512. https://doi.org/10.1021/la400433z
- Sajanlal, P. R.; Pradeep, T. Langmuir 2010, 26, 8901. https://doi.org/10.1021/la904676u
- Park, S.; Lee, J.; Haam, S.; Lee, S. Bull. Korean Chem. Soc. 2009, 30, 869. https://doi.org/10.5012/bkcs.2009.30.4.869
- Huang, L.; Wang, M.; Zhang, Y.; Guo, Z. R.; Sun, J. F.; Gu, N. J. Phys. Chem. C 2007, 111, 16154. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp072969g
- Doering, W. E.; Nie, S. Anal. Chem. 2003, 75, 6171. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac034672u
- Jang, M.; Nah, J. Bull. Korean Chem. Soc. 2003, 24, 1303. https://doi.org/10.5012/bkcs.2003.24.9.1303
- Park, S.; Lee, J.; Haam, S.; Lee, S. Bull. Korean Chem. Soc. 2009, 30, 869. https://doi.org/10.5012/bkcs.2009.30.4.869
- Mahmoud, M. A.; El-Sayed, M. A. Nano Lett. 2009, 9, 3025. https://doi.org/10.1021/nl901501x
- Mulvaney, S. P.; Musick, M. D.; Keating, C. D.; Natan, M. J. Langmuir 2003, 19, 4784. https://doi.org/10.1021/la026706j
Cited by
- Electrochemical Synthesis of Flower-Like Gold Nanoparticles for SERS Application vol.48, pp.8, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11664-019-07343-y