Child Health Nursing Research

Korean Academy of Child Health Nursing (한국아동간호학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Systematic Review of Effects of Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure on Apnea of Preterm Infants

미숙아 무호흡을 위한 비강 지속적 양압환기법 효과에 대한 체계적 고찰

  • Received : 2014.06.20
  • Accepted : 2014.07.18
  • Published : 2014.07.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to analysis the effects of nasal Continuous Postive Airway Pressure (nCPAP) for preterm infants using systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods: Thirteen peer-reviewed journals including preterm infants and apnea and nCPAP published between 1973 and 2013 were included. Effect size and statistics of homogeneity were done using STATA 10.0. Results: The design for 9 studies was Randomized Control Trial. In most of studies the pressure of nCPAP was set to 4-6 cm$H_2O$. The effect size of 5 studies for the effect on apnea rate using nCPAP compared to nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilator (nIPPV) showed that the Standardized Mean Difference (SMD) was -0.11 and was not significantly different (Z=0.41, p=.680). But the difference in nCPAP for nasal Synchronizes Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilator (nSIPPV) (subgroup) was significant (SMD=-.44). The effect size of 7 studies on effect for ventilator weaning of using nCPAP compared to nIPPV showed the Risk Ratio (RR) as 1.60 and was not significantly different (Z=1.12, p=.268). But the difference between nCPAP and nSIPPV (subgroup) was significant (RR=3.94). Conclusion: The results indicate a need for an advanced care system and suggest continuous studies of apnea in preterm infants.

목적 본 연구는 국내외 연구의 체계적 문헌고찰을 통해 미숙아무호흡에 대한 nCPAP의 효과를 재확인하고 nIPPV 중 nSIPPV를 적용한 연구들을 구별하여 효과 차이가 있는지 확인해보고자 한다. 본 연구의 결과를 토대로 고위험신생아 간호전략을 위한 기초적인 자료를 제공하기 위해서이다. 방법 본 연구에서는 1970년 1월부터 2013년 9월까지 미숙아 무호흡증을 대상으로 nCPAP를 제공하고 그 효과를 확인한 연구를 대상으로 검색하였다. 영문 검색어는 'preterm infant', 'prematurity', 'nCPAP', 'apnea', 'trial' 이었으며 국문검색어는 '미숙아', '무호흡', '무호흡중재'로 검색하였다. 총 13편의 논문분석을 위하여 코딩의 준거분석틀에 따라 자료코딩을 하였다. 자료의 코딩에 따른 준거분석틀은 다음과 같다. 먼저 각 연구 특성에 따른 자료의 코딩은 연구자, 게재연도, 표본크기, 중재방법, 중재시간, 주요결과, 적용시간, 실험설계의 편향 유형을 조사하여 제시하였다. 코딩된 자료는 신뢰구간 95%, 통계적 유의수준 5%로 정하며 이용된 프로그램은 STATA 10.0을 이용하였다. 결과 nCPAP의 무호흡감소의 효과와 nIPPV의 차이는 -0.11 (95% CI [-0.64, 0.42])로 유의한 차이가 검증되지 않았다(Z=0.41, p=.680). 그러나 nCPAP와 nSIPPV의 효과차이는 결합추정치 -0.44 (95% CI [-0.81, -0.07)로 nSIPPV가 미숙아무호흡 감소에 효과가 있는 것으로 나타났다(Z=2.35, p=.019). nCPAP의 호흡기치료중지 성공에 대한 효과를 메타분석 한 결과 1.60 (95% CI [0.70, 3.63])이었으며 nIPPV와 차이가 검증되지 않았다(Z=1.12, p=.268). 그러나 nSIPPV는 nCPAP에 비해 결합추정치는 3.94 (95% CI [1.74, 8.90])로 호흡기치료 중지에 효과가 있는 것으로 나타났다(Z=3.29, p=.0001). 결론 미숙아의 무호흡감소와 호흡기치료의 단축을 위해 nCPAP와 nIPPV 중 nSIPPV의 효과를 확인하였으며 본 연구결과를 기초로 임상에서 활용 가능한 미숙아 호흡관리 프로토콜 개발을 위해 지속적인 연구들이 진행되어져야 할 것이다.

Keywords

References

  1. Barrington, K. J., Bull, D., & Finer, N. N. (2001). Randomized trial of nasal synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation compared with continuous positive airway pressure after extubation of very low birth weight infants. Pediatrics, 107(4), 638-641. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.107.4.638
  2. Bhandari, V., Finer, N. N., Ehrenkranz, R. A., Saha, S., Das, A., Walsh, M. C., et al. (2009). Synchronized nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation and neonatal outcomes: A retrospective study. Pediatrics, 124(2), 517-526. http://dx.doi.org/10.1542/peds 2008-1302
  3. Bhatia, J. (2000). Current options in the management of apnea of prematurity. Clinical Pediatrics, 39, 327-336. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/000992280003900602
  4. Bisceglia, M., Belcastro, A., Poerio, V., Raimondi, F., Mesuraca, L., Crugliano, C., et al. (2007). A comparison of nasal intermittent versus continuous positive pressure delivery for the treatment of moderate respiratory syndrome in preterm infants. Minerva Pediatrics, 59(2), 91-95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1542/peds.2008-1302
  5. Davis, P. G., Lemyre, B., & De Paoli, A. G. (2001). Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation versus nasal continuous positive airway pres sure for preterm neonates after extubation. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 3, CD003212. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/14651858. CD003212
  6. Davis, P., Jankov, R., Doyle, L., & Henschke, P. (1998). Randomized, controlled trial of nasal continuous positive airway pressure in the extubation of infants weighing 600 to 1,250 g. Archives Disease of Child Fetal Neonatal Edition, 79(1), F54-F57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/fn.79.1.F54
  7. De Paoli, A. G., Davis, P. G., & Lemyre, B. (2003). Nasal continuous positive airway pressure versus nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation for preterm neonates: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Paediatrica, 92(1), 70-75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1651-2227.2003.tb00472.x
  8. De Paoli, A. G., Morley, C., & Davis, P. G. (2003). Nasal cpap for neonates: what do we know in 2003? Archives Disease Child Fetal Neonatal Edition, 88(3), F168-72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/adc.2007.117614
  9. Dunn, M. S., Kaempf, J., de Klerk, A., de Klerk, R., Reilly, M., Howard, D., et al. (2011). Randomized trial comparing 3 approaches to the initial respiratory management of preterm neonates. Pediatrics, 128(5), e1069-1076. http://dx.doi.org/10.1542/peds.2010-3848
  10. Henderson-Smart, D. J., Subramanian, P., & Davis, P. G. (2005). Continuous positive airway pressure versus theophylline for apnea in preterm infants. Cochrane Database Systematic Review, 4, CD001072. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1542/peds.112.5.1031
  11. Im, H. S., & Park, E. S. (2004). The effects of regular stimulation on the reduction of premature infant's apnea. Korean Journal of Child Health Nursing, 10(4), 451-459.
  12. Khalaf, M. N., Brodsky, N., Hurley, J., & Bhandari, V. (2001). A prospective randomized, controlled trial comparing synchronized nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure as modes of extubation. Pediatrics, 18(1), 13-17. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1542/peds.108.1.13
  13. Kiciman, N. M., Andreasson, B., Bernstein, G., Mannino, F., Rich, W., Henderson, C., et al. (1998). Thoracoabdominal motion in newborns during ventilation delivered by endotracheal tube or nasal prongs. Pediatric Pulmonology, 25(3), 175-181. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0496(199803)25:3<175::AID-PPUL7>3.0.CO;2-L
  14. Kilgour, E., Rankin, N., Ryan, S., & Pack, R. (2004). Mucocillary function deteriorates in the clinical range of inspired air temperature and humidity. Intensive Care Medicine, 30(7), 1491-1494. http://dx.doi. org/10.1007/s00134-004-2235-3
  15. Kim, J. S., & Lee, E. J. (2011). Effect of optimal humidification for extremely low birth weight infants during nasal continuous positive airway pressure. Journal of Korean Academy Child Health Nursing, 17(2), 145-152. http://dx.doi.org/104094/jkachn.2011.17.2.145 https://doi.org/10.4094/jkachn.2011.17.2.145
  16. Kim, Y. J., Jung, B. K., & Lee, S. G. (2003). A study on the effects of the early use of nasal CPAP in the weaning of mechanical ventilators. Journal of the Korean Pediatric Association, 46(12), 1200-1206.
  17. Kirpalani, H., Millar, D., Lemyre, B., Yoder, B. A., Chiu, A., & Roberts, R. S. (2013). A trial comparing noninvasive ventilation strategies in preterm infants. The New England Journal of Medicine, 369(7), 611-620. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1056/nejm197106172842401
  18. Klausner, J. F., Lee, A. Y., & Hutchison, A. A. (1996). Decreased imposed work with a new nasal continuous positive airway pressure device. Pediatric Pulmonolgy, 22(3), 188-194. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI) 1099-0496(199609)22:3
  19. Lemyre, B., Davis, P. G., & De Paoli, A. G. (2002). Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure for apnea of prematurity. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 1, CD002272. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD002272
  20. Lin, C. H., Wang, S. T., Lin, Y. J., & Yeh, T. F. (1998). Efficacy of nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation in treating apnea of prematurity. Pediatric Pulmonology, 26, 349-353. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0496(199811)26:5<349::AID-PPUL8>3.0.CO;2-7
  21. Mathews, T. J., & MacDorman, M. F. (2010). Synchronized nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation and noenatal outcomes: A retrospective study. Pediatrics, 124(2), 517-526. http://dx.doi.org/10.1542/peds. 2008-1302
  22. Miller, M. J., DiFiore, J. M., Strohl, K. P., & Martin, R. J. (1990). Effects of nasal CPAP on supraglottic and total pulmonary resistance in preterm infants. Journal of Applied Physiology, 68(1), 141-146. https://doi.org/10.1152/jappl.1990.68.1.141
  23. Pantalitschka, T., Sievers, J., Urschitz, M. S., Herberts, T., Reher, C., & Poets, C. F. (2009). Randomized crossover trial of four nasal respiratory support systems for apnoea of prematurity in very low birth weight infants. Archives of Disease Fetal Neonatal Edition, 94(4), F245-F248. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/adc.2008.148981
  24. Park, S. K. (1996). Apnea of prematurity. Journal of the Korean Pediatric Association, 39(3), 306-312.
  25. Ryan, C. A., Finer, N. N., & Peters, K. L. (1989). Nasal intermittent positive- pressure ventilation offers no advantages over nasal continuous positive airway pressure in apnea of prematurity. American Journal of Disease of Children, 143, 1196-1198.
  26. So, B. H., Tamura, M., Watanabe, T., & Kamoshita, S. (1995). Application of nasal continuous positive airway pressure to early extubation in very low birth weight infants. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 72, F191-F193.
  27. Tang, S., Zhao, J., Shen, J., Hu, Z., & Shi, Y. (2013). Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure in neonates: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Indian Pediatrics, 50(16), 371-376. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13312-013-0122-0
  28. Williams, R. N., Rankin, N., Smith, T., Galler, D., & Seakins, P. (1996). Relationship between the humidity and temperature of inspired gas and the function of the airway mucosa. Critical Care Medicine, 24, 1920-1929. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003246-199611000-00025
  29. Wright, C. J., & Kipalani, H. (2011). Targeting inflammation to prevent bronchopulmonary dysplasia: Can new insight be translated into therapies? Pediatrics, 128(1), 111-126. http://dx.doi.org/10.1542/peds.2010-3875