Journal of Digital Convergence (디지털융복합연구)

The Society of Digital Policy and Management (한국디지털정책학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analysis of Trends in Research on Instruction Models for ICT Teaching and Learning

ICT 교수·학습 측면에서 본 국내 수업모형 연구동향 분석

  • Received : 2013.11.27
  • Accepted : 2014.01.20
  • Published : 2014.01.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study categorized the literature on instruction models by research period, theme, teaching model, class, and subject to identify research trends. The sampling period was from 1977 to March 2013, and 586 research papers were analyzed. Changes in the studies on instruction models were divided into three stages: Stage 1 (1977-1996), Stage 2 (1997-2006), and Stage 3 (2006-2007). Research papers increased rapidly from 8% in Stage 1 to 51% in Stage 2, showing a rapid increase in Stage 2. "Design and development" was the most researched theme throughout the three stages, and the most researched instruction model type was "curriculum-oriented."By subjects, it was found that studies on "cross-curriculum" were being conducted more actively than other subjects. Based on these results, this study proposes directions for future domestic research on instruction models.

이 연구의 목적은 수업모형 관련 논문을 연구시기별, 연구주제별, 수업모형별, 학교급별, 교과목별로 분류하여 연구동향을 확인하기 위한 것이다. 연구대상의 표집기간은 1977년부터 2013년 3월까지로 설정했으며, 최종 586개의 연구논문을 토대로 분석을 진행하였다. 수업모형 연구의 변천사를 시기별 세 단계로 구분하였다. 제1기(1977년~1996년), 제2기(1997년~2006년), 제3기(2007년~2013년)이며, 제1기에 8%에서 제2기에 51%로, 제2기에 비약적으로 증가했다. 세 시기에 걸쳐 가장 많이 연구된 주제는 '설계 및 개발'이었으며, 연구가 가장 활발한 수업모형군은 '교과 교육과정지향'인 것으로 나타났다. 교과별로 보면, '범교과' 연구가 다른 교과에 비해 상대적으로 활발히 진행되고 있었다. 이러한 결과들을 바탕으로 향후 수업모형의 국내 연구 방향에 대해 제안하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. Nak-Won Kwon, A study on the identification of criteria for classifying the teaching method, Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, Vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 1-32, 2004.
  2. Nak-Won Kwon, Kwang-Jae Chu, A study on application of teaching model in elementary teachers, Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 329-347, 2005.
  3. S. M. Corey, The nature of instruction. In M. D. Merrill(ed.), Instruction Design: Reading, Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall. Inc, 1977.
  4. L. S. Shulman, Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, Vol. 57, No. 1, pp. 1-22, 1987. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411
  5. Seong-Yeon Jeon, A theoretical investigation of teaching-learning, Wonmisa, 2001.
  6. Keol Lim, Dong-Yeop Lee, Research on pre-service teachers' perceptions of smartphones for educational use and suggestions for school policy, The Society of Digital Policy & Management, Vol. 10, No. 9, pp. 47-57, 2012.
  7. Moo-Young Kim, Seung-Bae Lee, Ho-Jun Moon, The study tendency of sport education model in korea: achievements and tasks, Korean Journal of Sport Pedagogy, Vol. 17, No. 2, pp. 21-39, 2010.
  8. Sung-Hun Woo, Kyung-Duck Min, Improvement of teaching-learning method for middle-school science by applying the STS instruction model, Collection of Abstracts of Regular Assembly and Autumn Academic Conference, pp. 21-22, 1999.
  9. Mi-Jin Jeong, Ki-Soon Yoon, Duck-Kee Kwon, A Meta-analysis on the Application Effects of STS Teaching and Learning Model, Journal of Science Education, Vol. 32, No. 2, pp. 51-70, 2008. https://doi.org/10.21796/jse.2008.32.2.51
  10. Kyung-Hee Kang, The Trend and The Issues of Domestic Studies in Relation to Science Teaching-Learning Methods, Journal of Science Education, Vol. 34, No. 1, pp. 22-31, 2010.
  11. P. G. Cole., & L. K. Chan, Teaching principles and practices, New York: Prentice Hall, 1987,
  12. P. Eggen., & D. Kauchak, Strategies for teachers: Teaching content and thinking skills (4th ed.), Needham Heights: M.A. Allyn and Bacon, 2002.
  13. C. M. Reigeluth, Principles of educational systems design, International Journal of Educational Research, Vol. 19, No. 2, pp. 117-131, 1993. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-0355(93)90022-C
  14. Ki-Ok Yoon, Moon-Seong Jeong, Yeong-Hwan Choi, Moon-Bong Kang, Suk-Goo Noh, Theory and practice of instruction models, Seoul: Hakmun, 2002.
  15. M. A. Gunter., E. H. Thomas., & S. L. Mintz, Instruction: A model approach(5th ed), Allyn & Bacon, 2007.
  16. Ho-Kwon Kim, Exploration of school learning, Seoul: Kyoyookbook, 1980.
  17. Nam-Soo Kim, Byung-Soo Kim, Jin-Young Im, Sang-Woo Park, Yoon-Kyung Park, A survey on the awareness of elementary-school teachers on instruction models, Center for Education Research of Korea National University of Education, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp. 345-364, 2011.
  18. B. Joyce., M. Weil., & E. Calhoun, Models of teaching(6th Eds.), Boston: Allyn & Bacon, 2000.
  19. Yong-Boo Bea, Moon-Bong Kang, Suk-Goo Noh, Sung-Hyeok Park, Young-Hwan Choi, Ki-Ok Yoon, Investigation of instruction models for teacher education, Gyeongin National University of Education (formerly Incheon National University of Education), 2000.
  20. J. D. McNeil., & J. Wiles, The essentials of teaching, NY: Macmillan publishing company, 1990.
  21. J. G. Saylor., W. M. Alexsander., & A. J. Lewis, Curriculum planning, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1981.
  22. N. L. Gage, The psychology of teaching methods, Published by The National Society for The Study of Education, 1976.
  23. Ki-Ok Yoon, Moon-Seong Jeong, Young-Hwan Choi, Moon-Bong Kang, Suk-Goo Noh, Instruction model, Seoul: Dongmunsa, 2009.
  24. Yoon-Kyung Park, Analysis on design and practice of social studies class of pre-service teachers: focusing on representative (intensive) courses of Grade 4, Sourcebook of academic conference co-hosted by The Korean Association for The Social Studies Education, The Society of Korean Practical Arts Education, Korea Association of Information Education, Korean Elementary Art Education Association and Center for Education Research of Cheongju National University of Education, pp. 51-62, 2013.