DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Path Analysis on Factors Influencing Second Primary Cancer Screening Practices in Stomach, Colon, and Breast Cancer Survivors

암 생존자의 이차암 검진 영향요인에 대한 경로분석: 위암, 대장암, 유방암 생존자 대상으로

  • Received : 2013.11.08
  • Accepted : 2014.02.06
  • Published : 2014.04.30

Abstract

Purpose: This study was conducted to identify the factors influencing second primary cancer (SPC) screening practice by examining the relationships of physical symptoms, knowledge and attitudes regarding SPC screening, perceived risk, primary cancer type, and demographic factors of cancer survivors. Methods: Participants were 308 survivors of stomach, colon, or breast cancer recruited from 2 university hospitals in Korea. Data were collected using a questionnaire and analyzed using IBM SPSS 21.0 and AMOS 18.0. Results: The proportion of participants taking all cancer screenings according to national guidelines was 40%. They had moderate knowledge and a relatively positive attitude regarding SPC screening and high cancer risk perception. The participants had taken fewer SPC screenings after than before cancer diagnosis. The factors influencing cancer risk perception were age, physical symptoms, knowledge regarding SPC and primary cancer type (stomach). The factors influencing SPC screening practice were age, gender, economic status, knowledge regarding SPC screening, and primary cancer types (colon). Conclusion: It is important for clinical professionals to recognize that survivors of cancer are susceptible to another cancer. Education on SPC screening for these survivors should focus on communicating with and encouraging them to have regular cancer screenings.

Keywords

References

  1. Feuerstein M. Defining cancer survivorship. Journal of Cancer Survivorship. 2007;1(1):5-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11764-006-0002-x
  2. National Cancer Center. National cancer control programs [Internet]. Goyang: Author; 2013 [cited 2013 November 3]. Available from: http:// www.ncc.re.kr/manage/manage12_00.jsp.
  3. Carver JR, Shapiro CL, Ng A, Jacobs L, Schwartz C, Virgo KS, et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical evidence review on the ongoing care of adult cancer survivors: Cardiac and pulmonary late effects. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2007;25(25):3991-4008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/jco.2007.10.9777
  4. Wilkins KL, Woodgate RL. Preventing second cancers in cancer survivors. Oncology Nursing Forum. 2008;35(2):E12-E22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1188/08.onf.e12-e22
  5. Cho J, Guallar E, Hsu YJ, Shin DW, Lee WC. A comparison of cancer screening practices in cancer survivors and in the general population: The Korean national health and nutrition examination survey (KNHANES) 2001-2007. Cancer Causes and Control. 2010;21(12):2203- 2212. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10552-010-9640-4
  6. Travis LB. The epidemiology of second primary cancers. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers and Prevention. 2006;15(11):2020-2026. http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.epi-06-0414
  7. Mariotto AB, Rowland JH, Ries LA, Scoppa S, Feuer EJ. Multiple cancer prevalence: A growing challenge in long-term survivorship. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers and Prevention. 2007;16(3):566-571. http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.epi-06-0782
  8. Park SM, Lim MK, Jung KW, Shin SA, Yoo KY, Yun YH, et al. Prediagnosis smoking, obesity, insulin resistance, and second primary cancer risk in male cancer survivors: National Health Insurance Corporation Study. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2007;25(30):4835-4843. http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/jco.2006.10.3416
  9. Trask PC, Rabin C, Rogers ML, Whiteley J, Nash J, Frierson G, et al. Cancer screening practices among cancer survivors. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2005;28(4):351-356. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2005.01.005
  10. Park JK, Park HA. Screening rates of major cancers after a cancer diagnosis in adults in Korea. Korean Journal of Health Promotion. 2012;12(2):67-74.
  11. Shin DW, Baik YJ, Kim YW, Oh JH, Chung KW, Kim SW, et al. Knowledge, attitudes, and practice on second primary cancer screening among cancer survivors: A qualitative study. Patient Education and Counseling. 2011;85(1):74-78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2010.09.015
  12. Shin DW, Kim YW, Oh JH, Kim SW, Chung KW, Lee WY, et al. Knowledge, attitudes, risk perception, and cancer screening behaviors among cancer survivors. Cancer. 2011;117(16):3850-3859. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cncr.25951
  13. Cox CL. Online exclusive: A model of health behavior to guide studies of childhood cancer survivors. Oncology Nursing Forum. 2003;30(5): E92-E99. http://dx.doi.org/10.1188/03.onf.e92-e99
  14. Rimal RN, Juon HS. Use of the risk perception attitude framework for promoting breast cancer prevention. Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 2010;40(2):287-310. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2009.00574.x
  15. Katapodi MC, Lee KA, Facione NC, Dodd MJ. Predictors of perceived breast cancer risk and the relation between perceived risk and breast cancer screening: A meta-analytic review. Preventive Medicine. 2004;38 (4):388-402. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2003.11.012
  16. Oh EJ, Lee YE, Lee SO. Cervical cancer screening behavior and related factors among married women. Journal of the Korean Society of Maternal and Child Health. 2010;14(1):12-23. https://doi.org/10.21896/jksmch.2010.14.1.12
  17. Yang YH. Relationships between knowledge about early detection, cancer risk perception and cancer screening tests in the general public aged 40 and over. Asian Oncology Nursing. 2012;12(1):52-60. http://dx.doi.org/10.5388/aon.2012.12.1.52
  18. Ju HO, Kim JS, Cho YS, Park NH, Eo YS, Cho YR, et al. A survey on cancer screening among nurses at general hospital in Busan. Korean Journal of Women Health Nursing. 2003;9(1):18-27.
  19. Hwang SK, Eo YS, Cho YR, Seo JM, Lee YM, Jeong IS, et al. A survey on cancer screening among the middle-aged in Pusan area. Journal of Korean Society for Health Education and Promotion. 2002;19(3):135-152.
  20. Khan NF, Carpenter L, Watson E, Rose PW. Cancer screening and preventative care among long-term cancer survivors in the United Kingdom. British Journal of Cancer. 2010;102(7):1085-1090. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6605609
  21. Kelly KM, Shedlosky-Shoemaker R, Porter K, Desimone P, Andrykowski M. Cancer recurrence worry, risk perception, and informational- coping styles among appalachian cancer survivors. Journal of Psychosocial Oncology. 2011;29(1):1-18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07347332.2011.534014
  22. Shin DW, Kim Y, Baek YJ, Mo HN, Choi JY, Cho J. Oncologists experience with second primary cancer screening: Current practices and barriers and potential solutions. Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention. 2012;13(2):671-676. https://doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2012.13.2.671
  23. Park ER, Ostroff JS, Rakowski W, Gareen IF, Diefenbach MA, Feibelmann S, et al. Risk perceptions among participants undergoing lung cancer screening: Baseline results from the national lung screening trial. Annals of Behavioral Medicine. 2009;37(3):268-279. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12160-009-9112-9
  24. Park SM, Park CT, Park SY, Bae DS, Nam JH, Cho CH, et al. Factors related to second cancer screening practice in disease-free cervical cancer survivors. Cancer Causes and Control. 2009;20(9):1697-1703. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10552-009-9421-0
  25. Bae BR. LISREL structural equation model: Understanding, application and programming. 2nd ed. Seoul: Chungram Books; 2008.
  26. Stein KD, Denniston M, Baker F, Dent M, Hann DM, Bushhouse S, et al. Validation of a modified Rotterdam symptom checklist for use with cancer patients in the United States. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management. 2003;26(5):975-989. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0885-3924(03)00321-X
  27. Kim SE, Pérez-Stable EJ, Wong S, Gregorich S, Sawaya GF, Walsh JM, et al. Association between cancer risk perception and screening behavior among diverse women. Archives of Internal Medicine. 2008;168(7): 728-734. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archinte.168.7.728

Cited by

  1. 암생존자의 암검진 미수검 관련 요인분석: 국민건강영양조사(2007-2012년) 자료 이용 vol.25, pp.3, 2014, https://doi.org/10.4332/kjhpa.2015.25.3.162
  2. An Integrated TK-TD Model for Evaluation of Radix Aconitikusnezoffii (RAK) vol.105, pp.11, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1159/000507866