DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Modification of surface pretreatment of white spot lesions to improve the safety and efficacy of resin infiltration

  • Yim, Hyun-Kyung (Department of Preventive Dentistry and Public Oral Health, Brain Korea 21 PLUS Project, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University) ;
  • Min, Ji-Hyun (Department of Preventive Dentistry and Public Oral Health, Brain Korea 21 PLUS Project, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University) ;
  • Kwon, Ho-Keun (Department of Preventive Dentistry and Public Oral Health, Brain Korea 21 PLUS Project, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University) ;
  • Kim, Baek-Il (Department of Preventive Dentistry and Public Oral Health, Brain Korea 21 PLUS Project, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University)
  • Received : 2013.11.17
  • Accepted : 2014.01.09
  • Published : 2014.07.25

Abstract

Objective: A low-viscosity resin (infiltrant) was used to inhibit the progression of white spot lesions (WSLs) and resolve associated esthetic issues. An alternative pretreatment was explored to increase the pore volume of the surface layer of the WSLs. Also, the penetration effects of the infiltrant were evaluated for various pretreatments. Methods: Sixty two artificial lesions were fabricated on bovine teeth. As a positive control, 15% HCl gel was applied for 120 seconds. Further, 37% $H_3PO_4$ gel was applied for 30 seconds using three methods. The samples were divided as follows: $H_3PO_4$ only group, $H_3PO_4$ sponge group, and $H_3PO_4$ brush group. The acid was gently rubbed with the applicators (i.e., a sponge or brush) throughout the application time. To compare the effects of resin infiltration, twenty paired halves of specimens were treated with an infiltrant (ICON$^{(R)}$). Results: Thicknesses of the removed surface layers and infiltrated areas were evaluated by confocal laser scanning microscope. The positive control and the 37% $H_3PO_4$ brush group failed to show significant differences in the removed thickness (p > 0.05); however, the mean percentage of the infiltrated area was higher in the 37% $H_3PO_4$ brush group ($84.13{\pm}7.58%$%) than the positive control ($63.51{\pm}7.62%$, p < 0.001). Scanning electron microscope observations indicate higher pore volumes for the 37% $H_3PO_4$ brush group than for the positive control. Conclusions: Application of 37% $H_3PO_4$ with a brush for 30 seconds increased the pore volume of WSL surface layers and the percentage of infiltrated areas in comparison to the use of 15% HCl for 120 seconds.

Keywords

References

  1. Ekizer A, Zorba YO, Uysal T, Ayrikcila S. Effects of demineralizaton-inhibition procedures on the bond strength of brackets bonded to demineralized enamel surface. Korean J Orthod 2012;42:17-22. https://doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2012.42.1.17
  2. Wagner L, Szepietowska M. Fluoride penetration from three orthodontic adhesives: an experimental study. Korean J Orthod 2013;43:29-34. https://doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2013.43.1.29
  3. O'Reilly MT, De Jesus Vinas J, Hatch JP. Effectiveness of a sealant compared with no sealant in preventing enamel demineralization in patients with fixed orthodontic appliances: a prospective clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2013; 143:837-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.01.021
  4. Tufekci E, Dixon JS, Gunsolley JC, Lindauer SJ. Prevalence of white spot lesions during orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances. Angle Orthod 2011; 81:206-10. https://doi.org/10.2319/051710-262.1
  5. Neuhaus KW, Graf M, Lussi A, Katsaros C. Late infiltration of post-orthodontic white spot lesions. J Orofac Orthop 2010;71:442-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-010-1038-0
  6. Paris S, Meyer-Lueckel H. Masking of labial enamel white spot lesions by resin infiltration--a clinical report. Quintessence Int 2009;40:713-8.
  7. Kim S, Kim EY, Jeong TS, Kim JW. The evaluation of resin infiltration for masking labial enamel white spot lesions. Int J Paediatr Dent 2011;21:241-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-263X.2011.01126.x
  8. Paris S, Hopfenmuller W, Meyer-Lueckel H. Resin infiltration of caries lesions: an efficacy randomized trial. J Dent Res 2010;89:823-6. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034510369289
  9. Meyer-Lueckel H, Paris S. Improved resin infiltration of natural caries lesions. J Dent Res 2008;87:1112-6. https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910808701201
  10. Paris S, Meyer-Lueckel H. Infiltrants inhibit progression of natural caries lesions in vitro. J Dent Res 2010;89:1276-80. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034510376040
  11. Meyer-Lueckel H, Paris S. Infiltration of natural caries lesions with experimental resins differing in penetration coefficients and ethanol addition. Caries Res 2010;44:408-14. https://doi.org/10.1159/000318223
  12. Meyer-Lueckel H, Paris S, Kielbassa AM. Surface layer erosion of natural caries lesions with phosphoric and hydrochloric acid gels in preparation for resin infiltration. Caries Res 2007;41:223-30. https://doi.org/10.1159/000099323
  13. Meireles SS, Andre Dde A, Leida FL, Bocangel JS, Demarco FF. Surface roughness and enamel loss with two microabrasion techniques. J Contemp Dent Pract 2009;10:58-65.
  14. Croll TP, Killian CM, Miller AS. Effect of enamel microabrasion compound on human gingiva: report of a case. Quintessence Int 1990;21:959-63.
  15. Nyvad B, Machiulskiene V, Baelum V. Reliability of a new caries diagnostic system differentiating between active and inactive caries lesions. Caries Res 1999;33:252-60. https://doi.org/10.1159/000016526
  16. Rocha Gomes Torres C, Borges AB, Torres LM, Gomes IS, de Oliveira RS. Effect of caries infiltration technique and fluoride therapy on the colour masking of white spot lesions. J Dent 2011;39:202-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2010.12.004
  17. Kugel G, Ferrari M. The science of bonding: from first to sixth generation. J Am Dent Assoc 2000;131 Suppl:20S-5S. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2000.0398
  18. Attin T, Knofel S, Buchalla W, Tutuncu R. In situ evaluation of different remineralization periods to decrease brushing abrasion of demineralized enamel. Caries Res 2001;35:216-22. https://doi.org/10.1159/000047459
  19. White DJ. Use of synthetic polymer gels for artificial carious lesion preparation. Caries Res 1987;21:228-42. https://doi.org/10.1159/000261026
  20. Paris S, Meyer-Lueckel H, Colfen H, Kielbassa AM. Resin infiltration of artificial enamel caries lesions with experimental light curing resins. Dent Mater J 2007;26:582-8. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.26.582
  21. Hermsen RJ, Vrijhoef MM. Loss of enamel due to etching with phosphoric or maleic acid. Dent Mater 1993;9:332-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(93)90052-R
  22. Croll TP. Bonded resin sealant for smooth surface enamel defects: new concepts in "microrestorative" dentistry. Quintessence Int 1987;18:5-10.
  23. Poitevin A, De Munck J, Van Ende A, Suyama Y, Mine A, Peumans M, et al. Bonding effectiveness of self-adhesive composites to dentin and enamel. Dent Mater 2013;29:221-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2012.10.001
  24. Carstensen W. The effects of different phosphoric acid concentrations on surface enamel. Angle Orthod 1992;62:51-8.
  25. Neuhaus KW, Schlafer S, Lussi A, Nyvad B. Infiltration of natural caries lesions in relation to their activity status and acid pretreatment in vitro. Caries Res 2013;47:203-10. https://doi.org/10.1159/000345654
  26. Meyer-Lueckel H, Paris S. Progression of artificial enamel caries lesions after infiltration with experimental light curing resins. Caries Res 2008;42:117-24. https://doi.org/10.1159/000118631
  27. Meyer-Lueckel H, Paris S, Mueller J, Colfen H, Kielbassa AM. Influence of the application time on the penetration of different dental adhesives and a fissure sealant into artificial subsurface lesions in bovine enamel. Dent Mater 2006;22:22-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2005.03.005
  28. Yassen GH, Platt JA, Hara AT. Bovine teeth as substitute for human teeth in dental research: a review of literature. J Oral Sci 2011;53:273-82. https://doi.org/10.2334/josnusd.53.273

Cited by

  1. Evaluation of Surface Roughness Characteristics Using Atomic Force Microscopy and Inspection of Microhardness Following Resin Infiltration with Icon® : EVALUATION OF SURFACE ROUGHNESS C vol.29, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12279
  2. Microhardness and Roughness of Infiltrated White Spot Lesions Submitted to Different Challenges vol.42, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.2341/16-144-l
  3. SEM Comparison of Penetration in Artificial White Spots Lesion between an Infiltrant Resin and Two Adhesive Systems vol.7, pp.3, 2014, https://doi.org/10.4236/ojst.2017.73010
  4. 유전치 Resin Infiltration을 위한 표면처리 방법의 대안 vol.45, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.5933/jkapd.2018.45.2.179
  5. Dental Treatment of White Spots and a Description of the Technique and Digital Quantification of the Loss of Enamel Volume vol.10, pp.12, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3390/app10124369
  6. Minimally Invasive Therapies for the Management of Dental Caries-A Literature Review vol.9, pp.12, 2014, https://doi.org/10.3390/dj9120147
  7. Novel nanostructured resin infiltrant containing calcium phosphate nanoparticles to prevent enamel white spot lesions vol.126, pp.None, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.104990