Aesthetic Considerations after Free Flap Reconstruction

  • Lee, Sang Shin (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Eun Key (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine)
  • Received : 2014.03.17
  • Accepted : 2014.04.30
  • Published : 2014.05.30

Abstract

Purpose: The success rate of free flap operation has shown a recent increase. Especially for breast reconstructive patients, aesthetic results are considered a necessity. However, for patients who underwent reconstruction in parts of the body other than breast, for example, head and neck, lower and upper extremities, aesthetic considerations are underscored. Nowadays, however, aesthetic standpoint toward these patients is changing. Materials and Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of 8 patients who underwent secondary procedures after free flap surgery from March of 2011 to April of 2014. Results: Secondary refinement was a safe and less time-consuming technique for maximizing the function and aesthetic appearance for the patient. Conclusion: Appearance has become increasingly important with regard to function and quality of life. Therefore, for free flap reconstructive patients, secondary refinements may be considered in order to change the shape and contour. The secondary refinements are critical to the final result and must be a planned part of the entire reconstructive sequence.

Keywords

References

  1. Karahangil M, Bingol D, Ozkaya O, Akan IM. Secondary techniques in breast reconstruction refinement: the periareolar advancement flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012;129:1003e.
  2. Haddock NT, Saadeh PB, Siebert JW. Achieving aesthetic results in facial reconstructive microsurgery: planning and executing secondary refinements. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012;130:1236-45. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e31826d16a6
  3. Marek CA, Pu LL. Refinements of free tissue transfer for optimal outcome in lower extremity reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 2004;52:270-5. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sap.0000110482.79996.a6
  4. Bui DT, Mehrara BJ, Disa JJ, Cordeiro PG. Use of liposuction for secondary revision of irradiated and nonirradiated free flaps. Ann Plast Surg 2004;52:541-5. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sap.0000123352.01368.e0
  5. de Souza Pinto EB, Abdala PC, Maciel CM, dos Santos Fde P, de Souza RP. Liposuction and VASER. Clin Plast Surg 2006;33:107-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cps.2005.09.001
  6. Reuben CM, Bastidas N, Sharma S. Power-assisted suction lipectomy of fasciocutaneous flaps in the extremities. Ann Plast Surg 2010;65:60-5. https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0b013e3181c8f4f3
  7. Hui-Chou HG, Sulek J, Bluebond-Langner R, Rodriguez ED. Secondary refinements of free perforator flaps for lower extremity reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011;127:248-57. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181f95b67
  8. Askouni EP, Topping A, Ball S, Hettiaratchy S, Nanchahal J, Jain A. Outcomes of anterolateral thigh free flap thinning using liposuction following lower limb trauma. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2012;65:474-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2011.11.007
  9. Kimata Y, Uchiyama K, Ebihara S, Kishimoto S, Asai M, Saikawa M, et al. Comparison of innervated and noninnervated free flaps in oral reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999;104:1307-13. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199910000-00010