Journal of dental hygiene science (치위생과학회지)

The Korean Society of Dental Hygiene Science (한국치위생과학회)
권호 표지

Evaluation of Dimensional Stability of Digital Dental Model Fabricated by Impression Scanning Method

인상 스캐닝 방법에 의해 제작된 디지털 치과 모형의 체적 안정성 평가

  • Kim, Jae-Hong (Department of Health Science Specialized in Dental Laboratory Science and Engineering, Graduate School, Korea University) ;
  • Kim, Ki-Baek (Department of Health Science Specialized in Dental Laboratory Science and Engineering, Graduate School, Korea University)
  • 김재홍 (고려대학교 일반대학원 보건과학과 치의기공전공) ;
  • 김기백 (고려대학교 일반대학원 보건과학과 치의기공전공)
  • Received : 2014.01.22
  • Accepted : 2014.02.10
  • Published : 2014.03.31
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study in vitro investigation was to evaluate the dimensional stability of dental digital models made by impression scanning method. Twenty working models were produced. Twenty impressions were made from study models. The dimensional stability of models of two groups (stone and digital models) was examined using six landmark distances. Stone models were measured through digital vernier calipers. Digital models were measured by the computer program. Statistical analyses were performed with Wilcoxon rank sum test (${\alpha}=0.05$). The mean of six landmark distances were significantly larger in the stone models than in the digital models (p<0.05) but digital models showed clinically acceptable accuracy.

본 연구에서는 구강으로부터 채득된 인상체를 스캐닝하여 디지털 모형을 제작하였을 때 제작된 디지털 모형의 체적 안정성을 평가하고자 하였다. 그리하여 환자의 구강을 가정한 상악 모형을 본 모형으로 채택하였다. 본 모형과 동일한 증례의 연구 모형을 치과용 석고를 이용하여 총 20개의 석고 모형을 제작하였다. 제작된 연구 모형 20개를 치과용 기성 트레이와 두 종류의 치과용 인상재를 이용하여 20개 연구 모형을 대상으로 20개의 인상을 채득하였다. 채득된 20개의 인상체를 치과용 스캐너로 스캐닝하는 방식으로 디지털 모형으로 변환하였다. 체적 안정성을 평가하기 위하여 6개의 대표 지점을 선정한 뒤 디지털 모형과 함께 디지털 모형의 근간인 석고 모형을 계측하였다. 그 결과 계측된 모든 부위에서 디지털 모형이 석고 모형보다 체적이 작은 것으로 조사되었고, 이는 통계적으로 유의하였다(p<0.05). 이러한 결과들로 추론하여 보았을 때 환자의 구강으로부터 채득된 인상체를 스캐닝하여 제작한 디지털 모형의 체적은 환자의 구강보다 작다는 것을 알 수 있었다. 그러나 이 차이는 미비한 것으로 여러 선행 연구 결과들을 근거로 하였을 때 임상적으로 허용이 가능한 것으로 생각된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Perakis N, Belser U, Magne P: Final impression: a review of aterial properties and description of a current technique. Int J Periodontic Restor Dent 24: 109-117, 2004.
  2. Wettstein F, Sailer I, Roos M, Hammerle C: Clinical study of the internal gaps of zirconia and metal frameworks for fixed partial dentures. Eur J Oral Sci 116: 272-279, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.2008.00527.x
  3. Persson A, Oden A, Andersson M, Sandborgh-Englund G: Digitization of simulated clinical dental impressions: virtual three dimensional analysis of exactness. Dent Mater 25: 929-936, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2009.01.100
  4. Bolton WA: Disharmony in tooth size and its relation to the analysis and treatment of malocclusion. Angle Orthod 28: 113-130, 1958.
  5. McGuinness NJ, Stephens CD: Storage of orthodontic study models in hospital units in the U.K. Br J Orthod 19: 227-232, 1992. https://doi.org/10.1179/bjo.19.3.227
  6. Mah J, Hatcher D: Current status and future needs in craniofacial imaging. Orthod Craniofac Res 6: 10-16, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0544.2003.230.x
  7. White AJ, Fallis DW, Vandewalle KS: Analysis of intra-arch and interarch measurements from digital models with 2 impression materials and a modeling process based on cone-beam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 137: 456.e1-9, 2010.
  8. Redlich M, Weinstock T, Abed Y, Schneor R, Holdstein Y, Fischr A: A new system for scanning, measuring, and analyzing dental casts based on a 3D holographic sensor. Orthod Craniofac Res 11: 90-95, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-6343.2007.00417.x
  9. Leifert MF, Leifert MM, Efstratiadis SS, Cangialosi TJ: Comparison of space analysis evaluations with digital models and plaster dental casts. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 136: 16.e1-e4, 2009.
  10. Dalstra M, Melsn B: From alginate impressions to digital virtual models: accuracy and reproducibility. J Orthod 36: 36-41, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1179/14653120722905
  11. Christensen GJ: The state of fixed prosthodontics impressions: room for improvement. J Am Dent Assoc 136: 343-346, 2006.
  12. American Dental Association: Council on dental materals, ANSI/ADA specification No. 25 for Dental Gypsum Products. American Dental Association, Chicago, pp.640-644, 1987.
  13. Millstein PL: Determining the accuracy of gypsum casts made from type IV dental stone. J Oral Rehabil 19: 239-243, 1992. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.1992.tb01098.x
  14. Custer F, Updegrove L, Ward M: Accuracy and dimensional stability of a silicone rubber base impression material. J Prothet Dent 14: 1115-1121, 1964. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(64)90181-7
  15. Creed B, Chung HK, Jeryl DE, James JX, Lee A: Comparison of the accuracy of linear measurement obtained from cone beam computerized tomography images and digital models. Semin Orthod 17: 49-56, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.sodo.2010.08.010
  16. Lowey MN: The development of a new method of cephalometric and study cast mensuration with a computer controlled, video image capture system. Part II: study cast mensuration. Br J Orthod 20: 315-331, 1993. https://doi.org/10.1179/bjo.20.4.315
  17. Kim KB, Lee GT, Kim HY, Kim JH: The influence of different gypsum materials on the accuracy from complete arch digital impression. J Dent Hyg Sci 12: 617-623, 2012.
  18. Bak SI: The comparison between manual and 3D-digital measurement in dental cast measurements according to the degree of crowding. Unpublished master's thesis, Korea University, Seoul, 2006.
  19. Bell A, Ayoub AF, Siebr P: Assessment of the accuracy of a three-dimensional imaging system for archiving dental study models. J Orthod 30: 219-223, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1093/ortho/30.3.219
  20. Santoro M, Galkin S, Teredesai M, Nicolay OF, Cangialoi TJ: Comparison of measurements made on digital and plaster models. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 124: 101-105, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(03)00152-5
  21. Asquith J, Gillgrass T, Mossy P: Three-dimensional imaging of orthodontic models: a pilot study. Eur J Orthod 29: 517-522, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjm044
  22. Quimby ML, Vig KW, Rashid RG, Firestoe AR: The accuracy and reliability of measurements made on computerbased digital models. Angle Orthod 74: 298-303, 2004.
  23. Bootvong K, Liu Z, McGrath C, et al: Virtual model analysis as an alternative approach to plaster model analysis: reliability and validity. Eur J Orthod 23: 589-595, 2010.
  24. Kim JH, Kim KB: Influence of high temperature of the porcelain firing process on the marginal fit of zirconia core. J Dent Hyg Sci 13: 135-141, 2013.