DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effects of Iron-Reducing Bacteria on Carbon Steel Corrosion Induced by Thermophilic Sulfate-Reducing Consortia

  • Received : 2013.10.02
  • Accepted : 2013.11.05
  • Published : 2014.02.28

Abstract

Four thermophilic bacterial species, including the iron-reducing bacterium Geobacillus sp. G2 and the sulfate-reducing bacterium Desulfotomaculum sp. SRB-M, were employed to integrate a bacterial consortium. A second consortium was integrated with the same bacteria, except for Geobacillus sp. G2. Carbon steel coupons were subjected to batch cultures of both consortia. The corrosion induced by the complete consortium was 10 times higher than that induced by the second consortium, and the ferrous ion concentration was consistently higher in iron-reducing consortia. Scanning electronic microscopy analysis of the carbon steel surface showed mineral films colonized by bacteria. The complete consortium caused profuse fracturing of the mineral film, whereas the non-iron-reducing consortium did not generate fractures. These data show that the iron-reducing activity of Geobacillus sp. G2 promotes fracturing of mineral films, thereby increasing steel corrosion.

Keywords

Introduction

Microbe-influenced corrosion (MIC) is due to the presence and activity of microorganisms, including bacteria and fungi, and affects a wide range of industries, resulting in severe economic losses [19]. Carbon steel, although susceptible to corrosion, is frequently employed in industries and infrastructure because of its strength, availability, relatively low cost, and fire resistance [19]. Infrastructure affected by MIC (e.g., buried pipelines) is often operated under anaerobic or microaerobic conditions [20]. Most studies on anaerobicmicroaerobic MIC use sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRBs) because they are sulfide producers and promoters of the cathodic depolarization process in steel [14,38]. According to von Wolzogen and Van der Vlugt [36], under anaerobic conditions, electrons from the metal surface (cathode) reduce protons to form hydrogen, which forms a film that prevents further proton reduction, thus producing electrostatic isolation (passivation). Different bacteria that colonize the metal surface can consume the hydrogen film, resulting in Fe2+ release from the metal surface. Sulfide produced by SRBs combines with Fe2+ to form ferrous sulfide and generate an adhesive film. This mineral film acts as a cathode for hydrogen evolution, thus increasing the corrosion rate [16], but can also have a protective passivation effect depending on the crystalline mineral composition [9,11,22]. The differences in SRB-related corrosive effects are also caused, at least in part, by the SRB species themselves [26,34], in addition to ambient factors.

Under microaerobic conditions, a protective mineral film may be formed with ferric oxides. The dissolution of this protective film by iron-reducing bacteria (IRBs) may result in increased corrosion rates [10,25]. SRBs and IRBs frequently coexist in association with buried metallic structures [1,20]. The corrosive effect of microbial cocultures (consortia) composed of SRBs and IRBs is controversial [12]. It has been suggested that ferrous ions derived from bacterial ferric reduction may prevent formation of the protective sulfide film [25], thus increasing corrosion rates, and that bacterial consortia containing both bacterial types produce higher corrosion rates than axenic cultures [33,35]; however, other studies have shown that IRBs inhibit steel corrosion in a dual-species biofilm with SRBs [8,21]. SRBs and IRBs coexist in heterogeneous communities with different bacterial populations that modify the metabolism of the entire community [13,39], thus likely modifying their corrosive effect.

In natural environments, the reactions leading to steel corrosion intensify with temperature [4], and high-temperature environments are characterized by diverse bacterial communities [32], many of which may have corrosive effects [2,29]. In a previous study with a microcosm approach [33], we reconstructed different thermophilic bacterial consortia and found that when IRBs and SRBs were cointegrated in a consortium with Bacillus spp., they produced steel corrosion rates 4.8 and 5.0 times higher than those of sterile controls. Here, we provide evidence that, in bacterial consortia containing IRBs-SRBs, IRBs produce high ferrous ion concentrations that destabilize the mineral protective film formed on the steel surface, thus increasing the corrosion rate.

 

Materials and Methods

Bacteria Employed and Culture Conditions

We used the bacterial strains Bacillus sp. G2 (facultative anaerobic, IRB) reclassified as Geobacillus sp. G2 by Nazina et al. [23], Bacillus sp. G9a (facultative anaerobic, fermentative, slime forming), Bacillus sp. G11 (strictly aerobic, growth-factor requiring), and Desulfotomaculum sp. SRB-M (strictly anaerobic, hydrogen consuming, SRB) that were isolated from two hot springs in central Mexico and characterized as previously described [33]. The bacterial strains were cultured in medium D2 (g/l): MgSO4·7H2O, 1.50; Fe(NH4)2(SO4)2, 0.10; glucose, 5.00; casein peptone, 5.00; meat extract, 3.00; yeast extract, 0.20; pH 8; [3]; they were maintained by subculture in D2 agar plates (medium D2 plus agar, 20 g/l) at 55℃.

Analytical Techniques

The Fe2+ concentration in the cultures was determined by the ferrozine assay [31]. The dissolved sulfide content was measured in the culture media by the methylene blue method [6] with a simple modification: to eliminate bacterial growth-related turbidity interference, the samples were centrifuged and the supernatant was assayed. The pH of the solution was measured using a potentiometer. Oxygen in the culture medium was measured with a dissolved oxygen meter.

Steel Corrosion by Bacterial Consortia

Carbon steel 1018 (AISI-SAE) coupons with an average area of 12.9 cm2 were used. The individual areas of the coupons were estimated according to their density, weight, and geometry. Each coupon was initially sterilized by immersion in 70% ethanol for 10 min; degreased in 100% ethanol for 15 min; and quickly dried under ultraviolet light in a stream of warm, sterile air as a slight modification of the method of Obuekwe et al. [24]; a nd t hen placed in culture tubes (volume, 70 ml; 2.2 cm diameter × 20 cm length) containing 35 ml of culture medium D2 and 35 ml of air. At 55℃, the oxygen in the culture medium was of 28 μmol/l at 1 cm from the aerobic interface and 15 μmol/l at the bottom of the tube (10 cm from the aerobic interface). The tubes were inoculated with a sulfate- and iron-reducing consortium (SIRC) integrated by overnight culture of 0.5 ml of Geobacillus sp. G2, Bacillus sp. G9a, Bacillus sp. G11, and Desulfotomaculum sp. SRB-M, or they were inoculated with a sulfate-reducing consortium (SRC) integrated with the same bacteria except for the IRB Geobacillus sp. G2. In all the experiments, non-inoculated tubes were included as sterile controls. Tubes were incubated at 55℃ for 3 or 25 days in a microoxic environment. After incubation, the coupons were cleaned using a slight modification of the method of Bryant et al. [5] in which the coupons were sonicated in citric acid (5% (w/v)) for 5 min for remove the bio- and mineral film, and then rinsed in distilled and deaerated water for 1 min. The coupons were flamed and weighed. Corrosion was measured as weight loss divided by the coupon area [33].

Scanning Electronic Microscopy

Carbon steel 1018 coupons with an average area of 2.4 cm2 were degreased and experimentally oxidized in Petri dishes with distilled water (depth, 2 mm), air drilled, ethanol-sterilized, and stored in vacuum in hermetic vials. The other coupons were incubated for 72 h in tubes with 35 ml of D2 medium inoculated with Desulfotomaculum sp. SRB-M to produce a biogenic ferrous sulfide film. Then, in an anaerobic chamber, the coupons were removed from the tubes, submerged in 70% deaereated ethanol for 10 min, drilled in absorbent paper under a N2 stream, and stored under vacuum conditions. A third coupon group was not pretreated and was only sterilized in 70% ethanol.

Coupons for the three treatments were incubated with cultures of the SIRC or SRC, or in sterile D2 medium, for 3 or 25 days. After the incubations, the coupons were removed and dehydrated in increasing concentrations of 20%, 40%, 60%, 80%, and 100% ethanol (in water (v/v)) for 5 min each. The coupons were stored in vacuum for metalization with copper and were examined using a scanning electronic microscope (JEOL JSM-6400) at 10 kV.

 

Results

Corrosion Experiments with Reconstructed Thermophilic Bacterial Consortia

Carbon steel 1018 coupons were incubated in a sterile medium, in SIRC cultures, or in SRC cultures. After 3 days of incubation (short period), the steel coupons incubated in sterile media showed corrosion of nearly 2.7 g/m2 (abiotic corrosion), whereas the SIRC and SRC culture media showed a slightly alkaline pH, with a ferrous ion concentration (from steel dissolution) close to 1 mmol/l and a basal sulfide concentration provided by the culture medium (Table 1). Coupons incubated for 3 days in SRC cultures did not show corrosion, as measured by weight loss, but showed a slight increment in weight (0.05 g/m2), probably because of mineral deposits on the metal surface. The culture medium had a moderate acidic pH, the ferrous ion levels were much lower (36 μmol/l) than those in the abiotic controls, and the sulfide concentration was the highest among all conditions in the entire experiment (110 μmol/l). In contrast, coupons incubated in the SIRC cultures showed the highest corrosion, almost two times higher than that of the coupons incubated in sterile medium. The culture medium of the SIRC had a pH nearly identical to that of the SRC medium, but the ferrous ion concentration was 10 times higher and the sulfide concentration was 3.5 times lower (Table 1).

Table 1.Values shown represent the average of four replicates ± SE; letters are used to indicate that means on the same incubation day differ significantly by Duncan’s multiple range test (p < 0.05).

When the steel coupons were incubated for 25 days (long period), similar results were obtained. Coupons incubated in sterile media showed abiotic corrosion of 4.9 g/m2 with a culture medium that had a slightly alkaline pH, but a relatively low ferrous ion concentration (close to 1 mmol/l) and a basal sulfide concentration. Coupons incubated with the thermophilic consortia were also affected by the presence or absence of the IRB Geobacillus sp. G2. The pH in both consortia was close to neutral, but in the SRC culture medium, the ferrous ion concentration was much lower and the sulfide concentration was two times higher than that in the SIRC medium. The formation of floccules of a dark precipitate was very clearly seen at the bottom of the culture tubes with SIRC. The difference in steel corrosion was dramatic; the corrosion was 10-fold higher in coupons incubated in SIRC relative to coupons incubated in SRC (Table 1).

Examination of Carbon Steel Coupons by Scanning Electron Microscopy

Carbon steel coupons were incubated for 3 or 25 days under sterile conditions, in SIRC cultures, or in SRC cultures. Some coupons were previously covered with an oxide or biological sulfide film. After 3 days of incubation, steel coupons incubated in sterile medium showed shallow pits with limited extension and were essentially intact without any mineral film (Fig. 1A). Coupons previously covered with an oxide film and then incubated in sterile medium showed an irregular dense mineral layer with numerous edges (Fig. 1C) characteristic of iron oxides [24], whereas coupons previously treated with biogenic sulfide and then incubated in sterile medium showed a dense homogeneous mineral layer with granular inclusions but without evident cracks (Fig. 1F). A similar mineral layer was found in coupons incubated with SIRC, regardless of whether they were coated with a mineral layer (Fig. 1B) or had been previously coated with an oxide (Fig. 1E) or sulfide layer (Fig. 1H), although it is notable that cracks were apparent with these three treatments. The mineral films were colonized by bacteria. In contrast, coupons incubated in SRC cultures showed dense mineral layers, without evident cracks (Figs. 1D and 1G), and were colonized by fewer bacteria than coupons exposed to SIRC.

When the steel coupons were incubated for 25 days, the trend was the same as that at 3 days. However, all coupons incubated in sterile media showed a similarly homogeneous dense mineral film, regardless of whether they were precoated with a mineral layer (Fig. 2A) or were pre-coated with an oxide film (Fig. 2D) or a sulfide film (Fig. 2G). Fig. 2G also shows the bacteria responsible for the production of the biogenic sulfide film embedded in the mineral layer; these bacteria were killed by flaming before incubation in the sterile medium. The exposure of these bacteria indicated weathering in the biogenic ferrous sulfide film.

Fig. 1.Overall appearance of the surface of carbon steel coupons subjected to incubation at 55℃ for 3 days and then recovered. Clean coupon incubated in (A) sterile culture medium or (B) SIRC culture. Coupons covered with ferric oxide and incubated in (C) sterile culture medium, (D) SRC culture, or (E) SIRC culture. Coupons covered with biogenic ferrous sulfide and incubated in (F) sterile culture medium, (G) SRC culture, or (H) SIRC culture. All micrographs were obtained with a magnification of 5,000×.

After 25 days of incubation with the thermophilic bacterial consortia, a dense mineral film was found, and when the coupons were incubated with SRC, the mineral film did not show evident cracks (Figs. 2 and 2E), but when the coupons were incubated with SIRC, the mineral film cracked (Figs. 2C, 2F, and 2H). The width of the fractures increased by 4-fold from 3 to 25 days, and the cracks were colonized by bacteria (Figs. 2F and 2H).

Fig. 2.Overall appearance of the surface of carbon steel coupons subjected to incubation at 55°C for 25 days and then recovered. Clean coupon incubated in (A) sterile culture medium, (B) SRC culture, or (C) SIRC culture. Coupons covered with ferric oxide and incubated in (D) sterile culture medium, (E) SRC culture, or (F) SIRC culture. Coupons covered with biogenic ferrous sulfide and incubated in (G) sterile culture medium or (H) SIRC culture. All micrographs were obtained with a magnification of 5,000×.

 

Discussion

MIC of steel is a complex phenomenon that involves diverse factors such as oxygen concentration (aerobic, microaerobic, or anaerobic conditions), the environment (temperature, pH, and nutrients), the groups of microorganisms (species, physiological factors, and ecological factors) [26,34], and the particularities of steel itself. Because of this complexity, generalizing the data available in the literature has been difficult. Rodin et al. [28] previously showed that diverse bacterial consortia that include SRBs have a corrosive or protective effect on steel according to theculture conditions. Various studies have shown that IRBs–in combination with SRBs–have a protective effect on steel [8,21], but other studies have shown that IRBs enhance the corrosive effect of SRBs [33,35]. In the present study, we found that addition of the IRB Geobacillus sp. G2 reversed the protective effect of an SRC against steel corrosion.

The protective effect of the SRC was observed at both short (3 days) and long (25 days) incubation times, but at both time points, the pH was not the most important factor whenever both consortia contained the fermenting bacterium G9a, which produced the same pH in the respective media. Fe2+ levels were much higher in SIRC cultures than in SRC cultures. At the short incubation time, the sterile controls had an Fe2+ concentration similar to that observed for SIRC, but in our microaerobic system, it is expected that the Fe2+ can be re-oxidized; therefore, at the long incubation time, the Fe2+ level in SIRC cultures was 3-fold higher than that in sterile controls and 60-fold higher than that in SRC cultures (Table 1), probably because of the iron-reducing activity of Geobacillus sp. G2. Additionally, the higher Fe2+ concentration in SIRC cultures probably caused two other observed effects: (i) lower sulfide concentration in SIRC than in SRC cultures resulting from the formation of ferrous sulfide floccules and (ii) increased steel corrosion by SIRC compared with SRC (Fig. 3).

Sulfide is corrosive [18], but at low concentrations, it reacts with the steel surface and produces a protective film of ferrous sulfide crystallized as mackinawite [30]; in our system, the maximum concentration of sulfide was 110 μmol/l, which was lower than the level in other systems [18,21] and may thus have caused the protective effect in SRC [9,33,37]. King et al. [15,17] previously showed that in SRB cultures with a high ferrous concentration, the breakdown of the mackinawite protective film by transformation into other less-adhesive sulfide conferred less protection to the underlying metal. It is therefore not surprising that SIRC showed the highest steel corrosion in the present study.

To evaluate the mineral film in different cultures, steel coupons covered with an oxide film, a biogenic sulfide film, or not covered were included in the two consortium cultures (Figs. 1 and 2). Steel coupons in these cultures presented a dense mineral film. Given that coupons precovered with oxide appeared similar to coupons biogenically covered with a sulfide film, it is possible that a secondary mineral film of ferrous sulfide covered the surface. Steel coupons incubated in SIRC cultures were extensively fractured, regardless of whether the steel surfaces were pre-coated, whereas SRC cultures did not show such fractures. Over time, the fractures became wider and reached a thickness of nearly 1 μm. Thus, the integrity and fracture condition of the mineral film correlated with the protective and corrosive effects of the SRC and SIRC, respectively. This finding suggests that, in SIRC cultures, the mineral film was transformed to a poorly adhesive sulfide material with poor integrity and without protective characteristics. A fractured mineral film permits diffusion of ferrous ions from the corroded steel surface to the medium and facilitates the diffusion of aggressive species such as sulfides to the steel surface for new corrosion cycles. Dong et al. [7] proposed that transformed ferrous sulfide minerals are conductive and undergo cathodic depolarization; therefore, a porous layer of these minerals also results in a large specific surface area composed of porous films. A similar effect can be expected on fractured sulfide film.

Fig. 3.Schematic diagram of the proposed reaction mechanism for acceleration of steel corrosion by IRBs in the presence of SRBs. The diagram shows a steel surface submerged in a medium in the presence of SRBs (A) or in the presence of SRBs and IRBs (B), under microaerobic conditions. Anaerobe facultative bacteria (not schematized) that consume oxygen from an aerobic interface maintain microaerobic conditions. Ferrous ions obtained from steel dissolution are oxidized to ferric ions at the aerobic interface, which are precipitated or produce ferric hydroxides on the metal surface. SRBs oxidize H2 from the steel or from the glucose in the medium and reduce sulfate to produce sulfide. At low ferrous ion concentrations (A), sulfide reacts with the steel surface and produces a protective film of ferrous sulfide crystallized as mackinawite. The protective sulfide film isolates the steel surface from the protons present in the medium and limits ferrous ion diffusion, thereby inhibiting steel corrosion. In the presence of IRBs (B), ferric ions are reduced by IRBs, leading to the accumulation of ferrous ions in the medium; sulfide reacts with these ferrous ions from the medium to produces poorly adhesive ferrous sulfide floccules. These floccules form a film that is easily fractured and allows the interaction of protons from the medium with the steel surface; new H2 evolution; and ferrous ion diffusion, all of which enhance steel corrosion.

IRBs have been found to be protective against corrosion when added to SRB-containing environments, probably by depleting oxygen and biocompetitively excluding SRBs [27]. The present study showed that (i) under microaerobic conditions where ferrous ions can potentially accumulate, with a low sulfide ion concentration, IRB addition to a consortium of SRBs and fermentative bacteria increases steel corrosion, possibly through destabilization of the protective sulfide film, and (ii) that IRBs must be taken into account in MIC diagnosis.

References

  1. Al-Judaibi A, Al-Moubaraki A. 2013. Microbial analysis and surface characterization of SABIC carbon steel corrosion in soils of different moisture levels. Adv. Biol. Chem. 3: 264-273. https://doi.org/10.4236/abc.2013.32030
  2. Almeida MAN, De França FP. 1999. Thermophilic and mesophilic bacteria in biofilms associated with corrosion in a heat exchanger. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 15: 439-442. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008963632593
  3. Atlas RM, Parks LC (eds.) 1993. Handbook of Microbiological Media. CRC Press, Boca Raton Florida.
  4. Benmoussa A, Hadjel M, Traisnel M. 2006. Corrosion behavior of API 5L X-60 pipeline steel exposed to nearneutral pH soil simulating solution. Mater. Corros. 57: 771-777. https://doi.org/10.1002/maco.200503964
  5. Bryant R, Jansen W, Boivin J, Laishley E, Costerton W. 1991. Effect of hydrogenase and mixed sulfate-reducing bacterial populations on the corrosion steel. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 57: 2804-2809.
  6. Cline JD. 1969. Spectrophotometric determination of hydrogen sulfide in natural waters. Limnol Oceanogr. 14: 454-458. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1969.14.3.0454
  7. Dong ZH, Shi W, Ruan HM, Zhang GA. 2011. Heterogeneous corrosion of mild steel under SRB-biofilm characterised by electrochemical mapping technique. Corros. Sci. 53: 2978-2987. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2011.05.041
  8. Duan J, Wu S, Zhang X, Huang G, Du M, Hou B. 2008. Corrosion of carbon steel influenced by anaerobic biofilm in natural seawater. Electrochim. Acta 54: 22-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2008.04.085
  9. El-Mendili Y, Abdelouas A, Bardeau JF. 2013. Insight into the mechanism of carbon steel corrosion under aerobic and anaerobic conditions. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 15: 9197-9204. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3cp50853f
  10. Esnault L, Jullien M, Mustin C, Bildstein O, Libert M. 2012. Metallic corrosion processes reactivation sustained by ironreducing bacteria: implication on long-term stability of protective layers. Phys. Chem. Earth 36: 1624-1629.
  11. Halim A, Watkin E, Gubner R. 2012. Short-term corrosion monitoring of carbon steel by bio-competitive exclusion of thermophilic sulphate reducing bacteria and nitrate reducing bacteria. Electrochim. Acta 77: 348-362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2012.06.040
  12. Herrera LK, Videla HA. 2009. Role of iron-reducing bacteria in corrosion and protection of carbon steel. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 63: 891-895. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2009.06.003
  13. Heyer A, D'Souza F, Morales CF, Ferrari G, Mol JMC, de Wit JHW. 2013. Ship ballast tanks: a review from microbial corrosion and electrochemical point of view. Ocean Eng. 70: 188-200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2013.05.005
  14. Javaherdashti R. 2011. Impact of sulphate-reducing bacteria on the performance of engineering materials. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 91: 1507-1517. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-011-3455-4
  15. King RA, Dittmer CK, Miller JDA. 1976. Effect of ferrous ion concentration on the corrosion of iron in semicontinuous cultures of sulphate-reducing bacteria. Br. Corros. J. 11: 105-107. https://doi.org/10.1179/000705976798320106
  16. King RA, Miller JD. 1971. Corrosion by the sulphatereducing bacteria. Nature 233: 491-492. https://doi.org/10.1038/233491a0
  17. King RA, Miller JDA, Wakerley DS. 1973. Corrosion of mild steel in cultures of sulphate-reducing bacteria: effect of changing the soluble iron concentration during growth. Br. Corros. J. 8: 89-93. https://doi.org/10.1179/bcj.1973.8.2.89
  18. King RA, Wakerley DS. 1973. Corrosion of mild steel by ferrous sulphide. Br. Corros. J. 8: 41-45. https://doi.org/10.1179/000705973798322521
  19. Koch GH, Brongers PH, Thompson NG, Virmani YP, Payer JH. 2002. Corrosion Costs and Prevention Strategies in the United States. US Department of Transportation, Report No. FHWA-RD-01-156, Washington DC.
  20. Kozlova I, Kopteva Z, Zanina V, Purish L. 2010. Microbial corrosion as a manifestation of technogenesis in biofilms formed on surfaces of underground structures. Mater. Sci. 46: 389-398. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11003-010-9302-4
  21. Lee AK, Buehler MG, Newman DK. 2006. Influence of a dual-species biofilm on the corrosion of mild steel. Corros. Sci. 48: 165-178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2004.11.013
  22. McNeil MB, Little BJ. 1990. Technical note: mackinawite formation during microbial corrosion. Corrosion 46: 599-600. https://doi.org/10.5006/1.3585154
  23. Nazina TN, Tourova TP, Poltaraus AB, Novikova EV, Grigoryan AA, Ivanova AE, et al. 2001. Taxonomic study of aerobic thermophilic bacilli: descriptions of Geobacillus subterraneus gen. nov., sp. nov. and Geobacillus uzenensis sp. nov. from petroleum reservoirs and transfer of Bacillus stearothermophilus, Bacillus thermocatenulatus, Bacillus thermoleovorans, Bacillus kaustophilus, Bacillus thermodenitrificans to Geobacillus as the new combinations G. stearothermophilus, G. thermocatenulatus, G. thermoleovorans, G. kaustophilus, G. thermoglucosidasius and G. thermodenitrificans. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 51: 433-446. https://doi.org/10.1099/00207713-51-2-433
  24. Obuekwe CO, Westlake DW, Cook FD, Costerton JW. 1981. Surface changes in mild steel coupons from the action of corrosion-causing bacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 41: 766-774.
  25. Obuekwe CO, Westlake DW, Plambeck JA, Cook FD. 1981. Corrosion of mild steel in cultures of ferric iron reducing bacterium isolated from crude oil I. Polarization characteristics. Corrosion 37: 461-467. https://doi.org/10.5006/1.3585992
  26. Paisse S, Ghiglione JF, Marty F, Abbas B, Gueune H, Amaya JMS, et al. 2013. Sulfate-reducing bacteria inhabiting natural corrosion deposits from marine steel structures. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 97: 7493-7504. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-012-4464-7
  27. Potekhina JS, Sherisheva NG, Povetkina LP, Pospelov AP, Rakitina TA, Warnecke F, Gottschalk G. 1999. Role of microorganisms in corrosion inhibition of metals in aquatic habitats. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 52: 639-646. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002530051571
  28. Rodin VB, Zhigletsova SK, Zhirkova NA, Aleksandrova NV, Chugunov VA, Kholodenko VP. 2011. Corrosive activity of natural microbial associations at various conditions of cultivation. Appl. Biochem. Microbiol. 47: 615-620. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0003683811060111
  29. Rozanova EP, Dubinina GA, Lebedeva EV, Suntsova LA, Lipovskich VM, Tsvetkov NN. 2003. Microorganisms in heat supply systems and internal corrosion of steel pipelines. Microbiology 72: 179-186. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023268030951
  30. Singer M, Brown B, Camacho A, Nešic S. 2011. Combined effect of carbon dioxide, hydrogen sulfide, and acetic acid on bottom-of-the-line corrosion. Corrosion 67: 015004-1-015004-16.
  31. Sørensen J. 1982. Reduction of ferric iron in anaerobic, marine sediment and interaction with reduction of nitrate and sulfate. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 43: 319-324.
  32. Urios L, Marsal F, Pellegrini D, Magot M. 2013. Microbial diversity at iron-clay interfaces after 10 years of interaction inside a deep argillite geological formation (Tournemire, France). Geomicrobiol. J. 30: 442-453. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490451.2012.705227
  33. Valencia-Cantero E, Peña-Cabriales JJ, Martínez-Romero E. 2003. The corrosion effects of sulfate- and ferric-reducing bacterial consortia on steel. Geomicrobiol. J. 20: 157-169. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490450303885
  34. Venzlaff H, Enning D, Srinivasan J, Mayrhofer KJ, Hassel A W, Widdel F, Stratmann M. 2013. Accelerated cathodic reaction in microbial corrosion of iron due to direct electron uptake by sulphate-reducing bacteria. Corros. Sci. 66: 88-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2012.09.006
  35. Videla HA, Le Borgne S, Panter C, Singh-Raman RK. 2008. MIC of steels by iron reducing bacteria. Paper No. 08505, pp. 1-10. In: Corrosion 2008. NACE International, Houston, TX.
  36. von Wolzogen KC, van der Vlugt LS. 1934. Graphitization of cast iron as an electrochemical process in anaerobic soils. Water 18: 147-165.
  37. Xu J, Wang K, Sun C, Wang F, Li X, Yang J, Yu C. 2011. The effects of sulfate reducing bacteria on corrosion of carbon steel Q235 under simulated disbonded coating by using electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. Corros. Sci. 53: 1554- 1562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2011.01.037
  38. Zhang C, Wen F, Cao Y. 2011. Progress in research of corrosion and protection by sulfate-reducing bacteria. Proc. Environ. Sci. 10: 1177-1182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proenv.2011.09.188
  39. Zhang J, Zhang Y, Chang J, Quan X, Li Q. 2013. Biological sulfate reduction in the acidogenic phase of anaerobic digestion under dissimilatory Fe (III)-reducing conditions. Water Res. 47: 2033-2040. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2013.01.034

Cited by

  1. Carbon steel corrosion induced by sulphate-reducing bacteria in artificial seawater: electrochemical and morphological characterizations vol.21, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1590/s1517-707620160004.0091
  2. Microbial fouling and corrosion of carbon steel in deep anoxic alkaline groundwater vol.33, pp.2, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1080/08927014.2017.1285914
  3. Use of Bacteria To Stabilize Archaeological Iron vol.83, pp.9, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.03478-16
  4. Experimental, quantum chemical and molecular dynamic simulations studies on the corrosion inhibition of mild steel by some carbazole derivatives vol.7, pp.None, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-02446-0
  5. Electrochemical and Computational Studies of Some Carbazole Derivatives as Inhibitors of Mild Steel Corrosion in Abiotic and Biotic Environments vol.4, pp.2, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40735-018-0130-7
  6. Corrosion of Q235 carbon steel influenced by the introduction of aerogenic and aerobic bacteria vol.69, pp.9, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1002/maco.201810086
  7. Microbially influenced corrosion of carbon steel in the presence of anaerobic sulphate-reducing bacteria vol.55, pp.2, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1080/1478422x.2019.1700642
  8. An Electrochemist Perspective of Microbiologically Influenced Corrosion vol.1, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.3390/cmd1010005
  9. N-substituted carbazoles as corrosion inhibitors in microbiologically influenced and acidic corrosion of mild steel: Gravimetric, electrochemical, surface and computational studies vol.1223, pp.None, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molstruc.2020.129328
  10. Corrosion behaviour of X60 steel in the presence of sulphate-reducing bacteria (SRB) and iron-reducing bacteria (IRB) in seawater vol.56, pp.6, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1080/1478422x.2021.1919840
  11. Data-driven operational failure likelihood model for microbiologically influenced corrosion vol.153, pp.None, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2021.07.040