DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Comparative Study on the Nominated Subcontractor (NSC) System of Building Construction Project in Asian Commonwealth of Nations - Focused on the NSC Clause Analysis of Standard Contract Forms -

아시아 지역 영연방국가의 지정하도급(NSC)제도에 관한 비교 연구 - 표준계약약관의 지정하도급자 항목분석을 중심으로 -

  • Cho, Jaeyong (Department of Architecture and Architectural Engineering, Graduate School of Engineering, Kyoto University) ;
  • Kim, Junggon (Department of Architecture and Architectural Engineering, Graduate School of Engineering, Kyoto University) ;
  • Park, Hyeonggeun (Construction Management & Economy Research Division, Korea Institute of Construction Technology)
  • 조재용 (교토대학 공학연구과 건축학전공) ;
  • 김정곤 (교토대학 공학연구과 건축학전공) ;
  • 박형근 (한국건설기술연구원 건설관리경제연구실)
  • Received : 2013.11.04
  • Accepted : 2014.03.20
  • Published : 2014.05.31

Abstract

In recent, many Korean contractors have tried to extend their business area into the overseas construction market, mainly as a result of a reduction in their domestic construction market. However in terms of risk, overseas construction projects are likely to face a number of unpredictable problems, many of which occur as a result of differences in contract cultures and construction environments between Korea and other countries. One key issue facing overseas construction projects in particular, is that of sub-contracting and control, and the way in which many countries of Commonwealth of Nations operate a unique subcontracting method well known as a nominated sub-contractor(NSC). This paper introduces the NSC system and differences as comparing among standard construction contract forms, such as JCT, SIA, HKIA and PAM. in UK and Asian Commonwealth of Nations. Also, we attempt to classify the type of the NSC system through the consideration of NSC clauses in accordance with the objection and termination of NSC contracting respectively.

최근 국내 건설시장의 축소와 수주경쟁의 심화로 인하여 많은 건설기업들이 이에 대한 대안으로써 해외건설 시장에 진출하고 있다. 그러나 해외건설 프로젝트에서는 국내 건설 프로젝트와 책임과 권한의 범위가 다른 다양한 프로젝트 주체가 참여하고 있으며, 프로젝트를 둘러싼 수행환경 및 계약관행이 국내 건설 프로젝트와 다르기 때문에 다양한 리스크 요인이 존재하고 있다. 특히 해외건설 프로젝트의 문제가운데 하나가 Nominated Sub-Contracting (NSC)로 알려진 영국과 영국연방국가에서 사용되어지고 있는 하도급계약이다. 본 논문은 영국과 아시아지역 영연방 국가의 JCT약관, SIA약관, HKIA약관, PAM약관의 비교를 통해 NSC제도와 차이점을 소개한다. 또한 NSC계약의 채용 거부와 계약 해지와 관련된 약관항목분석을 통해 NSC제도의 유형을 분류한다.

Keywords

References

  1. An, C., Yoo, H., and Kim, Y. (2012). "A Decision Support Model for the Exchange Risk Management of Overseas Construction Projects" Korean journal of Construction Engineering and Management, KICEM, 13(3), pp. 109-121. https://doi.org/10.6106/KJCEM.2012.13.3.109
  2. Cheung, S. O., Yiu, K. T., and Chim, P. S. (2006). "How Relational are Construction Contracts?", Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 132(1), pp. 48-56. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(2006)132:1(48)
  3. Dulaimi, M. F., and Shan, H. G. (2002). "The factors influencing bid mark-up decisions of large-and medium-size contractors in Singapore", Construction Management and Economics, 20, pp. 601-610. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190210159890
  4. Eguchi, T., Miyoshi, K., and Yabuuchi, T. (2000). "On the Rules of Nominated Subcontractor(NSC) and Prime Cost Contract(PCC) in UK", Proceedings of 16th symposium on building construction and Management of Projects, Tokyo, pp. 189-215.
  5. Hinze, J., and Tracey, A. (1994). "The Contractor-Subcontractor Relationship : The Subcontractors' View", Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 120(2), pp. 274-287. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1994)120:2(274)
  6. Hughes, G., Gray, C., and Murdoch, J. (1994). "Construction subcontracts : for what we are about to receive" 7th annual Construction Law Conference, King's College, London, pp. 1-15.
  7. International Contractors Association of Korea (2013). "Amount of overseas construction contract by region: (Jan. 20, 2014).
  8. Joint Contract Tribunal (2011). "Design and Build Contract 2011" RIBA Publications, pp. 78-79.
  9. Joint Contract Tribunal (2011). "Standard Building Contract with Approximate Quantities 2011" RIBA Publications, pp. 47-48.
  10. Kennedy, P., Morrison, A., and Milne, D. O. (1997). "Resolution of disputes arising from set-off clauses between main contractors and subcontractors" Construction Management and Economics, 15, pp. 527-537. https://doi.org/10.1080/014461997372737
  11. Mbachu, J. (2008). "Conceptual framework for the assessment of subcontractors'eligibility and performance in the construction industry", Construction Management and Economics, 26, pp. 471-484. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190801918730
  12. Murdoch, J., and Hughes, W. (2008). "Construction Contracts : Law and Management" 4th Edition, Taylor & Francis, p. 283.
  13. Park, H., Shin, E and Lee, K. (2008). "Improvement plan going into other countries of domestic construction companies", Korean journal of Construction Engineering and Management, KICEM, 9(6), pp. 225-234.
  14. Pertubuhan Akitek Malaysia (2006). "Agreement and Conditions of PAM Contract" PAM Publications, pp. 32-35.
  15. Real Estate Developer's Association of Singapore (2010). "REDAS Design and Build Conditions of Contract" 3rd Edition, REDAS Publications.
  16. Singapore Academy of Law Hompage : Commercial Law, Ch.26 Building and Construction Law,
  17. Singapore Institute of Architects (2011). "Articles and Conditions of Building Contract Lump Sum Contract" 9th Edition, SIA Publications, pp. 23-27.
  18. Statistics Korea: Overseas construction contracts
  19. The Hong Kong Institute of Architects (2005). "Agreement & Schedule of Conditions of Building Contract", HKIA Publications, pp. 57-63.
  20. Uher T. E. (1991). "Risks in subcontracting : Subcontract conditions", Construction Management and Economics, 9, pp. 495-508. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446199100000038
  21. Yik, FWH., Lai, JHK., Chan, KT., and Yiu, ECY. (2006). "Problems with specialist subcontracting in the construction industry", Building Serv. Eng. Res. Technol., 27(3), pp. 183-193. https://doi.org/10.1191/0143624406bse160oa
  22. Zhi, H. (1995). "Risk management for overseas construction projects", International Journal of Project Management, 13(4), pp. 231-237. https://doi.org/10.1016/0263-7863(95)00015-I