Steel and Composite Structures

Techno-Press (테크노프레스)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Seismic behavior of special moment-resisting frames with energy dissipating devices under near source ground motions

  • Bayat, Mahmoud (Young Researchers and Elites club, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University) ;
  • Bayat, Mahdi (Young Researchers and Elites Club, Mashhad Branch, Islamic Azad University)
  • Received : 2014.02.10
  • Accepted : 2014.03.02
  • Published : 2014.05.25
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In this study, the performances of the SMRF building equipped with energy dissipating devices are studied. Three types of these structures with different heights are considered. The Added Damping and Stiffness (ADAS) devices are used as energy dissipating devices in these structures. The behavior of these structures with ADAS devices subjected to near source ground motions are investigated. Three SMRF buildings with five, ten and fifteen-story, with ADAS devices were chosen. The nonlinear time history analysis was used by applying the near source ground motions with PERFORM 3D.V4 and conclusions are drawn upon an energy criterion. The effect of PGA variation and height of the frames are also considered based on the energy criterion.

Keywords

References

  1. Aguirre, M. and Sanchez, A.R. (1992), "Structural seismic damper", J. Struct. Eng., ASCE, 118(5), 1158-1171. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1992)118:5(1158)
  2. Apostolakis, G. and Dargush, G. (2010), "Optimal seismic design of moment resisting steel frames with hysteretic passive devices", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 39(4), 355-376.
  3. Baker, J.W. (2007), "Quantitative classification of near-fault ground motions using wavelet analysis", Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 97(5), 1486-1501. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120060255
  4. Barron, R. and Ayala, A.G. (2013), An Energy-Based Design Method for Buildings with Supplemental Damping and Nonlinear Behavior, Seismic Behaviour and Design of Irregular and Complex Civil Structures, Springer, 297-307.
  5. Bayat, M. and Abdollahzadeh, G.R. (2011a), "Analysis of the steel braced frames equipped with ADAS devices under the far field records", Latin American Journal of Solids and Structures, 8(2), 163-181. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1679-78252011000200004
  6. Bayat, M. and Abdollahzadeh, G.R. (2011b), "On the effect of the near field records on the steel braced frames equipped with energy dissipating devices", Latin American Journal of Solids and Structures, 8(4), 429-443. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1679-78252011000400004
  7. Bergman, D.M. and Goel, S.C. (1987), "Evaluation of cyclic testing of steel-plate device for added dampingand stiffness", University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
  8. Brown, P., Aiken, I.D. and Jafarzadeh, F.J. (2001), Seismic Retrofit of the Wallace F. Bennett Federal Building, Modern Steel Construction, AISC, Chicago, IL, USA.
  9. Constantinou, M.C. and Symans, M.D. (1993), "Seismic response of structures with supplemental damping", Struct. Des. Tall Build., 2(2), 77-92. https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.4320020202
  10. Erfani, S., Babazadeh Naseri, A. and Akrami, V. (2012), "The beneficial effects of beam web opening in Seismic behavior of steel moment frames", Steel Compos. Struct., Int. J., 13(1), 35-46. https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2012.13.1.035
  11. FEMA 273 (1997), NEHRP Guidelines and Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings, Report FEMA 273 (Guidelines), Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, D.C., USA.
  12. Kelly, J.M., Skinner, R.I. and Heine, A.J. (1972), "Mechanisms of energy absorption in special devices for use in earthquake resistant structures", Bulletin of New Zealand National Society for Earthquake Engineering, 5(3), 63-88.
  13. Longo, A., Montuori, R. and Piluso, V. (2012a), "Theory of plastic mechanism control of dissipative truss moment frames", Eng. Struct., 37, 63-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2011.12.046
  14. Longo, A., Montuori, R. and Piluso, V. (2012b), "Failure mode control and seismic response of dissipative truss moment frames", J. Struct. Eng., 138(11), 1388-1397. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000569
  15. Martinez-Romero, E. (1993), "Experiences on the use of supplemental energy dissipators on building structures", Earthq. Spectra, 9(3), 581-624. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1585731
  16. Monti, M.D. and Robinson, W.H. (1996), "A lead shear damper suitable for reducing the motion induced by earthquake and wind", Eleventh Worm Conference on Earthquake Engineering.
  17. Moreschi, L.M. (2000), "Seismic design of energy dissipation systems for optimal structural performance", Ph.D. Thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA, USA.
  18. Parulekar, Y., Reddy, G., Vaze, K., Ghosh, A., Kushwaha, H. and Babu, R.R. (2009), "Seismic response analysis of RCC structure with yielding dampers using linearization techniques", Nucl. Eng. Des., 239(12), 3054-3061. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2009.08.016
  19. PERFORM 3D.V4, Analysis software, RAM International, L.L.C., University of California.
  20. Pong, W., Lee, Z., Tsai, C.S. and Chen, B.J. (2009), "Heuristic design procedure for structures with displacement dependent damping devices", Eng. Comput., 26(4), 347-359. https://doi.org/10.1108/02644400910959151
  21. Ponzo, F.C., Di Cesare, A., Nigro, D., Vulcano, A., Mazza, F., Dolce, M. and Moroni, C. (2012), "JET-PACS project: Dynamic experimental tests and numerical results obtained for a steel frame equipped with hysteretic damped chevron braces", J. Earthq. Eng., 16(5), 662-685. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2012.657335
  22. Rai, D.C., Annam, P.K. and Pradhan, T. (2013), "Seismic testing of steel braced frames with aluminum shear yielding dampers", Eng. Struct., 46, 737-747. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.08.027
  23. Reyes-Salazar, A., Soto-Lopeza, M.E., Bojorquez-Mora, E. and Lopez-Barraza, A. (2012), "Effect of modeling assumptions on the Seismic behavior of steel buildings with perimeter moment frames", Struct. Eng. Mech., Int. J., 41(2), 183-204. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2012.41.2.183
  24. Shih, M.H. and Sung, W.P. (2005), "A model for hysteretic behavior of rhombic low yield strength steel added damping and stiffness", Comput. Struct., 83(12-13), 895-908. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2004.11.012
  25. Skinner, R.I., Kelly, J.M. and Heine, A.J. (1975), "Hysteresis dampers for earthquake resistant structures", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 3(3), 287-296.
  26. Symans, M.D., Charney, F.A., Whittaker, A.S., Constantinou, M.C., Kircher, C.A., Johnson, M.W. and McNamara, R.J. (2008), "Energy dissipation systems for seismic applications: Current practice and recent developments", J. Struct. Eng., 134(1), 0733-9445.
  27. Whittaker, A.S., Bertero, V.V., Alonso, L.J. and Thompson, C.L. (1989), "Earthquake simulator testing of steel plate added damping and stiffness elements", Report UCB/EERC-89/02, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.
  28. Whittaker, A.S., Bertero, V.V., Thompson, C.L. and Alonso, L.J. (1991), "Seismic testing of steel plate energy dissipation devices", Earthq. Spectra, 7(4), 563-604. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1585644
  29. Uniform Building Code (1997).
  30. Zahrai, S.M. and Jalali, M. (2014), "Experimental and analytical investigations on Seismic behavior of ductile steel knee braced frames", Steel Compos. Struct., Int. J., 16(1), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2014.16.1.001

Cited by

  1. Seismic Retrofit of Reinforced Concrete Frame Buildings with Hysteretic Bracing Systems: Design Procedure and Behaviour Factor vol.2017, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/2639361
  2. Effect of granulated rubber on shear strength of fine-grained sand vol.9, pp.5, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2017.03.008
  3. Improving Seismic Behavior of MRFs by U-shaped Hysteretic Damper Along Diagonal Brace pp.2093-6311, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13296-018-0139-2
  4. Prediction of Liquefaction Potential of Sandy Soil around a Submarine Pipeline under Earthquake Loading vol.10, pp.2, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)PS.1949-1204.0000349
  5. Modeling of compressive strength of cemented sandy soil pp.1568-5616, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1080/01694243.2018.1548535
  6. Shear behavior of fiber-reinforced sand composite vol.12, pp.5, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-019-4326-z
  7. Investigation of the deformability properties of fiber reinforced cemented sand vol.33, pp.17, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1080/01694243.2019.1619224
  8. Analytical investigation on lateral load responses of self-centering walls with distributed vertical dampers vol.72, pp.3, 2014, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2019.72.3.355
  9. Experimental study of impact of cement treatment on the shear behavior of loess and clay vol.13, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-020-5181-7
  10. Seismic behavior of structural and non-structural elements in RC building with bypass viscous dampers vol.34, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2020.34.4.487
  11. Experimental study on hysteretic behavior of steel moment frame equipped with elliptical brace vol.34, pp.6, 2020, https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2020.34.6.891
  12. Comparison of different local site effect estimation methods in site with high thickness of alluvial layer deposits: a case study of Babol city vol.13, pp.7, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-020-5258-3
  13. Seismic retrofit of steel buildings using external resistant RC walls and friction dampers vol.76, pp.6, 2020, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2020.76.6.823