Journal of the Korean Society for information Management (정보관리학회지)

Korean Society for Information Management (한국정보관리학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on Structural Relationship Among Perceived Interactivity and User Related Variables in Health Information Websites

건강정보 웹사이트에서 지각된 상호작용성과 이용자 변수간의 구조적 관계 연구

  • 남재우 (중앙대학교 사회과학대학 문헌정보학과) ;
  • 박태연 (중앙대학교 사회과학대학 문헌정보학과)
  • Received : 2014.11.20
  • Accepted : 2014.12.12
  • Published : 2014.12.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study analyzed the effect of perceived interactivity in health information websites on users. First, this study analyzed the effect of users' individual characteristics on the perceived interactivity. As a result, hypochondriasis had a negative relationship with perceived interactivity, and health literacy had a positive relationship with it. On the other hand, although the perceived interactivity had a positive effect on users' attitudes toward health information websites and expected outcomes, it did not have an effect on continuous usage intention. However, their attitudes and perceived outcomes had a positive influence on continuous usage intention and at the same time mediated the perceived interactivity. Eventually, the perceived interactivity had an effect on continuous usage intention of health information websites by the medium of other positively related variables.

본 연구는 건강정보 웹사이트에서 지각된 상호작용성이 이용자에게 미치는 영향을 분석하였다. 이를 위해 먼저 이용자의 개별적 특성이 지각된 상호작용성에 영향을 미치는지 분석하였다. 그 결과 건강염려증은 지각된 상호작용성과 부의 관계를, 헬스리터러시와는 정의 관계를 나타내고 있었다. 한편, 지각된 상호작용성은 웹사이트에 대한 이용자의 태도 및 성과기대에 긍정적인 영향을 미치고 있었지만, 지속적 사용의도에는 영향을 미치고 있지 않았다. 그러나 이용자의 태도와 성과기대는 지속적 사용의도에 긍정적인 영향을 미치면서, 지각된 상호작용성을 매개하고 있었다. 결국 지각된 상호작용성은 긍정적 관계에 있는 다른 변수를 매개로 웹사이트에 대한 지속적 사용의도에 영향을 주고 있었다.

Keywords

References

  1. 경정익, 이국철, 강병기 (2012). 모바일 부동산 정보서비스의 특성이 만족도와 재사용 의도에 미치는 영향. 부동산학연구, 18(3), 89-108.(Kyung, Jungik, Lee, Kookchul, & Kang, Byunggi (2012). Effect of characteristics of mobile real estate information service on satisfaction and intention of reuse. Journal of the Korea Real Estate Analysts Association, 18(3), 89-108.)
  2. 경종수, 김명수 (2012). SNS의 서비스특성과 상호작용성이 신뢰와 결속에 미치는 영향. e-비즈니스연구, 13(3), 3-25.(Kyung, Jungsu, & Kim, Myungsu (2012). The study of impact of characteristics and interaction of SNS service on trust and commitment. The e-business Studies, 13(3), 3-25.)
  3. 국립국어원 (2008). 국민의 기초문해력 조사. 서울: 국립국어원. Retrieved from http://news.korean.go.kr/online/Klnumber/img/attachment-test.pdf(The National Institute of the Korean Language (2008). National Assessment of Literacy. Seoul: The National Institute of the Korean Language. Retrieved from http://news.korean.go.kr/online/Klnumber/img/attachment-test.pdf)
  4. 김성수, 김상현, 이상엽 (2005). 의료정보이해능력(Health Literacy): 한국형 측정도구 개발을 위한 예비연구. 보건교육․건강증진학회지, 22(4), 215-227.(Kim, Sungsoo, Kim, Sanghyun, & Lee, Sangyeoup (2005). Health literacy: Development of a Korean health literacy assessment tool. Korean Journal of Health Education and Promotion, 22(4), 215-227.)
  5. 김수현, 이은주 (2008). 노인의 기능적 의료정보 이해능력이 지각된 건강상태에 미치는 영향. 대한간호학회지, 38(2), 195-203.(Kim, Suhyeun, & Lee, Eunju (2008). The influence of functional literacy on perceived health status in korean older adults. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing, 38(2), 195-203.) https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2008.38.2.195
  6. 김은미, 임소혜, 함선혜 (2008). 웹페이지의 상호작용성과 이용자 관여도가 정보처리와 정서적 반응에 끼치는 효과. 한국언론학회지, 52(4), 250-277.(Kim, Eunmee, Lim, Sohye, & Ham, Sunhea (2008). Effects of interactivity and involvement in the user's information processing and emotional responses. Korean Journal of Journalism, & Communication Studies, 52(4), 250-277.)
  7. 류시원, 하유정 (2003). 인터넷 건강정보 질 관리 실천방안. 보건복지포럼, 86, 68-69.(Ryu, Siwon, & Ha, Yujeong (2003). The implementation of internet health information quality initiative. Health and Welfare Policy Forum, 86, 68-69.)
  8. 류시원, 하유정 (2004). 인터넷 건강정보 이용실태 분석. 보건복지포럼, 97, 71-87.(Ryu, Siwon, & Ha, Yujeong (2004). Usage of health information on the internet. Health and Welfare Policy Forum, 97, 71-87.)
  9. 박두병 (1996). 알기쉬운 일반정신의학. 서울: 하나의학사.(Park, Dubyoung (1996). Easy general psychiatry. Seoul: Hana Medical Publishers.)
  10. 박상희, 이수영 (2011). 질병태도와 인터넷에서의 건강정보추구행태에 기반한 건강정보 이용자 유형에 관한 탐색적 연구. 한국언론학보, 55(4), 105-410.(Park, Sanghee, & Lee, Sooyoung (2011). Exploring categories of health information users on the basis of illness attitude and health information seeking behavior on the internet. Korean Journal of Journalism & Communication Studies, 55(4), 105-410.)
  11. 서울대학교 (2013, October 14). 국민들은 건강정보를 어디에서 얻나? Retrieved from http://www.snuh.org/pub/snuh/sub02/sub01/1183047_3957.jsp(Seoul National University (2013, October 14). Where people are get health information? Retrieved from http://www.snuh.org/pub/snuh/sub02/sub01/1183047_3957.jsp)
  12. 설상철, 신종학 (2005). 인터넷쇼핑몰에서의 상호작용성, 신뢰 및 지각된 가치가 재구매 의도에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구. 대한경영학회지, 18(4), 1457-1482.(Seol, Sangcheol, & Shin, Jonghak (2005). The effects of interactivity, trust and perceived value on repurchase intention in internet shopping mall. Korea Journal of Business Administration, 18(4), 1457-1482.)
  13. 성기문, 신지나, 안중호 (2009). 홈네트워크환경에서 개인적 특성과 지각된 상호작용성이 서비스 만족, 태도, 사용의도에 미치는 영향. 한국전자거래학회지, 14(2), 71-94.(Sung, Kimoon, Shin, Geena, & Ahn, Joongho (2009). Effect of individual characteristics and perceived interactivity in home-network context on service satisfaction, attitude, and intention to use : Focusing on the flow theory. The Journal of Society for e-Business Studies. 14(2), 71-94.)
  14. 송태민 (2006). 국내 건강정보 웹사이트 현황분석. 보건복지포럼, 113, 61-67.(Song, Taemin (2006). Health information websites in Korea. Health and Welfare Policy Forum, 113, 61-67.)
  15. 신현신, 김평중 (2012). 건강정보 웹사이트의 소비자 중심 품질요인에 대한 연구. 한국컴퓨터정보학회논문집, 17(7), 129-138.(Sin, Hyunsin, & Kim, Pyungjung (2012). A study on the consumer-focused quality factor of health information websites. Journal of The Korea Society of Computer and Information, 17(7), 129-138.) https://doi.org/10.9708/jksci.2012.17.7.129
  16. 안지현, 임인석 (2011). 국가건강정보포털의 의미와 역할. 대한의사협회지, 54(9), 957-960.(Ahn, Jihyun, & Lim, Inseok (2011). The significant role of the National Health Information Portal, http://health.mw.go.kr. Journal of Korean Medical Association, 54(9), 957-960.)
  17. 유현재, 안창현, 황숙영 (2011). 국내 건강정보 웹사이트에 나타나는 상호작용성에 대한 연구. 한국광고홍보학보, 13(1), 65-104.(Yu, Hyunjae, An, Changhyun, & Hwang, Sookyoung (2011). Interactivity represented on healthrelated websites: A content analysis of korean health information websites. The Korean Journal of Advertising and Public Relations, 13(1), 65-104.)
  18. 이두희, 구지은 (2001). 인터넷 쇼핑몰에서의 상호작용성에 관한 연구: 척도개발 및 효과분석. 마케팅연구, 16(2), 115-140.(Lee, Doohee, & Ku, Jieun (2001). Scale development and effect analysis: A study on the interaction at internet shopping malls. Korea Marketing Review, 16(2), 115-140.)
  19. 이성호, 안중호, 장정주 (2006). 지각된 상호작용성의 매개역할이 모바일 콘텐츠 사용자의 태도 및 행동 의도에 미치는 영향. 경영정보학연구, 16(3), 205-227.(Lee, Sungho, An, Jungho, & Jung, Jeongju (2006). The effect of perceived interactivity's mediator role on mobile contents users' attitude and behavioral intention. Asia Pacific Journal of Information Systems, 16(3), 205-227.)
  20. 이옥희 (2008). 인터넷 패션 쇼핑몰에서 상호작용성과 쇼핑가치가 관계몰입과 웹사이트 태도에 미치는 영향. 복식문화연구, 16(6), 1126-1141.(Lee, Okhee (2008). Effects of interactivity and shopping value on elationship commitment and attitude toward the website. The Research Journal of the Costume Culture, 16(6), 1126-1141.) https://doi.org/10.29049/rjcc.2008.16.6.1126
  21. 이인혜 (2009). 성격과 질병태도간의 관계: 질병에 대한 집착과 건강에 대한 염려. 한국심리학회지: 건강, 14(2), 293-311.(Lee, Inhye (2009). A relationship of personality and hypochondriacal illness attitudes. Korean Journal of Health Psychology, 14(2), 293-311.)
  22. 이재신, 김봉수 (2009). 인지된 상호작용성의 선행요인: 영상전화를 중심으로. 한국방송학보, 23(5), 285-295.(Lee, Jaeshin, & Kim, Bongsoo (2009). Factors affecting the perception of interactivity-focusing on mobile bideo phones. Korean Journal of Broadcasting and Telecommunication Studies, 23(5), 285-295.)
  23. 이종옥, 김용문 (2013). 국내 스마트폰 사용자들의 앱북 구매행위에 미치는 영향요인 연구. 한국전자거래학회지, 18(3), 45-67. http://dx.doi.org/10.7838/jsebs.2013.18.3.045(Lee, Jongok, & Kim, Yongmoon (2013). A study on the impact of the app-book purchasing behavior of smart phone users in korea. The Journal of Society for e-Business Studies, 18(3), 46-67.)
  24. 이주현, 최영균 (2002). 검색엔진 웹사이트에서 상호작용성이 소비자의 사이트에 대한 관여도와 태도, 사이트 재방문 의도 등에 미치는 영향. 광고학연구, 13(5), 223-247.(Lee, Juhyun, & Choi, Youngkyun (2002). The effects of perceived interactivity on users' involvement, attitude, and revisiting intention on a search engine Web Site. The Korean Journal of Advertisin, 13(5), 223-247.)
  25. 이학식, 임지훈 (2008). SPSS 14.0 매뉴얼. 서울: 법문사.(Lee, Haksik, & Lim, Jihun (2008). Statistical package for the social sciences. Seoul: Beopmunsa.)
  26. 이희수, 박현정, 이세정 (2003). OECD 조사도구로 본 한국성인의 문해실태와 과제. 한국교육, 30(3), 229-256.(Lee, Heesu, Park, Hyunjeong, & Lee, Syejeong (2003). A study on the adult literacy in Korea by OECD international adults literacy survey (IALS). Journal of Korean Education, 30(3), 229-256.)
  27. 장혜정, 심재선, 김윤 (2004). 소비자 특성별 건강정보 접근 방법. 대한의료정보학회지, 10(4), 415-427.(Jang, Hyejung, Sim, Jaesun, & Kim, Yoon (2004). Sources of health information by customer's characteristics. Healthcare Informatics Research, 10(4), 415-427.)
  28. 정영철, 이기호, 유주헌, 김수진, 김석일, 이견직, 주지홍 (2010). 수요자중심의 건강정보 연계모델 및 활용방안에 관한 연구. 서울: 한국보건사회연구원 건강증진사업지원단.(Jung, Youngchol, Lee, Kiho, Yoo, Juhun, Kim, Sujin, Kim, Seokil, Lee, Gyeonjik, & Ju, Jihong (2010). A study of consumer-centered personal health information model and its utilization. Seoul: Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs.)
  29. 정은주, 이연숙 (2005), 감성 인터랙션 공간디자인의 개념적 접근연구, 한국실내디자인학회 학술발표대회 논문집, 7(2), 76-81.(Jung, Eunju, & Lee, Yeonsuck (2005). Conceptual approach for understanding emotional interaction space design. Proceedings of the Korean Institute of Interior Design, 7(2), 76-81.)
  30. 천명환, 정철호 (2012). SNS 사용자의 지각된 상호작용성 및 위험이 만족과 지속사용의도에 미치는 영향. 한국지식정보기술학회지, 7(6), 9-19.(Chun, Myunghwan, & Jung, Chulho (2012). The effects of perceived interactivity and risk on the user satisfaction and continuance use Intention in SNS. Journal of Knowledge Information Technology and Systems, 7(6), 9-19.)
  31. 한국도서관협회 문헌정보학용어사전 편찬위원회 (2010). 한국문헌정보학용어사전. 서울: 한국도서관협회.(Korean Library Association (2010). The glossary of library and information science. 2nd ed. Seoul: Korean Library Association.)
  32. 황장선, 김은혜, 조정식 (2006). 웹 사이트에 대한 태도에 영향을 미치는 요인으로서의 인지된 상호작용성, 인터넷 이용 동기 및 관여도. 한국광고홍보학보, 8(1), 160-187.(Hwang, Jangsun, Kim, Eunhye, & Cho, Jungsik (2006). The perceived Interactivity (PI), internet wsage motivation, and involvement as the factors affecting on the attitude toward the website (Ast). The Korean Journal of Advertising and Public Relations, 8(1), 160-187.)
  33. Ad Hoc Committee on Health Literacy for the Council on Scientific Affairs, American Medical Association (1999). Health literacy: Report of the council on scientific affairs. JAMA, 281(6), 552-557. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.281.6.552
  34. Ahn, T. S., Hong, M. k., & Pedersenc, P. M. (2004). Effects of perceived interactivity and web organization on user attitudes. European Sport Management Quarterly, 14(2), 111-128.
  35. Akrimi, Y., & Khemakhem, R. (2014). An analysis of perceived usability, perceived interactivity and website personality and their effects on consumer satisfaction. International Journal of Management Excellence, 2(3), 227-236. https://doi.org/10.17722/ijme.v2i3.97
  36. American Library Association (2000). Information literacy competency standards for higher education. Chicago, Illinois: American Library Association.
  37. American Library Association. Presidential Committee on Information Literacy (1989). Final report. Chicago: American Library Association. Retrieved from http://www.ala.org/acrl/publications/whitepapers/presidential.
  38. Bezjian-Avery, A., Calder, B., & Iacobucci, D. (1998). New media interactive advertising vs. traditional advertising. Journal of Advertising Research, 38(4), 23-32.
  39. Bhattacherjee, A. (2001). Understanding information systems continuance: An expectationconfirmation model. MIS Quarterly, 25(3), 351-370. https://doi.org/10.2307/3250921
  40. Chabner, D. E. (2007). Language of medicine. (8nd ed.). 박경환 외 공역 (2009). 새의학용어. 서울: 이퍼블릭.
  41. Chen, Q., & William, W. (1999). Attitude toward the site. Journal of Advertising Research, 39(5), 27-37.
  42. Cho, C. H., & Leckenby, J. B. (1997). Internet-related programming technology and advertising, Proceeding of the 1997 Conference of the American Academy of Adverising, Carle, M. Macklin, ed., Cincinnati, Ohio: University of Cincinnati.
  43. Chung, H., & Zha, X. (2006). Effects of perceived Interactivity on web site preference and memory: Role of personal motivation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10(1): Article 7. DOI: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2004.tb00232.x Retrieved from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2004.tb00232.x/full
  44. Davis, T. C., Williams, M. V., Marin, E., Parker, R. M., & Glass, J. (2002). Health literacy and cancer communication. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 52(3), 134-149. https://doi.org/10.3322/canjclin.52.3.134
  45. Dillon, P. M., & Leonard, D. C. (1998). Multimedia and the web form a A to Z, (2nd ed.). Phoenix, Ariz: Oryx Press.
  46. Egbert, N., & Nanna, K. (2009). Health literacy: Challenges and strategies. Online Journal Issues Nurse. 14(3), Manuscript 1. Retrieved from http://www.nursingworld.org/MainMenuCategories/ANAMarketplace/ANAPeriodicals/OJIN/TableofContents/Vol142009/No3Sept09/Health-Literacy-Challenges.html#NLM00
  47. Eveland, W. P. (2003). A "mix of attributes" approach to the study of media effects and new communication technologies. Journal of Communication, 53, 395-410. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2003.tb02598.x
  48. Hoffman, D., & Novak, T. (1996). Marketing in hypermedia computer-mediated environments: Conceptual foundations. Journal of Marketing, 60, 50-68. https://doi.org/10.2307/1251841
  49. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1-55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
  50. Hwang, J. S., McMillan, S. J., & Lee, G. H. (2002). The role of interactivity and involvement in attitude toward the web site, in Proceedings of the american academy of advertising, Auburn, AL, pp. 10-17.
  51. Institute of Medicine. (2004). Health literacy: A prescription to end confusion. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
  52. Karmpaul, S., & Richard, J. B. (2014). Health-related internet habits and health anxiety in university students. Anxiety, Stress & Coping, 27(5), 542-554. https://doi.org/10.1080/10615806.2014.888061
  53. Kellner, R. (1986). Somatization and hypochondriasis. New York: Praeger.
  54. Lee, J. S. (2000). Interactivity: A new approach. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication (AEJMC), Phoenix, AZ.
  55. Liu, Y., & Shrum, L. J. (2002). What is interactivity and is it always such a good thing? Implications of definition, person, and situation for the influence of interactivity on advertising effectiveness. Journal of advertising, 31(4), 53-64. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2002.10673685
  56. McMillan, S. J., & Hwang, J. S. (2002). Measures of perceived interactivity: An exploration of the role of direction of communication, user control, and time in shaping perceptions of interactivity. Journal of Advertising, 31(3), 29-42. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2002.10673674
  57. Murray, E., Lo, B., Pollack, L., Donelan, K., Catania, J., Lee, K., Zapert, K., & Turner, R. (2003). The impact of health information on the Internet on health care and the physician-patient relationship: National U.S. survey among 1.050 U.S. physicians. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 5(3), e17. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.5.3.e17
  58. Newhagen, J. E., cordes, J. W., & Levy, M. T. (1995). Audience scope and the perception of interactivity in viewer mail on the internet. Journal of Communication, 45(3), 164-175. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1995.tb00748.x
  59. Rafaeli, S. (1988). Interactivity: From new media to communication. In R. P. Hawkins, J. M. Wiemann & S. Pingree (Eds.), Advancing communication science: Merging mass and interpersonal process (pp. 110-134). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  60. Ratzan, S. C. (2001). Health literacy: Communication for the public good. Health Promotion International, 16(2), 207-214. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/16.2.207
  61. Ratzan, S. C., & Parker, R. M. (2000). Introduction. In: National library of medicine current bibliographies in nedicine: Health literacy. Selden, C. R., Zorn, M., Ratzan, S. C. & Parker, R. M. (Eds). NLM Pub No. CBM 2000-1. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
  62. Shankar, V., Smith, A. K., & Rangaswamy, A. (2003). Customer satisfaction and loyalty in online and offline environments. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 20(2), 153-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8116(03)00016-8
  63. Sherry, H. S., & Margo, C. W. (2000). Watt. Illness attitudes scale dimensions and their associations with anxiety-related constructs in a nonclinical sample. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 38, 83-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7967(98)00207-1
  64. Shipps, B., & Phillips, B. (2013). Social networks, interactivity and satisfaction: Assessing socio-technical behavioral factors as an extension to technology acceptance. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 8(1), 35-52. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-18762013000100004
  65. Simonds, S. K. (1974). Health education as social policy. Health Education Monographs, 2(Suppl. 1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1177/109019817400200102
  66. Steuer, J. (1992). Defining virual reality: Dimensions determining telepresence. Journal of Communication, 42(2), 73-93.
  67. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of disease prevention and health Promotion. Quick guide to health literacy. Retrieved from http://www.health.gov/communication/literacy/quickguide
  68. UNESCO (2003). The Prague declaration: Towards an information literate society. Prague, Czech Republic, 20-23 September 2003.
  69. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425-478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
  70. Williams, F., Rice, R. E., & Rogers, E. M. (1988). Research methods and the new media. New York: The Free Press.
  71. World Health Organization (1998). Health promotion glossary. Geneva: World Health Organization. Retrived from http://whqlibdoc.who.int/hq/1998/WHO_HPR_HEP_98.1.pdf
  72. World Health Organization, Commission on Social Determinants of Health (2008). CSDH final report: Closing the gap in a generation: health equity through action on the social determinants of health. Geneva: World Health Organization.
  73. Wu, G. (1999). Perceived interactivity and attitude toward website. In Roberts, M. S. (Ed.), Proceedings of the American Academy of Advertising, Gainesville, FL: University of Florida.
  74. Wu, G. (2000). The role of perceived interactivity in interactive ad processing, Doctoral Dissertation, The University of Texas at Austin.
  75. Wu, G. (2006). Conceptualizing and measuring the perceived interactivity of websites. Journal of Advertising, 28(1), 87-104.
  76. Zurkowski, & Paul, G. (1974). The information service environment relationships and priorities. Washington D.C. National Commission on Libraries and Information Science.