참고문헌
- Kravitz RL, Franks P, Feldman MD, et al. Editorial peer reviewers' recommendations at a general medical journal: are they reliable and do editors care? PLoS One 2010;5:e10072. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0010072
- Kachewar SG, Sankaye SB. Reviewer index: a new proposal of rewarding the reviewer. Mens Sana Monogr 2013;11:274-84. https://doi.org/10.4103/0973-1229.109347
- Steinhauser G, Adlassnig W, Risch JA, et al. Peer review versus editorial review and their role in innovative science. Theor Med Bioeth 2012;33:359-76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11017-012-9233-1
- Merton RK. The Matthew effect in science: the reward and communication systems of science are considered. Science 1968;159:56-63. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.159.3810.56
- Epstude K, Mussweiler T. What you feel is how you compare: how comparisons influence the social induction of affect. Emotion 2009;9:1-14. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014148
- Hwang K. The need for a reviewer to play Devil's advocate. Arch Plast Surg 2013;40:171-2. https://doi.org/10.5999/aps.2013.40.3.171
피인용 문헌
- ‘Scholarly peer reviewing’: The art, its joys and woes vol.59, pp.8, 2014, https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5049.162981