Computers and Concrete

  • 제13권2호
  • /
  • Pages.271-290
  • /
  • 2014
  • /
  • 1598-8198(pISSN)
  • /
  • 1598-818X(eISSN)
테크노프레스 (Techno-Press)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The effect of architectural form on the earthquake behavior of symmetric RC frame systems

  • Inan, Tugba (Department of Architecture, Izmir Institute of Technology) ;
  • Korkmaz, Koray (Department of Architecture, Izmir Institute of Technology) ;
  • Cagatay, Ismail H. (Department of Civil Engineering, University of Cukurova)
  • 투고 : 2012.04.23
  • 심사 : 2013.11.11
  • 발행 : 2014.02.25
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

In this study, structural irregularities in plan, which has a considerable effect on earthquake behavior of buildings, have been investigated in detail based on Turkish Earthquake Code 2007. The study consists of six main parametric models and a total of 144 sub-models that are grouped based on RC structural systems such as frame, frame + rigid core, frame with shear wall, and frame with shear wall + rigid core. All models are designed to have both symmetrical plan geometry and regular rigidity distribution. Changes in the earthquake behavior of buildings were evaluated according to the number of storeys, number of axes and the configuration of structural elements. Many findings are obtained and assessed as a result of the analysis for each structural irregularity. The study shows that structural irregularities can be observed in completely symmetric buildings in terms of plan geometry and rigidity distribution.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Athanassiadou, C.J. (2008), "Seismic performance of R/C plane frames irregular in elevation", Eng. Struct., 30, 1250-1261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2007.07.015
  2. Bal, I.E., Crowley, H., Pinho, R. and Gulay, F.G. (2008), "Detailed assessment of structural characteristics of Turkish RC building stock for loss assessment models", Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 28, 914-932. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2007.10.005
  3. Belmouden, Y. and Lestuzzi, P. (2009), "An equivalent frame model for seismic analysis of masonry and reinforced concrete buildings", Construct. Build. Mater., 23, 40-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2007.10.023
  4. Cagatay, I.H. (2005), "Experimental evaluation of buildings damaged in recent earthquakes in turkey", Eng. Failure Analysis, 12(3), 440-452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2004.02.007
  5. Cagatay, I.H., Beklen C. and Mosalam K.M. (2010), "Investigation of short column effect of RC buildings: failure and prevention", Comput. Concr., 7(6), 523-532. https://doi.org/10.12989/cac.2010.7.6.523
  6. Charleson, A. (2008), Seismic Design for Architects: Outwitting the Quake, Burlington: Elsevier, USA.
  7. Chen, W.W., Yeh, Y.K., Hwang, S.J., Lu, C.H. and Chen, C.C. (2012), "Out-of-plane seismic behavior and CFRP retrofitting of RC frames infilled with brick walls", Eng. Struct., 34, 213-224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2011.09.015
  8. Dimova, S. and Alashki, I. (2003), "Seismic design of symmetric structures for accidental torsion", Bull. Earthq. Eng., 1(2), 303-320. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026353312676
  9. Ganjavi, B., Amiri, J.V., Amiri, G.G. and Amrei, R.S.A. (2007), "Effect of seismic loading patterns on height-wise distribution of drift, hysteretic energy and damage in reinforced concrete buildings", J. Appl. Sci.,7(22), 3431-3441. https://doi.org/10.3923/jas.2007.3431.3441
  10. IdeCad (2010), IdeYapi, Istanbul, Turkey.
  11. Inan, T. (2010), The interaction of reinforced concrete skeleton systems and architectural form subjected to earthquake effects, Master Thesis, Izmir Institute of Technology.
  12. Inan, T. and Korkmaz, K. (2011), "Evaluation of structural irregularities based on architectural design considerations in Turkey", Struct, Survey, 29(4), 303-319. https://doi.org/10.1108/02630801111162378
  13. Inan, T., Korkmaz, K. and Cagatay, I.H., (2012), "An investigation on plan geometries of RC buildings: with or without projections in plan", Comput. Concrete, 9(6), 439-455. https://doi.org/10.12989/cac.2012.9.6.439
  14. Ozmen, G. (2004), "Excessive torsional irregularity in multi-story structures", Technical J., 15, 3131-3144.
  15. Ozmen, C. and Unay, A.I. (2007), "Commonly encountered seismic design faults due to the architectural design of residential buildings in Turkey", Build. Environ., 42, 1406 -1416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2005.09.029
  16. Requirements for Design and Construction of Reinforced Concrete Structures (2000), Turkish Standards Institute (TS-500).
  17. Sezen, H., Elwood, K.J., Whittaker, A.S., Mosalam, K.M., Wallace, J.W. and Stanton, J.F. (2000), Structural engineering reconnaissance of the August 17, 1999 Kocaeli (Izmit), Turkey, earthquake, PEER 2000/09, University of California, Berkeley.
  18. Specification for Buildings to be Built in Seismic Zones 2007 (2007), Ministry of public works and settlement, Government of Republic of Turkey.
  19. Stefano De, M. and Pintucchi, B., (2008), "A review of research on seismic behavior of irregular building structures since 2002", Bull. Earthq. Eng., 6(12), 285-308. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-007-9052-3
  20. Tezcan S.S. and Alhan C. (2001), "Parametric analysis of irregular structures under seismic loading according to new Turkish earthquake code", Eng. Struct., 21, 600-609.
  21. Wang, X., Shan, M., Su, Y., Ge, N. and Chen, H. (2012), "Analysis on efficiency of slot-cutting around RC frame joint for "strong column and weak beam" engineering design", Syst. Eng. Procedia, 3, 381-390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sepro.2011.10.060

피인용 문헌

  1. Comparative investigation of the costs and performances of torsional irregularity structures under seismic loading according to TEC vol.14, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.12989/cac.2014.14.4.405
  2. Investigation of the effect of weak-story on earthquake behavior and rough construction costs of RC buildings vol.16, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.12989/cac.2015.16.1.141
  3. Examination of the effects on earthquake behavior and rough construction costs of short column situation occurring in reinforced concrete buildings vol.20, pp.3, 2014, https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2021.20.3.309