참고문헌
- American Society for Testing and Materials. 1990. Standard practice for establishing allowable properties for visually graded dimension lumber from in-grade tests of full size specimens. ASTM D 1990-91.
- Arwade, S. R., Peggi, L. C., and M. T. Krupka. 2011. Length effect in tensile strength in the orthogonal directions of structural composite lumber. J. of Testing and Evaluation 39(4): 1-7.
- Bakar, S.A. and L. S. ABD. 2005. Verification of Weibull's theory to brittle fracture to meranti's timber loaded in tension parallel to the grain. Jurnal Teknologi. 43(B): 27-34.
- Barrett, J. D. and A. R. Fewell. 1990. Size factors for the bending and tension strength of structural lumber. Proceedings of CIB Working Commission W 18A - Timber Structures. Lisbon, Portugal.
- Barrett, J. D., F. Lam, and W. Lau. 1995. Size effect in visually graded softwood structural lumber. J. of Materials in Civil Eng. 7(1): 19-30. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(1995)7:1(19)
- Barrett, J. D. and W. Lau. 1994. Canadian lumber properties. Canadian Wood Council. pp. 141 -154.
- Bohannan, B. 1966. Effect of size on bending strength of wood members. U.S. Forest Service Research Paper FPL 56.
- Johnson, L. A., J. W. Evans, and D. W. Green. 1989. Volume effect adjustments for the in-grade data. In-Grade Testing of Structural Lumber, 56 -61, Forest Research Society.
- Fonselius, M. 1997. Effect of size on bending strength of laminated veneer lumber. Wood Sci. and Tech. 31: 399-413 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00702562
- Lam, F. and E. Varoglu. 1991. Variation of tensile strength along the length of lumber. Part 1. Experimental. Wood Sci. and Tech. 25: 351- 359
- Lam, Frank. 2000. Length effect on the tensile strength of truss chord lumber. Can. J. of Civ. Eng. 27: 481-489. https://doi.org/10.1139/l99-084
- Lee, J. J., G. C. Kim, K. M. Kim, and J. K. Oh. 2003. Distribution characteristics of bending properties for visual graded lumber of Japanese larch. Mokchae Konghak 31(5): 72-79.
- Madsen, Borg. 1990. Size effect in defect-free Douglas-fir. J. of Materials in Civil Eng. 17: 238 -242.
- Madsen B, and A. H. Buchanan. 1986. Size effect in timber explained by a modified weakest link theory. Can. J. of Civil Eng. 13: 218-232. https://doi.org/10.1139/l86-030
- Shim, K. B. and M. J. Park. 1998. Establishing system of allowable stresses for structural lumber. FRI. J. For. Sci. 57: 43-52.
- Showalter. K. L., F. E. Woeste, and B. A. Bendsten. 1987. Effect of length on tensile strength in structural lumber. USDA, Forest Service FPL Research Paper FPL-RP-482.
- Zhu, J., K. Asae, T. Takeda, and M. Tokumoto. 2001. Methods to estimate the length effect on tensile strength parallel to the grain in Japanese larch. J. of Wood Sci. 47: 269-274. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00766712
- Zhou, H., R. Haiqing, L. Jianxiong, J. Jinghui, and W. Xueshun. 2010. Length effect on the tension strength between mechanically graded highand low-grade Chinese fir lumber. For. Prod. J. 60(2): 144-149.