DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Ethanol Production from the Seaweed Gelidium amansii, Using Specific Sugar Acclimated Yeasts

  • Cho, Hyeyoung (Department of Biotechnology, Pukyong National University) ;
  • Ra, Chae-Hun (Department of Biotechnology, Pukyong National University) ;
  • Kim, Sung-Koo (Department of Biotechnology, Pukyong National University)
  • Received : 2013.07.19
  • Accepted : 2013.10.31
  • Published : 2014.02.28

Abstract

For the production of ethanol from seaweed as the source material, thermal acid hydrolysis and enzymatic saccharification were carried out for monosugars production of 25.5 g/l galactose and 7.6 g/l glucose using Gelidium amansii. The fermentation was performed with Pichia stipitis KCTC 7228 or Saccharomyces cerevisiae KCCM 1129. When wild P. stipitis and S. cerevisiae were used, the ethanol productions of 11.2 g/l and 6.9 g/l were produced, respectively. The ethanol productions of 16.6 g/l and 14.6 g/l were produced using P. stipitis and S. cerevisiae acclimated to high concentration of galactose, respectively. The yields of ethanol fermentation increased to 0.5 and 0.44 from 0.34 and 0.21 using acclimated P. stipitis and S. cerevisiae, respectively. Therefore, acclimation of yeasts to a specific sugar such as galactose reduced the glucose-induced repression on the transport of galactose.

Keywords

Introduction

Seaweed biomass has been regarded as an alternative to fossil fuel. As a renewable and eco-friendly biomass [2,22], seaweed is a third-generation biomass that can be used for bioenergy production. Seaweed grows quickly, is ligninfree, but is not used as a primary food crop [2,6]. In particular, Gelidium amansii, red seaweed, has the advantage of high carbohydrate contents. G. amansii is composed of cellulose and agar (galactan). Agar is composed of galactose and 3,6-anhydrogalactose (AHG) [7]. In ethanol production using G. amansii, thermal acid hydrolysis and enzymatic hydrolysis have been used for the saccharification. The agar is hydrolyzed to galactose and 3,6-AHG by thermal acid hydrolysis. Thermal acid hydrolysis is a simple process that has a short reaction time. Enzymatic saccharification has been used for the saccharification of cellulose in order to overcome the low yield of glucose production [9-11]. Therefore, galactose and glucose are monosaccharides for ethanol fermentation from G. amansii. However, glucose of hydrolysates causes the repression of galactose uptake. Because the repression decreases the yield of ethanol production, the repression has to be overcome for successful fermentation. The acclimation of galactose allows simultaneous utilization of glucose and galactose [5]. In many studies on mixed sugar fermentation, the yeast used has been improved by acclimation to a high concentration of sugar for a short time to enhance ethanol production. Therefore, acclimation of galactose is the key process of fermentation when G. amansii is used [5,12,14].

Separated hydrolysis and fermentation (SHF) is a separated process of saccharification and fermentation. The main advantage of SHF is to separately optimize the process steps. Specifically, enzymatic saccharification and fermentation need different optimal pH and temperature. Therefore, the SHF process is more efficient for high ethanol yield than the simultaneous saccharification and fermentation (SSF) process when G. amansii is used [1,7,13].

In order to produce ethanol using seaweed as the source material, this study conducted a thermal acid hydrolysis and enzymatic saccharification of G. amansii. Pichia stipitis has an ethanol yield of 82% and its able to ferment most sugars, including glucose, galactose, and cellobiose. Saccharomyces cerevisiae can generate a high yield of ethanol from about 90 % of glucose [16]. Therefore, fermentations were carried out using Pichia stipitis and Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The yeasts were acclimated to produce a high concentration of ethanol and minimize the fermentation time by the prevention of repression on galactose uptake.

 

Materials and Methods

Raw Materials and Composition Analysis

Gelidium amansii was obtained from the Gijang fisheries market in Busan, Korea. A composition analysis of G. amansii was conducted at the Feed & Foods Nutrition Research Center of Pukyong National University in Busan, Korea.

Thermal Acid Hydrolysis

Milled Gelidium amansii was added to 91 mM H2SO4 to make solid/liquid (S/L) contents of 8% (w/v). Then, a thermal acid hydrolysis was carried out in the autoclave at 121℃ for 45 min [6,21]. The efficiency of thermal acid hydrolysis was calculated as follows:

in which ETAH is the efficiency of thermal acid hydrolysis (%), ΔSgal is the galactose increase (g/l) during thermal acid hydrolysis, and [Gal]max is the theoretical maximum galactose concentration in pretreated G. amansii [20].

Enzymatic Saccharification

The enzymatic saccharification of acid hydrolysate was performed by adding 8.4 EGU/ml of Celluclast 1.5 L (Novozyme) and 1.2 FBG/ml of Viscozyme L (Novozyme) with 2% (w/v) sodium azide to inhibit microbial growth during the enzymatic hydrolysis, after adjusting to pH 4.5 with 10 N NaOH [9,24]. Viscozyme L has endo-beta-glucanase that hydrolyzes (1,3)- or (1,4)-linkages in beta-D-glucans with side activities of xylanase, cellulase, and hemicellulose. Celluclast 1.5 L has cellulase that hydrolyzes (1,4)-beta-D-glucosidic linkages in cellulose and other beta-D-glucans.

The reaction was carried out in a water bath at 45℃, 30 rpm for 60 h [13]. The efficiency of enzymatic saccharification was calculated as follows:

in which EES is the efficiency of enzymatic saccharification (%), ΔSglu is the glucose increase (g/l) during enzymatic saccharification, and [Glu]max is the theoretical maximum glucose concentration from fiber of G. amansii [20].

Fermentation

Seed culture and fermentation medium. Stocked Pichia stipitis KCTC 7228 and Saccharomyces cerevisiae KCCM 1129 were cultured in YPG agar plates composed of 10 g/l yeast extract, 20 g/l peptone, 20 g/l galactose, and 15 g/l agar for 24 h [19]. Each colony of yeasts was inoculated with 15 ml of YPG (yeast extract, peptone, and galactose) medium containing 10 g/l yeast extract, 20 g/l peptone, and 20 g/l galactose. The mixture was cultured at 30℃, 30 rpm for 24 h. Five milliliters of cultures was transferred to 50 ml of YPG medium and cultured under the same condition. The OD600 of P. stipitis and S. cerevisiae reached 23.6 and 27.3, respectively. The acclimation of P. stipitis and S. cerevisiae to high concentration of galactose was carried out. Five milliliters of yeasts was inoculated in 50 ml of YPHG (yeast extract, peptone, and high concentration of galactose) medium composed of 10 g/l yeast extract, 20 g/l peptone, and 120 g/l galactose, and cultured for 18 h until the OD600 of P. stipitis and S. cerevisiae reached 26.2 and 24.8 [19]. Each cell of 25 ml was centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 5 min to remove the YPG medium and cell pellets were inoculated, respectively.

Separated hydrolysis and fermentation. The fermentation was carried out in 500 ml flasks with a working volume of 250 ml [17]. After enzymatic saccharification and final neutralization to pH 6.4 were carried out, fermentations were carried out with acclimated and non-acclimated yeasts P. stipitis and S. cerevisiae. The fermentation was carried out at 30℃, 30 rpm for 96 h. The efficiency of ethanol yield was calculated as follows:

in which YEtOH is the ethanol yield (g/g), [EtOH] is the ethanol concentration achieved during fermentation (g/l), and [Sugar]ini is the total initial fermentable sugar (galactose+glucose) concentration at onset of fermentation (g/l). YEtOH of 0.51 is the theoretical maximum ethanol yield [19].

Analytical Methods

The cell concentrations were determined by the optical density (OD) measurement of the cells using a UV-Vis spectrophotometer and converted to dry cell weight. The concentrations of glucose, galactose, ethanol, and 5-HMF were measured by HPLC (Agilent 1100 Series; Agilent. Inc., USA) equipped with an Agilent G1362A refractive index detector. A Biorad Aminex HPX-87H column and Supelguard C610H column were used with filtered and degassed 5 mM H2SO4 as the eluent at the flow rate of 0.6 ml/min and a column temperature of 65℃. The activities of cellulase and β-glucosidase were determined according to the procedure described in Mandels et al. [18] and Kubicek [15].

Results and Discussion

Composition of G. amansii

G. amansii is a red alga and has the highest carbohydrate contents among seaweeds [11]. The analytical results indicated that the total carbohydrate content was 74.4% (w/w). Agar and fiber in the total carbohydrate were 62.8% (w/w) and 11.6% (w/w), respectively. The ratio of galactose to 3,6-anhydrogalactose was reported as 1:1.13 (0.47:0.53) [8]. Therefore, the maximum galactose content was calculated as 33%: (0.628 g agar/g G. amansii) × (0.47 g galactose unit/g agar) × (180 g galactose/162 g galactose unit) × 100. The maximum glucose content was calculated as 13%: (0.116 g cellulose/g G. amansii) × (180 g glucose/162 g unit of cellulose) × 100. The total initial fermentable sugar content was calculated as 46% of G. amansii. Therefore, the maximum galactose concentration can reach 26.4 g/l: (80 g G. amansii /l liquid) × (0.33 g galactose/g G. amansii); and glucose concentration can reach 10.4 g/l: (80 g G. amansii /l liquid) × (0.13 g glucose/g G. amansii) from 80 g/l of slurry [19]. Moreover, the components in G. amansii were composed of 18.1% (w/w) crude protein, 0.2% (w/w) crude lipid, and 7.3% (w/w) crude ash, as shown in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.Compositional analysis data and mass balance flow chart of bioethanol production process from Gelidium amansii. (ETAH, efficiency of thermal acid hydrolysis; EES, efficiency of enzymatic saccharification; YEtOH, efficiency of ethanol yield; aNP, non-acclimated P. stipitis; bAP, acclimated P. stipitis; cNS, non-acclimated S. cerevisiae; dAS, acclimated S. cerevisiae).

Thermal Acid Hydrolysis

The agar can be hydrolyzed by acid, but cannot be hydrolyzed by the enzyme [7]. Sulfuric acid of 91 mM was added to 8% (w/v) slurry of G. amansii and treated at 121℃ for 45 min. As a result, the galactose concentration of 25.6 g/l was obtained and the ETAH was 97.2%, as shown in Fig. 1. Because the physical morphology of the agar is softer than that of cellulose, the optimal reaction conditions for thermal acid hydrolysis would be milder than that of cellulose [15]. Therefore, the glucose was not found in the thermal acid hydrolysis. When thermal acid hydrolysis was used, 5-hydroxymethyl furfural (5-HMF) was generated from the degradation of 3,6-anhydrogalactose owing to its acid-labile character [11]. In this study, 4.8 g/l of 5-HMF as inhibitor in the fermentation process was found in the thermal acid hydrolysis. However, according to a previous study, a 5-HMF concentration above 5 g/l shows the crucial role of inhibiting the fermentation process when using red seaweed hydrolysates [11,20]. Therefore, the 5-HMF concentration of thermal acid hydrolysis did not affect the fermentation process.

Enzymatic Saccharification

For the hydrolysis of fiber, Celluclast 1.5 L, Viscozyme L, and mixed enzymes of Celluclast 1.5 L and Viscozyme L were used. After a thermal acid hydrolysis, enzymatic saccharification was carried out at pH 4.5, 130 rpm, 45℃ for 60 h, as shown in Fig. 2. The glucose was released until 48 h after the addition of enzymes. Specifically, the mixed enzymes (Celluclast 1.5 L + Viscozyme L) produced 7.6 g/l and 7.8 g/l glucose at 48 and 60 h, respectively. In the case of Celluclast 1.5 L treatment, the glucose was released until 48 h of saccharification. The final glucose concentration of 5.5 g/l with EES of 52.9% was obtained. When Viscozyme L was treated, the glucose concentration of 1.7 g/l with EES of 16.3% was obtained at 4 h. Enzyme saccharification of Celluclast 1.5 L to G. amansii hydrolysate was preferable to that of Viscozyme L. Among those treatment methods, the mixed enzyme treatment showed a synergistic effect and the maximum efficiency of enzymatic saccharification [20]. Therefore, mixed enzymes were used as an optimal saccharification of fiber to glucose for 48 h, and the glucose concentration of 7.6 g/l with EES = 72.8% was obtained, as shown in Fig. 1.

Fig. 2.Effects of various enzymes on the production of glucose from G. amansii by enzymatic saccharification at 45℃, 30 rpm for 60 h.

Separated Hydrolysis and Fermentations

SHF was carried out by the addition of the galactose acclimated or non-acclimated P. stipitis (Fig. 3) or S. cerevisiae (Fig. 4). Fermentation with non-acclimated P. stipitis to high concentration of galactose is shown in Fig. 3A. Glucose was consumed first as the fermentation started because glucose was the preferred substrate to galactose. Glucose was consumed in 48 h, and then galactose was consumed for 24 h. However, galactose was not totally consumed until 96 h, and 7.1 g/l of galactose remained, as shown in Fig. 3A. The ethanol concentration after 96 h of fermentation with non-acclimated P. stipitis was 11.5 g/l with YEtOH = 0.34, as shown in Fig. 3A.

A galactose concentration of 25.6 g/l and a glucose concentration of 7.6 g/l were consumed by high concentration of galactose acclimated P. stipitis, as shown in Fig. 3B. Compared with non-acclimated P. stipitis, glucose was totally consumed during 60 h. The galactose was consumed until 84 h, and the final ethanol concentration of 16.6 g/l with YEtOH = 0.5 was produced, as shown in Fig. 3B.

Fig. 3.Ethanol production from hydrolysis of G. amansii by SHF with P. stipitis KCTC 7228. (A) Non-acclimated P. stipitis and (B) acclimated P. stipitis to high concentration of galactose.

The fermentation with non-acclimated S. cerevisiae to high concentration of galactose produced ethanol concentration of 6.9 g/l with YEtOH = 0.21 for 96 h, as shown in Fig. 4A. As the result of saccharification, 25.6 g/l galactose was hydrolyzed by thermal acid hydrolysis and 7.6 g/l glucose was obtained by enzymatic hydrolysis. S. cerevisiae preferred glucose to galactose. The glucose consumption rate of S. cerevisiae with 0.33 was faster than that of P. stipitis with 0.16, as shown in Fig. 4A. The glucose was consumed in 24 h; however, galactose was rarely consumed because of the repression of galactose uptake by glucose. Since glucose directly enters glycolysis, which is the main metabolic pathway in ethanol fermentation, glucose is taken by yeasts in preference to galactose (requiring conversion to glucose prior to the use for the glycolysis) [2]. Therefore, the ethanol production from the mixture of galactose and glucose was inhibited owing to the glucose repression to galactose consumption. The utilization of galactose by yeast requires the enzymes of the Leloir pathway, which catalyze the transformation of galactose to glucose-6-phosphate. These enzymes are encoded by a family of the GAL gene, and their expression is induced by growth in galactose and repressed during growth in glucose. When galactose is absent from the medium, the GAL gene inhibits the function of the transcriptional activator. Therefore, the acclimation of yeasts to galactose diminishes the repression of galactose consumption [3,4]. The fermentation with acclimated S. cerevisiae utilized 25.8 g/l galactose and 8.1 g/l glucose, as shown in Fig. 4B. The galactose was rarely consumed owing to the repression of non-acclimated S. cerevisiae, as shown in Fig. 4A. However, when S. cerevisiae was acclimated to high concentration of galactose, the glucose and galactose were simultaneously consumed, as shown in Fig. 4B. Diauxic fermentation was observed in acclimated S. cerevisiae on galactose. Fermentation using glucose produced ethanol for 24 h. When glucose was exhausted, ethanol fermentation had temporarily slowed down, resulting in a lag that is called the diauxic shift, from 24 to 36 h. After a short lag at the diauxic shift, the galactose was totally consumed for 96 h [22]. An ethanol concentration of 14.6 g/l with YEtOH = 0.44 was obtained from 25.6 g/l galactose and 7.6 g/l glucose, as shown in Fig. 4B. As results, the overall mass balance and ethanol yields are described in Fig. 1. Therefore, the acclimation of yeasts to high concentration of galactose could make simultaneous utilization of galactose and glucose for the production of ethanol from the seaweed G. amansii. Acclimated yeasts produced a higher ethanol concentration than non-acclimated yeasts.

Fig. 4.Ethanol production from hydrolysis of G. amansii by SHF with S. cerevisiae KCCM 1129. (A) Non-acclimated S. cerevisiae and (B) acclimated S. cerevisiae to high concentration of galactose.

References

  1. Alfani F, Gallifuoco A, Saporosi A, Spera A, Cantarella M. 2000. Comparison of SHF and SSF processes for the bioconversion of steam-exploded wheat straw. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 25: 184-192. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jim.7000054
  2. Bai FW, Anderson WA, Moo-Young M. 2008. Ethanol fermentation technologies from sugar and starch feedstocks. Biotechnol. Adv. 26: 89-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2007.09.002
  3. Bro C, Knudsen S, Regenberg B, Olsson L, Nielsen J. 2005. Improvement of galactose uptake in Saccharomyces cerevisiae through overexpression of phosphoglucomutase: example of transcript analysis as a tool in inverse metabolic engineering. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71: 6465-6472. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.71.11.6465-6472.2005
  4. Delgenes J, Moletta R, Navarro J. 1988. Fermentation of Dxylose, D-glucose and L-arabinose mixture by Pichia stipitis Y7124: sugar tolerance. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 29: 155-161. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01982895
  5. Ernandes JR, William JW, Stewart GG. 1992. Simultaneous utilization of galactose and glucose by Saccharomyces spp. Biotechnol. Adv. 6: 233-238.
  6. Jang JS, Cho Y, Jeong GT, Kim SK. 2012. Optimization of saccharification and ethanol production by simultaneous saccharification and fermentation (SSF) from seaweed, Saccharina japonica. Bioprosess Biosyst. Eng. 35: 11-18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-011-0611-2
  7. Jeong TS, Kim YS, and Oh KK. 2011. Two-stage acid saccharification of fractionated Gelidium amansii minimizing the sugar decomposition. Bioresour. Technol. 102: 10529-10534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2011.09.017
  8. Jol CN, Neiss TG, Penninkhof B, Rudolph B, De Ruiter GA. 1999. A novel high-performance anion-exchange chromatographic method for the analysis of carrageenans and agars containing 3,6-anhydrogalactose. Anal. Biochem. 268: 213-222. https://doi.org/10.1006/abio.1998.3059
  9. Kamireddy SR, Li J, Tucker M, Degenestein J, Ji Y. 2013. Effects and mechanism of metal chloride salts on pretreatment and enzymatic digestibility of corn stover. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 52: 1775-1782. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie3019609
  10. Kang HK, Kim NM, Kim GJ, Seo ES, Ryu HJ, Yun SI, et al. 2011. Enhanced saccharification of rice straw using hypochloritehydrogen peroxide. Biotechnol. Bioprocess Eng. 16: 273-281. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12257-010-0262-1
  11. Kim C, Ryu HJ, Kim SH, Yoon JJ, Kim HS, Kim YJ. 2010. Acidity tunable ionic liquids as catalysts for conversion of agar into mixed sugars. Bull. Korean Chem. Soc. 31: 511-514. https://doi.org/10.5012/bkcs.2010.31.02.511
  12. Kim H, Ra CH, Kim SK. 2013. Ethanol production from seaweed (Undaria pinnatifida) using yeast acclimated to specific sugars. Biotechnol. Bioprocess Eng. 18: 533-537. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12257-013-0051-8
  13. Kim NJ, Li HJ, Chang HN, Lee PC. 2011. Ethanol production from marine algal hydrolysates using Escherichia coli KO11. Bioresour. Technol. 102: 7466-7469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2011.04.071
  14. Kim S R, H a SJ, Wei N , Oh E J, J in Y S. 2012. Simultaneous co-fermentation of mixed sugars: a promising strategy. Trends Biotechnol. 30: 274-282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2012.01.005
  15. Kubicek CP. 1982. $\beta$-Glucosidase excretion by Trichoderma pseudokoningii: correlation with cell wall bound$\beta$-1,3- glucanase activities. Arch. Microbiol. 132: 349-354. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00413388
  16. Limayem A, Ricke SC. 2012. Lignocellulosic biomass for bioethanol production: current perspectives, potential issues and future prospects. Prog. Energ. Combust. 38: 449-467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2012.03.002
  17. Liu R, Li J, Shen F. 2008. Refining bioethanol from stalk juice of sweet sorghum by immobilized yeast fermentation. Renew. Energy 33: 1130-1135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2007.05.046
  18. Mandels M, Aldreotti R, Roche C. 1976. Measurement of saccharifying cellulase. Biotechnol. Bioeng. Symp. 6: 21-23.
  19. Park JH, Hong JY, Jang HC, Oh SG, Kim SH, Yoon JJ, Kim YJ. 2012. Use of Gelidium amansii as a promising resource for bioethanol: a practical approach for continuous dilute-acid hydrolysis and fermentation. Bioresour. Technol. 108: 83-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2011.12.065
  20. Ra CH, Jeong GT, Shin MK, Kim SK. 2013. Biotransformation of 5-hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF) by Scheffersomyces stipitis during ethanol fermentation of hydrolysate of the seaweed Gelidium amansii. Bioresour. Technol. 140: 421-425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2013.04.122
  21. Saha BC, Iten LB, Cotta MA, Wu YV. 2005. Dilute acid pretreatment, enzymatic saccharification and fermentation of wheat straw to ethanol. Process Biochem. 40: 3693-3700. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2005.04.006
  22. Stahl G, Nakamura SNB, Ariga O, Nakasaki K. 2004. Translational accuracy during exponential, postdiauxic, and stationary growth phases in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Eukaryot. Cell 3: 331-338. https://doi.org/10.1128/EC.3.2.331-338.2004
  23. Yanagisawa M, Nakamura K, Ariga O, Nakasaki K. 2011. Production of high concentrations of bioethanol from seaweeds that contain easily hydrolysable polysaccharides. Process Biochem. 46: 2111-2116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2011.08.001
  24. Zheng Y, Pan Z, Zhang R, Wang D. 2009. Enzymatic saccharification of dilute acid pretreated saline crops for fermentable sugar production. Appl. Energy 86: 2459-2465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2009.03.012

Cited by

  1. Thermal Acid Hydrolysis Pretreatment, Enzymatic Saccharification and Ethanol Fermentation from Red Seaweed, Gracilaria verrucosa vol.43, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.4014/mbl.1410.10007
  2. Enhanced ethanol production by fermentation of Gelidium amansii hydrolysate using a detoxification process and yeasts acclimated to high-salt concentration vol.38, pp.6, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-015-1362-2
  3. Effects of galactose adaptation in yeast for ethanol fermentation from red seaweed, Gracilaria verrucosa vol.38, pp.9, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-015-1411-x
  4. Evaluation of ethanol production and bioadsorption of heavy metals by various red seaweeds vol.39, pp.6, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-016-1571-3
  5. 갈조류 미역(Undaria pinnatifida)의 분리당화발효와 다양한 효모를 이용한 바이오에탄올의 생산 vol.44, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.4014/mbl.1610.10007
  6. 홍조류(Kappaphycus alvarezii)의 동시 당화 발효를 이용한 바이오에탄올의 생산 vol.44, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.4014/mbl.1603.03001
  7. Evaluation of Galactose Adapted Yeasts for Bioethanol Fermentation from Kappaphycus alvarezii Hydrolyzates vol.26, pp.7, 2014, https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.1602.02019
  8. 해조류 바이오매스를 이용한 바이오에탄올 생산기술 vol.26, pp.8, 2016, https://doi.org/10.5352/jls.2016.26.8.976
  9. Bioethanol production from Gracilaria verrucosa using Saccharomyces cerevisiae adapted to NaCl or galactose vol.40, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-016-1718-2
  10. Clostridium 종을 이용한 미역으로부터 아세톤, 부탄올, 에탄올 (ABE) 생산 vol.45, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.4014/mbl.1702.02009
  11. 홍조류(Eucheuma denticulatum)를 이용한 바이오에탄올 생산 vol.45, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.4014/mbl.1709.09002
  12. Improved fermentation performance to produce bioethanol from Gelidium amansii using Pichia stipitis adapted to galactose vol.41, pp.7, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-018-1926-z
  13. Mechano-Enzymatic Deconstruction with a New Enzymatic Cocktail to Enhance Enzymatic Hydrolysis and Bioethanol Fermentation of Two Macroalgae Species vol.23, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules23010174
  14. Evaluation of tropical seaweeds as feedstock for bioethanol production vol.15, pp.5, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-017-1455-3
  15. Proximate composition and the production of fermentable sugars, levulinic acid, and HMF from Gracilaria fisheri and Gracilaria tenuistipitata cultivated in earthen ponds vol.31, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10811-018-1552-9
  16. Application of the Severity Factor and HMF Removal of Red Macroalgae Gracilaria verrucosa to Production of Bioethanol by Pichia stipitis and Kluyveromyces marxianus with Adaptive Evolution vol.187, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-018-2888-y
  17. Detoxification of Hydrolysates of the Red Seaweed Gelidium amansii for Improved Bioethanol Production vol.188, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-019-02970-x
  18. Galactose에 순치한 Saccharomyces cerevisiae를 이용하여 꼬시래기(Gracilaria verrucosa)로부터 바이오에탄올 생산 vol.49, pp.1, 2021, https://doi.org/10.48022/mbl.2009.09005
  19. A Cookbook for Bioethanol from Macroalgae: Review of Selecting and Combining Processes to Enhance Bioethanol Production vol.7, pp.4, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40726-021-00202-7