Journal of Digital Convergence (디지털융복합연구)

The Society of Digital Policy and Management (한국디지털정책학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analysis of the Operation Efficiency and Influence Factors of Local Welfare Facilities for the Disabled -Focusing on Housing Facilities of the Severely Disabled in Jeolla Region-

지역 장애인복지시설의 운영효율성 및 영향요인 분석 -전라지역 중증장애인 거주시설을 중심으로-

  • 이형배 (충북대학교 아동복지학과)
  • Received : 2014.10.13
  • Accepted : 2014.12.20
  • Published : 2014.12.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This research analyzed the operation efficiency and influence factors of housing facilities for the severely disabled in Jeolla region by using the DEA model. First, the analysis of efficiency for 2012 was carried out using the CCR model. As a result, 12 DMUs were proved to be efficient, and the average efficiency of CCR was 0.85, confirming that the efficiency of all DMUs were satisfactory. Second, regression analysis was carried out to analyze the factors affecting the efficiency of the DEA model by using the Tobit model. In this case, the inputs and calculated variables were set as independent variables whereas the efficiency as the dependent variable. As a result, the detailed variables had a low significance; the overall input variables showed a negative influence while the calculated variables tended to be a positive influence. In terms of operation efficiency, there was no meaningful result in input variables besides the number of workers. Instead of expanding the input variables, the following should be made for housing facilities of the severely disabled; more efforts should be put in to improve welfare service delivery system and operating environment and structure, and the program must be supplemented as well.

본 연구는 DEA 모형을 활용하여 전라지역 중증장애인 거주시설의 운영효율성 및 영향요인 분석을 수행하였다. 첫째, CCR 모형을 이용한 2012년의 효율성 분석을 수행하였으며, 그 결과 12개 DMU가 효율적으로 판명되었고, CCR 평균효율성은 0.85로 전체 DMU의 효율성이 양호함을 확인하였다. 둘째, DEA 모형의 효율성 영향요인 분석을 위해서 Tobit 모형을 이용하여 투입 및 산출변수를 독립변수로 하고 효율성을 종속변수로 하는 회귀분석을 실시하였으며, 그 결과 세부변수의 유의성은 낮았으나, 전체적으로 투입변수는 효율성에 부(-)의 영향력을 보이고 산출변수는 정(+)의 영향력 경향을 보였으며, 운영효율성에서 종사자수 외의 투입변수에서 유의미한 결과가 나타나지 않은 점은 결국 중증장애인 거주시설은 투입변수에 대한 확대보다는 복지 전달체계, 운영환경 및 구조 개선, 프로그램 보완 등의 노력이 필요한 것으로 볼 수 있다.

Keywords

References

  1. K. H. Son, Disabled Welfare. Hyunhaksa, 2004.
  2. Korea National Council on Social Welfare. 2009 Social Welfare Metrics, 2009.
  3. G. J. Moon & S. C. Kang, Measurement on the Efficiency of Social Welfare Centers using DEA, Korean Public Administration Quarterly, Vol. 16, No. 2, pp. 333-362, 2004.
  4. G. J. Yoon, Use of DEA for Measuring the Efficiency of Public Sector, Government Review, Vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 7-31, 2003.
  5. J. D. Lee & D. H. Oh, Effectiveness Analysis Theory - DEA: Data Envelope Analysis, Seoul iB Book, 2010.
  6. Ministry of Health & Welfare, Steps to Consolidate the Protection of Human Rights at Housing Facilities of the Disabled, 2014.
  7. Golany, B & Roll, Y. "An application procedure for DEA." Omega, Vol. 17, No. 3, pp. 237-250, 1989. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-0483(89)90029-7
  8. Epstein, M & Henderson, J. "Data Envelopment Analysis for Managerial Control and Diagnosis." Decision Sciences, Vol. 20, No. 1, pp. 90-119, 1989. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.1989.tb01399.x
  9. S. M. Lym, How to Select Input and Calculation Factors in terms of DEA, Industrial Engineering, Vol. 22, No. 1, pp. 44-55, 2009.
  10. Thore, S. Phillips, F. Ruefli, T. & Yue, P. "DEA and the Management of the Product cycle: The US Computer Industry." Computers and Operations Research, Vol. 23, No. 4, pp. 341-356, 1996. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-0548(95)00043-7
  11. Thompson, R. Dharmapala, P. Rothenberg, L. & Thrall, R. DEA/AR Efficiency and Profitability of 14 major oil Companies in US Exploration and Production. Computers and Operations Research, Vol. 23, No. 4, pp. 357-373, 1996. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-0548(95)00044-5
  12. D. S. Song & J. J. Kim, Analysis of Business Efficiency in Small and Medium-sized Manufacturing Firms - focusing the Manufacturers of Compound and Chemical Products, korea Productivity Association, Vol. 14, No. 2, pp. 177-197, 2000.
  13. G. S. Kim, Efficiency of Korean SI Companies by using Data Envelopment Analysis and Productivity Index Analysis, Journal of the Korea society of IT services, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 1-16, 2006.
  14. Y. G. Cho & G. H. Bae, Analysis on Efficiency and Changes in Competitiveness of the Steel Industry in Northeast Asian Countries, Northeast Asian Economic Research, Vol. 20, No. 2, pp. 1-24, 2008.
  15. Liu, S. & Wang, R., "Efficiency measures of PCB Manufacturing firms using Relational Two-stage Data Envelopment Analysis." Expert Systems with Applications, Vol. 36, No. 3, pp. 4935-4939, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2008.06.014
  16. S. H. Go, Measurement of Relative Effectiveness on Household Waste Disposal in Local Governments: focusing DEA Technique, Dankook University graduate school PhD, 2005.
  17. J. G. Park, Study on Operation Efficiency Evaluation at Start-up Childcare Centers using DEA: focusing on Start-up Childcare Centers designated by the Small and Medium Business Administration, Konkuk University graduate school PhD, 2005.
  18. G. W. Choi & Y. M. Park & S. Y. Shin & D. G. Guk, Efficiency Evaluation at Industry Meal Places of Contract Foodservices using DEA, The Korean Society of Community Nutrition Journal, Vol. 12, No. 2, pp. 178-188, 2007.
  19. Donthu, N. Hershberger, E. K. & Osmonbekov, T., Benchmarking Marketing Productivity using data Envelopment Analysis. Journal of Business Research, Vol. 58, No. 11, pp. 1474-1482, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2004.05.007
  20. Zaim, S. Bayyurt, N. Turkyilmaz, A. Solakoglu, N. & Zaim, H., "Measuring and Evaluating Efficiency of Hospitals through Total Quality Management: A Multi-criteria Data Envelopment Analysis Model". Journal of Transnational Management, Vol. 12, No. 4, pp. 77-97, 2007.
  21. C. G. Oh, Evaluation on Local Government Public Service - focusing the Social Welfare Center in Daegu Metropolitan City, Daegu University graduate school PhD, 2005.
  22. G. S. Song, Empirical Research on Performance Evaluation of Community Welfare Center services - focusing the linked model of Efficiency and Satisfaction level, Vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 205-222, 2006.
  23. E. H. Kim, Integrated Performance Evaluation of Social Welfare Services: focusing the Social Welfare Center in Kwangju Metropolitan City, Korean Public Administration Quarterly, Vol. 23, No. 3, pp. 801-827, 2011.
  24. D. G. Syung, I. G, Choi, Efficiency Evaluation on Women's Welfare Service using DEA - focusing Women Resources Development Center, Korean Political Science Association Journal, vol. 16, No. 3, pp. 351-380, 2009.
  25. S. M. Yang, Evaluation on Organization Efficiency of Occupational Rehabilitation Center for the Disabled, disability and employment, Vol. 20, No. 4, pp. 401-423, 2010.
  26. Y. B. Lee, Importance of Environmental Factors in Efficiency Evaluation of Local Governments using DEA - Approaching with the Service Quality Index of Seoul as an Example, Modern society and administration, Vol. 18, No. 2, pp. 55-81, 2008.
  27. E. Y. Yoon, Study on Efficiency Measurement of Social Welfare Facilities using DEA - focusing on Elementary Local Self Governments in Kyunggi-do, korea Policy Institute, Vol. 9, No. 3, pp. 373-392, 2009.
  28. W. D. Go, Analysis on Operation Efficiency of Social Welfare Facilities in Local Governments, The Korea Contents Association Journal, Vol. 11, No. 9, pp. 238-245, 2011.
  29. J. J. Jang, Study on introducing DEA model for Evaluating Management Efficiency of Social Corporates - focusing on Nursing and Domestic Care Businesses, Korea Corporation Management Association, Vol. 17, No. 2, pp. 179-191, 2010.
  30. Tofallis, C. Improving discernment in DEA using profiling. Omega, Vol. 24, No. 3, pp. 361-364, 1996 https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-0483(95)00065-8