DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Air Tightness Performance of Residential Timber Frame Buildings

  • Kim, Hyun-Bae (Department of Forest Sciences, Seoul National University) ;
  • Park, Joo-Saeng (Div. of Wood Engineering, Dept. of Forest Resources Utilization, Korea Forest Research Institute) ;
  • Hong, Jung-Pyo (SK Forest co. Ltd.) ;
  • Oh, Jung-Kwon (Research Institute for Agriculture and Life Science, Department of Forest Sciences, Seoul National University) ;
  • Lee, Jun-Jae (Research Institute for Agriculture and Life Science, Department of Forest Sciences, Seoul National University)
  • Received : 2013.03.05
  • Accepted : 2013.12.17
  • Published : 2014.03.25

Abstract

Energy consumption statistics in 2005 from the Korea Energy Management Corporation show that building energy usage was about 24.2% of total domestic energy consumption, and 64% of total building energy usage was consumed by residential buildings. Thus, about 10% of total domestic energy consumption is due to the heating of residential buildings. Building energy can be calculated by the configuration of the building envelope and the rate of infiltration (the volume of the infiltration of outdoor air and the leakage of indoor air), and by doing so, the annual energy usage for heating and cooling. Therefore, air-tightness is an important factor in building energy conservation. This investigate air infiltration and various factors that decrease it in timber frame buildings and suggest ways to improve air-tightness for several structural types. Timber frame buildings can be classified into light frame, post and beam, and log house. Post and beam includes Han-ok (a Korean traditional building). Six light frame buildings, three post and beam buildings, one Korean traditional Han-ok and a log house were selected as specimens. Blower door tests were performed following ASTM E779-03. The light frame buildings showed the highest air-tightness, followed by post and beam structures, and last, log houses.

Keywords

References

  1. ASTM E 741-00 (2004). Standard Test Method for Determining Air Change in a Single Zone by Means of a Tracer Gas Dilution.
  2. ASTM E 779-03 (2004). Standard Test Method for Determining Air Leakage Rate by Fan Pressurization.
  3. Chen, S., Levine, M.D., Li, H., Yowargana, P. and Xie, L. 2012. Measured air tightness performance of residential buildings in North China and its influence on district space heating energy use, Energy and Building 51: 157-164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2012.05.004
  4. Cho, J.H. 2010. Measurements of the dwelling unit airtightness in high-rise residential buildings, Journal of Architectural Institute of Korea 26(10): 337-344.
  5. Dodoo, A., Gustavsson, L., and Sathre, R. 2011. Primary energy implications of ventilation heat recovery in residential buildings, Energy and Buildings 43(7): 1566-1572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2011.02.019
  6. Feist, W., Schnieders, J., Dorer, V., and Haas, A. 2005. Re-investing air heating: Convenient and comfortable within the frame of the Passive House concept, Energy and Building 37: 1186-1203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2005.06.020
  7. Furbringer, J.M., Foradini, F., and Roulet, C.A. 1994. Bayesian method for estimating air-tightness coefficients from pressurization measurements, Building and environment 29(2): 151-157. https://doi.org/10.1016/0360-1323(94)90066-3
  8. ISO 9972 (2006). Determination of air permeability of buildings - Fan pressurization method.
  9. Kalamees, T. 2007. Air tightness and air leakages of new lightweight single-family detached house in Estonia. Building and environment 42: 2369-2377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2006.06.001
  10. Kim, S.J., Park, J.S., Park, M.J., and Lee, J.J. 2012. Air tightness of light frame house according to presence of air barrier, Proceeding of the Korea society of wood science and technology annual meeting, Dae-gu, pp. 10-11.
  11. Kim, S.J., Park, J.S., Park, M.J., Yeo, H.M., and Lee, J.J. 2011. Evaluation of thermal performance in wooden house with thermal images, Proceeding of the Korea society of wood science and technology annual meeting, Kwang-ju, pp. 66-67.
  12. Koo, S.H. J.H. Jo. M.S. Yeo, and K.W. Kim. 2010. A study on the Characteristics of Airtightness in High-rise Residential Building by Field Measurement. Architectural Institue of Korea 1: 757-760.
  13. Nabinger, S. and Persily, A. 2011. Impacts of airtightening retrofits on ventilation rates and energy consumption in a manufactured home, Energy and Buildings 43(11): 3059-3067. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2011.07.027
  14. Park, W.S. and J.O. Yoon. 2003. The Field Measurement of Airtightness in the Apartment Buildings. Korea Institute of Ecological Architecture and Environment 9: 43-50.
  15. Schnieders, J. 2003. CEPHEUS-measurement results from more than 100 dwelling units in passive houses, ECEEE Summer Study: 341-351.
  16. Sfakianaki, A., K. Pavlou, M. Santamouris, I. Livada, M.-N. Assimakopoulos, P. Mantas, and A. Christakopoulos. 2008. Air tightness measurements of residential houses in Athens, Greece, Building and Envirionment 43: 398-405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2007.01.006
  17. Sherman, M. and Dickerhoff, D. 1994. AIRTIGHTNESS OF U.S. DWELLINGS, Document- Air infiltration centre AICPROC: 225-234.
  18. Stein, J.R. and A. Meier. 2000. Accuracy of energy rating systems. ENERGY 25: 339-354. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-5442(99)00072-9
  19. The Energy Conservatory(2010). Minneapolis Blower Door Operation Manul for Model3 System.
  20. Yoon, J.H., J.W. Park, K.S. Lee, N.C. Beak, and U.C. Shin. 2008. A study on the measurement of air- tightness performance of detached houses in Chung-cheong area. Journal of the Korean Solar Energy Society 5: 65-71.