DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Development and Application of Hydrological Safety Evaluation Guidelines for Agricultural Reservoir with AHP

AHP를 이용한 농업용저수지 수문학적 안전성평가 방법 개발 및 적용

  • Received : 2014.01.10
  • Accepted : 2014.03.17
  • Published : 2014.05.31

Abstract

According to the "Safety Evaluation Detailed Instructions (Dam)", precise safety inspection is carried out for dams that exceed a certain scale. However, as the Hydrological Safety Evaluation from various evaluation standards is designed to evaluate the safety of existing dams considering PMF, the evaluation is much less applicable for most agricultural reservoirs. Therefore, the Hydrological Safety Guidelines for agricultural reservoirs are expected to be re-evaluated considering the diverse risk factors with the coefficient model and AHP in this study. The coefficient model has been developed by selecting the hydrological safety superordinate subordinate evaluation factors to reflect diverse risk factors of agricultural reservoirs. After calculating the sum of indicators score for each evaluation factors, validation procedures were performed for the questionnaire which a panel answered. The practical coefficient has eventually been estimated for the hydrological safety evaluation considering the diverse risk factors. The conclusions acquired based on the study done are that both most agricultural reservoirs were classified as flood defense capability is insufficient and agricultural reservoirs which meet embankment-freeboard standards considering PMF was overestimated.

현재 국내 일정규모 이상 댐들에 대해서는 "안전점검 및 정밀안전진단 세부지침(댐)" 기준에 따라 정밀안전진단을 수행하고 있다. 하지만 여러 평가 기준 중 수문학적 안전성 평가는 가능최대홍수량(Probable Maximum Flood, PMF)에 대한 기존 댐 안전성을 평가하는 것으로 대부분의 농업용저수지에 대해서는 적용성이 많이 떨어진다. 따라서 본 연구에서는 계수화 모델과 AHP 기법을 통해 다각적 위험요인을 고려한 농업용저수지의 수문학적 안전성을 재평가하고자 한다. 이를 위하여 농업용저수지의 다양한 인자를 반영하기 위한 수문학적 안전성 상 하위 평가항목을 선정하여 계수화 모델을 개발하였다. 평가항목 별 지표 점수의 총합을 산출한 후 전문가 집단의 응답에 대한 검증절차를 실시하였고, 평가항목의 가중치를 산정하여 최종적으로 다각적 위험요인을 고려한 농업용저수지의 수문학적 안전성 평가를 위한 실용계수를 산정하였다. 본 연구 결과 기존 평가기준은 댐의 가능최대홍수량에 대한 수문학적 안전성을 평가하는 기준으로 대부분의 농업용저수지에 대해서는 홍수방어능 부족에 따른 제체의 월류로 저수지의 파괴위험성이 큰 것으로 분류되었다. 그리고 가능최대홍수량에 대한 여유고 기준을 만족하는 저수지에 대해서는 댐의 형식 및 상태별 여유고에 대한 평가만으로 필댐을 평가하는 것으로 나타났다.

Keywords

References

  1. American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE). (1988). Evaluation Procedures for Hydrologic Safety of Dams, 978-0-87262-652-2/ 0-87262-652-0, Task Committee on Spillway Design Flood Selection of the Committee on Surface Water Hydrology of the Hydraulics Division, New York, pp.107.
  2. Australian National Committee on Large Dams (ANCOLD). (2000). Guidelines on Assessment of the Consequences of Dam Failure, ANCOLD, Tasmania.
  3. Bang, DS (2009). A study on evaluation guideline of hydrological safety for dam considering potential hazard of downstream, Master's Thesis, University of Seoul, Seoul, Korea. [Korean literature]
  4. Choi, JY (1996). The Development of a Comprehensive Water Quality Indicators, 1996-RE-10, KETRI. [Korean literature]
  5. Kim, HD (2009). Study on the Priority Decision for the Redevelopment of Agricultural Reservoirs, Ph.D Thesis, Konkuk University, Seoul, Korea. [Korean literature]
  6. Kim, SW (2010). Analysis on hydrologic stability of agricultural reservoir using probable maximum flood, Master's Thesis, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju, Korea. [Korean literature]
  7. Korea Forest Conservation Association (KFCA). (2005). A Report of Development and improvement of forest health monitoring indicators and standards Classification Alternative, KFCA. [Korean literature]
  8. Korea Hydro & Nuclear Power Corporation (KHNP). (2007). Research of Hydrological Safety Evaluation Guidelines Regarding Overflow of Dams, KHNP. [Korean literature]
  9. Korea Maritime institute (KMI). (2007). Development of Coastal Research Index System, KMI.. [Korean literature]
  10. Korea Rural Community Corporation (KRC). (2010). A Report of Existing Reservoir Hydrological Research Support Project, KRC. [Korean literature]
  11. Ministry for Food Agriculture Forestry and Fisheries (MIFAFF). (2011). Maintenance Regulation of Agricultural Production Infrastructure, MIFAFF. [Korean literature]
  12. Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry (MIAF). (2002). Design Guidelines of Agricultural Production Infrastructure Maintenance Business(Fill Dam), MIAF. [Korean literature]
  13. Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry (MIAF). (2003). Revised Design Guidelines of Irrigation Facilities for Disaster Preparedness, 13, MAF. [Korean literature]
  14. Ministry of Land Transport and Maritime Affairs (MLTMA). (2009). Safety Evaluation Detailed Instructions (Dam), MLTMA. [Korean literature]
  15. Rural Development Corporation (RDC). (1999). Overview of Agricultural Production Infrastructure Maintenance Business, RDC. [Korean literature]
  16. Sung, GY (2010). Vision-based Terrain Classification Technique for Autonomous Off-road Navigation of Unmanned Vehicles, Ph.D Thesis, Chungnam National University, Daejon, Korea. [Korean literature]
  17. Yang, SM (2010). Development of Simplified Assesment Method for Hydrologic Safety Evaluation of Small Scale Reservoir, Master's Thesis, Joongbu University, Geumsan-Gun, Korea. [Korean literature]
  18. Yi, JE and Nam (2007). Determination of Hydrologic Stability Increase Alternative for Andong Multi-Purpose Reservoir Using Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, The Korea Spatial Planning Review, 53, pp. 93-110. [Korean literature] https://doi.org/10.15793/kspr.2007.53..006
  19. Yoon, MS and Lee, KH (2003). A Study on the Awareness of the Yearly Income System among Dental Personnels, J. of Dental Hygiene Science, 5(3), pp. 5-10. [Korean literature]

Cited by

  1. Development of Evaluation Items and Indicators for Hydrological Safety on Agricultural Reservoir vol.16, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.17663/JWR.2014.16.4.403
  2. Weighting assessment on evaluation indicators of dam rehabilitation using the AHP analysis vol.49, pp.5, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3741/JKWRA.2016.49.5.381
  3. Development of Hydrological Safety Evaluation Model for Agricultural Reservoir vol.17, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.17663/JWR.2015.17.2.130
  4. Dam Rehabilitation Assessment Using the Delphi-AHP Method for Adapting to Climate Change vol.144, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000877