DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Priority Analysis for Infrastructure Recovery from Volcanic Disaster

사회기반시설의 화산재해 복구 우선순위 산정

  • Received : 2014.01.09
  • Accepted : 2014.03.04
  • Published : 2014.06.01

Abstract

Recently volcanic eruptions and activities occurring in many parts of world have become a common global concern to many countries. The severity of these Volcanic disasters, such as of Mt. Eyjafjallajokull in Iceland and Mt. Merapi in Indonesia, have caused damages and causalities reaching astronomical levels. The infrastructure is categorized into 18sections that appropriately reflecting the survey data collected from various government agents, current inhabitant and engineers to accumulate a database on the priorities and preferences of restoring and reconstructing many kinds of infrastructure and facilities. The survey data was collect by using the "Likert 5 Scale Method" which emphasized the importance and priority of reconstruction and restoration for the specific facilities and infrastructures. The data was corrugated, organized and used in plotting and planning a strategic recovery agenda. The survey results were analyzed and verified to ensure the validity and reliability of the data by using chi-square test. This paper presents that recovery period and recovery cost to the total damage of infrastructure and facilities were used to make a recovery network with implemented construction management method. The research is expected that a more efficient and prompt recovery protocol and recovery plan can be executed and can be use as a reference and database.

최근 아이슬란드의 에야프얄라요쿨화산과 인도네시아의 메라피화산의 등 대형화산재해에 따른 국가적 손실이 세계 곳곳에서 빈번하게 발생하고 있으며 천문학적인 경제적 손실과 인명손실이 발생하였다. 국내의 경우 한반도의 백두산이 최근 빈번한 지진파가 발생하는 가운데 백두산화산 분화의 가능성이 고조되고 있는 현실이다. 본 논문은 사회기반시설에 대해 18가지로 분류를 통해 인도네시아 현지 공무원, 주민, 연구원을 대상으로 사회기반시설의 복구우선순위에 대한 리커트 5점척도 방법으로설문을 실시하여 설문결과에 가중치를 적용, 정량적인 복구우선순위 결과와 사회기반시설의 복구 니즈를 도출하였다. 국내의 경우 화산재해의 피해경험이 전무하기 때문에 이에 따른 피해자들의 복구수요파악이 부족한 실정이다. 따라서 본 연구를 통해 도출된 재해 복구 우선순위를 국내 대형 화산재해 발생 시 복구 우선순위로 활용할 수 있을 것으로 기대하며 연구결과를 활용하여 화산재해 발생 시 복구, 복원 시 참고할 수 있는 자료로써 활용될 수 있을 것으로 기대한다.

Keywords

References

  1. Blong, R. J. (1986). Volcanic hazards : A Sourcebook on the Effects of Eruptions, Disasters, Vol. 10, No. 3, pp. 238-240. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7717.1986.tb00595.x
  2. Ha, H. S. (2012). Enforcement an analysis of disaster recovery business, National Assembly Budget Office (in Korean).
  3. Hong, Y. P. (2013). The proposal of guidelines for elementary school system - for structure and support rapid and appropriate, Korea University Press (in Korean).
  4. Kim, H. W. and Park, J. E. (2013). "An analysis of disaster management response with respect to supervolcano disaster case studies." Journal of KOSHAM, Vol. 13, pp. 151-156. https://doi.org/10.9798/KOSHAM.2013.13.2.151
  5. Kim, I. H. (1995). Decision-making and construction plan, Construction Association of Korea (in Korean).
  6. Ko, Y. B. (2011). Dictionary of sociology, Social and Cultural Institute (in Korean).
  7. Lee, S. S., Kim, H. S. and Lee, D. H. (2010). Analysis of volcanic ash dispersion due to eruption of Mt. Baek-doo, National Institute for Disaster Prevention.
  8. Park, B. C. (2011). Planning for countermeasure technologies for huge volcanic activity, National Disaster Management Institute.
  9. Park, H. T., Kang, I. S. and Kim, C. H. (2007). Construction project management, Gimundang (in Korean).
  10. Seoul Urban Planning Bureau (2012). Terms of urban planning easy to understand from Seoul (in Korean).
  11. Toba, D. (2011). Talk about it real in the affected areas, Wani Plus (in Japan).
  12. Yoon, S. H. (2011). Influence with the possibility of volcanic eruption of Baekdu, Assembly Environment Forum, pp. 5-6.