Earthquakes and Structures

  • 제6권1호
  • /
  • Pages.19-43
  • /
  • 2014
  • /
  • 2092-7614(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2092-7622(eISSN)
테크노프레스 (Techno-Press)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Risk assessment of steel and steel-concrete composite 3D buildings considering sources of uncertainty

  • Lagaros, Nikos D. (Institute of Structural Analysis & Antiseismic Research, Department of Structural Engineering, School of Civil Engineering, National Technical University Athens)
  • 투고 : 2013.03.20
  • 심사 : 2013.09.22
  • 발행 : 2014.01.25
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

A risk assessment framework for evaluating building structures is implemented in this study. This framework allows considering sources of uncertainty both on structural capacity and seismic demand. In particular randomness on seismic load, incident angle, material properties, floor mass and structural damping are considered; in addition the choice of fibre modelling versus plastic hinge model is also considered as a source of uncertainty. The main objective of this work is to study the contribution of these sources of uncertainty on the fragilities of steel and steel-reinforced concrete composite 3D building structures. The fragility curves are expressed in the form of a two-parameter lognormal distribution where vertical statistics in conjunction with metaheuristic optimization are implemented for calculating the two parameters.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. ANSI/AISC 341-10 (2010), Seismic provisions for structural steel buildings, AISC, Chicago, Illinois, June.
  2. Aslani, H. and Miranda, E. (2005), "Probability-based seismic response analysis", Eng. Struct., 27(8), 1151-1163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.02.015
  3. Aygun, B., Dueas-Osorio, L., Padgett, J.E. and Desroches, R. (2011), "Efficient longitudinal seismic fragility assessment of a multispan continuous steel bridge on liquefiable soils", J. Bridge Eng., 16(1), 93-107. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000131
  4. Celik, O.C. and Ellingwood, B.R. (2010), "Seismic fragilities for non-ductile reinforced concrete frames - role of aleatoric and epistemic uncertainties", Struct. Safe., 32(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2009.04.003
  5. Dolsek, M. (2009), "Incremental dynamic analysis with consideration of modelling uncertainties", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 38(6), 805-825. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.869
  6. Eleftheriadou, A.K. and Karabinis, A.I. (2012), "Seismic vulnerability assessment of buildings based on damage data after a near field earthquake (7 September 1999 Athens - Greece)", Earthq. Struct., 3(2), 117-140. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2012.3.2.117
  7. Ellingwood, B.R. (2001), "Earthquake risk assessment of building structures", Reliab. Eng. Syst. Safe., 74(3), 251-262. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0951-8320(01)00105-3
  8. Ellingwood, B.R. and Galambos, T.V. (1982), "Probability-based criteria for structural design", Struct. Saf., 1(1), 15-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-4730(82)90012-1
  9. Ellingwood, B.R., Galambos, T.V., MacGregor, J.G. and Cornell, C.A. (1980), Development of a probability-based load criterion for American National Standard A58, National Bureau of Standards, Washington DC.
  10. Fragiadakis, M. and Lagaros, N.D. (2011), "An overview to structural seismic design optimisation frameworks", Comput. Struct., 89(11-12), 1155-1165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2010.10.021
  11. Fragiadakis, M. and Papadrakakis, M. (2008), "Modelling, analysis and reliability of seismically excited structures: computational issues", Int. J. Comput. Method., 5(4), 483-511. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219876208001674
  12. Gardoni, P., Mosalam, K.M. and Der Kiureghian, A. (2003), "Probabilistic seismic demand models and fragility estimates for RC bridges", J. Earthq. Eng., 7(1), 79-106.
  13. Hauke, B., Gudel, M. and Obiala, R. (2008), "Experimental study of composite column-wall systems subjected to combined loading conditions", EUROSTEEL 2008, 3-5 September 2008, ECCS European Convention for Constructional Steelwork.
  14. HAZUS-MH MR1 (2003), Multi-hazard loss estimation methodology earthquake model, FEMA-National Institute of Building Sciences, Washington DC.
  15. Jeong, S.H. and Elnashai, A.S. (2007), "Probabilistic fragility analysis parameterized by fundamental response quantities", Eng. Struct., 29(6), 1238-1251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2006.06.026
  16. Kappos, A.J., Panagopoulos, G., Panagiotopoulos, C. and Penelis, G. (2006), "A hybrid method for the vulnerability assessment of R/C and URM buildings", Bull. Earthq. Eng., 4(4), 391-413. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-006-9023-0
  17. Kennedy, R.P,. Cornell, C.A., Campbell, R.D., Kaplan, S. and Perla, H.F. (1980), "Probabilistic seismic safety study of an existing nuclear power plant", Nucl. Eng. Des., 59(2), 315-338. https://doi.org/10.1016/0029-5493(80)90203-4
  18. Kent, D.C. and Park, R. (1971), "Flexural members with confined concrete", J. Struct. Div., 97(7), 1969-1990.
  19. Kim, J.H., Choi, I.K. and Park, J.H. (2011), "Uncertainty analysis of system fragility for seismic safety evaluation of NPP", Nucl. Eng. Des., 241(7), 2570-2579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2011.04.031
  20. Kircher, C.A., Nassar, A.A., Kustu, O. and Holmes, W.T. (1997), "Development of building damage functions for earthquake loss estimation", Earthq. Spectra, 13(4), 663-682. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1585974
  21. Lagaros, N.D. (2008), "Probabilistic fragility analysis of RC buildings designed with different rules", Earthq. Eng. Eng. Vib., 7(1), 45-56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-008-0823-x
  22. Lagaros, N.D. (2010), "Multicomponent incremental dynamic analysis considering variable incident angle", Struct. Infr. Eng., 6(1-2), 77-94. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732470802663805
  23. Lagaros, N.D. and Karlaftis, M.G. (2011), "A critical assessment of metaheuristics for scheduling emergency infrastructure inspections", Swarm Evolut. Computat., 1(3), 147-163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.swevo.2011.06.002
  24. Lagaros, N.D. and Papadrakakis, M. (2012), "Applied soft computing for optimum design of structures", Struct. Multidiscip. O., 45, 787-799. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-011-0741-9
  25. Liel, A.B., Haselton, C.B., Deierlein, G.G. and Baker, J.W. (2009), "Incorporating modelling uncertainties in the assessment of seismic collapse risk of buildings", Struct. Safe., 31(2), 197-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2008.06.002
  26. McKenna, F. and Fenves, G.L. (2001), The OpenSees command language manual - Version 1.2., Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Centre, University of California, Berkeley.
  27. Medina, R.A. and Krawinkler, H. (2004), "Seismic demands for nondeteriorating frame structures and their dependence on ground motions", PEER Report 2003/15, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, College of Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, CA.
  28. Menegotto, M. and Pinto, P.E. (1973), "Method of analysis for cyclically loaded reinforced concrete plane frames including changes in geometry and non-elastic behaviour of elements under combined normal force and bending", Proceedings, IABSE Symposium on Resistance and Ultimate Deformability of Structures Acted on by Well Defined Repeated Loads, 15-22.
  29. Mitropoulou, C.C., Lagaros, N.D. and Papadrakakis, M. (2010), "Building design based on energy dissipation: a critical assessment", Bull. Earthq. Eng., 8(6), 1375-1396. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-010-9182-x
  30. Mitropoulou, C.C. and Papadrakakis, M. (2011), "Developing fragility curves based on neural network IDA predictions", Eng. Struct., 33(12), 3409-3421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2011.07.005
  31. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research (PEER): NGA Database (2005), http://peer.berkeley.edu/smcat/search.html (last accessed December 2010).
  32. Pagni, C.A. and Lowes, L.N. (2006), "Fragility functions for older reinforced concrete beam-column joints", Earthq. Spectra, 22(1), 215-238. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.2163365
  33. Pedersen, M.E.H. (2010), "Good parameters for differential evolution", Hvass computer science laboratories Technical Report No. HL1002.
  34. Porter, K., Kennedy, R. and Bachman, R. (2007), "Creating fragility functions for performance-based earthquake engineering", Earthq. Spectra, 23(2), 471-489. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.2720892
  35. Scott, M.H. and Fenves, G.L. (2006), "Plastic hinge integration methods for force-based beam-column elements", J. Struct. Eng., 132(2), 244-252. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2006)132:2(244)
  36. Scott, B.D., Park, R. and Priestley, M.J.N. (1982), "Stress-strain behaviour of concrete confined by overlapping hoops at low and high strain rates", ACI J., 79, 13-27.
  37. Shinozuka, M., Feng, M.Q., Lee, J. and Naganuma, T. (2000), "Statistical analysis of fragility curves", J. Eng. Mech., 126(12), 1224-1231. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2000)126:12(1224)
  38. Shinozuka, M., Murachi, Y., Dong, X., Zhou, Y. and Orlikowski, M.J. (2003), "Effect of seismic retrofit of bridges on transportation networks", Earthq. Eng. Eng. Vib., 2(2), 169-179.
  39. Storn, R.M. and Price, K.V. (1997), "Differential evolution - a simple and efficient heuristic for global optimization over continuous spaces", J. Global Optim., 11, 341-359. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008202821328
  40. Tantala, M.W. and Deodatis, G. (2002), "Development of seismic fragility curves for tall buildings", Proceedings of the 15th ASCE Engineering Mechanics Conference, Columbia University, New York.
  41. Tremblay, R. (2002), "Inelastic seismic response of steel bracing members", J. Constr. Steel Res., 58(5-8), 665-701. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0143-974X(01)00104-3
  42. Vamvatsikos, D. and Cornell, C.A. (2002), "Incremental dynamic analysis", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 31(3), 491-514. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.141
  43. Wen, Y.K. and Ellingwood, B.R. (2005), "The role of fragility assessment in consequence-based engineering", Earthq. Spectra, 21(3), 861-877. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1979502

피인용 문헌

  1. Influence of soil–structure interaction on fragility assessment of building structures vol.6, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2016.02.005
  2. Reliability sensitivities with fuzzy random uncertainties using genetic algorithm vol.60, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2016.60.3.413
  3. Spatial variability analysis of soil strength to slope stability assessment vol.12, pp.3, 2014, https://doi.org/10.12989/gae.2017.12.3.483
  4. Damage Index-Based Lower Bound Structural Design vol.4, pp.None, 2014, https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2018.00032
  5. Tropical-cyclone-wind-induced flutter failure analysis of long-span bridges vol.132, pp.None, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2021.105933