DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

수업연한 4년제 지정 간호전문대학의 3+1 교육과정 운영 실태

The Current Status of the 3+1 Curriculum Implementation of Nursing College in Transition from a Three-year to a Four-year Nursing Education System

  • 투고 : 2014.02.03
  • 심사 : 2014.05.09
  • 발행 : 2014.05.31

초록

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the current status of the 3+1 curriculum implementation of nursing college in transition from a three-year to a four-year nursing education system. Method: This study employs a triangulation study including a questionnaire survey and a focus group interview. The data collected from 34 nursing colleges were analyzed using SPSS/WIN 21.0 program and the interview data(9 department chairs of nursing colleges) were analyzed using qualitative content analysis. Results: The important results are as follows; Many colleges applied academic performance as student selection standards. Factors in students' satisfaction are acquiring the bachelor's degree and a lot more relaxed college life. Factors in students' dissatisfaction are anxiety about national nursing exam and absence of college's own specialized programs. Main points of 3+1 course policy making are strengthening character education and core-fundamentals education in nursing. After qualitative contents analysis, three management-related subjects and 7 sub-subjects emerged. Three subjects were the effects of the 3+1 course running, the difficulties in management and how to run the 3+1 course effectively. Conclusion: From the results of this study, we concluded with some practical implications for the 3+1 course running for reformed nursing schools.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Cho, B. R. (2013, November). The Meaning and Challenge of 4 year Nursing Schools. Paper presented at the meeting of the Korean Accreditation Board of Nursing Education, Seoul.
  2. Hong, S. H., & Park, K. S. (2002). A study on the personality and Job satisfaction of Nurses. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing Administration, 8(3), 489-500.
  3. Hsieh, H. F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277-1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687
  4. Kim, H. S., Cha, J. G. (2012). Experience of Students of Nursing College in Transition From a Three year to a Four-year Nursing Education System. Journal of Korean Academy Society Nursing Education, 18(3), 465-473. https://doi.org/10.5977/jkasne.2012.18.3.465
  5. Kim, S, J., Kim, H. J., Lee, K. J., & Lee, S. O. (2000). Focus group study methodology. Seoul: Hyunmoonsa.
  6. Kim, S. Y., Joung, S. E., & Hwang, C. I. (2011). A Comparison on general education curriculum of 4-year and 3-year nursing schools in Korea, Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing, 41(1), 101-109. https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2011.41.1.101
  7. Morgan, D. L., Scannel1, A. U. (1998). Planning focus groups:focus group kit 2. London: SAGE Publication.
  8. Park, J. H. (2011). Study of abilities required to develop for student in nursing education. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing Administration, 17(1), 74-87. https://doi.org/10.11111/jkana.2011.17.1.74
  9. Partin, J. L., Payne, T. A., & Slemmons, M. F. (2011). Students' perceptions of their learning experience using high-fidelity simulation to teach concepts relative to obstetrics. Nursing Education Perspectives, 32(3), 186-188. https://doi.org/10.5480/1536-5026-32.3.186

피인용 문헌

  1. Analysis of Survey of Interdisciplinary Unification of Biomedical Laboratory Science vol.50, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.15324/kjcls.2018.50.3.289