DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study for Efficient Inter-Terminal Transportation in the Busan New Port

부산신항 타부두 환적의 효율적인 처리방안 연구

  • Received : 2013.10.02
  • Accepted : 2014.03.06
  • Published : 2014.03.31

Abstract

The Korean government establishes a strategy to develop the Busan New Port as a world ranking two transit-oriented port. This paper aims at presenting an efficient inter-terminal transport (ITT) system in the Busan New Port as a method of achieving the government strategy. First, it presents results of long term forecast for the inter-terminal transportation volume in the port. Second, it proposes two systems to treat ITT in the port; Double stack Multiple Trailer System (DMTS) and Rail-based transportation system. The implementation methods in the port are introduced in detail for the both systems, and the required number of the systems and costs are calculated for implementation of both the systems. B/C for DMTS is analyzed to 3.7, moreover unit-fare per [$ton{\cdot}km$] can is lowered to 67% against current fare. DMTS is shown to highly potential for efficient ITT in the port.

한국 정부는 부산신항을 세계 2위의 환적중심 항만으로 육성하기 위한 정책 목표를 수립하고 있다. 본 논문은 이와 같은 정책 목표 달성의 한 가지 방법으로 타부두 환적의 효율적인 처리방안 제시를 목적으로 한다. 본 논문에서는 먼저 부산신항의 타부두 환적 물동량에 대한 장기 예측결과를 제시한다. 다음 부산신항의 타부두 환적을 처리할 수 있는 시스템적 대안으로 Double stack Multiple Trailer System(DMTS)와 궤도식 시스템 대안을 제시한다. 각 시스템 대안의 부산신항에 적용방법을 소개하고, 예측된 타부두 환적 물동량을 처리하기 위한 대안별 시스템 소요량 및 도입비용을 산출한다. 특히, DMTS의 경제성 분석결과 B/C = 3.7을 확보할 것으로 예상되고, 재무성 분석결과 현행 톤${\cdot}km$ 당 요금을 현행 대비 67%까지 인하할 수 있어 부산신항 타부두 환적을 효율적으로 처리할 수 있는 유력한 대안으로 판단된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Wikipedia, List of World's Busiest Container Ports, Available From: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_world's_busiest_container_ports, (accessed Nov. 28, 2013).
  2. J. B. LI, Y. S. OH, "A Research on Competition and Cooperation Between Shanghai Port and Ningbo-Zhoushan Port", The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, Vol. 26, No. 1, pp. 67-92, 2010. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2092-5212(10)80012-4
  3. J. Leong, M. J. Chen, "Battle of the Asian Transshipment Hubs: PSA vs PTP", Working Paper, Darden Case No. UVA-S-0110, 2008.
  4. Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs, The Third, Basic Plan for National Ports (2011-2020), p.48, 2011.
  5. I. F. A. Vis, R. de Koster, "Transshipment of comtainers at a container terminal: An overview", European Journal of Operational Research, Vol 147, pp. 1-16, 2003. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(02)00293-X
  6. D. H. Lee, J. G. Jin, J. H. Chen, "Terminal and Yard Allocation Problem for a Container Transshipment Hub with Multiple Terminals", Transportation Research Part E, Vol. 48, pp. 516-528, 2012. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2011.09.004
  7. M. P. M. Hendriks, D. Armbruster, M. Laumanns, E. Lefeber, J. T. Udding, "Strategic Allocation of Cyclically Calling Vessels for Multi-terminal Container Operators", Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Vol. 24, pp. 248-273, 2012. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10696-011-9120-5
  8. A. Goussiatiner, "Efficiency of Multi-trailer Systems for Ship to Stacks Container Transportation", Port Technology International, pp. 78-82, 2011.
  9. Busan Port Authority, 2011 Port of Busan Container Statistics, 2011.
  10. Busan Port Authority, 2012 Port of Busan Container Statistics, 2012.
  11. Busan Port Authority, 2009 Port of Busan Container Statistics, 2019.
  12. Busan Port Authority, 2010 Port of Busan Container Statistics, 2010.
  13. S. M. Oh, S. H. Choi, K. L. Ahn, The Final Report of a Feasibility Study for Development of Technologies in Inter Terminals Transportation, pp. 78-98, 2012.
  14. Korea Maritime Institute, Pusan North Port - New Port Container Traffic Forecast and Allocation, 2011.
  15. K. S. Kim, The Report for Revision of Standard Manual for Preliminary Feasibility Study on Road and Rail Projects(5 Edition), 2008.
  16. S. M. Lee, Popularization of National Passenger Traffic of Origin and Destination Survey, 2007.