DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

정보윤리 담당교사의 전문성 평가도구 개발

Development of Assessment Tool about Professionalism of the Information Ethics Teachers

  • 김길모 (한국교원대학교 교육연구원) ;
  • 김성수 (한국교원대학교 컴퓨터교육과) ;
  • 김성식 (한국교원대학교 컴퓨터교육과)
  • Kim, Kil-Mo (Education Research Institute, Korea National University of Education) ;
  • Kim, Seong-Soo (Dept. of Computer Education, Korea National University of Education) ;
  • Kim, Seong-Sik (Dept. of Computer Education, Korea National University of Education)
  • 투고 : 2013.08.14
  • 심사 : 2013.12.24
  • 발행 : 2014.03.31

초록

정보화 사회의 발달로 우리의 삶은 더욱더 편리해지고 윤택해졌지만, 반대급부로 역기능이 발생하였다. 이러한 역기능은 특히 10대 청소년들에게 두드러지게 나타나고 있어 그 문제점이 커져만 가고 있다. 이를 해결하기 위해서는 정보윤리교육을 강화해야하는데 교육의 주체인 정보윤리 담당교사의 전문성이 부족한 실정이다. 따라서 본 연구는 정보윤리 담당교사의 전문성 구성요인을 살펴보고 평가도구를 개발하여 체계적이고 전문적인 정보윤리교육의 초석을 놓고자 하였다. 이에 본 연구는 문헌 분석을 통해 정보윤리 담당교사의 전문성 구성 요인을 개발하고, 이것을 바탕으로 예비 문항을 구성한 다음, 전문가 검토를 통해 예비 문항을 정선한 후 사전 검사와 본 검사를 통해 신뢰도와 타당도를 검증하여 최종문항을 개발하였다. 마지막으로 규준표를 작성하여 평가도 구의 활용도를 높임으로서 최종적으로 정보윤리 담당교사의 전문성 평가도구를 완성하였다. 본 평가도구를 통해, 첫째 정보윤리 교사에게 필요한 자질을 제시할 수 있을 것이며, 둘째 정보윤리 담당교사의 역량 배양을 위한 기초 자료로 활용할 수 있을 것이며, 마지막으로 이 평가도구를 통하여 체계적인 정보윤리 담당교사 연수를 위한 교육과정을 제안 할 수 있을 것이다.

As the development of the information society, our lives enriched and became more convenient. However it leads to the dysfunction. These dysfunctions appear especially to teenagers. Information Ethics education should be strengthened in order to solve these problems. However experts in the subject of Information Ethics are lacking. The goal of this study is to find some factors of professionalism of teachers responsible for Information Ethics education and to develop an assessment tool. In this study, we find some factors of professionalism of Information Ethics teachers, make some preliminary questions and select some of them by discussing with experts. Through a preliminary and main inspection we analyze the reliability and validity of the questions and develop the final questions. To practically use the assessment tool, we consisted the standards table. This assessment tool can be used for evaluation an Information Ethics teacher's ability, used as the basic materials for improving it and suggested making some systematic curriculums for teacher's training.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Baek, H.G & Yu, J.S (2012). A Development and Application of Role-Playing Instruction Model based on Mind Practice for Intensifying Information & Communication Ethics. Journal of The Korean Association of information Education, 16-2, 181-188.
  2. Bentler. P. M. & Chou, C-P. (1987). Practical issues in structural modeling. Sociological Methods & Research, 16-1, 78-117. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124187016001004
  3. Devellis, R. F. (2003). Scale Development: Theory and Applications Second Edition (Applied Social Research Methods). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  4. Fu, F. L., Su, R. C., & Yu, S. C. (2009). EGameFlow: A scale to measure learners' enjoyment of e-learning games. Computers & Education, 52-1, 101-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.07.004
  5. Kim, K.M (2012). Development of an Education Counseling System and the Information Ethics Index Based on TPB to Improve the Information Ethics Behavior of Adolescents. Ph. D. Korea National University of Education, Cheongwon.
  6. Kim, K.M & Kim, S.S (2012). The Design of the Prediction Model for Information Ethics Behavior of Adolescents. The Journal of Korean Association of Computer Education, 15-1, 23-31.
  7. Kim, T.H (2013). Computer Education Curricul um and Instruction : The Necessity and Streng thening Plan of Internet Ethics Education in Teacher Training Institutions. The Journal of Korean Association of Computer Education, 16-2, 1-8.
  8. Kim, H.S (2003). Teacher Expertise and Quali ty : Exploration of Concepts and Improvement Strategies. Korean journal of educational resear ch, 41-2, 93-114.
  9. KISA(2011a). Survey on the Internet Usage. Seoul: Korea Internet & Security Agency.
  10. KISA(2011b). Survey on Internet Ethical Culture. Seoul: Korea Internet & Security Agency.
  11. Knag, S.J & Lee, J.R & Kim, T.W & Yu, H.K & Kim, K.M(2013). Development of Smart School model. Sejong: Sejong city office of education.
  12. Kwak, J.E & Jeon, H.S & Kim, K.M & Kim, S.S (2012). Deduction and Verification of Professionalism Constructing Factors of Teachers Responsible for Information Ethics. The Journal of Korean Association of Computer Education, 15-5, 1-10.
  13. Lee, S.M (2006). The Basis of Factor Analysis. Seoul: Kyoyookgwahaksa.
  14. Lee, W.T (2012). A Study on Developing the Scale of Teacher's Professionalism. Ph. D. Dong-A University, Busan.
  15. Leem, S.S(2010). A Study on Reality and Improvement of Information Communication Ethics Education in the 7th Revised National Curriculum. Master's dissertation. Chungbuk National University, Cheongju.
  16. Park, D.S (2006a). Scale Method. Seoul: Kyoyookgwahaksa.
  17. Park, D.S (2006b). How to Create a Question. Seoul: Kyoyookgwahaksa.
  18. Um, M.Y & Cho, S.W (2005). Scale Development in Social Work Practice. Seoul: hakjisa.
  19. Wu. J.P (2012). The Concept and Understanding of Structural Equation Modeling by Professor Wu's. Seoul: Hannarae.

피인용 문헌

  1. Study on Information Ethics Education and Production of Tools in Domestic Early Childhood Education Institutions vol.25, pp.1, 2020, https://doi.org/10.9708/jksci.2020.25.01.221