응용통계연구 (The Korean Journal of Applied Statistics)

  • 제27권1호
  • /
  • Pages.103-114
  • /
  • 2014
  • /
  • 1225-066X(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2383-5818(eISSN)
한국통계학회 (The Korean Statistical Society)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

계층적 의사결정론에서 일관성 지수에 대한 통계적 검정

A Statistical Testing of the Consistency Index in Analytic Hierarchy Process

  • 투고 : 2013.11.15
  • 심사 : 2013.12.02
  • 발행 : 2014.02.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

계층적 의사결정론(AHP)에서 응답자의 신뢰성을 평가하기 위해 일관성 지수가 활용된다. 일반적으로 일관성 지수값이 0에 근접할 수록 신뢰성이 있다고 판단되나, 신뢰성에 대한 임계값은 9점 척도의 비교행렬로 부터 모의실험 된 무작위 지수의 평균에 의존한다. 본 연구에서는 9점 척도 비교행렬에 의한 모의실험 분포가 차원별로 치우침이 심한 분포라는 점에 기초하여, 차원별 일관성 지수의 분위수에 기초한 통계적 가설검정 방법을 소개하기로 한다. 그리고, 모의실험으로 계산된 일관성 지수의 분포에 따라 적절한 임계 분위값을 제공하였다. 또한, 쌍대비교행렬의 각 원소에 오차를 고려한 모형을 적용하여, 일관성 지수의 분포를 감마분포로 특수한 경우 근사시킬 수 있음을 제시하였다.

Significant research has been devoted to the consistency index of the Analytic Hierarchy Process(AHP) from several perspectives. Critics of the consistency index in AHP state that the critical value of consistency index depends on an average of the random index based simulation study using a 9 scale comparison matrix. We found that the distribution of the consistency index followed the skew distribution according to the dimension of the comparison matrix based on a simulation study with a 9 scale comparison matrix. From the simulation study, we suggest a consistency index quantile table to assist the decision-making process in AHP; in addition, we can approximate the distribution of the consistency index to the gamma distribution under the limited assumptions.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Basak, I. (1989). Estimation of the multi-criteria worths of the alternatives in a hierarchical structure of comparisons, Communication in Statistics Theory and Methods, 18, 3719-3738. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610928908830119
  2. Basak, I. (2001). The categorical data analysis approach for ratio model of pairwise comparisons, European Journal of Operational Research, 128, 532-544. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(99)00372-0
  3. Basak, I. (2002). On the use of information criteria in analytic hierarchy process, European Journal of Operational Research, 141, 200-216. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(01)00238-7
  4. Hahn, E. D. (2006). Link function selection in stochastic multicriteria decision making models, European Journal of Operational Research, 172, 86-100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2004.09.041
  5. Haines, L. M. (1998). A statistical approach to the analytic hierarchy process with interval judgements (I): Distributions on feasible regions, European Journal of Operational Research, 110, 112-125. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(97)00245-2
  6. Jeong, H. C., Lee, J. C. and Jhun, M. (2012). A study for obtaing weights in pairwise comparison matrix in AHP, The Korean Journal of Applied Statistics, 25, 531-541. https://doi.org/10.5351/KJAS.2012.25.3.531
  7. Ko, K, K. and Lee, K, J. (2001). Statistical characteristics of response consistency parameters in analytic hierarchy process, Journal of the Korean Operations Research and Management Science Society, 26, 71-82.
  8. Kumar, N. and Ganesh, L. S. (1996). A simulation-based evaluation of the approximate and the exact eigenvector methods employed in AHP, European Journal of Operational Research, 95, 656-662. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(95)00302-9
  9. Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process, McGraw-Hill, New York.
  10. Saaty, T. L. (2003a). Multicriteria Decision Making: The Analytic Hierarchy Process, McGraw-Hill, New York.
  11. Saaty, T. L. (2003b). Decision-making with the AHP: Why is the principal eigenvector necessary, European Journal of Operational Research, 145, 85-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(02)00227-8
  12. Scholl, A., Manthey, L., Helm, R. and Steiner, M. (2005). Solving multiattribute design problems with analytic hierarchy process and conjoint analysis: An empirical comparison, European Journal of Operational Research, 164, 760-777. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2004.01.026
  13. Vargas, L. G. (1990). An overview of the analytic hierarchy process and its applications, European Journal of Operational Research, 48, 2-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(90)90056-H
  14. Xu, Z. (2000). On consistency of the weighted geometric mean complex judgement matrix in AHP. European Journal of Operational Research, 126, 683-687. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(99)00082-X

피인용 문헌

  1. Strategy for selecting an optimal propulsion system of a liquefied hydrogen tanker vol.42, pp.8, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.01.037
  2. A comparative study on validity of AHP and conjoint analysis: a case of cosmetics preference vol.29, pp.5, 2016, https://doi.org/10.5351/KJAS.2016.29.5.921