Journal of Digital Convergence (디지털융복합연구)

The Society of Digital Policy and Management (한국디지털정책학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Team Project Activity and Satisfaction in Business Education

경영학 수업에서 팀 프로젝트활동과 수업만족에 관한 연구

  • Received : 2014.06.02
  • Accepted : 2014.07.20
  • Published : 2014.07.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Since 2010, the universities in Korea have been faced severe difficulties on the selection of students and on the delivery of high quality education services, as the number of students is reduced and the college entrance rate is declined. To solve these problems, the universities have introduced the various and professional education services such as team-based projects, case study, e-learning, action learning, etc. The purpose of this study is to examine the effect of team-based project learning on the student's satisfaction in business education. The 4 factors(team cohesiveness, teamwork, team performance and goal achievement) are measured by using questionnaire survey and data are collected from 134 students(34 teams) for 4 subjects. The results show that the structure of team cohesiveness${\rightarrow}$teamwork${\rightarrow}$student's satisfaction is statistically significant, and that team performance and goal achievement are not significant. The student's satisfaction in team-based project learning would highly be related with team cohesiveness.

2010년도에 들어서면서 학령인구의 감소와 함께 고등학교 졸업생들의 대학진학률 하향추세로, 대학들은 학생 선발과 양질의 교육콘텐츠 제공이라는 2중의 어려움에 직면하고 있다. 이에 각 대학은 환경의 변화에 대한 신속한 대응과 동시에 다양하고 전문화된 대학교육서비스(팀기반 프로젝트학습, 사례연구, e-러닝, 액션러닝 등)를 도입하고 있다. 본 연구에서는 대학생을 대상으로 팀기반 프로젝트학습이 수업만족에 미치는 영향을 조사하고자 하였다. 이를 위한 측정항목으로 4개 요인(팀 응집력, 팀워크, 팀 성과 및 목표달성)을 설정하고, 설문조사(4개 과목, 34팀, 134명)를 통해서 자료를 수집하여, 구조방정식모형으로 분석했다. 연구모형검증 결과는 팀 응집력${\rightarrow}$팀워크${\rightarrow}$수업만족의 구조가 제시되었으며, 팀 성과와 목표달성은 수업만족에 미치는 영향이 유의하지 않은 것으로 나타났다. 팀기반 프로젝트학습의 경우 팀응집력이 높아야 수업만족정도가 높아지는 것으로 분석되었다.

Keywords

References

  1. William J. Stevenson, Operations Management, 10th ed., McGraw-Hill, 2009.
  2. S. B. Lee and C. H. Ryu, Production and Operations Management, 4th ed., Myungkyungsa, 2012.
  3. J. Bloemer, Ko de Ruyter, and M. Wetzels, Linking Perceived Service Quality and Service Loyalty: a Multi-Dimensional Perspective. Journal of Marketing, Vol. 33 No. 6, pp. 1082-1106. MCB University Press, 1999.
  4. M. A. Jones, D. L. Mothersbaugh, and S. E. Beatty, Switching Barrier and Repurchase Intentions in Service. Journal of Retailing, Vol. 76, No.2, pp. 259-274, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4359(00)00024-5
  5. Byung-Suh Kang and Chul-ho Cho, A Study on Application of Web-used PBL on the Curriculum of Business Administration and Learning Performance. The Journal of Educational Information and Media, Vol. 12, No. 3, pp. 231-257, 2006.
  6. K. T. Kim, A Case for the Introduction of Problem-Based Learning to Business Education. Korean Journal of Ordo Economics, Vol. 15, No. 4, pp. 63-83, 2012.
  7. Kyung-won Chang and Soo-il Ko, Case study of Action Learning for Business Class: Effectiveness Analysis of Reflection Paper. Korean Journal of Educational Technology, Vol. 29, No. 3, pp. 689-721, 2013. https://doi.org/10.17232/KSET.29.3.689
  8. Ju-Hyun Kim, Eun-Yong Lee and Ju-min Lee, Problem-based Learning Framework for e-Learning : Case Study of K Cyber University. Journal of Cyber Society and Culture, Vol. 3, No.1, pp. 117-144, 2012.
  9. Seo-Young Lim, Dong-Soo Park and Jung-Min Lee, The Impact of Team Leader's Leadership Style on the Career Commitment and Turnover Intention of Team Members: Moderating Role of Team Members' Emotional Intelligence. Korean Journal of Corporation Management, Vol. 17, No. 3, pp. 1-22, 2010.
  10. Jungwon Cho and Jihye Kim, Collaborative Project Curriculum Applying Project-based Learning. Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial Cooperation Society, Vol. 11, No 1, pp. 214-219, 2010. https://doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2010.11.1.214
  11. S. P. Robbins, Organizational Behavior, 9th ed., Pearson Prentice Hall, NY, 2001.
  12. B. Cho and B Yoo, Tasks and Alternatives on the Education of Business Administration in Korean University. Business Education Research, Vol 14, No. 2, pp. 71-89, 2006.
  13. J. Katzenbach and D. K. Smith, The Wisdom of Teams, Harper Collins Publishers, New York, NY, 2003.
  14. T. J. Cossee, D. N. Ashworth and T. M. Weisenberger, The Effects of Team Size in a Marketing Simulation. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, Vol. 7, Summer, pp. 98-106, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1080/10696679.1999.11501844
  15. Kenneth. L. Bettenhausen, Five Years of Groups Research: What We Have Learned and What Needs to Be Addressed. Journal of Management, Vol. 17, No 2, pp345-81, 1991.
  16. D. Gladstein, Groups in context: A Model of Task Group Effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 29 pp499-517, 1984. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392936
  17. J. Keyton and J. Springston, Redefining Cohesiveness in Groups. Small Group Research, Vol. 21, No. 2, pp.234-54, 1990. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496490212006
  18. I. Summers, T. Coffelt, R. E. Horton, Psychological Reports, Vol 63, pp. 627-36, 1988. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1988.63.2.627
  19. Seong-Kook Kim, Organization and Human Behavior, 4th ed., Myungkyungsa, 2010.
  20. J. R. Hackman, The Design of Work Teams, In Handbook of Organizational Behavior, edition by W. Lorsch, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1987.
  21. D. R. Deeter-Schmelz, K. N. Kennedy, and R. Ramsey, Enriching our Understanding of Student Team Effectiveness. Journal of Marketing Education, Vol. 24, No 2, pp. 114-124, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1177/0273475302242004
  22. E. Sundstorm, K. P. De Meuse, and D. Futrell, Work teams : Application and Effectiveness, American Psychologist. Vol.45, No.2, pp. 483-504, 1990.
  23. D. R. Deeter-Schmelz and R. Ramsey, Student Team Performance: A Method for Classroom Assessment. Journal of Marketing Education, Vol. 20, No 2, pp. 85-93, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1177/027347539802000202
  24. J. L. Price and C. W. Mueller, Handbook of Organizational Measurement, Pitman Publishing Inc., 1986.
  25. J. F. Hair, R. E. Anderson, R. L. Tatham, and W. C. Black, Multivariate Data Analysis, 5th ed., NJ: Prentice Hall, 1998.
  26. J. C. Nunnally and I. H. Bernstein, Psychometric Theory, 3rd ed., NY: McGraw-Hill, 1994.
  27. J. C. Anderson and D. W. Gerbing, Structural Equation Modeling in Practice: A Review and Recommended Two-Step Approach. Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 103, No 3, pp. 411-423, 1988. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411
  28. J. H. Steiger, Structural Model Evaluation and Modification: An Interval Estimation Approach. Multivariate Behavioral Research, Vol 25, pp.173-80.