The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics

The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics (대한치과보철학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Cell attachment and proliferation of bone marrow-derived osteoblast on zirconia of various surface treatment

  • Pae, Ahran (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Lee, Heesu (Department of Oral Anatomy, Dental School, Gangneung-Wonju National University) ;
  • Noh, Kwantae (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Woo, Yi-Hyung (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Kyung Hee University)
  • Received : 2013.05.21
  • Accepted : 2014.02.26
  • Published : 2014.04.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

PURPOSE. This study was performed to characterize the effects of zirconia coated with calcium phosphate and hydroxyapatite compared to smooth zirconia after bone marrow-derived osteoblast culture. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Bone marrow-derived osteoblasts were cultured on (1) smooth zirconia, (2) zirconia coated with calcium phosphate (CaP), and (3) zirconia coated with hydroxyapatite (HA). The tetrazolium-based colorimetric assay (MTT test) was used for cell proliferation evaluation. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity was measured to evaluate the cellular morphology and differentiation rate. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) was employed for the analysis of surface chemistry. The genetic expression of the osteoblasts and dissolution behavior of the coatings were observed. Assessment of the significance level of the differences between the groups was done with analysis of variance (ANOVA). RESULTS. From the MTT assay, no significant difference between smooth and surface coated zirconia was found (P>.05). From the SEM image, cells on all three groups of discs were sporadically triangular or spread out in shape with formation of filopodia. From the ALP activity assay, the optical density of osteoblasts on smooth zirconia discs was higher than that on surface treated zirconia discs (P>.05). Most of the genes related to cell adhesion showed similar expression level between smooth and surface treated zirconia. The dissolution rate was higher with CaP than HA coating. CONCLUSION. The attachment and growth behavior of bone-marrow-derived osteoblasts cultured on smooth surface coated zirconia showed comparable results. However, the HA coating showed more time-dependent stability compared to the CaP coating.

Keywords

References

  1. Pae A, Lee H, Kim HS, Kwon YD, Woo YH. Attachment and growth behaviour of human gingival fibroblasts on titanium and zirconia ceramic surfaces. Biomed Mater 2009;4:025005. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-6041/4/2/025005
  2. Mustafa K, Silva Lopez B, Hultenby K, Wennerberg A, Arvidson K. Attachment and proliferation of human oral fibroblasts to titanium surfaces blasted with $TiO_2$ particles. A scanning electron microscopic and histomorphometric analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res 1998;9:195-207. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1998.090307.x
  3. Pae A, Kim SS, Kim HS, Woo YH. Osteoblast-like cell attachment and proliferation on turned, blasted, and anodized titanium surfaces. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2011;26:475-81.
  4. Orsini G, Assenza B, Scarano A, Piattelli M, Piattelli A. Surface analysis of machined versus sandblasted and acidetched titanium implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000;15:779-84.
  5. Bächle M, Butz F, Hübner U, Bakalinis E, Kohal RJ. Behavior of CAL72 osteoblast-like cells cultured on zirconia ceramics with different surface topographies. Clin Oral Implants Res 2007;18:53-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01292.x
  6. Gahlert M, Gudehus T, Eichhorn S, Steinhauser E, Kniha H, Erhardt W. Biomechanical and histomorphometric comparison between zirconia implants with varying surface textures and a titanium implant in the maxilla of miniature pigs. Clin Oral Implants Res 2007;18:662-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01401.x
  7. Ichikawa Y, Akagawa Y, Nikai H, Tsuru H. Tissue compatibility and stability of a new zirconia ceramic in vivo. J Prosthet Dent 1992;68:322-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(92)90338-B
  8. Josset Y, Oum'Hamed Z, Zarrinpour A, Lorenzato M, Adnet JJ, Laurent-Maquin D. In vitro reactions of human osteoblasts in culture with zirconia and alumina ceramics. J Biomed Mater Res 1999;47:481-93. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(19991215)47:4<481::AID-JBM4>3.0.CO;2-Y
  9. Scarano A, Piattelli M, Caputi S, Favero GA, Piattelli A. Bacterial adhesion on commercially pure titanium and zirconium oxide disks: an in vivo human study. J Periodontol 2004;75:292-6. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2004.75.2.292
  10. Rimondini L, Cerroni L, Carrassi A, Torricelli P. Bacterial colonization of zirconia ceramic surfaces: an in vitro and in vivo study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2002;17:793-8.
  11. Degidi M, Artese L, Scarano A, Perrotti V, Gehrke P, Piattelli A. Inflammatory infiltrate, microvessel density, nitric oxide synthase expression, vascular endothelial growth factor expression, and proliferative activity in peri-implant soft tissues around titanium and zirconium oxide healing caps. J Periodontol 2006;77:73-80. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2006.77.1.73
  12. Ismail FS, Rohanizadeh R, Atwa S, Mason RS, Ruys AJ, Martin PJ, Bendavid A. The influence of surface chemistry and topography on the contact guidance of MG63 osteoblast cells. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2007;18:705-14.
  13. Mustafa K, Wennerberg A, Arvidson K, Messelt EB, Haag P, Karlsson S. Influence of modifying and veneering the surface of ceramic abutments on cellular attachment and proliferation. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008;19:1178-87. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01560.x
  14. Hulbert SF, Young FA, Mathews RS, Klawitter JJ, Talbert CD, Stelling FH. Potential of ceramic materials as permanently implantable skeletal prostheses. J Biomed Mater Res 1970;4:433-56. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820040309
  15. Maniatopoulos C, Sodek J, Melcher AH. Bone formation in vitro by stromal cells obtained from bone marrow of young adult rats. Cell Tissue Res 1988;254:317-30.
  16. Kim HW, Kong YM, Bae CJ, Noh YJ, Kim HE. Sol-gel derived fluor-hydroxyapatite biocoatings on zirconia substrate. Biomaterials 2004;25:2919-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.09.074
  17. Takemoto M, Fujibayashi S, Neo M, Suzuki J, Kokubo T, Nakamura T. Bone-bonding ability of a hydroxyapatite coated zirconia-alumina nanocomposite with a microporous surface. J Biomed Mater Res A 2006;78:693-701.
  18. Boyan BD, Batzer R, Kieswetter K, Liu Y, Cochran DL, Szmuckler-Moncler S, Dean DD, Schwartz Z. Titanium surface roughness alters responsiveness of MG63 osteoblastlike cells to 1 alpha,25-(OH)2D3. J Biomed Mater Res 1998;39:77-85. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199801)39:1<77::AID-JBM10>3.0.CO;2-L
  19. Jarcho M. Calcium phosphate ceramics as hard tissue prosthetics. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1981;157:259-78.
  20. Sennerby L, Dasmah A, Larsson B, Iverhed M. Bone tissue responses to surface-modified zirconia implants: A histomorphometric and removal torque study in the rabbit. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2005;7:S13-20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2005.tb00070.x
  21. Wang G, Meng F, Ding C, Chu PK, Liu X. Microstructure, bioactivity and osteoblast behavior of monoclinic zirconia coating with nanostructured surface. Acta Biomater 2010;6:990-1000. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2009.09.021
  22. Sun L, Berndt CC, Gross KA, Kucuk A. Material fundamentals and clinical performance of plasma-sprayed hydroxyapatite coatings: a review. J Biomed Mater Res 2001;58:570-92. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.1056
  23. Zeng H, Lacefield WR. The study of surface transformation of pulsed laser deposited hydroxyapatite coatings. J Biomed Mater Res 2000;50:239-47. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(200005)50:2<239::AID-JBM19>3.0.CO;2-V
  24. de Groot K, de Putter C, Smitt P, Driessen A. Mechanical failure of artificial teeth made of dense calcium hydroxyapatite. Sci Ceram 1981;11:433-7.
  25. Cui FZ, Luo ZS, Feng QL. Highly adhesive hydroxyapatite coatings on titanium alloy formed by ion beam assisted deposition. J Mater Sci Mater Med 1997;8:403-5. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018597320022
  26. Benzaid R, Chevalier J, Saâdaoui M, Fantozzi G, Nawa M, Diaz LA, Torrecillas R. Fracture toughness, strength and slow crack growth in a ceria stabilized zirconia-alumina nanocomposite for medical applications. Biomaterials 2008;29:3636-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.05.021
  27. Piattelli A, Degidi M, Paolantonio M, Mangano C, Scarano A. Residual aluminum oxide on the surface of titanium implants has no effect on osseointegration. Biomaterials 2003;24:4081-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(03)00300-4
  28. Zinelis S, Thomas A, Syres K, Silikas N, Eliades G. Surface characterization of zirconia dental implants. Dent Mater 2010;26:295-305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2009.11.079
  29. Jha LJ, Best SM, Knowles JC, Rehman I, Santos JD, Bonfield W. Preparation and characterization of fluoride-substituted apatites. J Mater Sci Mater Med 1997;8:185-91. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018531505484

Cited by

  1. Synthesis and characterisation of β-TCP/bioglass/zirconia scaffolds vol.116, pp.8, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1080/17436753.2017.1356043
  2. ) obtained by a new low temperature system vol.13, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-605X/aaa3a4
  3. An introduction of biological performance of zirconia with different surface characteristics: A review vol.39, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2019-200