DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A probabilistic analytical seismic vulnerability assessment framework for substandard structures in developing countries

  • Kyriakides, Nicholas (Department of Civil and Structural Engineering, University of Sheffield, Sir Frederick Mappin Building) ;
  • Ahmad, Sohaib (Department of Civil and Structural Engineering, University of Sheffield, Sir Frederick Mappin Building) ;
  • Pilakoutas, Kypros (Department of Civil and Structural Engineering, University of Sheffield, Sir Frederick Mappin Building) ;
  • Neocleous, Kyriacos (Department of Civil and Structural Engineering, University of Sheffield, Sir Frederick Mappin Building) ;
  • Chrysostomou, Christis (Present Address: Cyprus University of Technology, Department of Civil Engineering and Geomatics)
  • Received : 2013.07.24
  • Accepted : 2014.02.28
  • Published : 2014.06.25

Abstract

This paper presents a framework for analytical seismic vulnerability assessment of substandard reinforced concrete (RC) structures in developing countries. Amodified capacity-demand diagram method is used to predict the response of RC structures with degrading behaviour. A damage index based on period change is used to quantify the evolution of damage. To demonstrate the framework, a class of substandard RC buildings is examined. Abrupt accumulation of damage is observed due to the brittle failure modes and this is reflected in the developed vulnerability curves, which differ substantially from the curves of ductile structures.

Keywords

References

  1. A.N.Associates (2006a), "Structural stability evaluation Al-Jameel plaza Mansehra road, Abbottabad".
  2. A.N.Associates (2006b), "Structural Stability Evaluation Riaz plaza Mansehra road, Mandian , Abbottabad".
  3. Ahmad, S. (2011), "Seismic vulnerability of non-ductile reinforced concrete structures in developing countries", Ph.D. thesis, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield.
  4. Ahmed, M. (2006), "Earthquake loss estimation and structural vulnerability assessment for Greater Cairo", PhD Thesis, Imperial College of Science and Technology, London.
  5. Ambraseys, N.N. (2002), "Engineering Seismology in Europe", 12th European Conference on Earthquake Engineering, London, September.
  6. ATC-40 (1996), Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Concrete Buildings. Publication of Applied Technology Council, Redwood City, California.
  7. Borzi, B., Pinho, R. and Crowley, H. (2008), "Simplified pushover-based vulnerability analysis for largescale assessment of RC buildings", Eng. Struct., 30(3), 804-820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2007.05.021
  8. Calvi, G.M. (1999), "A displacement-based approach for vulnerability evaluation of classes of buildings", Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 3(3), 411-438.
  9. Calvi, G.M., Pinho, R. and Crowley, H. (2006), "State-of-the-knowledge on the period elongation of RC buildings during strong ground shaking", First European Conference on Earthquake Engineering and Seismology. Geneva.
  10. CEDIM-ANNUAL-REPORT-2011 (2012). Focus on flood hazards in a changing climate. In: PROF-DRFRIEDEMANN-WENZEL.
  11. Celik, O.C. and Ellingwood, B.R. (2008), "Modeling beam-column joints in fragility assessment of gravity load designed reinforced concrete frames", J. Earthq. Eng., 12 (3), 357-381. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632460701457215
  12. Chaudat, T., Garnier, C., Cvejic, S., Poupin, S., Lecorre, M. and Mahe, M. (2005), Seismic Tests on a Reinforced Concrete Bare Frame with FRP retrofitting, Test Report. Ecoleader project No 2.
  13. Chopra, A.K. and Goel, R.K. (1999), "Capacity-demand-diagram methods based on inelastic design spectrum", Earthq. Spectra, 15(4), 637-655. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1586065
  14. Crowley, H., Borzi, B., Pinho, R., Colombi, M. and Onida, M. (2008), "Comparison of Two Mechanics-Based Methods for Simplified Structural Analysis in Vulnerability Assessment", Adv. Civil Eng., 2008.
  15. Crowley, H., Pinho, R. and Bommer, J. (2004), "A probabilistic displacement-based vulnerability assessment procedure for earthquake loss estimation", Bull. Earthq. Eng., 2(2), 173-219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-004-2290-8
  16. Dipasquale, E. and Cakmak, A.S. (1988), Identification of the serviceability limit state and detection of seismic structural damage, Report NCEER-88-0022, National Centre for Earthquake Engineering Research. State University of New York at Buffalo, NY.
  17. Dymiotis, C. (2000), "Probabilistic seismic assessment of reinforced concrete buildings with and without masonry infill walls", PhD Thesis, Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, London.
  18. EC8 (2004), Design of structures for earthquake resistance-Part 1 General rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings, CEN, Brussels, Belgium.
  19. Elnashai, A.S. (1999), "The North Athens (Greece) Earthquake of 7 September 1999. Analytical Studies of Structural Response", Technical Report, Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, London.
  20. Erberik, M.A. (2008), "Fragility-based assessment of typical mid-rise and low-rise RC buildings in Turkey", Engineering Structures, 30(5), 1360-1374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2007.07.016
  21. Erberik, M.A. and Elnashai, A.S. (2005), "Seismic Vulnerability of Flat Slab Structures", Technical Report. Mid America Earthquake Centre, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
  22. European Macroseismic Scale (Ems) (1998), Centre Europeen de Geondynamique et de Seismologie, Luxembourg.
  23. Fajfar, P. and Gaspersic, P. (1996), "The N2 method for the seismic damage analysis of RC buildings", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 25(1), 31-46. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199601)25:1<31::AID-EQE534>3.0.CO;2-V
  24. FEMA356 (2000), Prestandard and Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington DC, USA.
  25. FEMA440 (2005), Improvement of nonlinear static seismic analysis procedures. Applied Technology Council (ATC-55 Project), Redwood City, California, USA.
  26. Franchin, P., Lupoi, A., Pinto, P.E. and Schotanus, M.I.J. (2003), "Sesimic Fragility of Reinforced Concrete Structures Using a Response Surface Approach, J. Earthq. Eng., 7 (Special Issue 1), 45-77.
  27. Gardoni, P., Mosalam, K.M. and Derkiureghian, A. (2003), "Probabilistic seismic demand models and fragility estimates for RC bridges", J. Earthq. Eng., 7(1), 79-106.
  28. Ghobarah, A., Aboulelfath, H. and Biddah, A. (1999), "Response-based damage assessment of structures", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 28(1), 79-104. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199901)28:1<79::AID-EQE805>3.0.CO;2-J
  29. HAZUS (1999), "Earthquake loss estimation methodology". Technical manual. Report prepared for the Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington D.C. under a contract with NIBS, USA.
  30. Kappos, A.J., Panagopoulos, G., Panagiotopoulos, C.H. and Penelis, G.G. (2006), "A hybrid method for the vulnerability assessment of R/C and URM buildings", Bull. Earthq. Eng., 4(4), 391-413. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-006-9023-0
  31. Kyriakides, N. (2008), "Seismic Vulnerability Assessment of RC Buildings and Risk Assessment For Cyprus", PhD thesis, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield.
  32. Kyriakides, N., Pilakoutas, K. and Ahmad, S. (2012), "Vulnerability curves for RC substandard buildings", 15th World Conference of Earthquake Engineering, Lisbon, 24-28 September.
  33. Lang, K. (2002), "Seismic vulnerability of existing buildings", PhD thesis, Swiss Fedearal Institute of Technology, Zurich.
  34. Mckay, M., Conover, W. and Beckman, R. (1979), "A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code", Technometrics, 21(2), 239-245.
  35. Mosalam, K., Ayala, G., White, R. and Roth, C. (1997), "Seismic Fragility of LRC Frames with and without Masonry Infill Walls", J. Earthq. Eng., 1(4), 693-720.
  36. Park, Y.J. and Ang, A.H.S. (1985), "Mechanistic seismic damage model for reinforced concrete", J. Struct. Eng. (ASCE), 111(ST4), 722-739. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1985)111:4(722)
  37. Prakash, V., Powell, G. and Campbell, S. (1994), "Drain-3D base program description and user guideW, version 1.10. Report No. UCB/SEMM-94/07. Department of Civil Engineering, University of California, Berkeley.
  38. Priestley, M. (1997), "Displacement-based seismic assessment of reinforced concrete buildings", J. Earthq. Eng., 1(1), 157-192.
  39. Priestley, M. (2003), Myths and fallacies in earthquake engineering, revisited. IUSS Press, Pavia, Italy.
  40. Rossetto, T. and Elnashai, A.S. (2003), "Derivation of vulnerability functions for European-type RC structures based on observational data", Eng. Struct., 25(10), 1241-1263. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(03)00060-9
  41. Rossetto, T. and Elnashai, A.S. (2005), "A new analytical procedure for the derivation of displacementbased vulnerability curves for population of RC structures", Eng. Struct., 27(3), 397-409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2004.11.002
  42. Sezen, H. and Moehle, J. (2003), "Bond-slip behaviour of reinforced concrete members. Proceedings", fib Symposium Concrete Structures in Seismic Regions, Athens, Greece.
  43. Sezen, H. and Moehle, J.P. (2004), "Shear Strength Model for Lightly Reinforced Concrete Columns", Journal of Structural Engineering (ASCE), 130(11), 1692-1703. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2004)130:11(1692)
  44. Singhal, A. and Kiremidjian, A.S. (1997), "A Method for Earthquake Motion Damage Relationships with Application to Reinforced Concrete Frames". Technical Report NCEER-97-0008, National Centre for Earthquake Engineering Research, State University of New York at Bufallo.
  45. Timchenko, I. (2002), "Seismic vulnerability assessment of buildings on the basis of numerical analyses", 12th European Conference on Earthquake Engineering. London.
  46. UNDP-ERRP (2008), United Nation Development Programme (UNDP), Pakistan-Earthquake Risk Reduction and Preparedness (ERRP) project.
  47. Whitman, R., Reed, J. and Hong, S. (1973), "Earthquake damage probability matrices", Proceedings of the fifth World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Rome.
  48. Zembaty, Z., Kowalski, M. and Pospisil, S. (2006), "Dynamic identification of an RC frame in progressive states of damage, Eng. Struct., 28(5) 668-681. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.09.025

Cited by

  1. Framework for the derivation of analytical fragility curves and life cycle cost analysis for non-seismically designed buildings vol.78, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2015.07.008
  2. Empirical vulnerability assessment of the non-engineered reinforced concrete structures using the Kashmir earthquake damage data vol.13, pp.9, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-015-9735-0
  3. Seismic fragility assessment of existing sub-standard low strength reinforced concrete structures vol.14, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-015-0035-0
  4. Vulnerability assessment and feasibility analysis of seismic strengthening of school buildings vol.13, pp.12, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-015-9791-5
  5. Probabilistic Application in Seismic Vulnerability Assessment of Deficient Low- to Medium-Rise Reinforced Concrete Buildings in Pakistan vol.40, pp.9, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-015-1684-z
  6. Collapse Fragility Curves for RC Buildings Exhibiting Brittle Failure Modes vol.144, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001920
  7. Stress–Strain Model for Low-Strength Concrete in Uni-Axial Compression vol.40, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-014-1411-1
  8. Seismic retrofitting of RC buildings using CFRP and post-tensioned metal straps: shake table tests vol.15, pp.8, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-015-9800-8
  9. Seismic performance of deficient masonry infill reinforced-concrete structures vol.170, pp.2, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1680/jstbu.15.00115
  10. Numerical simulation of the experimental results of a RC frame retrofitted with RC Infill walls vol.9, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2015.9.4.735
  11. Seismic vulnerability of non-ductile RC buildings in Pakistan through stochastic analysis of design/construction deficiencies pp.1573-1456, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-018-0469-7
  12. Damage assessment of deficient reinforced concrete setback structures vol.171, pp.9, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1680/jstbu.17.00095
  13. Verification of performance criteria using shake table testing for the vulnerability assessment of reinforced concrete buildings pp.15417794, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.1601
  14. Simulation based improved seismic fragility analysis of structures vol.12, pp.5, 2014, https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2017.12.5.569
  15. Evaluation of Seismic Demand for Substandard Reinforced Concrete Structures vol.12, pp.None, 2014, https://doi.org/10.2174/1874836801812010009
  16. Study on the Effect of Extra Pole Support on Seismic Resistance for Low-Rise RC Structures vol.2019, pp.None, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/4763849