DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Evaluation in Physiomechanical Characteristics of Carbonized Oriented Strand Board by Different Carbonizing Conditions

  • Lee, Min (Department of Forest Products, Korea Forest Research Institute) ;
  • Park, Sang-Bum (Department of Forest Products, Korea Forest Research Institute) ;
  • Lee, Sang-Min (Department of Forest Products, Korea Forest Research Institute) ;
  • Son, Dong-Won (Department of Forest Products, Korea Forest Research Institute)
  • Received : 2013.02.12
  • Accepted : 2014.03.06
  • Published : 2014.03.25

Abstract

Environmental issues about indoor air quality have been increased and focused on volatile organic compounds (VOCs) caused cancer, asthma, and skin disease. Reducing VOCs has been attempted in many different methods such as using environmentally friendly materials and air cleaner or purifier. Charcoal is well known material for absorbing VOCs. Therefore, carbonized board from medium density fiberboard has been developed. We assumed that the source of carbonized boards can be any type of wood-based panels. In this study, carbonized boards were manufactured from oriented strand board (OSB) at 400, 600, 800, and $1000^{\circ}C$. Each carbonized OSB (c-OSB) was evaluated and determined physiomechanical characteristics such as exterior defects, dimensional shrinkage, modulus of elasticity, and bending strength. No external defects were observed on c-OSBs at all carbonizing conditions. As carbonizing temperature increased, less porosity between carbonized wood fibers was observed by SEM analysis. The higher rate of dimensional shrinkage was observed on c-OSB at $1000^{\circ}C$ (66%) than c-OSB at 400, 600, and $800^{\circ}C$ (47%, 58%, and 63%, respectively). The densities of c-OSBs were lower than original OSB, but there was no significant different among the c-OSBs. The bending strength of c-OSB increased 1.58 MPa (c-OSB at $400^{\circ}C$) to 8.03 MPa (c-OSB at $1000^{\circ}C$) as carbonization temperature increased. Carbonization temperature above $800^{\circ}C$ yielded higher bonding strength than that of gypsum board (4.6 MPa). In conclusion, c-OSB may be used in sealing and wall for decorating purpose without additional artwork compare to c-MDF which has smooth surface.

Keywords

References

  1. Bacon, R. and M. M. Tang. 1964. Carbonization of cellulose fibers-II. Physical property study. Carbon 2(3): 221-225. https://doi.org/10.1016/0008-6223(64)90036-3
  2. Byrne, C. E. and D. C. Nagle. 1997. Carbonized wood monoliths-characterization. Carbon 35(2): 267-273. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-6223(96)00135-2
  3. Cao, Q., Xie, K. C., Lv, Y. K., and W. R. Bao. 2006. Process effects on activated carbon with large specific surface area from corn cob. Bioresource Technol 97(1): 110-115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2005.02.026
  4. Hassan, S. B., Oghenevweta, J. E., and V. S. Aigbodion. 2012. Morphological and mechanical properties of carbonized waste maize stalk as reinforcement for eco-composites. Compos Part B Eng 43(5): 2230-2236.
  5. Hirose, T., Fan, T. X., Okabe, T., and M. Yoshimura. 2001. Effect of carbonization temperature on the basic properties of woodceramics impregnated with liquefied wood. J Mater Sci 36(17): 4145-4149. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017952502431
  6. Kercher, A. K. and D. C. Nagle. 2002. Evaluation of carbonized medium-density fiberboard for electrical applications. Carbon 40(8): 1321-1330. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-6223(01)00299-8
  7. Kim, N. H. and R. B. Hanna. 2006. Morphological characteristics of Quercus variabilis charcoal prepared at different temperatures. Wood Sci. Technol. 40(5): 392-401. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00226-005-0062-5
  8. Kwon, J. H., Park, S. B., Ayrilmis, N., Oh, S. W., and N. H. Kim. 2013. Effect of carbonization temperature on electrical resistivity and physical properties of wood and wood-based composites. Compos. Part B. Eng. 46: 102-107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.10.012
  9. Kwon, J.H., Park, S.B., Ayrilmis, N., Kim, N.H., and S. M. Kwon. 2012. Electromagnetic interference shielding effectiveness, electrical resistivity and mechanical performance of carbonized medium density fiberboard. J. Compos. Mater. 47(16): 1951-1958.
  10. McGinnes, Jr, E. A., Kandeel, S. A., and P. S. Szopa. 1971. Some Structural Changes Observed in the Transformation of Wood into Charcoal 1. Wood Fiber Sci. 3(2): 77-83.
  11. Nishimiya, K., Hata, T., Imamura, Y., and S. Ishihara. 1998. Analysis of chemical structure of wood charcoal by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. J. Wood Sci. 44(1): 56-61. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00521875
  12. Oh, S.W. and S. H. Byeon. 2002. Properties of woodceramics made from MDF (in Korean). Mokchae Konghak 30(2): 115-120.
  13. Parfen'eva L. S., Orlova, T. S., Kartenko, N. F., Smirnov, B. I., Smirnov, I. A., Misiorek, H., Jezowshk, A., Muha, J., and M. C. Vera. 2011. Structure, electrical resistivity, and thermal conductivity of beech wood biocarbon produced at carbonization temperatures below 1000${^{\circ}C}$. Phys Solid State+ 53(11): 2398-2407. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063783411110230
  14. Park, S. B., Lee, S. M., Park, J. Y., and S. H. Lee. 2009. Manufacture of Crack-free Carbonized Board from Fiberboard (in Korean). Mokchae Konghak 37(4): 293-299.
  15. Pulido-Novicio, L., Hata, T., Kurimoto, Y., Doi, S., Ishihara, S., and Y. Imamura. 2001. Adsorption capacities and related characteristics of wood charcoals carbonized using a one-step or two-step process. J. Wood Sci. 47(1): 48-57. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00776645
  16. Slocum, D. H., McGinnes, J. E. A., and F. C. Beall. 1978. Charcoal yield, shrinkage, and density changes during carbonization of oak and hickory woods. Wood Fiber Sci. 11: 42-7.
  17. Wang, S. Y., Tsai, M. H., Lo, S. F., and M. J. Tsai. 2008. Effects of manufacturing conditions on the adsorption capacity of heavy metal ions by Makino bamboo charcoal. Bioresource Technol. 99(15): 7027-7033. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2008.01.014
  18. World Health Organization. 2010. WHO guidelines for indoor air quality: selected pollutants. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO.