DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

ALGEBRAIC CORRECTION FOR METAL ARTIFACT REDUCTION IN COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY

  • Jeon, Kiwan (Division of Computational Science in Mathematics, National Institute for Mathematical Science) ;
  • Kang, Sung-Ho (Division of Computational Science in Mathematics, National Institute for Mathematical Science) ;
  • Ahn, Chi Young (Division of Computational Science in Mathematics, National Institute for Mathematical Science) ;
  • Kim, Sungwhan (Division of Liberal Arts, Hanbat National University)
  • Received : 2014.04.25
  • Accepted : 2014.05.27
  • Published : 2014.06.25

Abstract

If there are metals located in the X-ray scanned object, a point outside the metals has its range of projection angle at which projections passing through the point are disturbed by the metals. Roughly speaking, this implies that attenuation information at the point is missing in the blocked projection range. So conventional projection completion MAR algorithms to use the undisturbed projection data on the boundary of the metaltrace is less efficient in reconstructing the attenuation coefficient in detailed parts, in particular, near the metal region. In order to overcome this problem, we propose the algebraic correction technique (ACT) to utilize a pre-reconstructed interim image of the attenuation coefficient outside the metal region which is obtained by solving a linear system designed to reduce computational costs. The reconstructed interim image of the attenuation coefficient is used as prior information for MAR. Numerical simulations support that the proposed correction technique shows better performance than conventional inpainting techniques such as the total variation and the harmonic inpainting.

Acknowledgement

Supported by : National Institute for Mathematical Sciences(NIMS)

References

  1. R.M. Lewitt and R.H.T. Bates, Image reconstruction from projections: III: Projection completion methods (theory), Optik, 50 (1978), 189-204.
  2. M. Abdoli, M.R. Ay, A. Ahmadian, and H. Zaidi, A virtual sinogram method to reduce dental metallic implant artefacts in computed tomography-based attenuation correction for PET, Nucl. Med. Commun.,31 (2010), 22-31. https://doi.org/10.1097/MNM.0b013e32832fa241
  3. G.H. Glover and N.J. Pelc, An algorithm for the reduction of metal clip artifacts in CT reconstructions, Med Phys, 8 (1981), 799-807. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.595032
  4. W.A. Kalender, R. Hebel, and J. Ebersberger, Reduction of CT artifacts caused by metallic implants, Radiology, 164 (1987), 576-577. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.164.2.3602406
  5. A. Mehranian, M.R. Ay, A. Rahmim, and H. Zaidi, X-ray CT Metal Artifact Reduction Using Wavelet Domain $L_0$ Sparse Regularization, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 32(2013), 1707-1722. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2013.2265136
  6. S. Zhao, D.D. Robertson, G. Wang, B. Whiting, and K.T. Bae, X-ray CT metal artifact reduction using wavelets: An application for imaging total hip prostheses, IEEE Trans. Med. Imag., 19 (2000), 1238-1247. https://doi.org/10.1109/42.897816
  7. Y. Chen, Y. Li, H. Guo, Y. Hu, L. Luo, X. Yin, J. Gu, and C. Toumoulin, CT Metal Artifact Reduction Method Based on Improved Image Segmentation and Sinogram In-Painting, Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2012, Article ID 786281.
  8. H. Xue, L. Zhang, Y. Xiao, Z. Chen, and Y. Xing, Metal Artifact Reduction in Dual Energy CT by Sinogram Segmentation Based on Active Contour Model and TV Inpainting, IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record, (2009), 904-908.
  9. E.Meyer, R. Raupach, M. Lell, B. Schmidt, and M. Kachelriess, Normalized metal artifact reduction (NMAR) in computed tomography, Med. Phys., 37 (2010), 5482-5493. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.3484090
  10. B. De Man, J. Nuyts, P. Dupont et al., Reduction of metal streak artifacts in x-ray computed tomography using a transmission maximum a posteriori algorithm, IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci., 47 (2000), 977-981. https://doi.org/10.1109/23.856534
  11. J. Nuyts, B. De Man, P. Dupont, et al., Iterative reconstruction for helical CT: a simulation study, Phys. Med. Biol., 43 (1998), 729-737. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/43/4/003
  12. B. DeMan, J. Nuyts, P. Dupont et al., An iterative maximum-likelihood polychromatic algorithm for CT, IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging, 20 (2001), 999-1008. https://doi.org/10.1109/42.959297
  13. C.H. Yan, R.T. Whalen, G.S. Beaupr et al., Reconstruction algorithm for polychromatic CT imaging: application to beam hardening correction, IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging, 19 (2000), 1-11.
  14. J. Choi, et al. Sparsity Driven Metal Part Reconstruction for Artifact Removal in Dental CT, Journal of X-ray Science and Technology, 19 (2011), 457-475.
  15. F.E. Boas and D. Fleischmann, Evaluation of two iterative techniques for reducing metal artifacts in computed tomography, Radiology, 259 (2011), 894-902. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.11101782
  16. M. Oehler and T.M. Buzug, Statistical Image Reconstruction for Inconsistent CT Projection Data, Methods Inform. Med., 46 (2007), 261-269.
  17. M. Bertalmio, G. Sapiro, V. Caselles and C. Ballester, Image Inpainting, Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 2000, New Orleans, USA, July 2000.
  18. T. F. Chan and J. Shen, Mathematical Models for Local Nontexture Inpainting, SIAM J. Applied Math., 62 (2001), 1019-1043.
  19. S. Kaczmarz, Angentihrte Auflosung von Systemen linearer Gleichungen, Bull. Int. Acad. Pol. Sei. Lett., 35 (1937), 355-357.
  20. R. Gordon, R. Bender, and G.T. Herman, Algebraic reconstruction techniques (ART) for three-dimensional electron microscopy and X-ray photography, J. Theoret. Biol., 29 (1970), 471-482. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5193(70)90109-8
  21. K. Tanabe, Projection method for solving a singular system, Numer. Math., 17 (1971), 203-214. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01436376
  22. P. Gilbert, Iterative methods for the reconstruction of three dimensional objects from their projections, J. Theor. Biol., 36 (1972), 105-117. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5193(72)90180-4
  23. A.H. Andersen and A.C. Kak, Simultaneous algebraic reconstruction technique (SART): A superior implementation of the art algorithm, Ultrason. Imaging, 6 (1984), 81-94. https://doi.org/10.1177/016173468400600107
  24. S. Walt , J.L. Schonberger , J. N.-Iglesias, F. Boulogne, J.D. Warner et al., Scikit-image: image processing in python, http://scikit-image.org.
  25. E. Jones, T. Oliphant, P. Petersonet et al., SciPy: Open source scientific tools for Python, http://www.scipy.org.