DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Theoretical Investigation on the Structure, Detonation Performance and Pyrolysis Mechanism of 4,6,8-Trinitro-4,5,7,8-tetrahydro -6H-furazano[3,4-f]-1,3,5-triazepine

  • Li, Xiao-Hong (College of Physics and Engineering, Henan University of Science and Technology) ;
  • Zhang, Rui-Zhou (College of Physics and Engineering, Henan University of Science and Technology) ;
  • Zhang, Xian-Zhou (College of Physics and Information Engineering, Henan Normal University)
  • Received : 2013.12.05
  • Accepted : 2014.01.24
  • Published : 2014.05.20

Abstract

Based on the full optimized molecular geometric structures at B3LYP/cc-pvtz method, a new designed compound, 4,6,8-trinitro-4,5,7,8-tetrahydro-6H-furazano[3,4-f ]-1,3,5-triazepine was investigated in order to look for high energy density compounds (HEDCs). The analysis of the molecular structure indicates that the seven-membered ring adopts chair conformation and there exist intramolecular hydrogen bond interactions. IR spectrum and heat of formation (HOF) were predicted. The detonation velocity and pressure were evaluated by using Kamlet-Jacobs equations based on the theoretical density and condensed HOF. The bond dissociation energies and bond orders for the weakest bonds were analyzed to investigate the thermal stability of the title compound. The results show that $N_1-N_6$ bond is the trigger bond. The crystal structure obtained by molecular mechanics belongs to $Pna2_1$ space group, with lattice parameters Z = 4, a = 15.3023 ${\AA}$, b = 5.7882 ${\AA}$, c = 11.0471 ${\AA}$, ${\rho}=2.06gcm^{-3}$. In addition, the analysis of frontier molecular orbital shows the title compound has good stability and high chemical hardness.

Keywords

Introduction

In recent years, the synthesis of energetic, heterocyclic compounds has attracted an increasing amount of interest because of the higher heat of formation (HOF) and density than their carbocyclic analogues.1 Cyclic nitramines constitute an important class of organic energetic materials whose synthesis and properties have been widely studied2,3 and played the important roles in the civil and military fields for a long time.4-6 In order to study the effect of cyclic size and number of nitro group on energetic properties for nitramines, many four-, five-, six-, seven-, and eight-membered N-nitrated azacyclanes were synthesized. For example, RDX (hexahydro-1,3,5-trinitro-1,3,5-trizine) and HMX (1,3,5,7-tetranitro-1,3,5,7-tetraazacyclooctane) were synthesized7 and their detonation performances were obtained. Polycyclic and caged nitramines compounds such as TNAD (trans-1,4,5,8-tetranitro-1,4,5,8-tetraazadecalin)8 and CL-20 (2,4,6,8,10,12-hexanitro-2,4,6,8,10,12-hexaazaisowurtzitane)9 have higher HOFs, densities and detonation parameters than HMX. Cis- 2,4,6,8-Tetranitro-1H,5H-2,4,6,8-tetraazabicyclo[3.3.0]octane, commonly called “bicycle-HMX” exhibits better detonation performance than HMX and becomes another important polycyclic nitramine.10,11

However, there are few reports on azole-fused N-nitrated azacyclanes. Some researchers investigated furazano12-14 and tetrazole derivatives,14,15 which belonged to fused systems with six-membered azacyclanes. Recently, a new designed furazano-fused seven-membered N-nitrated azacyclane,4,6,8-trinitro-4,5,7,8-tetrahydro-6H-furazano[3,4-f ]-1,3,5-triazepine was reported.16 Up to now, there is no report about this compound. Figure 1 gave the molecular structure of the title compound.

Figure 1.The molecular structure of 4,6,8-trinitro-4,5,7,8-tetrahydro-6H- furazano[3,4 -f]-1,3,5-triazepine.

In this paper, the structural parameters, thermodynamic properties, density, detonation velocity and pressure, thermal stability have been studied by using density functional theory (DFT). Frontier molecular orbital is also investigated. It is expected that the results could provide useful information for laboratory synthesis and design and development of new novel energetic materials.

 

Computational Details

Geometry optimization of molecular structures were performed without any symmetry restriction by using density functional theory at the B3LYP level with the cc-pvtz basis set in Gaussian 03 package.17 Vibrational frequency analyses were performed at the same level. All optimized structures were characterized to be the local energy minimum on the potential energy surface by vibrational analysis. This indicates that the structure of each molecule corresponds to a local minimum on the potential energy surface. The 〈S2〉 values are all very close to 0.75, which shows negligible spin contamination of pure doublets states for fragment openshell systems.

The structure modifications can make the properties of the compound change drastically, so it is important to predict the properties and performance for a new designed compound. For energetic materials, the detonation velocity D and the detonation pressure P are two important parameters. The detonation velocity is the stable velocity of the shock front that characterizes detonation and the detonation pressure is the stable pressure that is development behind the front.18-20 D and P can be calculated according to Kamlet and Jacobs equations.21

In Eqs. (1) and (2), N is the moles of gas produced by per gram of explosives, is the an average molecular mass of the gaseous products in g/mol, Q is the estimated heat of detonation in cal/g, ρ is the density of the explosive in g/cm3. Obviously, the density plays a dominant role to determine D and P. Density is described as the primary physical parameter in detonation performance by Mader.22 Higher density can contribute to developing new energetic materials.

Heat of formation (HOF) can be calculated by means of the atom equivalents procedure.23-25 Since most of energetic materials are in solid, the calculation of detonation properties requires slid phase HOF (ΔHf,solid). According to Hess’s law of constant heat summation,26 the gas-phase HOF (ΔHf,gas) and heat of sublimation (ΔHf,sub) can be used to evaluate their solid phase HOF:

Politzer et al.27,28 found that the heats of sublimation can correlate well with the molecular surface area and electrostatic interaction index of energetic compounds. The empirical expression of the approach is as follows:

Where A is the surface area of the 0.001 electrons/bohr3 isosurface of electronic density of the molecule, ν describes the degree of balance between positive and negative potential on the isosurface and is a measure of variability of the electrostatic potential on the molecular surface. The coefficients a, b and c were determined by Rice and coworker25: a = 2.670 × 10−4 kcal/(mol*Å4), b = 1.650 kcal/mol and c = 2.966 kcal/mol. The descriptors A, ν and were calculated using the computational procedures proposed by Lu.29

The possible polymorphs and crystal structure of the title compound is predicted by rigorous molecular packing calculations using polymorph module of Material Studio30 since high-energy compounds are usually in condensed phases, especially solid form. The compass force-field is used to search the possible molecular packing among the most probable seven space groups (P21/c, P-1, P212121, Pbca, C2/c, P21, and Pna21).31-34

Furthermore, theoretical vibrational spectrum of the title compound was interpreted by means of potential energy distribution (PED) with the version V7.0-G77 of the MOLVIB program written by Sundius.35,36 The calculated Raman activities (Si) have been converted to relative intensities (Ii).

 

Results and Discussion

Molecular Geometry. It is necessary to study the geometric structures before discussing the other properties. The xyz coordinates of optimized geometry of the title compound are listed in Supplementary Table S1. Some bond lengths and angles obtained from B3LYP/cc-pvtz method are tabulated in Table 1. Obviously, the seven-membered ring adopts chair conformation so that atoms N3, C3, N2, C2 form central nearly planar fragment. In addition, amino-nitrogen atoms are not planar in all N-NO2 moieties and all NO2 groups deviate from the corresponding C-N-C planes in order to come closer to each other. The N-NO2 groups all depart from the attached ring plane because of the steric hindrance effect and the N2-NO2 moiety has the largest deviation from planarity. Geometry optimization performed on the title compound indicated that there exist intramolecular hydrogen bond interactions. The hydrogen bond lengths and angles are listed in Table 2.

Table 1.Selected bond lengths (Å) and angles (°) of the title compound computed at B3LYP level

Table 2.Selected hydrogen bond length (Å) and bond angle (°)

Gas- and Solid-phase Heats of Formation. The gas HOF of the title compound can be obtained by means of atom equivalent procedure23-25:

In Eq. (5), E is the quantum mechanically determined electronic energy of the molecule at 0 K, ni is the number of atoms of elements i and xi is its atom equivalent energy. Here, xi is determined by Rice and Byrd through a leastsquares fitting of Eq. (5) to the experimental of a series of CHNO energetic materials.23 Using this method, the HOF of the title compound is calculated at B3LYP/ccpvtz level. Solid-phase HOF, ΔHf,solid is an important property to predict the detonation properties of the energetic materials. Table 3 presents the total energies, ΔHf,gas and ΔHf,gas of the title energetic material.

The crystal density can be calculated by electrostatic potential on the molecular surfaces:

In Eq. (6), M is the molecular mass in g/molecule, V(0.001) is the volume of the isolated gas phase molecule, in cm3/molecule. The coefficients α, β, γ were 0.9183, 0.0028, 0.0443, respectively, which are obtained by Politer et al..37 The calculated density is also included in Table 3.

In order to have a comparison, the experimental HOFs of hexahydro-1,3,5-trinitro-1,3,5-triazine (RDX) and 1,3,5,7- tetranitro-1,3,5,7-tetraazacyclooctane (HMX) were also listed in Table 3. Using the method of Politzer et al.,26,27 the ΔHf,sub, the descriptors A, ν, and ΔHf,solid for the title compound, RDX and HMX38-40 were all listed in Table 3. It is noted that the experimental ΔHf,gas and ΔHf,solid of RDX and HMX are agreement with the calculated values of RDX and HMX, which shows that our calculations are reliable.

Density is one of the critical factors that determine the energetic properties of compounds. According to the Kamlet- Jacobs equation,21 density greatly affects the detonation performance. Detonation pressure is dependent on the square of the density, while detonation velocity is proportional to the density. Densities of the title compound, RDX and HMX are corrected by the method of Politzer et al.37 and also included in Table 3. For comparisons, the experimental densities and HOFs of HMX, RDX are also listed in this table. It is noted that densities of the studied compounds are slightly higher than those of RDX and HMX. From Table 3, the gas HOF of the title compound is 610.04 kJ/mol and the density is 1.97 g/cm3, which is much larger than those of RDX (1.78 g/cm3) and HMX (1.89 g/cm3).41,42

Detonation Properties. Based on the condensed HOF and density of the title compound, the detonation properties, including Q, D and P, were estimated. Table 4 lists the calculated D, P, Q and the oxygen balances OB(%) of the title compound. For better comparing and evaluating detonation performance of the title compound, the calculated and experimental data7,41 of RDX and HMX are also listed in Table 4.

In comparison with HMX and RDX, the title compound exhibits much better detonation performance. The detonation velocity and pressure of the title compound are 9.65 km/s and 43.51 GPa, respectively. This shows that the title compound is a promising energetic material. According to energy criterion for high energy density compound,42 i.e., ρ ≈ 1.90 g/cn3, D ≈ 90.0 km/s, P ≈ 40.0 GPa, the title compound satisfies the requirements.

Infrared Spectrum. Figure 2 provides the simulated IR spectrum of the title compound based on the scaled harmonic vibrational frequencies. Obviously, there are four main characteristic regions. The modes in 3140-3204 cm−1 are associated with C-H stretch. In this region, the strongest characteristic peak is at 3180 cm−1. The modes in 1604-1700 cm−1 are associated with the N=O asymmetric stretch of nitro groups and the strong characteristic peak is at 1676 cm−1. The modes in 1244-1364 cm−1 are the complex of C-H bending together with the N-N stretch and the strongest characteristic peak is at 1292 cm−1, which corresponds to the N-N stretch. Peaks at less than 1200 cm−1 such as 980 cm−1 are mainly caused by the deformation of the heterocyclic skeleton, C-H bending and N-NO2 stretch.

Table 3.aData in parentheses are the experimental values taken from refs (38-40)

Table 4.aOxygen balance (%) for CaHbOcNd: 1600 × (c-2a-b/2)/Mw; Mw is molecular weight. bData in parentheses for RDX and HMX are from Ref. [7,41]

Figure 2.The calculated infrared spectrum for the title compound.

Electronic Structure and Thermal Stability. For the energetic material, it is important to understand whether they are stable enough to be of practical interest. A good energetic material should have a high stability. Thus, studies on the bond dissociation or pyrolysis mechanism are important to understand the decomposition process of the energetic materials because they are directly relevant to the sensitivity and stability of the energetic compounds. The bond dissociation energy (BDE) could evaluate the strength of bonding that is fundamental to understand the decomposition process of the energetic materials. Since there may be several bonds of the same kind in a molecule, the Wiberg bond indexes (WBIs) from natural bond orbital (NBO) analysis were used to ascertain the weakest bond. A high WBI value indicates a stronger bond, whereas a low WBI value shows a weaker bond, so the bond with the smallest WBI among all bonds of the same type was considered.

In this paper, two possible initial steps, i.e. the breakings of N-NO2 bond in the side chain and C-N bond in the skeleton are considered. In order to find the weakest bond, natural bond orbital analysis (NBO) has been performed. Table 5 lists some Wiberg bond orders of the title compound. It is noted that C3-N3 in the skeleton and N1-N6 in the side chain have the smaller WBI among the same kind of bonds. The corresponding BDEs were also calculated and listed in Table 5.

Table 5.Wiberg bond order and BDEs (kJ/mol) of the title compound

From Table 5, the BDE of N1-N6 bond is 83.39 kJ/mol, which is weaker than that of C3-N3 bond. This indicates that N1-N6 breaks more easily and may be the trigger bond. The results agree with experimental studies showing dominance of NO2 fission in the early stages of thermal decomposition.43,44 According to the stability request of HEDC (BDE ≈ 80-120 kJ/mol), we think that the title compound is a stable compound.

Molecular Packing Prediction and Density. The crystal structure of the title compound in this paper is predicted by COMPASS force field,45 which can produce the gas- and condensed-phase properties reliably for a broad range of systems.46 Using COMPASS force field, we can pack arrangements in all reasonable space groups to search for the lowlying minima in the lattice energy surface. The structure optimized by B3LYP/cc-pvtz method is considered as input structure for polymorph search. Table 6 lists the lattice parameters in all reasonable space groups.

It is noted from Table 6 that the energies range from −187.2 to −193.0 kJ mol−1 cell−1 and the structure with Pna21 symmetry has the lowest energy. Most stable polymorphs usually possess the least energy at 0 K, so the title compound tends to exist in the Pna21 group. The corresponding lattice parameters are Z = 4, a = 15.3023 Å, b = 5.7882 Å, c = 11.0471 Å, r = 2.06 g cm−3. Figure 3 gave the molecular packing of the title compound in Pna21 space group.

Frontier Molecular Orbitals. The frontier molecular orbitals play an important role in the electric and optical properties, as well as in chemical reactions.47 Figure 4 shows the distributions and energy levels of the HOMO-1, HOMO, LUMO and LUMO+1 orbitals computed at B3LYP/ cc-pvtz level for the title compound.

Table 6.Unit cell parameters of the possible molecular packings of the title compound

Figure 3.Molecular packing of the title compound in Pna21 space group.

Figure 4.Molecular orbital surfaces and energy levels given in parentheses for the HOMO-1, HOMO, LUMO and LUMO+1 of the title compound computed at B3LYP/cc-PVTZ level.

As seen from Figure 4, LUMO+1 is mainly localized on the nitro groups and the skeleton of seven-membered Nnitrated azacyclane, while LUMO is mainly localized on the nitro groups and the C2, C3 atoms of seven-membered Nnitrated azacyclane. HOMO and HOMO-1 are all mainly localized on the furazan ring, the three nitro groups and the skeleton of seven-membered N-nitrated azacyclane. The value of the energy separation between the HOMO and LUMO is 5.49 eV. This large HOMO-LUMO gap means high excitation energies for many of excited states, a good stability and a high chemical hardness for the title compound.

 

Conclusion

In this paper, a new designed polynitro derivative was investigated by using density functional theory. IR spectrum was also predicted. The results show that there are four main characteristic regions. Detonation properties, HOF and the weakest bond were predicted. The results show the N1-N6 bond is predicted to be the trigger bond during pyrolysis based on the results of bond order and BDE. The most possible packing structure belongs to Pna21 space group. The detonation velocity and pressure of the title compound are 9.65 km/s and 43.51 GPa, respectively. All the calculation results indicate that the title compound possesses very high HOF, detonation velocity and pressure and is a potential candidate of HEDM.

References

  1. Pagoria, P. F.; Lee, G. S.; Mitchell, A. R.; Schmidt, R. D. Thermochim. Acta 2002, 384, 187-204. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-6031(01)00805-X
  2. Agrawal, J. P.; Hodgson, R. D. Organic Chemistry of Explosives; John Wiley & Sons: Chichester, 2007.
  3. Willer, R. L. J. Mex. Chem. Soc. 2009, 53, 108-119.
  4. Xiao, H. M. Molecular Orbital Theory for Nitro Compounds; National Defense Industry Press: Beijing, 1993.
  5. Jalovy, Z.; Zeman, S.; Suceska, M.; Vavra, P.; Dudek, K.; Rajic, M. J. Energ. Mater. 2001, 19, 219-239. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370650108216127
  6. Cobbledick, R. E.; Small, R. W. H. Acta Crystallogr. B 1972, 30, 1918-1922.
  7. Sasada, Y. Molecular and Crystal Structures in Chemistry Handbook; The Chemical Society of Japan: Maruzen, 1984.
  8. Willer, R. L. J. Org. Chem. 1984, 49, 5150-5154. https://doi.org/10.1021/jo00200a027
  9. Simpson, R. L.; Urtiew, P. A.; Ornellas, D. L.; Moody, G. L.; Scribner, K. J.; Hoffman, D. M. Propellants, Explos., Pyrotech. 1997, 22, 249-255. https://doi.org/10.1002/prep.19970220502
  10. Qiu, L.; Xiao, H. M. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 164, 329-336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.08.030
  11. Koppes, W. M.; Chaykovsky, M. H.; Adolph, G.; Gilardi, R.; George, C. J. Org. Chem. 1987, 52, 1113-1119. https://doi.org/10.1021/jo00382a025
  12. Willer, R. L.; Moore, D. W. J. Org. Chem 1985, 50, 5123-5127. https://doi.org/10.1021/jo00225a029
  13. Sheremetev, A. B.; Khim, Z. R. Mendeleev Chemistry Journal 1997, 41, 43-54.
  14. Ermakov, A. S.; Serkov, S. A.; Tartakovskii, V. A.; Novikova, T. S.; Khmel'nitskii, L. I.; Geterotsikl, S. K. Chemistry of Heterocyclic Compounds 1994, 30, 976-978. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01165039
  15. Willer, R. L.; Henry, R. A. J. Org. Chem. 1988, 53, 5371-5373. https://doi.org/10.1021/jo00257a037
  16. Aleksei, S. B.; Natal'ya, A. S.; Kyrill, S. Y.; Mikhail, A. Y.; Vladimir, T. A. Mendeleev Commun. 2010, 20, 249-252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mencom.2010.09.002
  17. Frisch, M. J.; Trucks, G. W.; Schlegel, H. B.; Scuseria, G. E.; Robb, M. A.; Cheeseman, J. R.; Zakrzewski, V. G.; Montgomery, J. A.; Stratmann, R. E.; Burant, J. C.; Dapprich, S.; Millam, J. M.; Daniels, A. D.; Kudin, K. N.; Strain, M. C.; Farkas, O.; Tomasi, J.; Barone, V.; Cossi, M.; Cammi, R.; Mennucci, B.; Pomelli, C.; Adamo, C.; Clifford, S.; Ochterski, J.; Petersson, G. A.; Ayala, P. Y.; Cui, Q.; Morokuma, K.; Malick, D. K.; Rabuck, A. D.; Raghavachari, K.; Foresman, J. B.; Cioslowski, J.; Ortiz, J. V.; Baboul, A. G.; Stefanov, B. B.; Liu, G.; Liashenko, A.; Piskorz, P.; Komaromi, I.; Gomperts, R.; Martin, R. L.; Fox, D. J.; Keith, T.; Al-Laham, M. A.; Peng, C. Y.; Nanayakkara, A.; Gonzalez, C.; Challacombe, M.; Gill, P. M. W.; Johnson, B.; Chen, W.; Wong, M. W.; Andres, J. L.; Gonzalez, C.; Head Gordon, M.; Replogle, E. S.; Pople, J. A. GAUSSIAN 03, Revision B.02, Gaussian Inc.: Pittsburgh PA, 2003.
  18. Iyer, S.; Slagg, N. Molecular Aspects in Energetic Materials, in: Structure and Reactivity; VCH Publishers: New York, 1988.
  19. Dlott, D. D. Fast Molecular Processes in Energetic Materials, in: Energetic Materials. Part 2. Detonation, Combustion; Elsevier: Amsterdam, 2003.
  20. Meyer, R.; Kohler, J. A. Homburg, Explosives; Wiley-VCH: Germany, 2007.
  21. Kamlet, M. J.; Jacobs S. J. J. Chem. Phys. 1968, 48, 23-35. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1667908
  22. Mader, C. L. Detonation Performance, in: Organic Energetic Compounds; Nova Science Publishers: New York, 1996.
  23. Rice, B. M.; Pai, S. V.; Hare, J. Combust. Flame 1999, 118, 445-458. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-2180(99)00008-5
  24. Habibollahzadeh, D.; Grice, M. E.; Concha, M. C.; Murray, J. S.; Politzer, P. J. Comput. Chem. 1995, 16, 654-658. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.540160513
  25. Byrd, E. F. C.; Rice, B. M. J. Phys. Chem. A 2006, 110, 1005-1013. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp0536192
  26. Atkins, P. W. Physical Chemistry; Oxford University Press: Oxford, 1982.
  27. Politzer, P.; Lane, P.; Murray, J. S. Cent. Eur. J. Energ. Mater 2011, 8, 39-52.
  28. Politzer, P.; Murray, J. S. Cent. Eur. J. Energ. Mat. 2011, 8, 209-220.
  29. Lu, T. Multiwfn Revision 2.5.2; Beijing Science and Technology: Beijing, 2012.
  30. Materials Studio 4.4. Accelrys, 2008.
  31. Chernikova, N. Y.; Belsky, V. K.; Zorkii, P. M. J. Struct. Chem. 1990, 31, 661-666.
  32. Mighell, A. D.; Himes, V. L.; Rodgers, J. R. Acta Crystallogr. 1983, 39, 737-740. https://doi.org/10.1107/S0108767383001464
  33. Wilson, A. J. C. Acta Crystallogr A 1988, 44, 715-724. https://doi.org/10.1107/S0108767388004933
  34. Srinivasan, R. Acta Crystallogr A 1992, 48, 917-918. https://doi.org/10.1107/S0108767392003714
  35. Sundius, T. MOLVIB: A Program for Harmonic Force Field Calculations, QCPE Program No. 807, 2002.
  36. Sundius, T. Vib. Spectrosc. 2002, 29, 89-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-2031(01)00189-8
  37. Politzer, P.; Martinez, J.; Murray, J. S.; Concha, M. C.; Toro- Labbe, A. Mol. Phys. 2009, 107, 2095-2101. https://doi.org/10.1080/00268970903156306
  38. Zhang, X.-H.; Yun, Z.-H. Explosive Chemistry; National Defence Industry Press: Beijing, 1989.
  39. Talawar, M. B.; Sivabalan, R.; Mukundan, T.; Muthurajan, H.; Sikder, A. K.; Gandhe, B. R.; Rao, A. S. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 161, 589-607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.04.011
  40. Badgujar, D. M.; Talawar, M. B.; Asthana, S. N.; Mahulikar, P. P. J. Hazard. Mater. 2008, 151, 289-305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.10.039
  41. Ghule, V. D.; Jadhav, P. M.; Patil, R. S.; Radhakrishnan, S.; Soman, T. J. Phys. Chem. A 2010, 114, 498-503. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp9071839
  42. Xiao, H. M.; Xu, X. J.; Qiu, L. Theoretical Design of High Energy Density Materials; Science Press: Beijing, 2008.
  43. Li, X.-H.; Zhang, R.-Z.; Yang, X.-D.; Zhang, H. J. Mol. Struct.- THEOCHEM. 2007, 815, 151-156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theochem.2007.03.029
  44. Li, X.-H.; Zhang, R.-Z.; Zhang, X.-Z. J. Hazard. Mater. 2010, 183, 622-631. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.07.070
  45. Sun, H. J. Phys. Chem. B 1998, 102, 7338-7364. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp980939v
  46. Xu, X. J.; Zhu, W. H.; Xiao, H. M. J. Phys. Chem. B 2007, 111, 2090-2097. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp066833e
  47. Fleming, J. Frontier Orbitals and Organic Chemical Reactions; Wiley: London, 1976.