DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Evidence of Spin Reorientation by Mössbauer Analysis

  • Received : 2014.02.21
  • Accepted : 2014.04.28
  • Published : 2014.06.30

Abstract

We report the crystallographic and magnetic properties of $Ni_{0.3}Fe_{0.7}Ga_2S_4$ by means of X-ray diffractometer (XRD), a superconducting quantum interference device (SQUID) magnetometer, and a M$\ddot{o}$ssbauer spectroscopy. In particular, $Ni_{0.3}Fe_{0.7}Ga_2S_4$ was studied by M$\ddot{o}$ssbauer analysis for evidence of spin reorientation. The chalcogenide material $Ni_{0.3}Fe_{0.7}Ga_2S_4$ was fabricated by a direct reaction method. XRD analysis confirmed that $Ni_{0.3}Fe_{0.7}Ga_2S_4$ has a 2-dimension (2-D) triangular lattice structure, with space group P-3m1. The M$\ddot{o}$ssbauer spectra of $Ni_{0.3}Fe_{0.7}Ga_2S_4$ at spectra at various temperatures from 4.2 to 300 K showed that the spectrum at 4.2 K has a severely distorted 8-line shape, as spin liquid. Electric quadrupole splitting, $E_Q$ has anomalous two-points of temperature dependence of $E_Q$ curve as freezing temperature, $T_f=11K$, and N$\acute{e}$el temperature, $T_N=26K$. This suggests that there appears to be a slowly-fluctuating "spin gel" state between $T_f$ and $T_N$, caused by non-paramagnetic spin state below $T_N$. This comes from charge re-distribution due to spin-orientation above $T_f$, and $T_N$, due to the changing $E_Q$ at various temperatures. Isomer shift value ($0.7mm/s{\leq}{\delta}{\leq}0.9mm/s$) shows that the charge states are ferrous ($Fe^{2+}$), for all temperature range. The Debye temperature for the octahedral site was found to be ${\Theta}_D=260K$.

Keywords

References

  1. A. P. Ramirez, R. J. Cava, and J. Krajewski, Nature 386, 156 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1038/386156a0
  2. D.-H. Kim and C.-Y. You, J. Magn. 13, 70 (2008). https://doi.org/10.4283/JMAG.2008.13.2.070
  3. K. Ohgushi, T. Ogasawara, Y. Okimoto, S. Miyasaka, and Y. Tokura, Phys. Rev. B 72, 155114 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.72.155114
  4. P. G. Radaelli, Y. Horibe, M. J. Gutmann, H. Ishibashi, C. H. Chen, R. M. Ibberson, Y. Koyama, Y. S. Hor, V. Kiryukhin, and S. W. Cheong, Nature 416, 155 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1038/416155a
  5. S. Nakatsuji, Y. Nambu, H. Tonomura, O. Sakai, S. Jonas, C. Broholm, H. Tsunetsugu, Y. Qiu, and Y. Maeno, Science 309, 1697 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1114727
  6. Y. Nambua, S. Nakatsujia, and Y. Maenoa, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 310, 1316 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2006.10.1011
  7. Y. Nambua, M. Ichiharab, Y. Kiuchib, S. Nakatsujib, Y. Maeno, J. Cryst. Growth 310, 1881 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2007.11.222
  8. P. Schiffer, A. P. Ramirez, D. A. Huse, P. L. Gammel, U. Yaron, D. J. Bishop, and A. J. Valentino, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 2379 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.74.2379
  9. J. P. Attfield, A. M. T. Bell, L. M. Rodriguez-Martinez, J. M. Greneche, R. J. Cernik, J. F. Clarke, and D. A. Perkins, Nature 396, 655 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1038/25309
  10. Y. Nambu, R. T. Macaluso, T. Higo, K. Ishida, and S. Nakatsuji, Phys. Rev. B 79, 214108 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.79.214108
  11. P. D. Réotier, A. Yaouanc, D. E. MacLaughlin, Songrui Zhao, T. Higo, S. Nakatsuji, Y. Nambu, C. Marin, G. Lapertot, A. Amato, and C. Baines, Phys. Rev. B 85, 140407(R) (2012). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.85.140407
  12. B. R. Myoung, S. J. Kim, and C. S. Kim, J. Korean Phys. Soc. 52, 1846 (2008). https://doi.org/10.3938/jkps.52.1846
  13. B. R. Myoung, S. J. Kim, and C. S. Kim, J. Korean Phys. Soc. 53, 750 (2008). https://doi.org/10.3938/jkps.53.750
  14. B. R. Myoung, S. J. Kim, B. W. Lee, and C. S. Kim, J. Appl. Phys. 107, 09E106 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3364052
  15. B. R. Myoung, W. J. Kwon, S. J. Kim, Y. Lee, Y. H. Jeong, and C. S. Kim, IEEE Trans. Magn. 48, 1301 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1109/TMAG.2011.2173319
  16. I. Presniakov, A. Baranov, G. Demazeau, V. Rusakov, A. Sobolev, J. A. Alonso, M. J. Martínez-Lope, and K. Pokholok, J. Phys. Condens. Matter 19, 036201 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/19/3/036201