디지털융복합연구 (Journal of Digital Convergence)

  • 제12권4호
  • /
  • Pages.133-143
  • /
  • 2014
  • /
  • 2713-6434(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2713-6442(eISSN)
한국디지털정책학회 (The Society of Digital Policy and Management)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

거래비용요소가 협력관계 지속요인, 관계만족도, 경영성과에 미치는 영향

The Effects of Transaction Cost Factors on Cooperative Relationship Lasting Factors, Degree of Relationship Satisfaction, and Performance

  • 투고 : 2014.01.06
  • 심사 : 2014.04.20
  • 발행 : 2014.04.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구는 거래비용요소가 경영성과에 미치는 영향을 검증한 것이다. 연구결과, 첫째, 불확실성은 재무적 성과와 비재무적성과에 직접적으로 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났지만, 자산특유성과 기회주의는 경영성과에 직접적인 영향이 없는 것으로 분석되었다. 둘째, 협력관계 지속요인에 직접적으로 영향을 미치는 변수는 자산특유성과 불확실성으로 나타났으나. 기회주의는 직접적인 영향이 없는 것으로 나타났다. 셋째, 관계만족도에 직접적으로 영향을 미치는 변수는 자산특유성과 기회주의로 나타났으며, 불확실성과의 관계는 없는 것으로 분석됐다. 넷째, 협력관계 지속요인과 관계만족도는 재무적 성과와 비재무성과에 각각 직접적으로 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 요약하면, 거래비용요소가 협력관계 지속요인과 관계만족도라는 매개변수를 통하여 경영성과에 영향을 미치고 있음을 발견하였다.

This paper investigate how transaction cost factors affect organizational performance both directly and indirectly, through cooperative relationship lasting factors and degree of relationship satisfaction. The results can be summarized as follows: First, asset uncertainty directly influenced financial and non-financial performance. Also asset specificity and opportunism did not influence financial and non financial performance directly. Second cooperative relationship lasting factors were connected with transaction cost factors direct variables on cooperative relationship lasting factors are asset specificity and uncertainty, but opportunism did not directly influence. Third, degree of relationship satisfaction were connected with transaction cost factors direct variables on degree of relationship satisfaction are asset specificity and opportunism, but uncertainty had not affected degree of relationship satisfaction. Fourth, cooperative relationship lasting factors and degree of relation satisfaction had affected financial performance and non financial performance. In summary, this study find that transaction cost factors had indirectly influenced organizational performance through mediated variables such as cooperative relationship lasting factors and degree of relationship satisfaction.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Kwack, J. S, How Subcontract Practice Impacts Business Performance of SMEs. doctorate thesis. Seoul national university, 2010.
  2. Soon-Kee Kim, and Sang-Wan Lee, Measurement Diversity, Alignment with Firm Strategy and Organizational Performance: A note on the Mediating role of Organizational Learning. Korean Accounting Association Journal, Vol. 20, No. 1, pp. 75-107, 2011.
  3. Bok, D. G., Vertical integration in the Korean automotive industry : a transaction cost approach, doctorate thesis. Seoul national university, 1998.
  4. Lee, S. H., J. R., and Yang, H. J., Mediating Effect of Trust and Satisfaction on Relationship Marketing in Customer-Salesperson. Korean marketing management journal Vol 6(1), pp. 1-32, 2001.
  5. Jung, J. T., A study on the performances by configurations of assembler-supplier relationships : in Korean auto industry. Master's thesis. Seoul National University, 1995.
  6. Jung, J. E., The Analysis of Transfer Pricing Process of Statellite Suppliers of Automakers -Transaction Cost Approach-. Korean accounting journal Vol. 11(2), pp. 31-65, 2002.
  7. Han, S. D., Implementation of JIT supply and Information Technology in the Buyer-Supplier Relationship of the Korean Auto Industry : An Empirical Study. doctorate thesis. Kyonggi University, 1996.
  8. Anderson E. and B. Weitz., The Use of Pledges to Build and Sustain Commitment in Distribution Channels. Journal of Marketing Research 29(February), pp. 18-34, 1992. https://doi.org/10.2307/3172490
  9. Anderson, C. J. and J. A. Narus. A Model of Distributor's Perspective of Distributor-Manufacturer Working Relationships. Journal of Marketing 48(Autumn), pp. 62-74, 1984.
  10. Anderson, C. J. and J. A. Narus. A Model of Distributor Firm and Manufacturer Firm Working Partnership. Journal of Marketing 54(January), pp. 42-58 .1990.
  11. Aoki, M., Information, Incentive and Bargaining in Japanese Economy. Cambridge University Press. 1988.
  12. Coase, R. H., The Nature of the Firms. Economica, Vol.4. pp.386-405. 1937. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0335.1937.tb00002.x
  13. Dauch, R. E., Passion for Manufacturing. Society of Manufacturing Engineers, 1993.
  14. Dyer, J. H., Specialized Supplier Networks as a Competitive Advantage: Empirical Results from the Auto-Industry. Strategic Management Journal, 17, pp. 271-291. 1996. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199604)17:4<271::AID-SMJ807>3.0.CO;2-Y
  15. Ganesan, S., Determinants of Long-Term Orientation in Buyer-Seller Relationships. Journal of Marketing, 58(April), pp. 1-19. 1994.
  16. Kamath, R. and J. K. Liker. A Second Look at Japanese Product Development. Harvard Business Review, Nov-Dec, pp.32-86. 1995.
  17. Kaplan, R. S. and D. P. Norton., The Balanced Scorecard Measures That Drive Performances. Harvard Business Review, Jan-Feb, pp. 71-79. 1992.
  18. Masten, S. E., J. W. Meehan, and E. A, Snyder, The Costs of Organization. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, Vol.7(Spring), pp.1-25. 1991. https://doi.org/10.1093/jleo/7.special_issue.1
  19. Noodewier, G. T., G. John, and J. R. Nevin., Performance Outcomes of Purchasing Arrangements in Industrial Buyer-Vendor Relationships. Journal of Marketing, 54, October, pp.80-95. 1990. https://doi.org/10.2307/1251761
  20. Pfeffer, J. and G. R. Salancik., The External Control of Organizations, A Resource Dependency Perspective, New York, Harper and Row. 1978.
  21. Richardson, J., Parallel Sourcing and Supplier Performance in the Japan Automobile Industry. Sloan Management Journal, Vol.14, pp.45-67. 1993.
  22. Williamson, O. E. Market and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implication, New York: The Free Press. 1975.
  23. Williamson, O. E, The Economics Institution of Capitalism, New York, Free Press. 1985.