DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Phylogenetic position of eight Amphora sensu lato (Bacillariophyceae) species and comparative analysis of morphological characteristics

  • Wang, Pengbin (Department of Life Science, College of Natural Sciences, Hanyang University) ;
  • Park, Bum Soo (Department of Life Science, College of Natural Sciences, Hanyang University) ;
  • Kim, Jin Ho (Department of Life Science, College of Natural Sciences, Hanyang University) ;
  • Kim, Joo-Hwan (Department of Life Science, College of Natural Sciences, Hanyang University) ;
  • Lee, Hae-Ok (Department of Life Science, College of Natural Sciences, Hanyang University) ;
  • Han, Myung-Soo (Department of Life Science, College of Natural Sciences, Hanyang University)
  • Received : 2013.10.02
  • Accepted : 2014.03.27
  • Published : 2014.06.15

Abstract

Amphora Ehrenberg ex Kutzing sensu lato is a common and widespread benthic diatom genus with a taxonomy that has been under continual revision, particularly based on molecular analyses. Although Amphora species have been studied using modern microscopy in recent years, there has not been much progress on molecular characterization of the species, especially in Asia. In this study of Amphora, sampling was carried out from September 2009 to August 2010 in Korean coastal waters. The morphological and molecular characteristics of eight Amphora sensu lato were examined: Amphora marina, A. proteus, Halamphora costata, H. coffeaeformis, H. eunotia, H. holsatica, H. terroris, and Halamphora sp. Based on previous accounts, morphology suggested that A. marina and A. proteus belong to the subgenus Amphora Cleve, which have smooth girdle bands and rather coarse and very distinct areolae on the valve. The other species, H. coffeaeformis, H. costata, H. eunotia, H. holsatica, H. terroris, and Halamphora sp. belong to the subgenus Halamphora Cleve, which was recently elevated to generic status by Levkov 2009, have plicate girdle bands, puncta which do not form straight longitudinal lines, valves which have a narrow ventral portion and apices that are generally rostrate-capitate and recurved. In agreement with analysis based on morphological characteristics, phylogenetic analysis based on small subunit rDNA suggested that the eight Amphora sensu lato species were not a monophyletic group as the morphological classification. Also, the results of molecular work and statistical analysis on all these Amphora sensu lato combined with phylogenic analysis on our geographically representative samples give strong evidence that Halamphora Levkov is independent of Amphora Cleve. Furthermore, in this study, Amphora terroris was transferred Halamphora as Halamphora terroris (Ehrenberg) Wang comb. nov. and Amphora marina was recorded for the first time in Korea.

Keywords

References

  1. Agardh, C. 1827. Aufzahlung einiger in den ostreichischen Landern gefundenen neuen Gattungen und Arten von Algen, nebst ihrer Diagnostik und beigefugten Bemerkungen. Flora 10:625-646.
  2. Andersen, R. A. 2005. Algal culturing techniques. Academic Press, San Diego, CA, 578 pp.
  3. Archibald, R. E. M. & Schoeman, F. R. 1984. Amphora coffeaeformis (Agardh) Kutzing: a revision of the species under light and electron microscopy. S. Afr. J. Bot. 3:83-102.
  4. Beerli, P. 2006. Comparison of Bayesian and maximum-likelihood inference of population genetic parameters. Bioinformatics 22:341-345. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bti803
  5. Beszteri, B., Acs, E., Makk, J., Kovacs, G., Marialigeti, K. & Kiss, K. T. 2001. Phylogeny of six naviculoid diatoms based on 18S rDNA sequences. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 51:1581-1586.
  6. Boyer, C. S. 1916. The Diatomaceae of Philadelphia and vicinity. Press of J. B. Lippincott Company, Philadelphia, PA, 232 pp.
  7. Boyer, C. S. 1927. Synopsis of North American Diatomaceae. Part 2. Naviculatae, Surirellatae. Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Phil. 79:229-583.
  8. Bruder, K. & Medlin, L. K. 2007. Molecular assessment of phylogenetic relationships in selected species/genera in the naviculoid diatoms (Bacillariophyta). I. The genus Placoneis. Nova Hedwigia 85:331-352. https://doi.org/10.1127/0029-5035/2007/0085-0331
  9. Bruder, K. & Medlin, L. K. 2008. Morphological and molecular investigations of naviculoid diatoms. II. Selected genera and families. Diatom Res. 23:283-329. https://doi.org/10.1080/0269249X.2008.9705759
  10. Chin, T. G., Cheng, Z., Liu, S. & Ma, J. 1992. The marine benthic diatoms in China. China Ocean Press, Beijing, 429 pp.
  11. Clavero, E., Grimalt, J. O. & Hernandez-Marine, M. 2000. The fine structure of two small Amphora species. A. tenerrima Aleem & Hustedt and A. tenuissima Hustedt. Diatom Res. 15:195-208. https://doi.org/10.1080/0269249X.2000.9705495
  12. Cleve-Euler, A. 1953. Die Diatomeen von Schweden und Finnland. III. K. Sven. Vetensk.-Akad. Handl. Ser. IV 4:1-255.
  13. Cleve, P. T. 1873. On diatoms from the Arctic Sea. Bih. K. Sven. Vetensk.-Akad. Handl. 13:1-28.
  14. Cleve, P. T. 1895. Synopsis of the naviculoid diatoms. K. Sven. Vetensk.-Akad. Handl. 27:99-142.
  15. Damste, J. S., Muyzer, G., Abbas, B., Rampen, S. W., Masse, G., Allard, W. G., Belt, S. T., Robert, J. M., Rowland, S. J., Moldowan, J. M., Barbanti, S. M., Fago, F. J., Denisevich, P., Dahl, J., Trindade, L. A. & Schouten, S. 2004. The rise of the rhizosolenid diatoms. Science 304:584-587. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1096806
  16. Davidovich, N. A., Gastineau, R., Gaudin, P., Davidovich, O. I. & Mouget, J. -L. 2012. Sexual reproduction in the newly-described blue diatom, Haslea karadagensis. Fottea 12:219-229.
  17. Ehrenberg, C. G. 1853. Uber einige neue Materialien zur Ubersicht des kleinsten Lebens. Bericht uber die zur Bekanntmachung geeigneten Verhandlungen der Koniglich-Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin 1853:505-533.
  18. Gregory, W. 1857. On new forms of marine Diatomaceae found in the Firth of Clyde and in Loch Fyne, illustrated by numerous figures drawn by R. K. Greville, LL. D., F. R. S. E. Trans. R. Soc. Edinb. 21:473-542. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0080456800032269
  19. Guillard, R. R. L. & Ryther, J. H. 1962. Studies of marine planktonic diatoms. I. Cyclotella nana Hustedt, and Detonula confervacea (Cleve) Gran. Can. J. Microbiol. 8:229-239. https://doi.org/10.1139/m62-029
  20. Guindon, S., Dufayard, J. F., Lefort, V., Anisimova, M., Hordijk, W. & Gascuel, O. 2010. New algorithms and methods to estimate maximum-likelihood phylogenies: assessing the performance of PhyML 3.0. Syst. Biol. 59:307-321. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syq010
  21. Hendey, N. 1964. An introductory account of the smaller algae of British coastal waters. Part V. Bacillariophyceae (diatoms). Her Majesty's Stationary Office, London, 317 pp.
  22. Hustedt, F. 1925. Bacillariales aus den Salzgewassern bei Oldesloe in Holstein. Mitteilungen der Geographischen Gesellschaft und der Naturhistorischen Museums in Lubeck, zweite Reihe 30:84-121.
  23. Hustedt, F. 1930. Bacillariophyta (Diatomeae). In Pascher, A. (Ed.) Die Susswasser-Flora Mitteleuropas. Heft 10. Zweite Auflage. Gustav Fischer, Jena, pp. 1-466.
  24. Jin, D., Cheng, Z., Lin, J. & Liu, S. 1982. The marine benthic diatoms in China. China Ocean Press, Beijing, 321 pp.
  25. Jung, S. W., Han, M. -S. & Ki, J. -S. 2010. Molecular genetic divergence of the centric diatom Cyclotella and Discostella (Bacillariophyceae) revealed by nuclear ribosomal DNA comparisons. J. Appl. Phycol. 22:319-329. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10811-009-9462-5
  26. Katano, T., Lee, J., Ki, J. -S., Kang, S. -H. & Han, M. -S. 2007. Effects of temperature and salinity on the growth and the optimum nitrogen to phosphorus ratio for the culture of Diatoma tenue isolated from a temporary arctic pond in Svalbard, Norway. J. Freshw. Ecol. 22:629-635. https://doi.org/10.1080/02705060.2007.9664823
  27. Ki, J. -S., Chang, K. B., Roh, H. J., Lee, B. Y., Yoon, J. Y. & Jang, G. Y. 2007. Direct DNA isolation from solid biological sources without pretreatments with proteinase-K and/or homogenization through automated DNA extraction. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 103:242-246. https://doi.org/10.1263/jbb.103.242
  28. Ki, J. -S., Cho, S. -Y., Katano, T., Jung, S. W., Lee, J., Park, B. S., Kang, S. -H. & Han, M. -S. 2009. Comprehensive comparisons of three pennate diatoms, Diatoma tenuae, Fragilaria vaucheriae, and Navicula pelliculosa, isolated from summer Arctic reservoirs (Svalbard $79^{\circ}N$), by fine-scale morphology and nuclear 18S ribosomal DNA. Polar Biol. 32:147-159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00300-008-0514-0
  29. Ki, J. -S. & Han, M. S. 2007. Informative characteristics of 12 divergent domains in complete large subunit rDNA sequences from the harmful dinoflagellate genus, Alexandrium (Dinophyceae). J. Eukaryot. Microbiol. 54:210-219. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1550-7408.2007.00251.x
  30. Klipp, E., Liebermeister, W., Wierling, C., Kowald, A., Lehrach, H. & Herwig, R. 2009. Systems biology: a textbook. Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 592 pp.
  31. Kooistra, W. H. & Medlin, L. K. 1996. Evolution of the diatoms (Bacillariophyta). IV. A reconstruction of their age from small subunit rRNA coding regions and the fossil record. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 6:391-407. https://doi.org/10.1006/mpev.1996.0088
  32. Krammer, K. 1980. Morphologic and taxonomic investigations of some freshwater species of the diatom genus Amphora Ehr. Bacillaria 3:197-225.
  33. Krammer, K. & Lange-Bertalot, H. 1986. Subwasserflora von Mitteleuropa, Bd 02/1 Bacillariophyceae 1. Teil: Naviculaceae. Spektrum Akademischer Verlag, Heidelberg Berlin, 876 pp.
  34. Krammer, K., Lange-Bertalot, H., Ettle, H., Gerloff, J., Heyning, H. & Mollenhauer, D. 1991. Bacillariophyceae. Vol. 2/1. Naviculaceae. Gustav Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart and Jena, 876 pp.
  35. Kutzing, F. T. 1844. Die Kieselschaligen Bacillarien oder Diatomeen. Zu finden bei W. Kohne, Nordhausen, pp. 1-152.
  36. Lee, K. & Round, F. E. 1987. Studies on freshwater Amphora species. I: Amphora ovalis. Diatom Res. 2:193-203. https://doi.org/10.1080/0269249X.1987.9704997
  37. Levkov, Z. 2009. Diatoms of Europe. Vol. 5. Amphora sensu lato. Koeltz, Koenigstein, 916 pp.
  38. Mann, D. G. 1993. Patterns of sexual reproduction in diatoms. Hydrobiologia 269/270:11-20. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00027999
  39. Mann, D. G. & Poulickova, A. 2010. Mating system, auxosporulation, species taxonomy and evidence for homoploid evolution in Amphora (Bacillariophyta). Phycologia 49:183-201. https://doi.org/10.2216/PH09-08.1
  40. Medlin, L. K., Cooper, A., Hill, C., Wrieden, S. & Wellbrock, U. 1995. Phylogenetic position of the Chromista plastids based on small subunit rRNA coding regions. Curr. Genet. 28:560-565. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00518169
  41. Medlin, L. K. & Kaczmarska, I. 2004. Evolution of the diatoms: V. Morphological and cytological support for the major clades and a taxonomic revision. Phycologia 43:245-270. https://doi.org/10.2216/i0031-8884-43-3-245.1
  42. Medlin, L. K., Kooistra, W. H., Gersonde, R. & Wellbrock, U. 1996. Evolution of the diatoms (Bacillariophyta). II. Nuclear-encoded small-subunit rRNA sequence comparisons confirm a paraphyletic origin for the centric diatoms. Mol. Biol. Evol. 13:67-75. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025571
  43. Medlin, L., Williams, D. M. & Sims, P. A. 1993. The evolution of the diatoms (Bacillariophyta). I. Origin of the group and assessment of the monophyly of its major divisions. Eur. J. Phycol. 28:261-275. https://doi.org/10.1080/09670269300650381
  44. Nagumo, T. 2003. Taxonomic studies of the subgenus Amphora Cleve of the genus Amphora (Bacillariophyceae) in Japan. Gebruder Borntraeger Verlagsbuchhandlung, Science Publishers, Stuttgart, 265 pp.
  45. Nylander, J. A. A. 2004. MrModeltest v2. Program distributed by the author. Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University, Uppsala.
  46. Oh, H. -Y., Cheon, J. -Y., Lee, J. H., Hur, S. B. & Ki, J. -S. 2010. Nuclear rDNA characteristics for DNA taxonomy of the centric diatom Chaetoceros (Bacillariophyceae). Algae 25:65-70. https://doi.org/10.4490/algae.2010.25.2.065
  47. Peragallo, H. & Peragallo, M. 1908. Diatomees marines de France et des districts maritimes voisins. Micrographe-Editeur, a Grez-sur-Loing (S.-et-M.), 491 pp.
  48. Posada, D. & Buckley, T. R. 2004. Model selection and model averaging in phylogenetics: advantages of Akaike information criterion and Bayesian approaches over likelihood ratio tests. Syst. Biol. 53:793-808. https://doi.org/10.1080/10635150490522304
  49. Rabenhorst, L. 1868. Flora europaea algarum aquae dulcis et submarinae. E. Kummerum, Leipzig, 359 pp.
  50. Ronquist, F., Teslenko, M., Van der Mark, P., Ayres, D. L., Darling, A., Hohna, S., Larget, B., Liu, L., Suchard, M. A. & Huelsenbeck, J. P. 2012. MrBayes 3.2: Efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Syst. Biol. 61:539-542. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/sys029
  51. Round, F. E., Crawford, R. M. & Mann, D. G. 1990. The diatoms: biology and morphology of the genera. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 747 pp.
  52. Sala, S. E., Guerrero, J. M. & Coste, M. 2007. Valve morphology of Amphora chilensis Hustedt (Bacillariophyceae). Nova Hedwigia 85:353-364. https://doi.org/10.1127/0029-5035/2007/0085-0353
  53. Sala, S. E., Sar, E. A., Hinz, F. & Sunesen, I. 2006. Studies on Amphora subgenus Halamphora (Bacillariophyta): the revision of some species described by Hustedt using type material. Eur. J. Phycol. 41:155-167. https://doi.org/10.1080/09670260600556609
  54. Sar, E. A., Sala, S. E., Hinz, F. & Sunesen, I. 2003. Revision of Amphora holsatica (Bacillariophyceae). Eur. J. Phycol. 38:73-81. https://doi.org/10.1080/0967026031000096272
  55. Sato, S., Tamotsu, N. & Mann, D. G. 2013. Morphology and life history of Amphora commutata (Bacillariophyta) I: the vegetative cell and phylogenetic position. Phycologia 52:225-238. https://doi.org/10.2216/12-072.1
  56. Schmidt, A. & Fricke, F. 1875. Atlas der Diatomaceen-kunde. C. H. Kain, London, 95 pp.
  57. Schoeman, F. R. & Archibald, R. E. M. 1976. The diatom flora of Southern Africa: National Institute for water research, CSIR Special Report. Council for Scientific and Industrial Research, Pretoria, 62 pp.
  58. Smith, W. 1857. Notes of an excursion to the Pyrenees in search of Diatomaceae. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. Ser. 2 19:1-13.
  59. Smith, W. & West, T. 1853. A synopsis of the British Diatomaceae: with remarks on their structure, functions and distribution; and instructions for collecting and preserving specimens. J. Van Voorst, London, 86 pp.
  60. Swofford, D. L. 2003. PAUP*: Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (and other methods). Version 4. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
  61. Tamura, K., Peterson, D., Peterson, N., Stecher, G., Nei, M. & Kumar, S. 2011. MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol. Biol. Evol. 28:2731-2739. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msr121
  62. Tempere, J. & Peragallo, H. 1908. Diatomees du Monde Entier. 2nd ed. Chez J. Tempere, Arcachon, pp. 17-112.
  63. Thompson, J. D., Higgins, D. G. & Gibson, T. J. 1994. Clustal W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 22:4673-4680. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/22.22.4673
  64. Throndsen, J. 1978. Preservation and storage. In Sournia, A. (Ed.) Phytoplankton Manual. UNESCO, Paris, pp. 69-74.
  65. Tomas, C. R. 1996. Identifying marine diatoms and dinoflagellates. Academic Press, San Diego, CA, 858 pp.
  66. Van Heurck, H. 1896. A treatise on the Diatomaceae. W. E. Baxter Ltd., London, 559 pp.
  67. Vesela, J., Neustupa, J., Pichrtova, M. & Poulickova, A. 2009. Morphometric study of Navicula morphospecies (Bacillariophyta) with respect to diatom life cycle. Fottea 9:307-316.
  68. Wasell, A. & Hakansson, H. 1992. Diatom stratigraphy in a lake on Horseshoe island, Antarctica: a marine-brackish-fresh water transition with comments on the systematics and ecology of the most common diatoms. Diatom Res. 7:157-194. https://doi.org/10.1080/0269249X.1992.9705205
  69. Wehr, J. D. & Sheath, R. G. 2003. Freshwater algae of North America: ecology and classification. Academic Press, San Diego, CA, 917 pp.
  70. Wolle, F. 1894. Diatomaceae of North America: illustrated with twenty-three hundred figures from the author's drawings on one hundred and twelve plate. The Comenius Press, Bethlehem, PA, 506 pp.
  71. Wood, E. J. F. & Crosby, L. 1959. Studies on Australian and New Zealand diatoms II. Normally epontic and benthic genera. Trans. R. Soc. N. Z. 86:1-58.

Cited by

  1. Epiphytic diatoms in lotic and lentic waters - diversity and representation of species complexes vol.15, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.5507/fot.2015.022
  2. Morphological and Molecular Phylogenetic Position of Prorocentrum micans sensu stricto and Description of Prorocentrum koreanum sp. nov. from Southern Coastal Waters in Korea and Japan vol.167, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.protis.2015.12.001
  3. Description and phylogenetic position ofAmphora aliformis(Bacillariophyta), a new species from Tokyo Bay vol.54, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.2216/14-081.1
  4. Intraspecific diversity and distribution of the cosmopolitan speciesPseudo-nitzschia pungens(Bacillariophyceae): morphology, genetics, and ecophysiology of the three clades vol.51, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1111/jpy.12263
  5. Molecular Detection of a Potentially Toxic Diatom Species vol.12, pp.5, 2015, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph120504921
  6. Development of a qPCR assay for tracking the ecological niches of genetic sub-populations within Pseudo-nitzschia pungens (Bacillariophyceae) vol.63, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hal.2016.12.002
  7. sp. nov. (Bacillariophyceae) from South Korea vol.33, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1080/0269249X.2018.1465479
  8. (Bacillariophyta) with a focus on morphological and ecological evolution pp.00223646, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1111/jpy.12836
  9. Relationship between dissolved organic carbon and bacterial community in the coastal waters of Incheon, Korea vol.46, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1515/ohs-2017-0006
  10. Two New Benthic Diatoms of the Genus Achnanthidium (Bacillariophyceae) from the Hangang River, Korea vol.12, pp.7, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3390/d12070285