DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on Legislative Conflict for Se -Jong City

세종시 설치를 위한 입법갈등에 관한 연구

  • Kim, Yong-Chul (Dept. of Public Administration, Pusan National University)
  • Received : 2013.11.29
  • Accepted : 2014.01.20
  • Published : 2014.01.28

Abstract

This study focus on the legislative conflict for Se-Jong City In case of this paper, the law of administration agency centered is based on the conflict of legislative conflict present government at that time suggested the amendment of that legal status because of so many inefficiency and negative effects regardless of opponent asserts. Here there were a deep various political interests fundamentally both of sides. Legislative conflict here affects the regional conflict among the benefits and indirect benefits or nothing in any area. As the result, political interest deeply which was connected in politics influenced the big national issues, not to amend as a result government failure will be come.

본 연구에서는 세종시 설치의 입법갈등에 관한 문제를 주제로 하여 그 원인과 정치적 입법상의 문제점을 분석해 보고자 하였다. 세종시 설치과정에서 많은 국가적 행정비능률성과 사회적 자원배분의 비형평성등이 이미 입법과정에서 제기된 상황이라 이러한 공공갈등은 더욱 심화 되어 나타났다. 여기에 각 정당과 정치이익주체들의 조직 또는 개인적 이익과 연계되면서 세종시의 입법갈등은 지역갈등으로 더욱 확대되었다. 결국 정치적 이익이 연계되어 있는 사회잇슈의 경우 이를 사전에 해소 할 수 있는 입법장치의 필요성이 있다는 것이 본 논문이 시사하는 연구의 정책적 함의이다.

Keywords

References

  1. Kang Young Jin. The Manual for Conflict Solution, Sung Gong Hoi Univ. NGO Center,2000
  2. Ko Kyung Hun. Policy Analysis of Local Government, PhD.Dissertation of Korea Univ., 2000
  3. The Office of Prime Minister. Under of Sejong City Problems., 2010a
  4. The Office of Prime Minister. The Development of Sejong City, 2010b
  5. Kim Dong Ju. What is the balanced Development? The misunderstanding and Practices, Local Autonamy, Vol. 222. The Foundation of Future Korea. pp.54-55.2007.
  6. Kim Du Hwan. Deliberate Citizen Participation in Social Conflict and Solving Problems, Civil Society and NGO, Vol.3, No.1, 2005.
  7. Kim Suk Tae. Rentseeking for Pereference Facilities and Rent Restoration, The Journal of Korean Administration Review, Vol.37 No.1, 2003.
  8. Kim Jung Whan. An Analysis for New Administration City, The Journal of Policy Science, Vol., 10, No.4..p.238. 2007.
  9. Kim Yun Guan .A Study on Government Success and Failure in Public Choice, The Journal of KIPA Reports, Vol.13, p.39. 2010
  10. Lee Hyun Gook,. The Basis of Public Choice, The Proceeding of The Association for Korean Administration, Summer, p.11, 2010.
  11. Jung Gu Ho. Consensus Approach for Policy Conflict Solving, The Journal for Korean Policy Science, Vol.16,No.2.pp.95-96,2007
  12. Jung Ju Yong. Election Agenda and Policy Conflict, The Journal for Korean Policy Science, Vol., 20, No.p.341., 2011.
  13. The Institute for Korean Administration). The Admlnistration Efficiency for Dissemination Movement of Government Centeral Agencies., 2009.
  14. Andeweg R.B. and Lia Mijzink. Beyond the Two body Image:Relations between Ministers and MPs, Hebert Doring ed. Parliments. and Majority Rule in Western Europe. N.Y.: ST. Martin's Press, 1995.
  15. Freeden M. Failure of Political Thinking. Political Studies, Vol.57 .pp.141-142., 2009. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2008.00732.x
  16. Hiller, J. Beyond Confused Noise: Ideas Toward Communicative Procedure Justice, Journal of Planning Education and Research., Vol. 18. pp.15-22., 1998.
  17. Hogwood B.&P.B.Guy. Policy Dynamics, N.Y.:St.. Martin's Press, 1983.
  18. Irgram, H.M.&Dean E.Mann. Why Policies Succeed or Fail, Beverly Hills, Cal.: Sage Publication .p.30. 1980.
  19. March, James G. and S.H. A). Organizations, John Wiley&Sons.pp.113-117, 1958
  20. McNutt, P.A.). The Economics of Public Choice, Cheltonham, UK.: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd. p.173.2002
  21. Pincione, G and Teson, F.R.. Rational Choice and Democratic Deliberation :A Theory of Discourse Failure. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.2006.
  22. Randy T.S,. The Roots of Government Failure, The Independent, Vol.22.No1.pp.7-8, 2012.