Child Studies in Asia-Pacific Contexts

한국아동학회 (Korean Association of Child Studies)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Effectiveness of Early Screening and Intervention for Children at Risk of Reading Underachievement

  • 투고 : 2014.01.03
  • 심사 : 2014.02.24
  • 발행 : 2014.02.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

The purpose of this study was to develop a screening test for children at risk of reading underachievement and to investigate the effectiveness of the early-stage intervention program. In the first part of the study, we recruited 155 elementary first grade students for a screening test. Phonological deletion, digit naming, object naming, and sound-letter correspondence knowledge of a screening test, all assessed at the beginning of the school year, predicted the reading ability at the end of the school year. In the second part of the study, we analyzed the difference in the reading ability between fourteen children who participated in the intervention program and eighteen non-participating children. Reading ability was assessed by evaluating word recognition, oral reading fluency, reading comprehension, and pseudo-word recognition. The reading ability of intervention group improved more compared to control group, and the difference between two groups accentuated over time. However, final analysis conducted in November revealed that two groups did not differ significantly in oral reading fluency. This suggests that, unlike word recognition and comprehension, fluency might not dramatically improve in a short period.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Adams, M. J. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  2. Badian, N. A. (2001). Phonological and orthographic processing: Their roles in reading prediction. Annals of Dyslexia, 51, 179-202.
  3. Bell, S. M., McCallum, R. S., & Cox, E. A. (2003). Toward a research-based assessment of dyslexia: Using cognitive measures to identify reading disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 36(6), 505-516. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222194030360060201
  4. Berg, D. H. (2008). Working memory and arithmetic calculation in children: The contribution roles of processing speed, shortterm memory and reading. Experimental Child Psychology, 99(4), 288-308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2007.12.002
  5. Berninger, V. W., Abbott, R. D., Vermeulen, K., Ogier, S., Brooksher, R., Zook, D., & Lemos, Z. (2002). Comparison of faster and slower responders to early intervention in reading: Differentiating features of their language profiles. Learning Disability Quarterly, 25(1), 59-75. https://doi.org/10.2307/1511191
  6. Bishop, A. G., & League, M. B. (2006). Identifying a multivariate screening model to predict reading difficulties at the onset of kindergarten: A longitudinal analysis. Learning Disability Quarterly, 29(4), 235-252. https://doi.org/10.2307/30035552
  7. Bishop, A. G. (2003). Prediction of first-grade reading achievement: A comparison of fall and winter kindergarten screenings. Learning Disability Quarterly, 26(3), 189-200. https://doi.org/10.2307/1593651
  8. Caravolas, M., Violin, J., & Hulme, C. (2005). Phoneme awareness is a key component of alphabetic literacy skills in consistent and inconsistent orthographies: Evidence from Czech and English children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 92(2), 107-139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2005.04.003
  9. Catts, H. W., Fey, M. E., Zhang, X., & Tomblin, J. B. (2001). Estimating the risk of future reading difficulties in kindergarten children: A research-based model and its clinical implementation. Language, Speech and Hearing Services in Schools, 32, 38-50. https://doi.org/10.1044/0161-1461(2001/004)
  10. Catts, H. W., Gillespie, M., Leonard, L. B., Kail, R. V., & Miller, C. A. (2002). The role of speed of processing, rapid naming, and phonological awareness in reading achievement. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35, 509-524.
  11. Compton, D. L. (2000). Modeling the response of normally achieving and at-risk first grade children to word reading instruction. Annals of Dyslexia, 50(1), 53-84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-000-0017-3
  12. Coyne, M. D., Kameenui, E. J., & Simmons, D. C. (2001). Prevention and intervention in beginning reading: Two complex systems. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 16(2), 62-73. https://doi.org/10.1111/0938-8982.00008
  13. Denckla, M. B., & Rudel, R. G. (1976). Rapid "Automatized" naming (R. A. N.): Dyslexia differentiated from other learning disabilities. Neuropsychologia, 14(4), 471-479. https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-3932(76)90075-0
  14. Denckla, M. B., & Cutting, C. E. (1999). History and significance of rapid automatized naming. Annals of Dyslexia, 49, 29-42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-999-0018-9
  15. Ehri, L. C., Nunes, S. R., Stahl, S. A., & Willows, S. M. (2001). Systematic phonics instruction helps students learn to read: Evidence from the National Reading Panel's meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 71(3), 393-447. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543071003393
  16. Francis, D. J., Shaywitz, S. E., Stuebing, K. K., Shaywitz, B. A., & Fletcher, J. M. (1996). Development lag versus deficit models of reading disability: A longitudinal, individual growth curves analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88(1), 3-17. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.88.1.3
  17. Georgiou, G. K., Parrila, R., & Kirby, J. (2006). Rapid naming speed components and early reading acquisition. Scientific Studies and Reading, 10(2), 199-220. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532799xssr1002_4
  18. Gwak, G. J., Park, H. W., & Kim, C. T. (2001). K-WISC-III. Seoul: Special Education Press.
  19. Hammill, D. D. (2004). What we know about correlates of reading. Exceptional Children, 70(4), 453-468. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290407000405
  20. Holland, J., McIntosh, D., & Huffman, L. (2004). The role of phonological awareness, rapid automatized naming, and orthographic processing in word reading. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 22(3), 233-260. https://doi.org/10.1177/073428290402200304
  21. Kameenui, E. J., & Simmons, D. C. (1997). Decodable texts and language of dichotomy: A response to Allington. Reading Today, 15, 18.
  22. Kim, A, H. (2007). Review of phonological awareness assessment. The Journal of Special Education: The Theory and Practice, 8(2), 139-167.
  23. Kim, D. I. (2000). BASA: Reading. Seoul: Hakjisa Press.
  24. Kim, M. B., & Bae, S. Y. (2007). Word recognition and phonological awareness of kindergartener, second and fourth grade. Korean Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 16(2), 89-107. https://doi.org/10.15724/jslhd.2007.16.2.006
  25. Kim, M. J. (1995). The effects of reading training based on phonics method on reading ability of reading disability. Doctoral Dissertation. Catholic University. South Korea.
  26. Kim, M. K. (1998). The development of a screening test for reading disorder. Doctoral Dissertation. Yonsei University. South Korea.
  27. Kim, S. Y. (2005). Effects of children's phonological processing, letter knowledge and language ability on their reading ability. Doctoral Dissertation. Busan University. South Korea.
  28. Kim, S. Y. (2008). Comparing the effectiveness of three early literacy activities for children with developmental language delay: Traineroriented, interaction-oriented, and childoriented activities. Doctoral Dissertation. Dankook University. South Korea.
  29. Lee, L. W. (2008). Development and validation of a reading-related assessment battery in Malay for the purpose of dyslexia assessment. Annals of Dyslexia, 58(1), 37-57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-007-0011-0
  30. Lonigan, C. H., Burgess, S. R., & Anthony, J. L. (2000). Development of emergent literacy and early reading skills in preschool children: Evidence form a latent-variable longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 36(5), 596-613. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.36.5.596
  31. McCallum, R. S., Bell, S. M., Wood, M. S., Below, J. L., Choate, S. M., & McCane, S. J. (2006). What is the role of working memory in reading relative to the big three processing variables (Orthography, Phonology, and Rapid naming)? Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 24(3), 243-259. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282906287938
  32. Muter, V., Hulme, C., Snowling, M. J., & Stevenson, J. (2004). Phonemes, rimes, vocabulary, and grammatical skills as foundations of early reading development: Evidence from a longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 40(5), 665-681. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.40.5.665
  33. National Institute Child & Human Development (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction: Reports of the subgroups. Report of the National Reading Panel. Retrieved from http;//www.nichd.nih.gov/issues/107th/education/nclb.htm
  34. O'Connor, R. E. (2000). Increasing the intensity of intervention in kindergarten and first grade. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 15(1), 43-54. https://doi.org/10.1207/SLDRP1501_5
  35. Park, K. S., Yoon, J. L., & Park, H. J. (1989). A basic learning skill test. Seoul: Korean Educational Development Institute.
  36. Powell, D., Stainthorp, R., Staurt, M., Garwood, H., & Quinlan, P. (2007). An experimental comparison between rival theories of rapid automatized naming performance and its relationship to reading. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 98(1), 46-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2007.04.003
  37. Schatschneider, C., Francis, D. J., Carlson, C. D., Fletcher, J. M., & Foorman, B. R. (2004). Kindergarten prediction of reading sills: A longitudinal comparative analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(2), 265-282. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.96.2.265
  38. Seok, D. I. (2006). Development of evaluation and assessment model for phonological awareness. Communication Sciences and Disorders, 11(3), 29-46.
  39. Share, D. L. (2004). Knowing letter names and learning letter sounds: A causal connection. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 88(3), 213-233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2004.03.005
  40. Shaywitz, B. A., Fletcher, J., & Shaywitz, S. E. (1995). Disorder and classifying learning disabilities and attention deficit hyperactivity. Defining Journal of Child Neurology, 10, 50-57. https://doi.org/10.1177/08830738950100S111
  41. Siegel, L, S., Share, D., & Geva, E. (1995). Evidence for superior orthographic skills in dyslexics. Psychological Science, 6(4), 250-254. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1995.tb00601.x
  42. Stringer, R. W., Toplak, M. E., & Stanovich, K. E. (2004). Differential relationship between RAN performance, behaviour ratings, and executive function measures: Searching for a double dissociation. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17(9), 891-914. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-004-2770-x
  43. Stuebing, K. K., Barth, A. E., Cirino, P. T., Francis, D. J., & Fletcher, J. M. (2008). A response to recent reanalyses of the National Reading Panel Report: Effects of systematic phonics instruction are practically significant. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(1), 123-134. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.100.1.123
  44. Swanson, H. L., & Siegel, L. (2001). Learning disabilities as a working memory deficit. Issues in Education, 7(1), 1-48.
  45. Swanson, H. L., Trainin, G., Necoechea, D. M., & Hammil, D. D. (2003). Rapid naming, phonological awareness, and reading: A metaanalysis of the correlation evidence. Review of Educational Research, 73(4), 407-440. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543073004407
  46. Torgesen, J. K., Wagner, R. K., & Rashotte, C. A., (1997). Prevention and remediation of severe reading disabilities: Keeping the eye in mind. Scientific Studies of Reading 1, 217-234. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532799xssr0103_3
  47. Wagner, R. K., Torgesen, J. K., Rashotte, C. A., Hecht, S. A., Barker, T. A., Burgers, S. R., Donahue, J., & Garon, T. (1997). Changing relations between phonological processing and word-level reading as children development beginning to skilled readers: A five-year longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 3(3), 468-479.
  48. Wolf, M., & Bowers, P. G. (1999). The doubledeficit hypothesis for the developmental dyslexia. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(3), 415-438. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.91.3.415