DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Perforator Flaps after Excision of Large Epidermal Cysts in the Buttocks

  • Kim, Sang Wha (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine) ;
  • Yang, Seong Hyeok (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Hanyang University College of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Jeong Tae (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Hanyang University College of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Youn Hwan (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Hanyang University College of Medicine)
  • Received : 2013.06.13
  • Accepted : 2013.08.05
  • Published : 2014.03.15

Abstract

Background Epidermal cysts are commonly occurring masses usually less than 5 cm in diameter, but in predisposed patients, epidermal cysts can grow relatively large due to chronic infection. Methods From June 2002 to July 2010, 17 patients received 19 regional perforator-based island flaps to cover defects due to the excision of large epidermal cysts (diameter >5 cm) in the buttocks. Eight patients had diabetes, and seven had rheumatoid arthritis. The pedicles were not fully isolated to prevent spasms or twisting. Results All the flaps survived completely, except for one case with partial necrosis of the flap, which necessitated another perforator-based island flap for coverage. There were two cases of wound dehiscence, which were reclosed after meticulous debridement. There were no recurrences of the masses during follow-up periods of 8.1 months (range, 6-12 months). Conclusions In patients with large epidermal cysts and underlying medical disorders, regional perforator-based island flaps can be the solution to coverage of the defects after excision.

Keywords

References

  1. Takemura N, Fujii N, Shibata C, et al. Fluid-fluid level in a giant epidermal cyst of the buttock. J Dermatol 2007;34:193-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1346-8138.2007.00248.x
  2. Yamamoto T, Nishikawa T, Fujii T, et al. A giant epidermoid cyst demonstrated by magnetic resonance imaging. Br J Dermatol 2001;144:217-8. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2133.2001.03997.x
  3. Golshan Momeni M, Anavim A, Lin F, et al. Giant epidermal inclusion cyst of buttock. Skeletal Radiol 2006;35:864-6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-006-0098-0
  4. El Alami M, Ghufoor K, Dilkes M. Laser marsipulization of epidermal cysts: avoiding linear scars. J Clin Laser Med Surg 2003;21:161-3. https://doi.org/10.1089/104454703321895626
  5. Funayama E, Oyama A, Furukawa H, et al. A new modified technique for removing epidermal cysts using a trepan in one stage with a smaller postoperative scar and no recurrence. Dermatol Surg 2010;36:2050-2. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4725.2010.01774.x
  6. Lee HE, Yang CH, Chen CH, et al. Comparison of the surgical outcomes of punch incision and elliptical excision in treating epidermal inclusion cysts: a prospective, randomized study. Dermatol Surg 2006;32:520-5.
  7. Wu H, Wang S, Wu L, et al. A new procedure for treating a sebaceous cyst: removal of the cyst content with a laser punch and the cyst wall with a minimal postponed excision. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2009;33:597-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-009-9331-2
  8. Nakamura M. Treating a sebaceous cyst: an incisional technique. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2001;25:52-6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002660010095
  9. Schoeller T, Wechselberger G, Otto A, et al. Definite surgical treatment of complicated recurrent pilonidal disease with a modified fasciocutaneous V-Y advancement flap. Surgery 1997;121:258-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0039-6060(97)90354-8
  10. Sungur N, Kocer U, Uysal A, et al. V-Y rotation advancement fasciocutaneous flap for excisional defects of pilonidal sinus. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006;117:2448-54. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000219170.74059.94
  11. Rosen W, Davidson JS. Gluteus maximus musculocutaneous flap for the treatment of recalcitrant pilonidal disease. Ann Plast Surg 1996;37:293-7. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000637-199609000-00010
  12. Onishi K, Maruyama Y. Sacral adipofascial turn-over flap for the excisional defect of pilonidal sinus. Plast Reconstr Surg 2001;108:2006-10. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-200112000-00026
  13. Basterzi Y, Canbaz H, Aksoy A, et al. Reconstruction of extensive pilonidal sinus defects with the use of S-GAP flaps. Ann Plast Surg 2008;61:197-200. https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0b013e3181587a06
  14. Lee SR, Kim DA, Oh SH. Reconstruction of the recurrent ischial sore with modified gluteus maximus myocutaneous V-Y advancement flap. J Korean Soc Plast Reconstr Surg 2009;36:714-9.
  15. Koshima I, Moriguchi T, Soeda S, et al. The gluteal perforator-based flap for repair of sacral pressure sores. Plast Reconstr Surg 1993;91:678-83. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199304000-00017
  16. Kim YH, Naidu S, Kim CY, et al. A perforator solution for excisional defects of pilonidal sinus. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2011;64:138-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2010.05.021
  17. Kim JT, Kim YH, Naidu S. Perfecting the design of the gluteus maximus perforator-based island flap for coverage of buttock defects. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010;125:1744-51. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181cb675f

Cited by

  1. Keystone-design perforator island flaps for the management of complicated epidermoid cysts on the back vol.9, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-51289-4
  2. Outcomes of the keystone perforator island flap for oncologic reconstruction of the back vol.124, pp.7, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.26629