Korean Journal of Radiology

  • 제15권6호
  • /
  • Pages.771-780
  • /
  • 2014
  • /
  • 1229-6929(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2005-8330(eISSN)
대한영상의학회 (The Korean Society of Radiology)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparison of Three-Dimensional Isotropic and Two-Dimensional Conventional Indirect MR Arthrography for the Diagnosis of Rotator Cuff Tears

  • Lee, Ji Hyun (Department of Radiology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine) ;
  • Yoon, Young Cheol (Department of Radiology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine) ;
  • Jee, Sukkyung (Joeun Madi Hospital) ;
  • Kwon, Jong Won (Department of Radiology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine) ;
  • Cha, Jang Gyu (Department of Radiology, Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital) ;
  • Yoo, Jae Chul (Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine)
  • 투고 : 2014.02.27
  • 심사 : 2014.08.24
  • 발행 : 2014.12.01
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Objective: To compare the accuracy between a three-dimensional (3D) indirect isotropic T1-weighted fast spin-echo (FSE) magnetic resonance (MR) arthrography and a conventional two-dimensional (2D) T1-weighted sequences of indirect MR arthrography for diagnosing rotator cuff tears. Materials and Methods: The study was approved by our Institutional Review Board. In total, 205 patients who had undergone indirect shoulder MR arthrography followed by arthroscopic surgery for 206 shoulders were included in this study. Both conventional 2D T1-weighted FSE sequences and 3D isotropic T1-weighted FSE sequence were performed in all patients. Two radiologists evaluated the images for the presence of full- or partial-thickness tears in the supraspinatus-infraspinatus (SSP-ISP) tendons and tears in the subscapularis (SSC) tendons. Using the arthroscopic findings as the reference standard, the diagnostic performances of both methods were analyzed by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Results: Arthroscopy confirmed 165 SSP-ISP tendon tears and 103 SSC tendon tears. For diagnosing SSP-ISP tendon tears, the AUC values were 0.964 and 0.989 for the 2D sequences and 3D T1-weighted FSE sequence, respectively, in reader I and 0.947 and 0.963, respectively, in reader II. The AUC values for diagnosing SSC tendon tears were 0.921 and 0.925, respectively, for reader I and 0.856 and 0.860, respectively, for reader II. There was no significant difference between the AUC values of the 2D and 3D sequences in either reader for either type of tear. Conclusion: 3D indirect isotropic MR arthrography with FSE sequence and the conventional 2D arthrography are not significantly different in terms of accuracy for diagnosing rotator cuff tears.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Hodler J, Kursunoglu-Brahme S, Snyder SJ, Cervilla V, Karzel RP, Schweitzer ME, et al. Rotator cuff disease: assessment with MR arthrography versus standard MR imaging in 36 patients with arthroscopic confirmation. Radiology 1992;182:431-436 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.182.2.1489363
  2. Massengill AD, Seeger LL, Yao L, Gentili A, Shnier RC, Shapiro MS, et al. Labrocapsular ligamentous complex of the shoulder: normal anatomy, anatomic variation, and pitfalls of MR imaging and MR arthrography. Radiographics 1994;14:1211-1223 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiographics.14.6.7855336
  3. Palmer WE, Caslowitz PL, Chew FS. MR arthrography of the shoulder: normal intraarticular structures and common abnormalities. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1995;164:141-146 https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.164.1.7998527
  4. Sahin G, Demirtas˛ M. An overview of MR arthrography with emphasis on the current technique and applicational hints and tips. Eur J Radiol 2006;58:416-430 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2006.01.002
  5. Uri DS, Kneeland JB, Dalinka MK. Update in shoulder magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Q 1995;11:21-44
  6. Bergin D, Schweitzer ME. Indirect magnetic resonance arthrography. Skeletal Radiol 2003;32:551-558 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-003-0669-2
  7. Dinauer PA, Flemming DJ, Murphy KP, Doukas WC. Diagnosis of superior labral lesions: comparison of noncontrast MRI with indirect MR arthrography in unexercised shoulders. Skeletal Radiol 2007;36:195-202 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-006-0237-7
  8. Lee MJ, Motamedi K, Chow K, Seeger LL. Gradient-recalled echo sequences in direct shoulder MR arthrography for evaluating the labrum. Skeletal Radiol 2008;37:19-25
  9. Vahlensieck M, Sommer T, Textor J, Pauleit D, Lang P, Genant HK, et al. Indirect MR arthrography: techniques and applications. Eur Radiol 1998;8:232-235 https://doi.org/10.1007/s003300050369
  10. Yagci B, Manisali M, Yilmaz E, Ozkan M, Ekin A, Ozaksoy D, et al. Indirect MR arthrography of the shoulder in detection of rotator cuff ruptures. Eur Radiol 2001;11:258-262 https://doi.org/10.1007/s003300000546
  11. Jung JY, Yoon YC, Yi SK, Yoo J, Choe BK. Comparison study of indirect MR arthrography and direct MR arthrography of the shoulder. Skeletal Radiol 2009;38:659-667 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-009-0660-7
  12. Kijowski R, Davis KW, Woods MA, Lindstrom MJ, De Smet AA, Gold GE, et al. Knee joint: comprehensive assessment with 3D isotropic resolution fast spin-echo MR imaging--diagnostic performance compared with that of conventional MR imaging at 3.0 T. Radiology 2009;252:486-495 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2523090028
  13. Kwon JW, Yoon YC, Choi SH. Three-dimensional isotropic T2-weighted cervical MRI at 3T: comparison with two-dimensional T2-weighted sequences. Clin Radiol 2012;67:106-113 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2011.06.011
  14. Stevens KJ, Wallace CG, Chen W, Rosenberg JK, Gold GE. Imaging of the wrist at 1.5 Tesla using isotropic three-dimensional fast spin echo cube. J Magn Reson Imaging 2011;33:908-915 https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.22494
  15. Subhas N, Kao A, Freire M, Polster JM, Obuchowski NA, Winalski CS. MRI of the knee ligaments and menisci: comparison of isotropic-resolution 3D and conventional 2D fast spin-echo sequences at 3 T. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011;197:442-450 https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.10.5709
  16. Jung JY, Yoon YC, Kwon JW, Ahn JH, Choe BK. Diagnosis of internal derangement of the knee at 3.0-T MR imaging: 3D isotropic intermediate-weighted versus 2D sequences. Radiology 2009;253:780-787 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2533090457
  17. Gold GE, Busse RF, Beehler C, Han E, Brau AC, Beatty PJ, et al. Isotropic MRI of the knee with 3D fast spin-echo extended echo-train acquisition (XETA): initial experience. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007;188:1287-1293 https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.06.1208
  18. Notohamiprodjo M, Horng A, Pietschmann MF, Müller PE, Horger W, Park J, et al. MRI of the knee at 3T: first clinical results with an isotropic PDfs-weighted 3D-TSE-sequence. Invest Radiol 2009;44:585-597 https://doi.org/10.1097/RLI.0b013e3181b4c1a1
  19. Choo HJ, Lee SJ, Kim OH, Seo SS, Kim JH. Comparison of three-dimensional isotropic T1-weighted fast spin-echo MR arthrography with two-dimensional MR arthrography of the shoulder. Radiology 2012;262:921-931 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.11111261
  20. Jung JY, Jee WH, Park MY, Lee SY, Kim YS. Supraspinatus tendon tears at 3.0 T shoulder MR arthrography: diagnosis with 3D isotropic turbo spin-echo SPACE sequence versus 2D conventional sequences. Skeletal Radiol 2012;41:1401-1410 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-012-1361-1
  21. Minagawa H, Itoi E, Konno N, Kido T, Sano A, Urayama M, et al. Humeral attachment of the supraspinatus and infraspinatus tendons: an anatomic study. Arthroscopy 1998;14:302-306 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-8063(98)70147-1
  22. Mochizuki T, Sugaya H, Uomizu M, Maeda K, Matsuki K, Sekiya I, et al. Humeral insertion of the supraspinatus and infraspinatus. New anatomical findings regarding the footprint of the rotator cuff. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008;90:962-969 https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.G.00427
  23. Clark JM, Harryman DT 2nd. Tendons, ligaments, and capsule of the rotator cuff. Gross and microscopic anatomy. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1992;74:713-725 https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-199274050-00010
  24. Oh DK, Yoon YC, Kwon JW, Choi SH, Jung JY, Bae S, et al. Comparison of indirect isotropic MR arthrography and conventional MR arthrography of labral lesions and rotator cuff tears: a prospective study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009;192:473-479 https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.08.1223
  25. Opsha O, Malik A, Baltazar R, Primakov D, Beltran S, Miller TT, et al. MRI of the rotator cuff and internal derangement. Eur J Radiol 2008;68:36-56 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.02.018
  26. Pfirrmann CW, Zanetti M, Weishaupt D, Gerber C, Hodler J. Subscapularis tendon tears: detection and grading at MR arthrography. Radiology 1999;213:709-714 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.213.3.r99dc03709
  27. DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL. Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics 1988;44:837-845 https://doi.org/10.2307/2531595
  28. Hawass NE. Comparing the sensitivities and specificities of two diagnostic procedures performed on the same group of patients. Br J Radiol 1997;70:360-366 https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.70.832.9166071
  29. Kijowski R, Gold GE. Routine 3D magnetic resonance imaging of joints. J Magn Reson Imaging 2011;33:758-771 https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.22342
  30. Hill NB Jr, Bucchieri JS, Shon F, Miller TT, Rosenwasser MP. Magnetic resonance imaging of injury to the medial collateral ligament of the elbow: a cadaver model. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2000;9:418-422 https://doi.org/10.1067/mse.2000.107392
  31. Jung JY, Yoon YC, Choi SH, Kwon JW, Yoo J, Choe BK. Three-dimensional isotropic shoulder MR arthrography: comparison with two-dimensional MR arthrography for the diagnosis of labral lesions at 3.0 T. Radiology 2009;250:498-505 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2493071548
  32. Magee T. Can isotropic fast gradient echo imaging be substituted for conventional T1 weighted sequences in shoulder MR arthrography at 3 Tesla? J Magn Reson Imaging 2007;26:118-122 https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.21000
  33. Stevens KJ, Busse RF, Han E, Brau AC, Beatty PJ, Beaulieu CF, et al. Ankle: isotropic MR imaging with 3D-FSE-cube--initial experience in healthy volunteers. Radiology 2008;249:1026-1033 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2493080227
  34. Yao L, Pitts JT, Thomasson D. Isotropic 3D fast spin-echo with proton-density-like contrast: a comprehensive approach to musculoskeletal MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007;188:W199-W201 https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.06.0556
  35. Ristow O, Stehling C, Krug R, Steinbach L, Sabo G, Ambekar A, et al. Isotropic 3-dimensional fast spin echo imaging versus standard 2-dimensional imaging at 3.0 T of the knee: artificial cartilage and meniscal lesions in a porcine model. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2010;34:260-269 https://doi.org/10.1097/RCT.0b013e3181c20f6d
  36. Seo JM, Yoon YC, Kwon JW. 3D isotropic turbo spin-echo intermediate-weighted sequence with refocusing control in knee imaging: comparison study with 3D isotropic fast-field echo sequence. Acta Radiol 2011;52:1119-1124 https://doi.org/10.1258/ar.2011.110328
  37. Rybak LD, La Rocca Vieira R, Recht M, Shepard T, Wiggins G, Babb J, et al. Preliminary study of 1.5-T MR arthrography of the shoulder with 3D isotropic intermediate-weighted turbo spin echo. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012;199:W107-W113 https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.11.7544
  38. Jung JY, Jee WH, Park MY, Lee SY, Kim YS. SLAP tears: diagnosis using 3-T shoulder MR arthrography with the 3D isotropic turbo spin-echo space sequence versus conventional 2D sequences. Eur Radiol 2013;23:487-495 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-012-2599-7
  39. Johnson G, Wadghiri YZ, Turnbull DH. 2D multislice and 3D MRI sequences are often equally sensitive. Magn Reson Med 1999;41:824-828 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1522-2594(199904)41:4<824::AID-MRM23>3.0.CO;2-1
  40. Herold T, Bachthaler M, Hamer OW, Hente R, Feuerbach S, Fellner C, et al. Indirect MR arthrography of the shoulder: use of abduction and external rotation to detect full- and partial-thickness tears of the supraspinatus tendon. Radiology 2006;240:152-160 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2393050453
  41. Van Dyck P, Gielen JL, Veryser J, Weyler J, Vanhoenacker FM, Van Glabbeek F, et al. Tears of the supraspinatus tendon: assessment with indirect magnetic resonance arthrography in 67 patients with arthroscopic correlation. Acta Radiol 2009;50:1057-1063 https://doi.org/10.3109/02841850903232723
  42. Yoo JC, Jun BJ, Shin SJ, Mcgarry MH, Lee TQ. Subscapularis footprint anatomy revisited with 3-dimensional perspective and its relationship with supraspinatus 1st facet. Arthroscopy 2013;29:e95

피인용 문헌

  1. MRI of the anterior talofibular ligament, talar cartilage and os subfibulare: Comparison of isotropic resolution 3D and conventional 2D T2-weighted fast spin-echo sequences at 3.0 T vol.45, pp.7, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-016-2367-x
  2. Does the Reporting Quality of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies, as Defined by STARD 2015, Affect Citation? vol.17, pp.5, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2016.17.5.706
  3. Selection and Reporting of Statistical Methods to Assess Reliability of a Diagnostic Test: Conformity to Recommended Methods in a Peer-Reviewed Journal vol.18, pp.6, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2017.18.6.888
  4. Diagnostic performance of wrist magnetic resonance (MR) arthrography: comparison of three-dimensional isotropic T1 weighted fast spin-echo MR arthrography and two-dimensional MR arthrograph vol.90, pp.1071, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20160867
  5. Diagnostic performance of shoulder magnetic resonance arthrography for labral tears having surgery as reference: comparison of high-resolution isotropic 3D sequence (THRIVE) with standard protocol vol.123, pp.8, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-018-0879-2
  6. Diagnosis of Rotator Cuff Tears with Non-Arthrographic MR Imaging: 3D Fat-Suppressed Isotropic Intermediate-Weighted Turbo Spin-Echo Sequence versus Conventional 2D Sequences at 3T vol.22, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.13104/imri.2018.22.4.229
  7. Comparison Between Isotropic 3-Dimensional Fat-Suppressed T2-Weighted Fast Spin Echo (FSE) and Conventional 2-Dimensional Fat-Suppressed Proton-Weighted FSE Shoulder Magnetic Resonance Imaging at 3-T vol.42, pp.4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1097/rct.0000000000000721
  8. Comparison between 3D isotropic and 2D conventional MR arthrography for diagnosing rotator cuff tear and labral lesions: A meta‐analysis vol.48, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.26024
  9. An Evidence-Based Approach to Assess the Accuracy of MRI in Diagnosing Rotator Cuff Tears: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis vol.16, pp.2, 2014, https://doi.org/10.5812/iranjradiol.79079
  10. Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for subscapularis tear: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic studies vol.139, pp.5, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-018-3095-6
  11. Diagnostic accuracy of MRA and MRI for the bursal-sided partial-thickness rotator cuff tears: a meta-analysis vol.14, pp.None, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-019-1460-y
  12. Evaluation of glenoid labral tears: comparison between dual-energy CT arthrography and MR arthrography of the shoulder vol.125, pp.1, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-019-01083-z