참고문헌
- Berkeley Policy Associates (2008) Early Implementation of Generation I of the Workforce Innovation in Regional Economic Development (WIRED) Initiative. Submitted to the U.S. Department of Labor. Oakland, CA: Berkeley Policy Associates.
- Berkeley Policy Associates (2009) The Power of Partnership: American Regions Collaborating for Economic Competitiveness: 2009 Generation I WIRED Interim Evaluation Report. Submitted to the U.S. DOL. Oakland, CA: BPA.
- Business Roundtable (2005) Tapping America's Potential: The Education for Innovation Initiative, accessed Nov. 30, 2013, http://www.uschamber.com/sites/default/files/reports/050727_tapstatement.pdf
- Charmaz, K. (2006) Constructing Grounded Theory. London: Sage.
- Colman, J. (1958) "Relational Analysis: The Study of Social Organization with Survey Methods," Human Organization 17: 28-36. https://doi.org/10.17730/humo.17.4.q5604m676260q8n7
- Commonwealth of Virginia (2008) Southeastern Virginia Partnership for Regional Transformation (SEVA-PORT): Implementation Plan. On behalf of Opportunity Inc, in partnership with the Greater Peninsula Workforce Investment Board and Crater Regional Workforce Investment Group. downloaded from the ETA webpage, accessed Nov. 15, 2013, http://www.doleta.gov/wired/regions/3g_Southeastern_Virginia.cfm
- Cresswell, J. W. (2007) Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches (2nd ed.) Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
- Creswell, J. W., and Brown, M/ L. (1992) "How Chairpersons Enhance Faculty Research: A Grounded Theory Study," Review of Higher Education 16(1): 41-62. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.1992.0002
- Education Commission of the States (2005) Keeping America Competitive: Five Strategies to Improve Science and Mathematics Education. Denver, CO: ECS, accessed Nov. 12, 2013, http://www.ecs.org/html/Document.asp?chouseid=6219
- Harper-Anderson, E. (2008) "Measuring the Connection Between Workforce Development and Economic Development: Examining the Role of Sectors for Local Outcomes," Economic Development Quarterly 22(2): 119-35. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891242408316308
- Hesse-Biber, S. N., and Leavy, P. (2006) The Practice of Qualitative Research, Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
- Kuenzi, J. J. (2008) "Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Education: Background, Federal Policy, and Legislative Action." Congressional Research Service Reports 35, Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.
- National Academies (2007) Rising above the Gathering Storm: Energizing and Employing America for a Brighter Economic Future. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, accessed Nov. 23, 2013, http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=11463
- National Summit on Competitiveness (2005) Statement of the National Summit on Competitiveness: Investing in U.S. Innovation. accessed Nov. 23, 2013, http://www.nist.gov/mep/upload/competitiveness-innovation-2.pdf
- Patton, M. Q. (2002) Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
- Romer, P. M. (1990a) "Endogenous Technological Change." The Journal of Political Economy 98(5): s71-102. https://doi.org/10.1086/261725
- Romer, P. M. (1990b) "Capital, Labor and Productivity," in M. N. Baily & C. Winston (eds.) Brookings Papers on Economic Activity: Microeconomics (pp. 317-67). Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.
- Saldana, J. (2009) The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. Los Angeles: SAGE.
- SEVA-PORT, Entreworks, and CREC (2010) SEVA-PORT Innovation Index: Tracking Progress in Southeastern Virginia. SEVA-PORT final report.
- Solow, R. M. (1957) "Technical change and the aggregate production function," Review of Economics and Statistics 39:312-320. https://doi.org/10.2307/1926047
- Strauss, A., and Corbin, J. (1998) Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.
- U.S. Department of Education (2007) Report of the Academic Competitiveness Council. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Education
- U.S. Government Accountability Office (2005) Higher Education: Federal Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Programs and Related Trends (GAO 06-114). Washington, D.C.: U.S. GAO., accessed Nov. 17, 2013, http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-06-114
- U.S. GAO (2012) Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Education: Strategic Planning Needed to Better Manage Overlapping Programs Across Multiple Agencies (GAO 12-108). Washington, D.C.: U.S. GAO., accessed Nov. 08, 2013, http://www.gao.gov/assets/590/587839.pdf
- U.S. GAO (2014) Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Education: Assessing the Relationship between Education and the Workforce (GAO-14-374). Washington, D.C.: U.S. GAO.