DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effects of Drought Stress on Photosynthetic Capacity and Photosystem II Activity in Oplopanax elatus

수분스트레스가 땃두릅나무의 광합성 능력 및 광계 II의 활성에 미치는 영향

  • Lee, Kyeong Cheol (Division of Plant Management, National Institute of Ecology) ;
  • Kim, Sun Hee (Department of Forest Conservation, Korea Forest Research Institute) ;
  • Park, Wan Geun (Department of Forest Resources, College of Forest and Environmental Sciences, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Kim, Young Seol (Department of Forest Resources, College of Forest and Environmental Sciences, Kangwon National University)
  • 이경철 (국립생태원 식물관리처) ;
  • 김선희 (국립산림과학원 산림생태연구과) ;
  • 박완근 (강원대학교 산림자원학과) ;
  • 김영설 (강원대학교 산림자원학과)
  • Received : 2013.12.04
  • Accepted : 2014.01.20
  • Published : 2014.02.28

Abstract

This study was performed to investigate the physiological responses of Oplopanax elatus by water condition. Drought stress was induced by withholding water for 26 days. The results show that $P_{N\;max}$, SPAD, gs, E and Ci were significantly decreased with decreasing of soil moisture contents. However, AQY and WUE were decreased slightly only at 26 day. This implies that photosynthetic rate is reduced due to an inability to regulate water and $CO_2$ exchange through the stomatal. According to JIP analysis, ${\Phi}_{PO}$, ${\Psi}_O$, ${\Phi}_{EO}$ and $PI_{ABS}$ were dramatically decreased at 21 day and 26 day, which reflects the relative reduction state of the photosystem II. On the other hand, the relative activities per reaction center such as ABS/RC, TRo/RC were significantly increased at 26 day. Particularly, Dio/RC and DIo/CS increased substantially under drought stress, indicating that excessive energy was consumed by heat dissipation. These results of chlorophyll a fluorescence show that the sensitivity changes photosystem II activity. Thus, according to the results, O. elatus was exhibited a strong reduction of photosynthetic activity to approximately 10% soil moisture contents, and JIP parameters could be useful indicator to monitor the physiological states of O. elatus under drought stress.

Keywords

References

  1. Abril M and Hanano R. (1998). Ecophysiological responses of three evergreen woody mediterranean species to water stress. Acta Oecologica. 19:377-387. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1146-609X(98)80042-8
  2. Boureima S, Oukarroum A, Diouf M, Cisse N and Van Damme P. (2012). Screening for drought tolerance in mutant germplasm of sesame(Sesamum indicum) probing by chlorophyll a fluorescence. Environmental and Experimental Botany. 81:37-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2012.02.015
  3. Evans JR. (1987). The dependence of quantum yield on wavelength and growth irradiance. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology. 14:69-79. https://doi.org/10.1071/PP9870069
  4. Falqueto AR, Silva FS, Cassol D, Magalhaes Junior AM, Oliveira AC and Bacarin MA. (2010). Chlorophyll fluorescence in rice: probing of senescence driven changes of PSII activity on rice varieties differing in grain yield capacity. Brazilian Journal of Plant Physiology. 22:35-41. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1677-04202010000100004
  5. Flexas J, Bota J, Loreto F, Cornic G and Sharkey T. (2004). Diffusive and metabolic limitations to photosynthesis under drought and salinity in $C_3$ plants. Plant Biology. 6:269-279. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2004-820867
  6. Franck N and Vaast P. (2009). Limitation of coffee leaf photosynthesis by stomatal conductance and light availability under different shade levels. Trees. 23:761-769. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-009-0318-z
  7. Holland V, Koller S and Bruggemann W. (2013). Insight into the photosynthetic apparatus in evergreen and deciduous European oaks during autumn senescence using OJIP fluorescence transient analysis. Plant Biology(Stuttg). doi: 10.1111/plb.12105.
  8. Kim HY, Seong ES, Lee JG, Yoo JH, Hwang IS, Kim MJ, Lim JD, Kim NY and Yu CY. (2012). Establishment of suspension culture system to induce somatic embryo in Oplopanax elatus Nakai. Korean Journal of Medicinal Crop Science. 20:461-465. https://doi.org/10.7783/KJMCS.2012.20.6.461
  9. Kim PG and Lee EJ. (2001). Ecophysiology of photosynthesis 1: Effects of light intensity and intercellular $CO_2$ pressure on photosynthesis. Korean Journal of Agricultural and Forest Meteorology. 3:126-133.
  10. Kim YB, An CG and Lee YH. (2000). Effect of soil moisture on quality and yield in tomotoes. Journal of the Korean Society for Horticultural Science. 41:139-142.
  11. Korea National Arboretum. (2013). Korea biodiversity information system. http://www.nature.go.kr/.
  12. Kume A and Ino Y. (1993). Comparison of ecophysiological response to heavy snow in two varieties of Acuba japonica with different areas of distribution. Ecological Research. 8:111-121. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02348523
  13. Kwon HS, Kim DH, Shin HK, Yu CY, Kim MJ, Lim JD, Park JK and Kim JK. (2007). Fourteen-day repeated-dose oral toxicity study of the ethanol extracts isolated from Oplopanax elatus in sprague-dawley rat. Korean Journal of Food Science and Technology. 39:470-475.
  14. Kwon YM, Ko SC, Kim JC, Moon BY, Park MC, Park HB, Park IH, Lee YS, Lee IH, Lee JS, Lee. JB, Lee CH, Jeon BU, Jo SH and Hong JB. (2003). Plant physiology. Academybook. Seoul, Korea. p.422-440.
  15. Lee KC, Noh HS, Kim JH, Ahn SY and Han SS. (2012). Changes of characteristics related to photosynthesis in Synurus deltoides under different shading treatments. Korean Journal of Medicinal Crop Science. 20:320-330. https://doi.org/10.7783/KJMCS.2012.20.4.320
  16. Lee SW, Hyun DY, Park CG, Kim TS, Yeon BY, Kim CG and Cha SW. (2007). Effect of soil moisture content on photosynthesis and root yield of Panax ginseng C. A. Meyer seedling. Korean Journal of Medicinal Crop Science. 15:367-370.
  17. Lee WS, Kim BS, Kang SK, Jeong SD and Hwang JM. (1996). Drought tolerance of pepper and correlations among WSD, leaf water potential and stomatal density. Journal of Horticulture, Environment, and Biotechnology. 37:1-4
  18. Naumann JC, Young DR and Anderson JE. (2007). Linking leaf chlorophyll fluorescence properties to physiological responses for detection of salt and drought stress in coastal plant species. Physiologia Plantarum. 131:422-433. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.2007.00973.x
  19. Oh CY, Han SH, Kim YY and Lee JC. (2005). Changes of drought tolerance and photosynthetic characteristics of Populus davidiana dode according to PEG concentration. Korean Journal of Agricultural and Forest Meteorology. 7:296-302.
  20. Oh SJ and Koh SC. (2004). Chlorophyll fluorescence and antioxidative enzyme activity of Crinum leaves exposed to natural environmental stress in winter. Korean Journal of Environmental Biology. 22:233-241.
  21. Oh SJ, Zhin KL and Koh SC. (2009). Characterization of chl a fluorescence of hydrophytes under cadmium stress. Environmental Sciences. 18:1361-1368. https://doi.org/10.5322/JES.2009.18.12.1361
  22. Rathod D, Brestic M and Shao H. (2011). Chlorophyll a fluorescence determines the drought resistance capabilities in two varieties of mycorrhized and non-mycorrhized Glycine max Linn. African Journal of Microbiology Research. 5:4197-4206.
  23. Saraswathi SG and Paliwal K. (2011). Drought induced changes in growth, leaf gas exchange and biomass production in Albizia lebbeck and Cassia siamea seedlings. Journal of Environmental Biology. 32:173-178.
  24. Singh B and Singh G. (2003). Biomass partitioning and gas exchange in Dalbergia sissoo seedlings under water stress. Photosynthetica. 41:407-414. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:PHOT.0000015465.86985.53
  25. Spoustova P, Synkova H, Valcke R and e ovska N. (2013). Chlorophyll a fluorescence as a tool for a study of the Potato virus Y effects on photosynthesis of nontransgenic and transgenic Pssu-ipt tobacco. Photosynthetica. 51:1-11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11099-013-0011-8
  26. Strasser RJ, Srivastava A and Tsimilli-Michael M. (2000). The fluorescence transient as a tool to characterize and screen photosynthetic samples. In Yunus M. et al. (eds.). Probing Photosynthesis: Mechanism, regulation and adaptation. Taylor and Francis. New York. NY, USA. p.445-483.
  27. Stirbet A, Strasser BJ and Strasser RJ. (1998). Chlorophyll a fluorescence induction in higher plants: Modelling and numerical simulation. Journal of Theoretical Biology. 193:131-151. https://doi.org/10.1006/jtbi.1998.0692
  28. Taiz L and Zeiger E. (2006). Plant physiology(4th ed.). Sinauer Associates. Sunderland. MA, USA. p.672-705.
  29. Van Heerden P, Swanepoel J and Kruger G. (2007). Modulation of photosynthesis by drought in two desert scrub species exhibiting $C_3$-mode $CO_2$ assimilation. Environmental and Experimental Botany. 61:124-136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2007.05.005
  30. Wang ZX, Chen L, Ai J, Qin HY, Liu YX, Xu PL, Jiao ZQ, Zhao Y and Zhang QT. (2012). Photosynthesis and activity of photosystem II in response to drought stress in amur grape(Vitis amurensis Rupr.). Photosynthetica. 50:189-196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11099-012-0023-9
  31. Zhang HG, Wu GX and Zhang YM. (1993). Chemical constituents from stems of Oplopanax elatus Nakai. Journal of Chinese Materia Medica. 18:104-105.
  32. Zushi K, Kajiwara S and Matsuzoe N. (2012). Chlorophyll a fluorescence OJIP transient as a tool to characterize and evaluate response to heat and chilling stress in tomato leaf and fruit. Scientia Horticulturae. 148:39-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2012.09.022

Cited by

  1. Effects of Soil Water Potential and Nitrogen Fertilization on Characteristics of Photosynthesis and Chlorophyll Fluorescence Induction in Schisandra chinensis Baillon vol.48, pp.6, 2015, https://doi.org/10.7745/KJSSF.2015.48.6.705
  2. Characteristics of Photosynthesis and Leaf Growth of Peucedanum japonicum by Leaf Mold and Shading Level in Forest Farming vol.23, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.7783/KJMCS.2015.23.1.43
  3. Comparison of Photosynthesis Characteristics and Chlorophyll a Fluorescence of Woody Plants that grow in Wetlands and Mountains vol.49, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.14397/jals.2015.49.3.51
  4. Effects of Elevated CO2 Concentration and Air Temperature on the Water Physiological Characters of Populus alba × P. glandulosa cutting vol.49, pp.6, 2015, https://doi.org/10.14397/jals.2015.49.6.101