Journal of Digital Convergence (디지털융복합연구)

The Society of Digital Policy and Management (한국디지털정책학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Comparative analysis of cultural power as a soft power among national power

국력요소 중, 소프트파워로서의 문화경쟁력 비교분석 연구

  • Choi, Chang-Hyun (Dept. of Public Administration, Kwandong University) ;
  • Park, Jeong-Bae (Dept. of Public performance Management, Chungwoon University) ;
  • Kim, Jong-Geun (Dept. of Public Policy and IT, Seoul National University of Science & Technology)
  • 최창현 (관동대학교 행정학과) ;
  • 박정배 (청운대학교 공연기획경영학과) ;
  • 김종근 (서울과학기술대학교 IT정책대학원)
  • Received : 2014.04.20
  • Accepted : 2014.06.20
  • Published : 2014.06.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In this study, we performed an empirical research on how cultural power affects soft power as one of the elements of National Power. To fully exert the force of cultural power, appropriate level of "resources for power" need to be disseminated into cultural elements. Utilization of these resources need to appropriately developed and produced in quality and quantity when needed. This activity should be ensured with "composite support competence"; which is the combination of support organizations and their potentials. Indicators of cultural power includes society favorability rating, cultural favorability rating, E&D industry competitiveness index, and T&T competitiveness index. According to analysis of cultural power by each country, cultural industry (E&D) competitiveness index and travel and tourism (T&T) competitiveness index shows relatively high correlation. This research aims to analyze the "cultural power as soft power" of South Korea, China and US, and how they are different and how their resources of power are represented in their E&D and T&T competitiveness.

본 연구에서는 문화력이 국력요소인 소프트파워에 어떤 영향을 미치고 있는지를 경험적 연구를 통해 살펴보았다. 문화력을 발휘하기 위해서는 문화적 국력요소에 대한 적절한 수준의 자원을 가지고 있어야 하고, 이의 활용을 통해 자원이 필요할 때 필요한 질과 양만큼 개발 생산하여 확보할 수 있는 역량을 갖추고 있어야 하며, 그런 자원들을 개발 생산, 확보하는 제반주체들의 활동이 원활히 발휘되도록 돕는 제반지원능력, 즉 복합지원역량으로 나타나야 한다. 문화력의 지표는 국민호감도, 문화호감도, 문화산업 경쟁력 지수, 체육경쟁력 지수, 관광 경쟁력 지수 등을 포함한다. 각 국가들의 문화력을 분석한 결과, 각 국가들의 문화산업 경쟁력과 여행 및 관광 경쟁력의 요소들이 비교적 높은 상관관계를 나타내었다. 따라서 본 연구에서는 '소프트파워로서의 문화력' 부문에서 한국 중국 미국 간 문화산업과 여행 및 관광 경쟁력 측면에서 요소 지표를 분석하여보고 문화차이 등 자원의 발휘를 고찰하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. Library of National Assembly, A Glance of China's Soft Power, p7, 2010. 01.
  2. Jeseph S. Nye Jr.(1991) Bound to Lead: The Changing Nature of American Power.
  3. Jeseph S. Nye Jr.(2004) Soft Power. SuWeon, Hong. . Sejong Institute.
  4. SetByol, Choi.MyoungJin, Lee.(2012.03), Basic Research for Constituting the South Korean Society's Cultural Capital Topographic Map :Based on Culture and Art Activities and Music Genre, Volume 13, No 1: 61-87
  5. SungDon, Whang, Study on the measurement of Total National Power- Focusing on education and science technology, 2009
  6. SungDon, Hwang, ChangHyun, Choi.(2014..02), What extent is our National Power positioned to?, Hansun Foundation.
  7. Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism(2012.1), Creative development strategies of traditional culture - the popularization and modernization and globalization.
  8. Korea Culture & Content Agency(2013.11). Development and characteristics of the UK creative industries Policy, KOOCA Focus, 2013-08(Vol 74),
  9. Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism(2010.11), Survey Report of traditional and cultural industries- Basic research for comprehensive development plan.
  10. http:biz.chosun.com/site/data/html_dir/2011/09/15/
  11. YeonWoo, Lee, JeonGeun, Park, ICT and National Competitiveness: hard power, soft power, and smart power strategy, IT Policy Research Series, No. 24(2010.12), National Information Society Agency.
  12. New culture marketing of K-POP, wwwthekian,net 2011.04.05.
  13. KyuSang, Seul.(2009.6). Soft power theory and foreign development assistance in China : Focus on meaning and evaluation of development assistance towards Southeast Asia. Kangwon National Univ. Social Science Research Vol. 48, No. 1
  14. Ho-jun, Kim(2009.2). Evaluation of China national power, Volume 16, No. 3 politics, Korea Political Science Review.
  15. TaeHo, Kim, A new area of Chinese Foreign study, Nanam publisher.
  16. WookYeon, Lee.(2009.2). China's cultural superpower strategy: the impact on its content and focusing on Korea. Dong-A Research Vol.56.
  17. JongHo, Shin.(2009.3). Deployment of China's soft power diplomacy and International political implications : National strategy. Vol.15, No.1
  18. Guangming Daily(2008.10.19). China, Cultivating the cultural industry and strengthen of soft power.
  19. SoRi, Maeng(2009.12), The creative Industry as driving forces of China economic industries, China Business Focus Issue No. 09-43.
  20. Yonhap News(2009.7.23). Investment Limit expansion of foreign capital in the cultural industry, Korea Culture and Tourism Institute (2008).
  21. Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism (2009.9). 2008 White Paper on Cultural Industries.
  22. MinSuk, Kang, InKyu, Kim, JeaMin, Lee(2009.11). The present status and plan of market entry in China content industry. KOCCA FOCUS 09-10.
  23. MunhwaIlbo(2009.5.1.). China's Foreign diplomacy and Confucius Institute.
  24. YongHo, Park, YeunSun, Hur(2008.3). United States Policy for African future prospects and strengthening trends. KIEP Regional Economic Focus Vol. 2, No. 3.
  25. WooHwan, Chung.(2008.7). Present statue and Insights for expanding in Africa of China & India Institute of International Trade
  26. Jeseph S. Nye Jr.(2004) Soft Power : The Means to Succeed in World Politics.
  27. SangBae, Kim(2009.9), Critical Understanding of the Concept of Smart Power : A Perspective of Middle-Power's Network Power. International Politics Vol 49-4
  28. http://ko.wikipedia.org/wiki/%EB%AF%B8%EA%B5%AD%EB%AC%B8%ED%99%94
  29. http://ko.wikipedia.org/wiki/%EB%AF%B8%EA%B5%AD_%EC%9A%94%EB%A6%AC
  30. Institute for International Trade(2009.06), International Trade Report
  31. SunJeong, Kim.(2009.6). Export status, and activated scheme in culture content industries.
  32. Korea Culture & Content Agency(2004). Comparative analysis of the competitiveness between Korean, China and Japan in cultural contents industry.
  33. KiYoung, Kwon.(2008.2.25.). World-wide strategy of China-Wave(Hwaryu) by public-private coalition. Dong-A monthly Magazine Volume 581.
  34. ManSuk, Kang.MinKyu, Kim.JeaMin, Lee.(2009.11). Status, and market advance scheme to china content industry. KOCCA FOCUS09-10.
  35. Weekly Chosun(2012.12.2.) Cultural Poweras of Soft Power, News.
  36. People's Forum Academic Frontier(2009.9.16.) Research Development of China's cultural industry.
  37. KyuDeuk, Whang.(2008.9). Future prospects, and strategy for energy security of the United States and China towards Africa. Institute of Foreign Affairs and National security.
  38. YeongHo, Park, YunSeun, Hur.(2008.3), Trends, and future prospects to strengthen US Policy towards Africa. Volume 2, No. 3, local economy focus, KIEP.
  39. KiJeong, Kim, JaHyun, Chun.(2009). China's resource diplomacy between bilateralism and multilateralism : Comparison with China's resource diplomacy to Central Asia and Africa.
  40. The Asia Economy Daily(2009.11.9). China, aggressive assistance to Africa region, News
  41. The kukmin Ilbo(2013.10.07), [Yeoido Forum] Korean Wave, Soft Power, and Public diplomacy, News.
  42. HyunGon, Kim, Social Collaboration Paradigm and Digital Cooperation Government in the Web2.0 Era, NIA-II-PER-09075
  43. DongSung, Cho, WheiChang, Moon, IPS Natinal Competitiveness Research 2012: theory & application
  44. Chinese Academy of Social Science, Research for Total National Power, 2006
  45. IMD (International Institute for Management Development), (2013), World Competitiveness Index
  46. WEF (World Economic Forum), (2013), Global Competitiveness Index