The Mathematical Education (한국수학교육학회지시리즈A:수학교육)

Korean Society of Mathematical Education (한국수학교육학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Designing and implementing professional development program of multi-tiered teacher community: Joint collaboration between teachers and PD program developers

공동체 단위 수학교사 연수 프로그램의 개발 및 효과 -'함께 만들어가는 수학교사 연수'를 중심으로-

  • Received : 2014.03.31
  • Accepted : 2014.05.12
  • Published : 2014.05.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This research has an intention of developing a professional development program. We proposed an alternative mathematics teacher training model based on the situated learning theory, community of practice, and reflective practitioner. The developed mathematics teacher professional development program recruited participation unit that was consisted of 3 or 4 teachers in same school and total of 28 teachers from 9 schools. Also, there were 18 mentors to support each school. In this sense, it can be called multi-tired teacher community professional development program. Through the program, the teachers improve their teaching competency. Also, the operation ability of teacher learning community was improved. Learning community culture has been formed in each school. It shows ability that the explorative learning community can be operated voluntarily although the program finished. Furthermore, community shared corporate responsibility about open class. They recognize open class as a new method to improve community teaching ability than a tool to evaluate individual teaching ability.

Keywords

References

  1. 권나영, 이은정, 박미미, 박진형 (2012). 수학교사 전문성 개발을 위한 고찰: 국외 수학교사 전문성 개발 프로그램 사례를 바탕으로, 수학교육학연구 22(3), 387-400. Kwon, N. Y., Lee, E., Park, M., & Park, J. (2012). A study of professional development for mathematics teachers: Based on the investigation of professional development programs in foreign countries. The Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics, 22(3), 287-400.
  2. 김진희, 최원준, 심준석 (2010). 내러티브를 활용한 수업비평: 교사 배움 공동체 사례, 중등교육연구 58(3), 333-355. Kim, J. H., Choi, W. J., & Shim, J. S. (2010). Narrative inquiry in class criticism: case of community of teacher Learning practice. Secondary Institute of Education, 58(3), 333-355.
  3. 박경미, 정영옥, 김화경, 김동원, 최수일, 최지선 (2010). 우리나라 초․중등학교 수학교육 발전방안 기획연구. 한국과학창의재단 2010-20. Park, K. M., Chung, Y., Kim H., Choi, S., & Choi, J. S. (2010). A research on the developmental plan for mathematics education in elementary and secondary school. KOFAC 2010-20.
  4. 박선미 (2010). 예비교사교육 방법으로서 '행위 중 반성'에 대한 비판적 고찰, 사회과교육 49(3), 39-52. Park, S. (2010). The Critical Analysis of the Reflection in Action as a Method of Pre-service Teacher Education. Social Studies Education, 49(3), 39-52.
  5. 서경혜 (2005). 반성과 실천: 교사의 전문성 개발에 대한 소고, 교육과정연구 23(2), 285-310. Seo, K. H. (2005). Reflection and Practice: On the Professional Development. The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 23(2), 285-310.
  6. 서경혜 (2013). 교사학습에 교사공동체의 실천적 지식, 27(1), 121-148. Seo, K. H. (2010). Teacher Community's Practical Knowledge. The Journal of Korean Teacher Education, 27(1), 121-148.
  7. 서경혜 (2013). 교사학습에 대한 공동체적 접근, 교육과학연구 44(3), 161-190. Seo, K. H. (2013). A Community Approach to Teacher Learning. Journal of Educational Studies, 44(3), 161-190.
  8. 이경화 (2012). 수학교사 전문성 개발 체제(PDS) 구축 방안 연구. 교육과학기술부. Lee K. H. (2012). A study on PDS model for mathematics teacher. MOE.
  9. 이경화, 나귀수, 권나영, 김동원, 이환철, 이동환, 고은성, 박민선, 박미미, 이은정, 조진우, 박진형 (2012). 한국형 수학교사 전문성 개발 체제(PDS) 모델 구축을 위한 기초 연구, 수학교육학연구 22(4), 581-602. Lee, K. H., Na, G. S., Kwon. N, Y., Kim, D., Lee, H. D., Lee, D. H., Ko, E. S., Park, M. S., Park, M., Lee, E. J., Cho, J. W., & Park, J. H. (2012). A Preliminary Study on Designing PDS Model for Korean Mathematics Teachers. The Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics, 22(4), 581-602.
  10. 이준기, 이태경, 하민수 (2013). 교사들의 아이디어 융합과정에서 나타나는 교역지대의 진화과정 탐색: 자율적 학습공동체 'STEAM 교사 연구회' 사례연구, 한국과학교육학회지 33(5), 1055-1086. Lee, J. K., Lee. T. K., & Ha, M. (2013). Exploring the evolution patterns if trading zones appearing in the convergence of teachers' ideas: The case study of a learning community of teaching volunteers 'STEAM teacher community'. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 33(3), 1055-1086.
  11. 이환철 (2012). 수학교육 관련 교사 연수 현황 분석을 통한 정책 방안 모색. 한국과학창의재단. Lee, H. C. (2012). On the analysis and policy alternatives of an in-service teacher training on mathematics education. KOFAC.
  12. 이환철, 장미숙 (2012). 수학교육 관련 교사 연수 현황 분석을 통한 정책 방안 모색, 한국학교수학회논문집 15(1), 171-182. Lee, H. C., & Jang, M. S. (2012). On the analysis and policy alternatives of an in-service teacher training on mathematics education. Journal of the Korean School Mathematics, 15(1), 171-182.
  13. 주미경, 문종은, 박모라 (2013). 중등 교사의 융복합교육 연수 만족도 및 요구 조사, 교과교육학연구 27(2), 521-547. Ju, M. K., Moon, J. E., & Park, M. (2013). Secondary School Teacher's Satisfaction with and Demand for an In-service Program for Yungbokhap Education. Research Institute of Curriculum Instruction, 27(2), 521-547.
  14. 최지선 (2013). 선택형 평가 문항 제작 전문성 향상 연수 프로그램 효과 제고에 대한 사례연구, 수학교육학연구 23(2), 193-212. Choi, J. S.. (2013). A study of the effectiveness of a mathematics teacher"s training program focused on the construction of test items. The Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics, 23(2), 199-212.
  15. Anderson, J. R., Reder, L. M., & Simon, H. A. (1996). Situated learning and education. Educational Researcher, 25(4), 5–11.
  16. Anderson, J. R., Reder, L. M., & Simon, H. A. (1997). Situated versus cognitive perspectives: Form versus substance. Educational Researcher, 26(1), 18–21.
  17. Ball, D.L. & Cohen, D. K. (1999). Developing practice, developing practitioners: toward a practice-based theory of professional development. In L. Darling-Hammond & G. Skyes (Eds.), Teaching as the learning professional: Handbook of policy and practice. (pp. 3-32). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  18. Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32-42.
  19. Brown, T., Heywood, D., Solomon, Y., & Zagorianakos, A. (2013). Experiencing the space we share: rethinking subjectivity and objetivity. ZDM-the International Journal on Mathematics Education, 45(4), 561-572. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-012-0478-y
  20. Cobb, P. & Bowers, J. (1999). Cognitive and Situated Learning Perspectives in Theory and Practice. Educational Researcher, 28(2), 4-15.
  21. Cochran-Smith, M. & Lytle, S. L. (1993). Inside outside: Teacher research and knowledge. NY: Teachers College Press.
  22. Doyle, J. (1991). Rational belief revision (preliminary report). In Fikes, E. and Sandewall, E. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Second Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (163-174), San Mateo, CA. Morgan Kaufmann.
  23. Goos, M. (2013). Sociocultural perspectives in research on and with mathematics teachers: a zone theory approach. ZDM-the International Journal on Mathematics Education, 45(4), 521-533. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-012-0477-z
  24. Greenberg, J., & Baron, R.A. (2000). Behavior in organizations, 7th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  25. Greeno, J. G., & the Middle-school Mathematics through Applications Project Group (1997). Theories and practices of thinking and learning to think. American Journal of Education, 106, 85-126. https://doi.org/10.1086/444177
  26. Greeno, J. G., Collins, A., & Resnick, L. B. (1996). Cognition and learning. In D. Berliner & R. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 15-46). New York: Macmillan.
  27. Hargreaves, A. (2000). Four ages of professionalism and professional learning. Teachers and Teaching:Theory and Practice, 6(2), 151-182. https://doi.org/10.1080/713698714
  28. Lave, J. (1996). Teaching, as learning, in practice. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 3(3), 149-164. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327884mca0303_2
  29. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning:Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge university press.
  30. Potari, D. (2013). The relationship of theory and practice in mathematics teacher professional development: an activity theory perspective. ZDM-the International Journal on Mathematics Education, 45(4), 507-519. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-013-0498-2
  31. Putnam, R. T. & Borko, H. (2000) What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning? Educational Researcher, 29(1), 4-15.
  32. Schon, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.
  33. Schon, D. A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
  34. Shulman, L. S., & Shulman, J. H. (2004). How and what teachers learn: A shifting perspective. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 36(2), 257-271. https://doi.org/10.1080/0022027032000148298
  35. Simon, M. (2013). Promoting fundamental change in mathematics teaching: a theoretical, methodological, and empirical approach to the problem. ZDM-the International Journal on Mathematics Education, 45(4), 573-582 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-013-0486-6
  36. Skott, J. (2013). The relationship of theory and practice in mathematics teacher professional development: an activity theory perspective. ZDM-the International Journal on Mathematics Education, 45(4), 547-559. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-013-0500-z
  37. Wenger, E. (2007). 실천공동체 COP[Communities of practice : learning, meaning, and identity] . (배을규, 손민호 역). 서울: 학지사. (원전은 1998년에 출판).

Cited by

  1. A Comparative Study on Cooperative Interaction in the Teacher’s Learning Community : Focused on Elementary Mathematics Lessons vol.28, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.29275/jerm.2018.02.28.1.75
  2. 국내 수학 교사교육 연구의 동향 분석: 2000년 이후 게재된 한국수학교육학회의 학술지 논문을 중심으로 vol.58, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.7468/mathedu.2019.58.1.121
  3. 연구공동체 활동을 통한 한 경력교사의 전문성 신장 : 수학적 창의성 촉진을 위한 대푯값 과제의 변형과 실행을 중심으로 vol.58, pp.4, 2019, https://doi.org/10.7468/mathedu.2019.58.4.545
  4. 수학 교사 공동체 관련 국내·외 연구 동향 vol.34, pp.4, 2020, https://doi.org/10.7468/jksmee.2020.34.4.439