DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Content Analysis as a Method for Measuring Exploitation and Exploration: Discussion with Example Application to the Worldwide Optical Library Industry

활용과 탐색 측정을 위한 방법론으로써 콘텐츠 분석 :세계 광디스크 라이브러리장치 산업

  • Received : 2014.06.19
  • Accepted : 2014.07.17
  • Published : 2014.07.28

Abstract

Measures of exploration and exploitation fall into three categories, patent-based measures, survey-based measures, and press-based measures. Such variety stems from the lack of consensus on definitions of exploration and exploitation. Given a dynamic nature of exploration and exploitation, I suggested how to improve existing press-based measures by suggesting strategies and procedures for constructing valid and reliable press-based measures in a single industry context. I illustrate my arguments through a study of the worldwide optical disk industry.

활용과 탐색을 측정하는 방법은 특허 기반의 방법, 설문 기반의 방법, 언론 기반의 방법 세 가지로 나뉜다. 다양한 방법론이 나오게 된 이유는 활용과 탐색의 정의에 대한 합의가 아직 이루어지지 않았기 때문이다. 활용과 탐색 활동은 기업이 장기적으로 행하기 때문에 언론 기반의 방법이 가장 적절하며, 이 논문에서는 세계 광디스크 라이브러리 장치 산업의 데이터를 활용하여 유효하고, 신뢰성 있는 언론 기반의 방법에 의해 활용과 탐색을 어떻게 측정하는 것인지를 보여주고자 한다.

Keywords

References

  1. J. G. March, "Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning," Organization Science, Vol.2, No.1, pp.71-87, 1991. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2.1.71
  2. A. S. Alexiev, J. J. P. Jansen, F. A. J. Van den Bosch, and H. W. Volberda, "Top Management Team Advice Seeking and Exploratory Innovation: The Moderating Role of TMT Heterogeneity," Journal of Management Studies, Vol.47, No.7, pp.1343-1364, 2010.
  3. Z. L. He and P. K. Wong, "Exploration vs. exploitation: An empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis," Organization Science, Vol.15, No.4, pp.481-494, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1040.0078
  4. J. J. P. Jansen, M. P. Tempelaar, F. A. J. van den Bosch, and H. W. Volberda, "Structural Differentiation and Ambidexterity: The Mediating Role of Integration Mechanisms. Organization Science," Vol.20, No.4, pp.797-811, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1080.0415
  5. P. G. Audia, and J. A. Goncalo, "Past success and creativity over time: A study of inventors in the hard disk drive industry," Management Science, Vol.53, No.1, pp.1-15, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1060.0593
  6. L. Rosenkopf and A. Nerkar, "Beyond local search: Boundary-spanning, exploration, and impact in the optical disk industry," Strategic Management Journal, Vol.22, No.4, pp.287-306, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.160
  7. H. L. Wang and J. T. Li, "Untangling the effects of overexploration and overexploitation on organizational performance: The moderating role of environmental dynamism," Journal of Management, Vol.34, No.5, pp.925-951, 2008.
  8. A. Gambardella, D. Harhoff, and B. Verspagen, "The value of European patents," European Management Review, Vol.5, No.3, pp.85-89, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1057/emr.2008.12
  9. J. Uotila, M. Maula, T. Keil, and S. A. Zahra, "Exploration, exploitation, and fiancial performance: Analysis of S&P 500 corporations," Strategic Management Journal, Vol.30, No.2, pp.221-231, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.738
  10. 박재민, 이중만, "기업의 혁신 활동이 기업성과에 미치는 영향", 한국콘텐츠학회논문지, 제11권, 제3호, pp.339-350, 2011. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2011.11.3.339
  11. D. A. Levinthal and J. G. March, "The Myopia of Learning," Strategic Management Journal, Vol.14, pp.95-112, 1993. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250141009
  12. R. Katila and G. Ahuja, "Something old, something new: A longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction," Academy of Management Journal, Vol.45, No.6, pp.1183-1194, 2002. https://doi.org/10.2307/3069433
  13. Z. L. He and P. K. Wong, "Exploration vs. exploitation: An empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis," Organization Science, Vol.15, No.4, pp.481-494, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1040.0078
  14. S. Auh and B. Menguc, "Balancing exploration and exploitation: The moderating role of competitive intensity," Journal of Business Research, Vol.58, No12, pp.1652-1661, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2004.11.007
  15. J. J. P. Jansen, D. Vera, and M. Crossan, "Strategic leadership for exploration and exploitation: The moderating role of environmental dynamism," Leadership Quarterly, Vol.20, No.1, pp.5-18, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2008.11.008
  16. S. Raisch and J. Birkinshaw, "Organizational ambidexterity: Antecedents, outcomes, and moderators," Journal of Management, Vol.34, No.3, pp.375-409, 2008.
  17. J. J. P. Jansen, F. A. J. Van den Bosch, and H. W. Volberda, "Managing potential and realized absorptive capacity: How do organizational antecedent's matter?," Academy of Management Journal, Vol.48, No.6, pp.999-1015, 2005. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2005.19573106
  18. F. T. Rothaermel and D. L. Deeds, "Exploration and exploitation alliances in biotechnology: A system of new product development," Strategic Management Journal, Vol.25, No.3, pp.201-221, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.376
  19. J. S. Sidhu, H. W. Volberda, and H. R. Commandeur, "Exploring exploration orientation and its determinants: Some empirical evidence," Journal of Management Studies, Vol.41, No.6, pp.913-932, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2004.00460.x
  20. N. Siggelkow and D. A. Levinthal, "Temporarily divide to conquer: Centralized, decentralized, and reintegrated organizational approaches to exploration and adaptation," Organization Science, Vol.14, No.6, pp.650-669, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.14.6.650.24840
  21. M. L. Tushman and P. Anderson, "Technological discontinuities and organizational environments," Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol.31, No.3, pp.439-465, 1986. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392832
  22. R. Singleton and B. C. Straits. Approaches to social research. New York: Oxford University Press, 2010.
  23. M. Gittelman, "A Note on the Value of Patents as Indicators of Innovation: Implications for Management Research," Academy of Management Perspectives, Vol.22, No.3, pp.21-27, 2008.
  24. W. Cohen, R. Nelson, and J. Walsh, Protecting their intellectual assets: Appropriability conditions and why U.S. manufacturing firms patent (or not). NBER. Cambridge, MA. 2000.
  25. V. J. Duriau, R. K. Reger, and M.D. Pfaffer, "A content analysis of the content analysis literature in organization studies-Research themes, data sources, and methodological refinements," Organizational Research Methods, Vol.10, No.1, pp.5-34, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428106289252
  26. I. Palmer, B. Kabanoff, and R. Dunford, "Managerial accounts of downsizing," Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol.18, pp.623-639, 1997. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(199711)18:1+<623::AID-JOB909>3.0.CO;2-T
  27. C, Fombrun and M. Shanley, "What's in a name-reputation building and corporate strategy," Academy of Management Journal, Vol.33, No.2, pp.233-258, 1990. https://doi.org/10.2307/256324
  28. P. C. Tetlock, M. Saar-Tsechansky, and S. Macskassy, "More than words: Quantifying language to measure firms' fundamentals," Journal of Finance, Vol.63, No.3, pp.1437-1467, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2008.01362.x
  29. P. Ming, "Thriving in the New: Implication of Exploration on Organizational Longevity," Journal of Management, Vol.36, No.6, pp.1529-1554, 2010.
  30. N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln, Handbook of qualitative research, Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage Publications. 1994.
  31. G. Deffner, "Microcomputers as aids in GOTTSCHALK-GLESER ratings," Psychiatry Research, Vol.18, No.2, pp.151-159, 1986. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1781(86)90027-2
  32. R. P. Weber, Basic content analysis, Newbury Park, Calif.: Sage Publications. 1990.
  33. S. D. Rosenberg, P. P. Schnurr, and T. E. Oxman, "Content analysis: A comparison of manual and computerized systems. Journal of Personality Assessment," Vol.54, No.1, pp.298-310, 1990. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa5401&2_28
  34. P. Warwick, N. Mercer, R. Kershner, and J. K. Staarman, "In the mind and in the technology: The vicarious presence of the teacher in pupil's learning of science in collaborative group activity at the interactive whiteboard," Computers in Education, Vol.55, No.1, pp.350-362, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.02.001
  35. 대맹, 강호정, "중국기업의 사회적 책임이 기업 가치에 미치는 영향", 한국콘텐츠학회논문지, 제13권, 제12호, pp.422-427, 2013. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2013.13.12.422