Women's Health Nursing (여성건강간호학회지)

Korean Society of Women Health Nursing (한국여성건강간호학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Women's Experiences on Spontaneous Delivery with Midwives

조산원과 가정에서 분만한 여성의 순산(順産) 경험

  • Lee, Sun Hee (Department of Nursing Science, Gimcheon University)
  • Received : 2013.11.11
  • Accepted : 2014.01.20
  • Published : 2014.03.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: This study was to understand the meaning of women's experience of spontaneous delivery with midwives at midwifery clinics or home. Methods: van Kaam's Psychophenomenological method composed of a four-stage, 12-step format was used. In-depth interviews were carried out from January to July, 2011, with twelve women. Results: Through the data analysis, 403 significant statements, 172 elements, 48 subcategories, and 19 categories were extracted, and from the 19 categories, 8 themes were drawn. The eight themes were: "Conflict on whether a hospital or a midwifery clinic", "Choosing natural delivery with the assurance of her ability to delivery spontaneously and having trust in the midwives." "Being encouraged by a midwife and family members with one accord", "Experience of the spontaneous delivery process on body", "Comfortable delivery in spite of painful process", "Deeply impressed by the overwhelming joy of birth", "Satisfaction with spontaneous delivery", and "Deeper love among family members". Conclusion: Through this study, women's delivery experiences with midwives was of spontaneous delivery. Women's birth of self-confidence and trust between the midwives and the women to predict a spontaneous delivery is a powerful factor. Also, family support and midwives delicate care was identified as factors in spontaneous delivery.

Keywords

References

  1. Callister LC. Making meaning: Women's birth narratives. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, and Neonatal Nursing. 2004; 33(4):508-518. https://doi.org/10.1177/0884217504266898
  2. Lindgren H, Erlandsson K. Women's experiences of empowerment in a planned home birth: A Swedish populationbased study. Birth. 2010;37(4):309-317. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-536X.2010.00426.x
  3. Eom JM. Effect of labor induction on cesarean delivery rates in term pregnancies [master's thesis]. Ulsan: University of Ulsan; 2011.
  4. Kringeland T, Daltveit AK, Mo̸ller A. How does preference for natural childbirth relate to the actual mode of delivery? a population- based cohort study from Norway. Birth. 2010; 37(1): 21-27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-536X.2009.00374.x
  5. How your baby birth? [television broadcast]. SBS spacial. Seoul, SBS: Public Broadcasting Service; 2012 Jun 24. Available from: http://vod.sbs.co.kr/player/vod_player.jsp\? filename=cu0214i0029700
  6. Janssen PA, Henderson AD, Vedam S. The experience of planned home birth: Views of the first 500 women. Birth. 2009;36(4):297-304. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-536X.2009.00357.x
  7. Hutton EK, Reitsma AH, Kaufman K. Outcomes associated with planned home and planned hospital births in low-risk women attended by midwives in Ontario, Canada, 2003-2006: a retrospective cohort study. Birth. 2009;36(3):180-189. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-536X.2009.00322.x
  8. O'Brien B, Chalmers B, Fell D, Heaman M, Darling EK, Herbert P. The experience of pregnancy and birth with midwives: Results from the Canadian maternity experiences survey. Birth. 2011;38(3):207-215. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-536X.2011.00482.x
  9. Janssen PA, Ryan EM, Etches DJ, Klein MC, Reime B. Outcomes of planned hospital birth attended by midwives compared with physicians in British Columbia. Birth. 2007;34(2): 140-147. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-536X.2007.00160.x
  10. Essex HN, Pickett KE. Mothers without companionship during childbirth: An analysis within the Millennium Cohort Study. Birth. 2008;35(4):266-276. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-536X.2008.00253.x
  11. Kang MJ. A study on the childbirth experience at maternity clinic. Journal of Cheju Halla College. 1995;19(1):7-20.
  12. Lee KS. Experience of the women who succeeded natural birth after cesarean section [dissertation]. Daejeon: Chungnam National University; 2003.
  13. Kim JH. Experience of self-directed birth: The birth of new self [dissertation]. Seoul: Yonsei University; 2003.
  14. van Kaam A. Formative spirituality volume four-scientific formation. New York: Crossroad; 1987. p. 99-115.
  15. De Koninck M, Blais R, Joubert P, Gagnon C. Comparing women's assessment of midwifery and medical care in Quebec, Canada. Journal of Midwifery & Women's Health. 2001;46(2): 60-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1526-9523(01)00093-9
  16. Lawrence A, Lewis L, Hofmeyr GJ, Dowswell T, Styles C. Maternal positions and mobility during first stage labour. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2009;15(2):CD003934.
  17. Harper B. Gentle birth choices. Song MR, translator. Rochester: Healing Art Press; 1994.
  18. Reveiz L, Gaitan HG, Cuervo LG. Enemas during labour. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2013;22(7):CD000330.
  19. Vahratian A, Zhang J, Troendle JF, Sciscione AC, Hoffman MK. Labor progression and risk of cesarean delivery in electively induced nulliparas. Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 2005;105 (4):698-704. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.AOG.0000157436.68847.3b
  20. Hatem M, Sandall J, Devane D, Soltani H, Gates S. Midwife-led versus other models of care for childbearing women. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2008;8(4):CD004667.
  21. Janssen PA, Saxell L, Page LA, Klein MC, Liston RM, Lee SK. Outcomes of planned home birth with registered midwife versus planned hospital birth with midwife or physician. Canadian Medical Association Journal. 2009;181(6-7):377-383. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.081869
  22. Rosen P. Supporting women in labor: Analysis of different types of caregivers. Journal of Midwifery & Women's Health. 2004;49(1):24-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmwh.2003.10.013
  23. Jang MJ, Park KS. Effect of family-participated delivery in a labor delivery room on the childbirth of primiparas. Korean Journal of Women Health Nursing. 2002;8(3):371-379.
  24. Walker R, Turnbull D, Wilkinson C. Strategies to address global cesarean rates: A review of the evidence. Birth. 2002;29 (1):28-39. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-536X.2002.00153.x
  25. Kim JS. The effect of mother-fetus interaction promotion program of talking and tactual stimulation on mother-fetus interaction and mother-infant play interaction. Korean Parent-Child Health Journal. 2002;5(2):253-276.
  26. Kim JH. The patient to the doctor, mother to the midwives. Journal of Korean Midwives. 2001;11(1):15-19.
  27. Hildingsson I, Rådestad I, Lindgren H. Birth preferences that deviate from the norm in Sweden: Planned home birth versus planned cesarean section. Birth. 2010;37(4):288-295. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-536X.2010.00423.x
  28. Odent M. Birth reborn. Jang EJ, Translator. London: Souvenir Press; 1994.
  29. Hodnett ED. Pain and women's satisfaction with the experience of childbirth: A systematic review. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2002;186(5):160-172.
  30. Jang YA. The characteristics and utilization status of method for birth giving and the problems connected with childbirth [master's thesis]. Seoul: Seoul National University; 2004.

Cited by

  1. 저출산 대응 공공서비스 관점에서 본 「토론토 출산지원센터」 현지조사연구 vol.26, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.6107/jkha.2015.26.1.031
  2. 조산원과 병원 분만 산모의 재원일 수, 의료비용, 산후불편감과 의료서비스 만족도 비교 vol.24, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.4069/kjwhn.2018.24.1.24
  3. Development and Effect of Nurse-Centered Doula Support Program for Mothers with Natural Childbirth: PILOT TEST vol.23, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.21896/jksmch.2019.23.4.269
  4. 한국 조산원 개원실태 및 조산직무지침 개발 vol.50, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.20032