Earthquakes and Structures

Techno-Press (테크노프레스)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A new lateral load pattern for pushover analysis in structures

  • Pour, H. Gholi (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Amirkabir University of Technology) ;
  • Ansari, M. (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Tarbiat Modares University) ;
  • Bayat, M. (Department of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, Mashhad Branch, Islamic Azad University)
  • Received : 2013.07.13
  • Accepted : 2014.02.15
  • Published : 2014.04.30
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Some conventional lateral load patterns for pushover analysis, and proposing a new accurate pattern was investigated in present research. The new proposed load pattern has load distribution according weight and stiffness variation in height and mode shape of structure. The assessment of pushover application with mentioned pattern in X type braced steel frames and steel moment resisting frames, with stiffness and mass variation in height, was studied completely and the obtained results were compared with nonlinear dynamic analysis method (including time history analysis). The methods were compared from standpoints of some basic parameters such as displacement, drift and shape of lateral load pattern. It is concluded that proposed load pattern results are closer to nonlinear dynamic analysis (NDA) compared to other pushover load patterns especially in tall and medium-rise buildings having different stiffness and mass during the height.

Keywords

References

  1. ATC Seismic evaluation and retrofit of concrete buildings (1996), Volumes 1-2, ATC-40, Applied Technology Council, Redwood City, California.
  2. ASCE Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of building (2000), FEMA-356, American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC.
  3. Bayat, M. and Abdollahzade, G.R. (2011a), "Analysis of the steel braced frames equipped with ADAS devices under the far field records", Lat. Am. J. Solids Struct., 8, 163-181. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1679-78252011000200004
  4. Bayat, M. and Abdollahzadeh, G.R. (2011b), "On the effect of the near field records on the steel braced frames equipped with energy dissipating devices", Lat. Am. J. Solids Struct., 8, 429-443. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1679-78252011000400004
  5. Bobadilla, H. and Chopra, A.K. (2007), "Modal pushover analysis for seismic evaluation of reinforced concrete special moment resisting frame buildings", Report no. EERC 2007-01, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, California.
  6. Building Seismic safety Council (BSSC) (1997), NEHRP guidelines for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings, FEMA-274, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington , D.C.
  7. Building Seismic Safety Council (BSSC) (2000), Pre standard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings, FEMA-356, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, D.C.
  8. Carvalho, G., Bento, R. and Bhatt, C. (2013), "Nonlinear static and dynamic analyses of reinforced concrete buildings - comparison of different modelling approaches", Earthq. Struct., 4(5), 451-470. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2013.4.5.451
  9. Cosenza, E., Manfredi, G. and Verderame, G. (2006), "A fibre model for push-over analysis of underdesigned reinforced concrete frames", Comput. Struct., 84(13-14), 904-916. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2006.02.003
  10. Chopra, A.K. and Goel, R.K. (2001), "A modal pushover analysis procedure to estimating seismic demands for buildings: theory and preliminary evaluation", Report No. PEER 2001/03, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley.
  11. Chintanapakdee, C. and Chopra, A.K. (2003), "Evaluation of modal pushover analysis using generic frames", Earthq. Eng.Struct. Dyn., 32(3), 417-442. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.232
  12. Chopra, A.K. and Goel, R.K. (2002), "A modal pushover analysis procedure for estimating seismic demands for buildings", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 31(3), 561-582. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.144
  13. Duan, H. and Hueste, M.B. (2012), "Seismic performance of a reinforced concrete frame building in China", Eng. Struct., 41, 77-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.03.030
  14. FEMA 273 (1997), "NEHRP Guidelines and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings", Technical Report FEMA. 273 (Guidelines), Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, D.C.
  15. Gonzales, H. and Lopez-Almansa, F. (2012), "Performance of buildings with thin RC bearing walls", Eng. Struct., 34, 244-258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2011.10.007
  16. Gupta, A. and Krawinkler, H. (1999), "Seismic demands for performance evaluation of steel moment resisting structures (SAC Task 5.4.3)", Report No. 132, John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, Stanford University, California.
  17. Guner, S. and Vecchio, F.J. (2010), "Pushover analysis of shear-critical frames verification and application", ACI Struct. J., 107(1), 72-81.
  18. Jianmeng, M., Changhai, Z. and Lili, X. (2008), "An improved modal pushover analysis procedure for estimating seismic demands of structures", Earthq. Eng. Eng. Vib., 7(1), 25-31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-008-0786-y
  19. Krawinkler, H. and Seneviratna, G.D.P.K. (1999), "Pros and cons of a pushover analysis of seismic performance evaluation", Eng. Struct., 20(4-6), 452-464.
  20. Kunnath, S.K. and Kalkan, E. (2004), "Evaluation of seismic deformation demands using nonlinear procedures in multistory steel and concrete moment frames", ISET J. Earthq. Technol., 41(1), 159-182.
  21. Kim, S.P. and Kurama, Y.C. (2008), "An alternative pushover analysis procedure to estimate seismic displacement demands", Eng. Struct., 30(12), 3793-3807. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2008.07.008
  22. Kyrkos, M.T. and Anagnostopoulos, S.A. (2011), "Improved earthquake resistant design of torsionally stiff asymmetric steel buildings", Earthq. Struct., 2(2), 127-147. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2011.2.2.127
  23. Lignos, D.G. and Gantes, C.J. (2005), "Modal pushover analysis as a tool for practical design of structures", Proc., 3rd conference on Mechanics and Solids, MIT, Paper no. 078-271.
  24. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center (PEER), http://peer.berkeley.edu/.
  25. Triantafyllou, S. and Koumousis, V. (2013), "Hysteretic finite elements for the nonlinear static and dynamic analysis of structures", J. Eng. Mech., 10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000699.

Cited by

  1. Effectiveness of different standard and advanced pushover procedures for regular and irregular RC frames vol.51, pp.3, 2014, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2014.51.3.433
  2. A stochastic adaptive pushover procedure for seismic assessment of buildings vol.14, pp.5, 2014, https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2018.14.5.477
  3. Developing a method for multi-modal shear-based pushover analysis vol.22, pp.2, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1007/s42107-020-00308-1