Journal of Korean Society of Transportation (대한교통학회지)

Korean Society of Transportation (대한교통학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

An Analysis of Access Travel Behavior to Shopping Facilities and Policy Implications Related to the Types of Shopping Facilities: Case Study in Suwon, Korea

쇼핑시설 유형별 이용자의 통행행태 차이 분석과 정책적 제언: 수원시를 대상으로

  • Lee, Kyu Jin (TOD-based Sustainable City Transportation Research Center, Ajou University) ;
  • Lee, Moon Young (TOD-based Sustainable City Transportation Research Center, Ajou University) ;
  • Choi, Keechoo (Department of Transportation System Engineering, Ajou University) ;
  • Park, Sungjin (Department of Urban Design and Planning, Hongik University)
  • 이규진 (아주대학교 TOD기반 지속가능 도시.교통연구센터) ;
  • 이문영 (아주대학교 TOD기반 지속가능 도시.교통연구센터) ;
  • 최기주 (아주대학교 교통시스템공학과) ;
  • 박성진 (홍익대학교 도시공학과)
  • Received : 2013.08.30
  • Accepted : 2014.03.25
  • Published : 2014.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The objective of this study is to analyze the travel behaviors of customers accessing to three different types of shopping facilities - traditional markets(TM), hyper markets(HM), and super supermarkets(SSM) - and also to find out the most desirable location for each type of shopping facilities that encourage sustainable transportation and smart urban growth. It also demonstrates what mode has the highest percentage of modal split and what is the access distance for public transport mode by each shopping facilities (SSM: 84.5% walking and 667m, TM: 20.1% bus and 1.6km, HM : 46.2% private car and 4.2km). Among TM, HM, and SSM, statistically significant differences are found in terms of mode choices and other associated travel behaviors. The research findings are expected to contribute to finding future urban planning and transportation solutions that promote walking and public transit uses for shopping trips and thus help support green transportation and sustainable urban growth.

본 연구는 기업형 슈퍼마켓(Super Supermarket: SSM), 재래시장, 대형마트 이용자의 통행행태와 접근수단별 이용권역을 비교 분석하고, 쇼핑시설에 대해 도시 교통 측면에서 고려해야 할 시사점 도출을 목적으로 한다. 각 쇼핑시설별로 가장 높은 분담율을 보이는 수단의 경우, SSM은 보행(84.5%), 재래시장은 버스(20.1%), 대형마트는 승용차(46.2%)인 것으로 나타났으며, 대중교통수단의 이용권역의 경우 SSM은 667m, 재래시장은 1.6km, 대형마트는 4.2km인 것으로 나타났다. 본 연구를 통해 SSM, 재래시장, 대형마트 이용자들의 선호 교통수단 및 통행특성은 통계적으로 뚜렷한 차이가 있다는 것을 확인하였으며, 이들의 고유 통행 특성에 대한 이해를 바탕으로 보행과 대중교통 이용 편의성을 증진시키기 위한 녹색교통 중심의 도시계획 설계에 기여할 것으로 기대된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Acker V. V., Witlox F. (2011), Commuting Trips within Tours: How is Commuting Related to Land Use?, Transportation, 38(3), 465-486. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-010-9309-6
  2. Agrawal A. W., Schlossberg M., Irvin K. (2008), How Far, by Which Route and Why? A Spatial Analysis of Pedestrian Preference. J. Urban Des., 13(1), 81-98. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574800701804074
  3. Cao X. J., Xu Z., Douma F. (2012), The Interactions between E-shopping and Traditional In-store Shopping: An Application of Structural Equations Model, Transportation, 39(5), 957-974. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-011-9376-3
  4. Cervero R. (2007), Transit Oriented Development's Ridership Bonus: A Product of Self-selection and Public Policies, Environ. and Plan. A, 39(9), 2068-2085. https://doi.org/10.1068/a38377
  5. Cheon G. S. (2004), A Study on the Effects of Attributes in Retail Selection of Consumers: Focused on the Comparison in Retail, A doctoral Thesis of Jeonju University, 100-128.
  6. Choi C. G., Lim D. I. (2008), Using Patterns of Leisure and Shopping Facilities by Life Style as well as household Income, J. Korean Urban Management Association, 21(2), 348-369.
  7. Choung E. H., Noh S. H. (2000), Location Large Discount Store and Difference of accessibility to Daily Shopping Place, J. Korean Geographical Society Association, 35(4), 585-598.
  8. Kim D. K., Ahn K. H. (2004), Impacts of Discount Stores on Shopping Behavior and Spacial in New Town, J. Korea Planners Association, 39(1), 33-44.
  9. Kim H. J. (1996), A Study on Pass-by Trips of Shopping Centers, J. Korea Planners Association, 25, 79-90.
  10. Kim S. G. (2006), Travel Demand and Transportation Cost of Household According to Accessibility to Public Transport and to Service Facilities, J. Korean Soc. Transp., 24(6), 65-74.
  11. Kim T. Y., Jang C. H. (1997), A study on the Function of Traditional Markets in Urban Spatial Structure: The Case Study of Taegu City, J. Korea Planners Association, 32(3), 87-105.
  12. Oh Y. P., Ahn Y. J. (2005), A Study on Characteristics of Purchasing Choice Behavior and its Model Establishment, J. Korean Urban Management Association, 18(3), 97-118.
  13. Park K. M. (2011), Influences of User and Spatial Characteristics on Behavior of Shopping and Leisure Facilities, Master's Thesis of Hanyang University.
  14. Seo M. H., Kim S. Y. (2011), An Analysis on the Relationship between Planning Elements of Urban Form and Travel Behavior Characteristics, J. Korea Planners Association, 46(4), 223-243.
  15. Shin K. S., Sung H. G. (2011), Analysis on the Structural Impact of Choice Factors for Shopping Behavior on Walking Activity and Its Comparison with Commuting Behavior, J. Korea Planners Association, 46(5), 249-260.
  16. Simma A., Axhausen K. W. (2001), Successive Days, Related Travel Behaviour?, IVT ETHZ.
  17. Sung H. G., Shin K. S., Rho J. H. (2008), Impacts of the Type and Location of Shopping and Leisure Facilities on Travel Mode Choice, J. Korea Planners Association, 43(5), 107-121.
  18. Yun K. S., Kim K. H., Kim K. S. (1996), Modelling the Choice Behavior of Shopping Destination and Travel Mode, J. Korea Planners Association, 31(5), 253-266.

Cited by

  1. How Does the Opening of Complex Urban Entertainment Centers Affect a Nearby Retail Trading Area? : Focused on Onemount and Starfield in Goyang City vol.55, pp.5, 2020, https://doi.org/10.17208/jkpa.2020.10.55.5.70