DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A study on ethical requirements for the protection of human subjects in the publication guidelines of dental health journals

국내 치과 학술지 투고규정 중 연구대상자 보호를 위한 연구 윤리기준 제시에 관한 조사

  • Jeong, Eun-Young (Graduate School of Bioethics Policy Studies, Ewha Womans University)
  • 정은영 (이화여자대학교 생명윤리정책협동과정)
  • Received : 2013.12.27
  • Accepted : 2014.04.03
  • Published : 2014.04.30

Abstract

Objectives : The purpose of the study was to examine the ethical requirements for the protection of human subjects in the publication guidelines of dental health journals. Methods : The guidelines of 27 dental health journals were reviewed to determine ethical standards alone, with Helsinki Declaration, by an institutional review board (IRB), informed consent, protection of subject privacy and confidentiality, and no conflicts of interest. Results : 1. Dentistry journals listed on National Research Foundation of Korea had a conflict of interest disclosure provisions of the contribution(76.9%) and the IRB approval(61.5%). 2. Half of the dental health journals were not listed on National Research Foundation of Korea Society but they agreed the advance posting provisions. 3. Dental hygiene journals provide 100% of ethics alone and receive 75% of IRB in the papers. 4. Dental health and dental hygiene journals have conflicts of interest disclosure regulations(59.2%) and IRB approval(51.8%). 5. There existed statistically significant differences between the dental health journals whether they were listed on the human subjects and ethical standards for protection in National Research Foundation of Korea or not. Conclusions : While the publication guidelines of dental health journals have followed to a greater extent in recent years, there is still a need for further instructions to ensure that the authors satisfy all ethical requirements in conducting research on human subjects. IRB approval for dental journals must be standardized and reinforced reflecting the characteristics of each journals. The researchers should obey the code of ethics suitable for education and the editors must review the paper continuously.

Keywords

References

  1. Kwon BK, Kim HC. Bioethics and law. 2nd ed. Seoul: Ewha Womans University Publishcation; 2013: 173-99.
  2. Park SH. A comparative study of the regulatory law and regulation on the role of institutional review board in human subjects research in Korea and the USA. Bioethics Policy Studies 2013; 7(1): 1-28.
  3. Jeong IS, Back JM, Shin SG. Korean journal of medicine and contribution of the relevant provisions of the magazine appeared ethical standards. J Korean Soc Clin Pharm Ther 1998; 6(2): 165-73.
  4. Yoon SJ, Choi YS, Choi BH, Yang SS. Plagiarism in students' research ethics education and alternative research situation. Korean J Med Ethics Educ 2011; 24(1): 315-35.
  5. Seong JM, Hwang JH, Lee SK, Kim JH, Kim UK, Song KS, et al. The awareness of research ethic by the dental hygiene department professors. J Korean Acad Oral Health 2011; 35(1): 112-9.
  6. Park SH, Jeong JY. An exploratory study on the current status of research ethics in higher education and its improvement methods - with a focus on devac paper plagiarism detection system. J Korean Assoc Infor Educ 2008; 12(2): 183-94.
  7. Lym YM, Go YS. Science research ethics. Seoul: Samsung Economic Research Institute, 2006; 1.
  8. Lee IJ. Research integrity and research ethics. J Korean Ethics Educ 2010; 4: 269-90.
  9. Seong JM, Park YD. Analysis of research ethics education needs impact factors. J Korean Soc Dent Hyg 2012; 12(1): 157-65. https://doi.org/10.13065/jksdh.2012.12.1.157
  10. Jeong IS, Um YR. Kim KS. Ethical requirements for the protection of human subjects in the publication guidelines of nursing journals. Korean J Med Ethics Educ 2008; 11(1): 63-71.
  11. Korea Dental Association, Academy[Internet]. [cited 2013 Dec 12]. Available from: http://kda.or.kr/KDA/Modules/Introduction/academy.
  12. Korea Dental Hygienist Association, Academy [Internet]. [cited 2013 Dec 7]. Available from: http://kdha.or.kr.
  13. Korean Medical Association. World medical association declaration of helsinki- Seoul revision: Ethical principle for medical research involing human subjects. J Korean Med Assoc 2010; 53(9): 739-42. https://doi.org/10.5124/jkma.2010.53.9.739
  14. National Research Foundation of Korea[Internet]. [cited 2013 Dec 15]. Available from: http://www.nrf.re.kr/nfr.
  15. Korean medical association. The social world of medical ethics guidelines. Seoul: Korean Medical Assosiation Pub; 2005: 84-99.
  16. Choi KS. Standard guidelines on ways to anonymize research report. Seoul: Bioethic Policy Research Center; 2008: 12.
  17. Amdur RJ, Biddle C. Institutional review board approval and publication of human research results. J America Med Assoc 1997; 277(1): 909-14. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1997.03540350059034
  18. Ministry of Science. Ict and future plaining, education and science instruction no. 236 [cited 2013 Dec 7]. Available from: http://www.msip.go.kr/www/brd/m_160/view.do?seq=83.
  19. Koo IH. A study on the need for standardization of ethical review. J Anthro Stud 2005; 13: 229-53.
  20. Lawmanager Korea. Bioethics and safety act[Internet]. [cited 2013 Dec 10]. Available from: http://www.law.go.kr.
  21. Won BY, Jang GW, Hwang MY, Kim SA, Jang JH. Development of Korean standard dental hygiene curriculum proposal. J Korean Soc Dent Hyg 2013; 13(1): 1-12. https://doi.org/10.13065/jksdh.2013.13.1.001
  22. ClincalTrials.gov. koNECT. Industry sponsored trials, total site[Internet]. [cited 2013 Dec 10]. Available from: http://www.clincaltrials.gov.koNECT.

Cited by

  1. Current Status of Institutional Review Boards in Dental Hospitals in Korea: A Survey vol.44, pp.2, 2014, https://doi.org/10.17779/kaomp.2020.44.2.001