Structural Engineering and Mechanics

  • 제50권1호
  • /
  • Pages.19-36
  • /
  • 2014
  • /
  • 1225-4568(pISSN)
  • /
  • 1598-6217(eISSN)
테크노프레스 (Techno-Press)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Krylov subspace-based model order reduction for Campbell diagram analysis of large-scale rotordynamic systems

  • Han, Jeong Sam (Department of Mechanical Design Engineering, Andong National University)
  • 투고 : 2013.08.13
  • 심사 : 2014.01.31
  • 발행 : 2014.04.10
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

This paper focuses on a model order reduction (MOR) for large-scale rotordynamic systems by using finite element discretization. Typical rotor-bearing systems consist of a rotor, built-on parts, and a support system. These systems require careful consideration in their dynamic analysis modeling because they include unsymmetrical stiffness, localized nonproportional damping, and frequency-dependent gyroscopic effects. Because of this complex geometry, the finite element model under consideration may have a very large number of degrees of freedom. Thus, the repeated dynamic analyses used to investigate the critical speeds, stability, and unbalanced response are computationally very expensive to complete within a practical design cycle. In this study, we demonstrate that a Krylov subspace-based MOR via moment matching significantly speeds up the rotordynamic analyses needed to check the whirling frequencies and critical speeds of large rotor systems. This approach is very efficient, because it is possible to repeat the dynamic simulation with the help of a reduced system by changing the operating rotational speed, which can be preserved as a parameter in the process of model reduction. Two examples of rotordynamic systems show that the suggested MOR provides a significant reduction in computational cost for a Campbell diagram analysis, while maintaining accuracy comparable to that of the original systems.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. ANSYS, Inc. (2011), ANSYS mechanical APDL Rotordynamic Analysis Guide, ANSYS Release 14.0, Canonsburg, USA.
  2. Antoulas, A.C., Sorensen, D.C. and Gugercin, S. (2001), "A survey of model reduction methods for large-scale systems", Contemp. Math., 280, 193-219. https://doi.org/10.1090/conm/280/04630
  3. Bai, Z. (2002), "Krylov subspace techniques for reduced-order modeling of large-scale dynamical systems", Appl. Numer. Math., 43, 9-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9274(02)00116-2
  4. Casciati, S. and Faravelli, L. (2014), "Quantity vs. quality in the Model Order Reduction (MOR) of a linear system", Smart Struct. Syst., 13(1), 99-109. https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2014.13.1.099
  5. Chiang, H.W.D., Kuan, C.P. and Li, H.L. (2009), "Turbomolecular pump rotor-bearing system analysis and testing", J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A, 27(5), 1196-1203. https://doi.org/10.1116/1.3179157
  6. Craig, R.R. and Bampton, M.C. (1968), "Coupling of substructures for dynamics analysis", AIAA J., 6, 1313-1319. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.4741
  7. Das, A.S. and Dutt, J.K. (2008), "Reduced model of a rotor-shaft system using modified SEREP", Mech. Res. Commun., 35(6), 398-407.
  8. Eid, R., Salimbahrami, B., Lohmann, B., Rudnyi, E. and Korvink, J. (2007), "Parametric order reduction of proportionally damped second-order systems", Sens. Mater., 19(3), 149-164.
  9. Freund, R.W. (2000), "Krylov-subspace methods for reduced-order modeling in circuit simulation", J. Comput. Appl. Math., 123, 395-421. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-0427(00)00396-4
  10. Glasgow, D.A. and Nelson, H.D. (1980), "Stability analysis of rotor-bearing systems using component mode synthesis", J. Mech. Des., Tran. ASME, 102(2), 352-359. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3254751
  11. Gugercin, S and Antoulas, A.C. (2004), "A survey of model reduction by balanced truncation and some new results", Int. J. Control, 77(8), 748-766. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207170410001713448
  12. Guyader, J.L. (2009), "Characterization and reduction of dynamic models of vibrating systems with high modal density", J. Sound Vib., 328(4-5), 488-506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2009.08.012
  13. Guyan, R.J. (1965), "Reduction of stiffness and mass matrices", AIAA J., 3, 380. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.2874
  14. Han, J.S. (2012), "Efficient frequency response and its direct sensitivity analyses for large-size finite element models using Krylov subspace-based model order reduction", J. Mech. Sci. Tech., 26(4), 1115-1126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-012-0227-8
  15. Han, J.S. (2013), "Calculation of design sensitivity for large-size transient dynamic problems using Krylov subspace-based model order reduction", J. Mech. Sci. Tech., 27(9), 2789-2800. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-013-0726-2
  16. Khulief, Y.A. and Mohiuddin, M.A. (1997), "On the dynamic analysis of rotors using modal reduction", Finite Elem. Anal. Des., 26, 41-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-874X(96)00070-4
  17. Kim, Y.D. and Lee, C.W. (1986), "Finite element analysis of rotor bearing systems using a modal transformation matrix", J. Sound Vib., 111(3), 441-456. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-460X(86)81403-1
  18. Mohiuddin, M.A., Bettayeb, M. and Khulief, Y.A. (1998), "Dynamic analysis and reduced order modelling of flexible rotor-bearing systems", Comput. Struct., 69(3), 349-359. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7949(98)00129-1
  19. Moore, B.C. (1981), "Principal component analysis in linear systems-controllability observability and model reduction", IEEE Tran. Auto. Control, 26(1), 17-2. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAC.1981.1102568
  20. Nelson, F.C. (2007), "Rotor dynamics without equations", Int. J. Condition Monit. Diag. Eng. Manage., 10(3), 2-10.
  21. Nelson, H.D. and McVaugh, J.M. (1976), "The dynamics of rotor-bearing systems using finite elements", J. Eng. Indus., 98, 593-600. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3438942
  22. Qu, Z. (2004), Model Order Reduction Techniques, Springer, New York, NY, USA.
  23. Rouch, K.E. and Kao, J.S. (1980), "Dynamic reduction in rotor dynamics by the finite element method", J. Mech. Des., Tran. ASME, 102(2), 360-368. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3254752
  24. Rudnyi, E. and Korvink, J. (2006), "Model order reduction for large scale engineering models developed in ANSYS", Lecture Note. Comput. Sci., 3732, 349-356.
  25. Sawicki, J.T. and Gawronski, W.K. (1997), "Balanced model reduction and control of rotor-bearing systems", J. Eng. Gas Turb. Pow., 119(2), 456-463. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2815596
  26. Shanmugam, A. and Padmanabhan, C. (2006), "A fixed-free interface component mode synthesis method for rotordynamic analysis", J. Sound Vib., 297(3-5), 664-679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2006.04.011
  27. The MathWorks, Inc. (2011), MATLAB Getting Started Guide, Natick, USA.
  28. Wagner, M.B., Younan, A., Allaire, P. and Cogill, R. (2010), "Model reduction methods for rotor dynamic analysis: a survey and review", Int. J. Rotat. Mach., 2010, 1-17.
  29. Wang, W. and Kirkhope, J. (1994a), "New eigensolutions and modal analysis for gyroscopic/rotor systems - part 1: undamped systems", J. Sound Vib., 175(2), 159-170. https://doi.org/10.1006/jsvi.1994.1320
  30. Wang, W. and Kirkhope, J. (1994b), "Component mode synthesis for damped rotor systems with hybrid interfaces", J. Sound Vib., 177(3), 393-410. https://doi.org/10.1006/jsvi.1994.1442
  31. Wang, W. and Kirkhope, J. (1995), "Complex component mode synthesis for damped systems", J. Sound Vib., 181(5), 781-800. https://doi.org/10.1006/jsvi.1995.0171
  32. Wang, G., Sreeram, V. and Liu, W.Q. (1999), "A new frequency weighted balanced truncation method and an error bound", IEEE Tran. Auto. Control, 44(9), 1734-1737. https://doi.org/10.1109/9.788542
  33. Wilson, E.L. (1985), "A new method of dynamic analysis for linear and nonlinear systems", Finite Elem. Anal. Des., 1, 21-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-874X(85)90004-6

피인용 문헌

  1. Automated static condensation method for local analysis of large finite element models vol.61, pp.6, 2014, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2017.61.6.807
  2. Structural modal reanalysis using automated matrix permutation and substructuring vol.69, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2019.69.1.105
  3. Comparison of model order reductions using Krylov and modal vectors for transient analysis under seismic loading vol.76, pp.5, 2014, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2020.76.5.643