DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Seismic Fragility Analysis of Lightning Arrester Considering Various Damage States

다양한 손상상태를 반영한 피뢰기 설비의 지진취약도 해석

  • Shin, Yooseong (Smart Load Rating Team, Korea Expressway Corporation) ;
  • Song, Jong-Keol (Department of Civil Engineering, Kangwon National University)
  • 신유성 (한국도로공사 스마트내하력평가팀) ;
  • 송종걸 (강원대학교 토목공학과)
  • Received : 2013.07.11
  • Accepted : 2013.10.08
  • Published : 2014.01.02

Abstract

The seismic evaluation of electric power facilities in the switchyard of nuclear power plants is currently insufficient. In order to evaluate the seismic performance of lightning arrester subjected to four types of earthquake (near- and far-fault earthquakes, NEHRP Site Class A&B and D earthquakes), seismic fragility analysis using maximum likelihood estimation is performed considering various damage states. The comparison of the seismic fragility curves for three main parts of lightning arrester that are the busing, anchor and steel frame, reveals that the failure of lightning arrester is governed by the bushing damage mode such as porcelain cracking.

Keywords

References

  1. Shin YS. Seismic fragility analysis for lightning arrester in switchyard of nuclear power plants. Master's degree thesis. Department of Civil Engineering, Kangwon National University. 2013.
  2. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center (PEERC). Open System for Earthquake Engineering Simulation. Berkeley, California; 2007. Available from: http://opensees.berkeley.edu.
  3. Kim MK, Choun YS. Seismic fragility evaluation of substation system in Korea. Journal of the Korea Institute for Structural Maintenance and Inspection. 2008;12(4):14-23.
  4. Barbat AH, Pujades LG, Lantada N. Seismic damage evaluation in urban areas using the capacity spectrum method: Application to Barcelona. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering. 2008;28:851-865. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2007.10.006
  5. SEAOC. Performance Based Seismic Engineering of Buildings, Structural Engineers Association of California, Sacramento, CA. c1995.
  6. PEER Strong Motion Database[Internet]. Berkeley, California Available from: http://peer.berkeley.edu/smcat/sites.html.
  7. Ruiz-Garcia J, Miranda E. Residual displacement ratios for assessment of existing structures. Earthquake Engng Struct. Dyn. 2006;35: 315-336. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.523
  8. Shinozuka M, Feng MQ, Kim HK, Ueda T. Statistical analysis of fragility curves. Technical Report at Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, NY, USA. c2001.
  9. Shinozuka M, Banerjee S. Fragility considerations in highway bridge. Technical Report at Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, NY, USA. c2006.
  10. Song JK, Jin HS, Lee TH. Seismic fragility analysis for probabilistic performance evaluation of PSC box girder bridges. Journal of the Korean Society of Civil Engineers. 2009;29(2A):119-130.
  11. Jin HS, Song JK. Effect of near- and far-fault earthquakes for seismic fragility curves of PSC box girder bridges. Journal of the Earthquake Engineering Society of Korea. 2010;14(5):53-64. https://doi.org/10.5000/EESK.2010.14.5.053