Phonetics and Speech Sciences (말소리와 음성과학)

Korean Society of Speech Sciences (한국음성학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Korean Adult Normative Data for the KayPENTAX Phonatory Aerodynamic System Model 6600

KayPENTAX Phonatory Aerodynamic System Model 6600을 이용한 한국 성인의 공기역학적 변수들의 정상치

  • 김재옥 (강남대학교 교육대학원 언어치료교육전공)
  • Received : 2014.02.09
  • Accepted : 2014.02.23
  • Published : 2014.03.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to (1) establish a Korean adult normative database for phonatory aerodynamic measures obtained with the KayPENTAX Phonatory Aerodynamic System (PAS) Model 6600, (2) investigate the intra-subject reliability of these measures across three testing sessions, and (3) examine the effect of gender on those measures. 170 healthy normal speakers (70 men and 100 women) between the ages 18 and 49 years participated in the study. The PAS protocol of maximum phonation and voicing efficiency were conducted and 25 measures were obtained. All aerodynamic measures taken in this study demonstrated high intra-subject reliability in clinical aspect. There were no significant effect of gender in the measures related to sound pressure and subglottal pressure. However, significant differences for gender were found for phonation time, airflow rate, expiratory volume, aerodynamic power, SPL range, pitch range, mean pitch, aerodynamic resistance, and aerodynamic efficiency. Clinicians should be aware of significant gender effects in some aerodynamic parameters when interpreting the data obtained from PAS.

Keywords

References

  1. Ahn, S. Y., Kim, H. S., Kim, Y. H., et al. (2003). Comparative evaluation of electroglottography and aerodynamic study in trained singers and untrained controls under different tow pitches. Phonetics and Speech Sciences, 10(2), 111-128. (안성윤, 김한수, 김영호, 송기재, 최성희, 이성은, 최홍식 (2003). 성악인과 일반인 발성의 전기성문검사 및 공기역학적 검사에 대한 연구. 말소리와 음성과학, 10, 111-128.)
  2. Ahn, T. S., Yang, S. I., & Shin, H. G. (1997). An aerodynamic study of velopharyngeal closure function in cleft palate patients. Phonetics and Speech Sciences, 1, 237-259. (안태섭, 양상일, 신효근 (1997). 구개열 환자의 비인강폐쇄 기 능에 대한 공기역학적 연구. 말소리와 음성과학, 1, 237-259.)
  3. Awan, S. N. & Alphonso, V. A. (2007). Effects of smoking on respiratory capacity and control. Clinical Linguistic & Phonatory, 21, 623-636. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699200701427401
  4. Awan, S. N., Novaleski, C. K., & Yingling, J. R. (2013). Test-retest reliability for aerodynamic measures of voice. Journal of Voice, 27(6), 674-684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2013.07.002
  5. Bernthal, J. E. & Beukelman, D. R. (1978). Intraoral air pressure during the production of /p/ and /b/ by children, youths, and adults. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 21, 361-371.
  6. Brown, W. S. Jr. & McGlone, R. E. (1969). Constancy of intraoral air pressure. Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica, 21, 332-339. https://doi.org/10.1159/000263267
  7. Brown, W. S. Jr. & Shearer, W. M. (1970). Constancy of intraoral air pressure related to integrated pressure-time measures. Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica, 22, 49-57. https://doi.org/10.1159/000263366
  8. Choi, H. S., Lee, J. H., Kim, I. S., et al. (2000). The acoustic and aerodynamic aspects of patients with spasmodic dysphonia. The Journal of the Korean Society of Logopedics and Phoniatrics, 11(1), 98-103. (최홍식, 이주환, 김인섭, 고윤우, 오종석, 배정호, 윤현철, 최성 희 (2000). 연축성 발성장애 환자의 음향학적 및 공기역학적 양상. 대한음성언어의학회지, 11, 98-103.)
  9. Colton, R. & Casper, J. (1996). Understanding voice production: A physiological perspective for diagosis and treatment. NY: Williams & Wilkins.
  10. Dejonckere, P. H., Bradley, P., Clemente, P., et al. (2001). A basic protocol for functional assessment of voice pathology, especially for investigating the efficacy of (phonosurgical) treatments and evaluating new assessment techniques. Eur Arch Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 258, 77-82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004050000299
  11. Goozee, J.V., Murdoch, B. E., Theodoros, D. G. et al. (1998). The effects of age and gender on laryngeal aerodynamic. International Journal of Communication Disorders, 33(2), 221-238. https://doi.org/10.1080/136828298247884
  12. Higgins, M. B. & Saxman, J. H. (1991). A comparison of selected phonatory behaviors of healthy aged and young adults. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 34, 1000-1010. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.3405.1000
  13. Higgins, M. B., Netsell, R., & Schulte, L. (1994). Aerodynamic and electroglotographic measures of normal voice production: intrasubject variability within and across sessions. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 37, 373-392.
  14. Hillman, R. E., Holmberg, E. B., Perkell, J. S. et al. (1989). Objective assessment of vocal hyperfunction: an experimental framework and initial results. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 32, 373-392. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.3202.373
  15. Hiss, S. G., Treole, K. & Stuart, A. (2001). Effect of age, gender, and repeated measures on intraoral air pressure in normal adults. Journal of Voice, 15(2), 159-164. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0892-1997(01)00017-0
  16. Holmberg, E. B., Hillman, R. E., & Perkell, J. S. (1988). Glottal airflow and transglottal air pressure measurements for male and female speakers in soft, normal, and loud voice. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 84, 511-529. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.396829
  17. Holmberg, E. B., Hillman, R. E., Perkell, J. S. et al. (1994). Relationships between intra-speaker variation in aerodynamic measures of voice production and variation in SPL across repeated recordings. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 37(7), 484-495. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.3703.484
  18. Holmes, L. C., Leeper, H. A. & Nicholson, I. R. (1994). Laryngeal airway resistance of older men and women as a function of vocal sound pressure level. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 37, 789-799. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.3704.789
  19. Isshiki, N. & von Leden, H. (1964). Hoarseness: aerodynamic studies. Arch Otolaryngol, 80, 206-213. https://doi.org/10.1001/archotol.1964.00750040212020
  20. Iwata, S., von Leden, H., & Williams, D. (1972). Airflow measurement during phonation. Journal of Communicative Disorders, 5, 67-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9924(72)90033-0
  21. KayPENTAX (2006). Instruction manual of phonatory aerodynamic system model 6600.
  22. Kim, J. O., Lim, S., & Choi, H. S. (2009). Aerodynamic characteristics of healthy Korean voice using Phonatory Analysis System. Proceedings of 1st Joint Meeting of Korean Speech-Language and Hearing Association & The Korean Academy of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, 82-86. (김재옥, 임성은, 최홍식 (2009). 한국 정상 성인 음성의 Phonatory Analysis System을 이용한 공기역학적 특성 분석. 제 1회 한국언어치료학회․한국언어청각임상학회 공동학술대회 논문집, 82-86.)
  23. Klich, R. J. & Sabo, W. J. (1988). Intraoral pressure differences in various degrees of breathiness. Folia Phoniatrica, 40, 265-269. https://doi.org/10.1159/000265918
  24. Korean Society of Laryngology, Phoniatrics and Logopedics. (2012). Laryngology, Phoniatrics, and Logopedics. Seoul: Iljogak. (대한후두음성언어의학회 (2012). 후두음성언어의학. 서울: 일 조각.)
  25. Liberman, P. (1968). Direct comparison of subglottal, and esophageal pressure during speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 43, 1157-1164. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1910950
  26. Maslan, J., Leng, X., Rees, C. et al. (2010). Maximum phonation time in healthy older adults. Journal of Voice, 25(6), 709-713.
  27. Miller, C. J. & Daniloff, R. (1993). Airflow measurements: theory and utility of findings. Journal of Voice, 1, 38-43.
  28. Nam, D. H., Choi, S. H., Choi, J. N. et al. (2005). The aerodynamic and respiratory muscle pressure aspects of patients with adductor spasmodic dysphonia. Speech Sciences, 12(4), 203-213.
  29. Netsell, R., Lotz, W. K., Duchane, A. S. et al. (1991). vocal tract aerodynamics during syllable productions: normative data and theoretical implications. Journal of Voice, 5, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0892-1997(05)80157-2
  30. Netsell, R., Lotz, W. K., & Shaughnessy, A. L. (1984). Laryngeal aerodynamics associated with selected voice disorders. American Journal of Otolaryngology, 5, 397-403. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0196-0709(84)80055-1
  31. Park, S-H., Jung, O. R., & Seok, D-I. (2001). The validity analysis between measurement method of subglottic air pressure. Speech Sciences, 8(3), 201-208. (박상희, 정옥란, 석동일 (2001). 성문하압 측정방법의 타당도 분석. 말소리와 음성과학, 8, 201-208.)
  32. Park, S. Y., Kim, J. O., Lim, S. E. et al. (2008). The Perceptual Evaluation and Aerodynamic Analysis of Spasmodic Dysphonia. Journal of the Korean Society of Logopedics and Phoniatrics, 19, 38-42. (박선영, 김재옥, 임성은, 남도현, 최홍식 (2008). 연축성발성장 애의 청지각적 평가 및 공기역학적 특성. 대한음성언어의학회 지, 19, 38-42.)
  33. Rothenberg, M. (1973). A new inverse-filtering technique for deriving the glottal airflow waveform during voicing. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 53, 1632-1645. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1913513
  34. Sapienza, C. & Hoffman-Ruddy, B. (2012). Voice disorders (2nd ed.). San Diego: Plural Publishing.
  35. Schneider, P. & Baken, R. J. (1984). Influence of lung volume on the airflow-intensity relationship. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 27, 430-435. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.2703.430
  36. Schutte, H. K. (1992). Integrated aerodynamic measurements. Journal of Voice, 6, 127-134. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0892-1997(05)80126-2
  37. Seo, J-S., Song, S-Y., Kwon, O-C. et al. (1997). Mean value of aerodynamic study in normal Korean. Journal of the Korean Society of Logopedics and Phoniatrics, 8, 28-32. (서장수, 송시연, 권오철, 김준우, 이희경, 정옥란 (1997). 음성 검사 중 공기역학적 검사에서 한국인의 정상 평균치. 대한후두 음성언어의학회지, 8, 27-32.)
  38. Smitheran, J. R. & Hixon, T. J. (1981). A clinical method for estimating laryngeal airway resistance during vowel production. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 46, 138-146. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshd.4602.138
  39. Stathopoulos, E. T. & Sapienza, C. (1993). Respiratory and laryngeal function of women and mean during vocal intensity variation. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 36, 64-75. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.3601.64
  40. Stathopoulos, E. T. (1986). Relationship between intraoral air pressure and vocal intensity in children and adults. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 29, 71-74. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.2901.71
  41. Stemple, J. C. & Fry, L. T. (2010). Voice therapy: clinical case studies (3rd ed.). San Diego: Plural Publishing.
  42. Subtelny, J. F., Worth, J. H., & Sakuda, M. (1966). Intraoral pressure and rate of flow during speech. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 29, 498-518.
  43. Tanaka, S. & Gould, W. J. (1985). Vocal efficiency and aerodynamic aspects in voice disorders. The Annals of Otology, Rhinology, and Laryngology, 94(1 Pt 1), 29-33.
  44. Weinrich, B., Brehm, S. B., Knudsen, C. K. et al. (2012). Pediatric normative data for the KayPENTAX Phonatory Aerodynamic System Model 6600. Journal of Voice, 27(1), 46-56.
  45. Wilson, J. V. & Leeper, H. A. (1992). Changes in laryngeal airway resistance in young adult men and women as a function of vocal sound pressure level and syllable context. Journal of Voice, 6, 235-245. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0892-1997(05)80148-1
  46. Yiu, E. M., Yuen, Y., Whitehill, T. et al. (2004). Reliability and applicability of aerodynamic measures in dysphonia assessment. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 18(6-8), 463-478. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699200410001703592
  47. Zraick, R. I., Smith-Olinde, L., & Shotts, L. L. (2011). Adult normative data for the KayPENTAX Phonatory Aerodynamic System Model 6600. Journal of Voice, 26(2), 164-176.
  48. Zraick, R. I., Smith-Olinde, L., & Shoutts, L. L. (2013). Erratum: "Adult Normative Data for the KayPENTAX Phonatory Aerodynamic System Model 6600." Journal of Voice, 26, 164-176.

Cited by

  1. Characteristics of Maximal Tongue and Lip Strength and Tongue Endurance Scores According to Age and Gender in Healthy Korean Adults vol.6, pp.2, 2014, https://doi.org/10.13064/KSSS.2014.6.2.097
  2. Comparison of Aerodynamic Variables according to the Execution Methods of KayPENTAX Phonatory Aerodynamic System Model 6600 vol.7, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.13064/KSSS.2015.7.4.093
  3. Aerodynamic features in patients with vocal polyps before & after laryngomicrosurgery vol.8, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.13064/KSSS.2016.8.3.039
  4. The Comparison of Aerodynamic Measures in Korean Stop Consonants based on Phonation Types vol.6, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.13064/KSSS.2014.6.4.195
  5. Changes in Respiration and Phonation in Acting Students after training with the Alexander Technique vol.19, pp.3, 2014, https://doi.org/10.12963/csd.14152
  6. A Comparison among Repeated Measures of the Voicing Efficiency Protocol in the Aerodynamic Assessment vol.23, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.12963/csd.18516